Mean Change In HbA1c Research Articles

Real-world safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in people with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramadan: The SoliRam observational study

Background and aimsTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of iGlarLixi in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) fasting during Ramadan. MethodsSoliRam was a multinational, prospective, single-arm, real-world observational study conducted during Ramadan 2020 and 2021 in adults with T2D treated with iGlarLixi ≥3 months at study entry. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 episode of severe and/or symptomatic documented hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]). ResultsAmong the 409 eligible participants followed during Ramadan, 96.8% fasted for ≥25 days and 92.4% did not break fasting during Ramadan. Four participants broke their fast due to hypoglycemia. Minimal adjustments were seen in antihyperglycemic therapies from pre to during Ramadan. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was experienced by 1.0%, 2.3%, and 0.3% of participants, respectively, during the last month of pre-Ramadan, Ramadan, and first month post-Ramadan. Mean change in HbA1c from pre-to post-Ramadan periods was −0.75% (−8.2 mmol/mol), and participants with HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) increased from 7.9% pre-Ramadan to 28.6% post-Ramadan. ConclusionsiGlarLixi is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for people with T2D, including those who intend to fast during Ramadan, and is associated with a low risk of hypoglycemia; benefits were observed both during and after Ramadan.

Efficacy and safety of basal insulin degludec 100 IU/mL versus glargine 300 IU/mL for type 1 diabetes: The single-center INEOX randomized controlled trial

AimsTo compare efficacy and safety of degludec 100 IU/mL (Deg-100) and glargine 300 IU/mL (Gla-300) in adults with type 1 diabetes. MethodsOpen-label, single-center, randomized, parallel-group, 24-week trial in adults with type 1 diabetes, on basal-bolus insulin therapy, HbA1c ≤ 10%, using self-monitoring blood glucose. Participants were randomized 1:1 to a basal-bolus insulin regimen with Deg-100 (N = 129) or Gla-300 (N = 131). Primary efficacy endpoint: mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week-24. Main safety outcome: incidence rate of hypoglycemia during the study. Quality of life (DQOL) and satisfaction with diabetes treatment (DTSQ) were assessed. ResultsAt week 24, after adjusting for baseline HbA1c, the decrease in HbA1c did not differ between groups: Deg-100 (−0.07 ± 0.7%) and Gla-300 (−0.16 ± 0.77%) (P = 0.320). There were no significant differences between groups in HbA1c, nocturnal hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, DQOL, or DTSQ scores. The incidence rates of hypoglycemia < 3.9 mmol/L (Deg-100: 115.24 events/person-year vs Gla-300: 99.01 events/person-year, p < 0.001); and < 3.0 mmol/L (Deg-100: 41.17 events/person-year vs Gla-300: 34.29 events/person-year, p < 0.001) were different between groups. ConclusionsDeg-100 and Gla-300 have similar metabolic efficacy, incidence ratio of nocturnal and severe hypoglycemia, DQOL and DTSQ scores. Differences in the incidence rate of hypoglycemia < 3.9 mmol/L and < 3.0 mmol/L should be confirmed.

Glycaemic Control in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Switching from Basal Insulin to Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300): Results from the REALI Pooled Database.

Using pooled data from the REALI European database, we evaluated the impact of previous basal insulin (BI) type on real-life effectiveness and safety of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes. Patient-level data were pooled from 11 prospective, open-label, 24-week studies. Participants were classified according to the type of prior BI. Of the 4463 participants, 1282 (28.7%) were pre-treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and 2899 (65.0%) with BI analogues (BIAs), and 282 (6.3%) had undetermined prior BI. There were no meaningful differences in baseline characteristics between subgroups, except for a higher prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in the NPH subgroup (21.6% versus 7.8% with BIAs). Mean ± standard deviation haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 8.73 ± 1.15% and 8.35 ± 0.95% at baseline to 7.71 ± 1.09% and 7.82 ± 1.06% at week 24 in the NPH and BIA subgroups, respectively. Least squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c was - 0.85% (95% confidence interval - 0.94 to - 0.77) in NPH subgroup and - 0.70% (- 0.77 to - 0.64) in BIA subgroup, with a LS mean absolute difference between subgroups of 0.16 (0.06-0.26; p = 0.002). Gla-300 mean daily dose was slightly increased at week 24 by 0.07 U/kg/day (approximately 6 U/day) in both subgroups. Incidences of symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia were low, without body weight change. Irrespective of previous BI therapy (NPH insulin or BIAs), switching to Gla-300 improved glycaemic control without weight gain and with low symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia incidences. However, a slightly greater glucose-lowering effectiveness was observed in people pre-treated with NPH insulin.

The efficacy and safety of GP40081 (insulin aspart biphasic 30) compared with NovoMix® 30 in Type 2 diabetes patients.

Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin Aspart-Mix biosimilar candidate GP40081 (GP-Asp30) compared with NovoMix® 30 (NN-Asp30). Materials & methods: In a randomized open-label, active-controlled, 26-week non-inferiority clinical trial 264 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily GP-Asp30 or NN-Asp30. The primary safety end point was the immune response rate. Efficacy outcomes were a mean change in HbA1c (primary), frequency of achieving a glycemic g fasting plasma glucose levels, 7-point glucose profiles, and insulin doses. Results: The immune response developed in 10/126 (8%) participants in the GP-Asp30 group and in 10/125 (8%) participants in the NN-Asp30 group (p=1.000). The mean difference in HbA1c change between groups was 0.12 (95%CI [-0.14, 0.38]). Other secondary efficacy and safety outcomes weren't statistically different between the two groups. Conclusion: GP-Asp30 demonstrated similar safety and efficacy compared with NN-Asp30 and may be considered a biosimilar insulin.

PMON60 Growth Hormone (GH) Replacement Therapy (GHRT) in Patients with Adult GH Deficiency (AGHD) Aged ≥60 Years: Data from NordiNet® IOS and the ANSWER Program

Abstract There are limited data on the effectiveness and safety of GHRT in older patients with AGHD. We compared real-world GHRT outcomes in older (aged ≥60 years) versus middle-aged (35–&amp;lt;60 years) adults. NordiNet® IOS (NCT00960128) and ANSWER (NCT01009905) were non-interventional studies investigating long-term effectiveness and safety of GHRT with Norditropin® (somatropin, Novo Nordisk). Safety was assessed in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) from both studies (non-GH-naïve patients included). The Effectiveness Analysis Set (EAS) was from NordiNet® IOS only (GH-naïve patients; ANSWER-EAS included patients previously treated for ≤6 months). Serious adverse reactions (SARs) and non-serious ARs (NSARs) with a suspected causal relationship to GHRT, and serious adverse events (SAEs) not considered related to GHRT are presented as incidence rates per 1000 patient-years and as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for older versus middle-aged adults. Of the 759 patients in the EAS, 545 were middle-aged and 214 older adults, mean (standard deviation) age 48.5 (7.0) and 67.2 (4.9) years, with 45.9% and 39.3% females, respectively. At baseline, GH dose was 0.24 (0.16) and 0.20 (0.10) mg/day, insulin-like growth factor-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) was -0.94 (1.40) and -0.82 (1.36) and BMI was 29.29 (6.09) and 28.95 (4.58) kg/m2, respectively. Mean follow-up was 5.4 (4.3) and 5.3 (3.9) years, respectively. Of the 2348 patients in the FAS, 1696 were middle-aged and 652 older adults, aged 48.4 (7.1) and 67.1 (5.1) years, of which 52.4% and 43.3% were female, respectively. Baseline GH dose was 0.32 (0.24) and 0.26 (0.18) mg/day, IGF-I SDS was -0.58 (1.53) and -0.27 (1.54) and BMI was 30.50 (7.26) and 29.42 (5.39) kg/m2, respectively. Mean follow-up was 5.2 (4.5) and 4.7 (3.9) years, respectively. Mean GH exposure was greater in women than men, and in middle-aged than older women (FAS); it increased slightly over time in all groups. Baseline IGF-I SDS was slightly higher in older versus middle-aged women, but not men (EAS). Mean IGF-I SDS increased from below 0 to values ≤1.24 with GHRT. Mean changes in BMI (EAS) and HbA1c (EAS and FAS) were small and similar between age groups in both sexes. No statistically significant differences were observed between older and middle-aged adults regarding incidence rates for NSARs (5.66 vs 5.38; IRR [mean; 95%CI] 1.051 [0.604;1.831]) and SARs (1.00 vs 2.52; IRR 0.396 [0.119;1.324]). As expected, SAE incidence rate (considered unrelated to GHRT) was higher in the older group (16.64 vs 9.04, IRR 1.840 [1.291;2.622]). Similarly, the IRRs of patients ≥75 (n=59) years versus the middle-aged group were only significant for SAEs (23.09 vs 9.04; IRR 2.553 [1.113;5.855]). These data suggest similar clinical outcomes with GHRT in patients with AGHD aged ≥60 compared with 35–&amp;lt;60 years without additional risk of adverse drug reactions in older patients. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Clinical Utility of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention in Indian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: 12-Week Prospective Single-Arm Intervention Study.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) having elevated levels of blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) are at higher risk of macro- and microvascular complications. Nonetheless, the goal of achieving glycemic control cannot be met with the use of pharmacotherapy alone. The recent emergence of digital therapeutic tools has shown the possibility of improving the modifiable risk factors and self-management of diabetes. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility of a digital therapeutic intervention as an add-on therapy to achieve glycemic control in patients with T2DM. This was a 12-week prospective, single-arm digital intervention study in patients with T2DM receiving regular antidiabetic treatment. The eligibility criteria included male and female patients with HbA1c≥6.5%, functional English literacy, and a mobile phone capable of running the intervention app. Outcome measures of the study were mean changes in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PPBG), BMI, and Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) index at the end of 12 weeks. A total of 128 participants completed the study period of 12 weeks. There were 54.7% (70/128) men and 45.3% (58/128) women with a mean age of 48.48 years (SD 10.27). At the end of 12 weeks, the mean change in HbA1c, FBG, PPBG, and BMI for the overall study population was -0.84% (P<.001), -8.39 mg/dl (P=.02), -14.97 mg/dl (P<.001), and -0.24 kg/m2 (P=.06), respectively. Among the participants showing improvement in the HbA1c value at the end of 12 weeks (responders), the mean change in HbA1c, FBG, PPBG, and BMI was -1.24% (P<.001), -12.42 mg/dl (P=.003), -21.45 mg/dl (P<.001), and -0.34 kg/m2 (P=.007), respectively. There was an increase in HOMA-IR values for the overall study population (0.54, P=.29). HbA1c response showed a significant association with a baseline HbA1c level ≥7.5%, no prior history of smoking, and no prior COVID-19 infection, as well as with higher levels of program engagement. A digital therapeutic intervention when used alongside standard medications significantly reduces HbA1c, FBG, and PPBG levels in patients with T2DM.

Simultaneous Versus Sequential Initiation of Lixisenatide and Basal Insulin for Type2 Diabetes: Subgroup Analysis of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Lixisenatide (PRANDIAL).

We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of lixisenatide and basal insulin (BI) according to timing of treatment initiation, treatment compliance, and number of concomitant daily injections in Japanese individuals with type2 diabetes (T2D). Each substudy analyzed subgroup data from the 3-year post-marketing surveillance PRANDIAL study. Endpoints included glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose, treatment response (HbA1c < 7.0% at week24 and 156), and safety. Changes in HbA1c levels were analyzed using paired ttests; between-group comparisons were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Of 2679 participants, 46.5% initiated BI before lixisenatide, 12.0% the same day, 2.7% between 1 and 90days, and 2.8% at 91 or more days after lixisenatide; 36.0% did not receive BI. Overall, 85.4% of patients were compliant with lixisenatide treatment. The majority of patients (52.4%) received two injections/day (one was lixisenatide). Compared with other subgroups taking BI and lixisenatide, the subgroup starting them simultaneously had a mean change in HbA1c of - 0.69% [8mmol/mol] (vs + 0.07% [0.8mmol/mol] to - 0.79% [9mmol/mol]) and numerically higher treatment response (21.0% vs 8.3-18.7%), but more hypoglycemia (8.1% vs 2.3-2.8%). Japanese people with T2D achieved better glycemic control by simultaneous as opposed to sequential initiation of lixisenatide and BI.

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NW Low-Glu® in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background Medicinal plants have long been used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to investigate the hypoglycemic efficacy and safety of NW Low-Glu® (contents of one capsule are 300 mg Mas Cotek + 100 mg Cinnamomum cassia L. + 250 mg Nigella sativa L. powdered extracts) in treatment-naïve, newly diagnosed T2DM patients. Methods This was a 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, phase 2 clinical trial. A total of 232 male and female patients aged ≥18 and ≤65 years who were newly diagnosed with T2DM and have not received any antidiabetic drugs before and were equally randomized to receive metformin (2000 mg per day), low-dose NW Low-Glu® (content of four capsules per day), or high-dose NW Low-Glu® (content of five capsules per day). Our primary objective was to measure the mean change in HbA1c between each of the experimental arms and the metformin arm. Results There was a significant reduction in mean HbA1c at 12 weeks compared to baseline in the low-dose (0.6 (1.4)%; p=0.002) and high-dose arms (0.8 (1.7)%; p=0.004). There was also a significant reduction in 2 hr PPG at 12 weeks in the low-dose (35.4 (74.9) mg/dL, p=0.001) and high-dose arms (24.7 (100.8) mg/dL, p=0.04). Weight reduction was significantly higher with both high-dose (1.1 (−1.7) Kg; p=0.005) and low-dose arms (0.9 (−1.5) Kg; p=0.023) compared to metformin (0.8 (−1.8) Kg). No serious AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusions After 3 months of treatment, NW Low-Glu® was noninferior to metformin in reducing HbA1c and 2 hr PPG, while leading to significantly higher weight reduction in newly diagnosed T2DM patients. It was also safe and well tolerated.

Mind- and Body-Based Interventions Improve Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aims/Hypothesis: Only 51% of patients with type 2 diabetes achieve the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% target. Mind and body practices have been increasingly used to improve glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes, but studies show inconsistent efficacy. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between mind and body practices, and mean change in HbA1c and fasting blood glucose (FBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: The authors conducted a literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov seeking through June 10, 2022, published articles on mind and body practices and type 2 diabetes. Two reviewers independently appraised full text of articles. Only intervention studies were included. Reviewers extracted data for meta-analysis. Restricted maximum likelihood random-effects modeling was used to calculate the mean differences and summary effect sizes. The authors assessed heterogeneity using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Funnel plots were generated for each outcome to gauge publication bias. Weighted linear models were used to conduct study-level meta-regression analyses of practice frequency. Results: The authors identified 587 articles with 28 meeting the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant and clinically relevant mean reduction in HbA1c of -0.84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.10% to -0.58%; p < 0.0001) was estimated. Reduction was observed in all intervention subgroups: mindfulness-based stress reduction: -0.48% (95% CI: -0.72% to -0.23%; p = 0.03), qigong: -0.66% (95% CI: -1.18% to -0.14%; p = 0.01), and yoga: -1.00% (95% CI: -1.38% to -0.63%; p < 0.0001). Meta-regression revealed that for every additional day of yoga practice per week, the raw mean HbA1c differed by -0.22% (95% CI: -0.44% to -0.003%; p = 0.046) over the study period. FBG significantly improved following mind and body practices, with overall mean difference of -22.81 mg/dL (95% CI: -33.07 to -12.55 mg/dL; p < 0.0001). However, no significant association was found between the frequency of weekly yoga practice and change in FBG over the study period. Conclusions/Interpretation: Mind and body practices are strongly associated with improvement in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. The overall mean reduction in HbA1c and FBG was clinically significant, suggesting that mind and body practices may be an effective, complementary nonpharmacological intervention for type 2 diabetes. Additional analyses revealed that the mean decrease in HbA1c was greater in studies requiring larger number of yoga practice sessions each week.

Advanced hybrid closed loop therapy versus conventional treatment in adults with type 1 diabetes (ADAPT): a randomised controlled study

Adults with type 1 diabetes who are treated with multiple daily injections of insulin plus intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) can have suboptimal glucose control. We aimed to assess the efficacy of an advanced hybrid closed loop (AHCL) system compared with such therapy in this population. The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Study in Adult Population with Type 1 Diabetes (ADAPT) trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial that involved 14 centres in three European countries (France, Germany, and the UK). We enrolled patients who were at least 18 years of age, had a type 1 diabetes duration of at least 2 years, HbA1c of at least 8% (64 mmol/mol), and were using multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM (cohort A) or real time continuous glucose monitoring (cohort B) for at least 3 months. Here, only results for cohort A are reported. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to AHCL therapy or continuation of multiple daily injections of insulin plus continuous glucose monitoring for 6 months with an investigator-blinded block randomisation procedure. Participants and treating clinicians could not be masked to the arm assignment. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in mean HbA1c change from baseline to 6 months in the intention-to-treat population using AHCL therapy and those using multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM. The primary endpoint was analysed using a repeated measures random-effects model with the study arm and period as factors. Safety endpoints included the number of device deficiencies, severe hypoglycaemic events, diabetic ketoacidosis, and serious adverse events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04235504. Between July 13, 2020, and March 12, 2021, 105 people were screened and 82 randomly assigned to treatment (41 in each arm). At 6 months, mean HbA1c had decreased by 1·54% (SD 0·73), from 9·00% to 7·32% in the AHCL group and 0·20% (0·80) in the multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM from 9·07% to 8·91% (model-based difference -1·42%, 95% CI -1·74 to -1·10; p<0·0001). No diabetic ketoacidosis, severe hypoglycaemia, or serious adverse events related to study devices occurred in either group; two severe hypoglycaemic events occurred in the run-in phase. 15 device-related non-serious adverse events occurred in the AHCL group, compared with three in the multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM group. Two serious adverse events occurred (one in each group), these were breast cancer (in one patient in the AHCL group) and intravitreous haemorrhage (in one patient in the multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM group). In people with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM and with HbA1c of at least 8%, the use of AHCL confers benefits in terms of glycaemic control beyond those that can be achieved with multiple daily injections of insulin plus isCGM. These data support wider access to AHCL in people with type 1 diabetes not at target glucose levels. Medtronic International Trading Sàrl.

Once-Weekly Semaglutide Use in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the SURE Spain Multicentre, Prospective, Observational Study.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disease for which an individualised treatment approach is recommended. Once-weekly (OW) semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for the treatment of insufficiently controlled T2D. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of OW semaglutide in adults with T2D in a real-world context. SURE Spain, from the 10-country SURE programme, was a prospective, multicentre, open-label, observational study, approximately 30 weeks in duration. Adults with T2D and ≥1 documented HbA1c value ≤12 weeks before semaglutide initiation were enrolled. Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study (EOS) was the primary endpoint, with change in body weight (BW), waist circumference, and patient-reported outcomes as secondary endpoints. Of the 227 patients initiating semaglutide, 196 (86.3%) completed the study on-treatment with semaglutide. The estimated mean changes in HbA1c and body weight between baseline and EOS were −1.3%-points (95% confidence interval (CI) −1.51;−1.18%-points) and −5.7 kg (95% CI −6.36;−4.98 kg). No new safety concerns were identified. Therefore, in routine clinical practice in Spain, OW semaglutide was shown to be associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c and BW in adults with T2D.

Comparison of empagliflozin and vildagliptin for efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Pakistani population.

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that needs early management to prevent complications and premature mortality. Therefore, it is essential to select evidence-based drugs available to control diabetes and limit the progression to related complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and vildagliptin in people with type 2 DM.MethodsThis was an open-label, parallel randomized controlled trial (NCT 05359432) conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. After obtaining consent, participants were randomized into two groups. The first group was given empagliflozin (10 mg once or two times daily) with metformin, and the second group got vildagliptin (50 mg once or two times daily) with metformin. HbA1c, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and body weight were measured at the baseline and 24-week visits.ResultsA total of 120 patients fulfilled the selection criteria and then underwent randomization to be placed into empagliflozin and vildagliptin groups. The mean change in HbA1c (-0.97% ± 0.68 for empagliflozin and -0.82% ± 1.57 for vildagliptin) was statistically similar in both groups (p-value = 0.980). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for safety parameters such as eGFR (p = 0.46), serum ALT (p = 0.13), LDL (p = 0.23), total cholesterol (p = 0.49), and triglycerides (p = 0.49).ConclusionResults of the study highlight that vildagliptin and empagliflozin have a significant beneficial effect in reducing HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, and weight of participants. Both drugs had no differences when compared on safety parameters.

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with reduced efficacy of an insulin adjustment education program for people with type 1 diabetes.

The Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) course teaches insulin dose adjustment to match dietary carbohydrates and improve glycaemic control in participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We investigated the association between socioeconomic deprivation and reduction in HbA1c as a marker of sustained glycaemic control, after attending DAFNE education. This retrospective observational study identified adults with T1DM who attended DAFNE training in NHS Lothian, South East Scotland. We extracted age, sex, postcode-based Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles and annual HbA1c measurements available four years before and after course attendance. We calculated mean HbA1c before (baseline) and after attendance at DAFNE, across four annual measurements. Change in mean HbA1c (mmol/mol) was categorised into three groups: decrease (≥ - 2.5), no change (<±2.5), increase (≥ + 2.5). We used multivariable ordinal logistic regression, with baseline mean HbA1c as a covariate, to investigate the association of SIMD quintile with reduction in mean HbA1c. 335 participants were included. Age and sex distribution were similar across SIMD quintiles (Mean age=45, range 21-91, 59% women). Lower SIMD quintiles (greater deprivation) had higher baseline mean HbA1c (SIMD 1: 76.0, SIMD 5: 69.0). Higher SIMD quintiles (lower deprivation) were associated with lower odds of no change/increase in mean HbA1c (SIMD 5, odds ratio=0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.10, 0.58, p=0.001, multivariable analysis). Socioeconomic deprivation was associated with higher baseline mean HbA1c and lower reduction in HbA1c following DAFNE education. Future research could explore causes and how best to support participants from deprived areas. This work has not been previously submitted to a journal. This work was presented as a poster at The ABCD Conference 2021 and the abstract (of no more than 300 words) from the meeting has been published: Innes CWD, Henshall DE, Wilson B, Poon M, Morley SD, Ritchie SA. Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with reduced efficacy of an insulin adjustment education programme for people with type 1 diabetes. Br J Diabetes. 2021; 21: 293-296.

Glycemic Response to Metformin and Its Association with Age and Gender in Type II Diabetes

Diabetes Mellitus has become a global health concern due to its continued rise in prevalence. According to International Diabetic Federation (IDF), Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) currently affects 462 million people worldwide and is expected to grow from this figure to 642 million by 2040. Objective: The study was conducted to evaluate the glycemic response to metformin in Type-II diabetes and assess its association with age and gender. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted at the Pharmacology Department of Riphah International University from Jan 2020 to Dec 2021.Type-II diabetic patients (n=200) on metformin monotherapy fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled and followed up till three months. Baseline parameters were documented and reduction in HbA1c was determined. Numerical and categorical data was analyzed by chi-square and t-test using SPPS 23. Results: Our study demonstrates that 52% (104) of the patients were metformin responders while 48% (96) were non-responders. The reduction in HbA1c was significantly greater in responders than non- responders (- 1.58±1.07 % VS -0.32±0.35 %). Out of 85 males, 46 (54%) responded to metformin optimally while only half (50%) of the female subjects produced desirable response. However, there was no effect of gender on metformin response status with p=0.60 and changes in HbA1c levels over time were not significantly different in either sex. The mean age of responders and non-responders was found to be 48.23±9.64 years and 44.13±7.82 respectively. The effect of age on response of metformin and mean change in HbA1c among different age groups was found to be statistically significant with p=0.03 and p=0.04 respectively. Conclusion: There exists variability in response to metformin in type-II diabetes which is associated with age of the patient but remains un-influenced by gender of the patient.

Efficacy and safety of tirzepatide monotherapy compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS J-mono): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial

As the disease progresses, many patients with type 2 diabetes have difficulty in reaching treatment goals. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide, a novel GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist, compared with dulaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted in 46 medical research centres and hospitals in Japan. Adults aged 20 years or older with type 2 diabetes who had discontinued oral antihyperglycaemic monotherapy or were treatment-naïve were included. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or dulaglutide (0·75 mg) once per week using a computer-generated random sequence with an Interactive Web Response System. Participants were stratified based on baseline HbA1c (≤8·5% or >8·5%), baseline BMI (<25 or ≥25 kg/m2), and washout of antidiabetic medication. Participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The starting dose of tirzepatide was 2·5 mg once per week for 4 weeks, which was then increased to 5 mg in the tirzepatide 5 mg treatment group. For the tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg treatment groups, increases by 2·5 mg occurred once every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was reached. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c from baseline at week 52 measured in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03861052. Between May 7, 2019, and March 31, 2021, 821 participants were assessed for study eligibility and 636 were randomly assigned to receive at least one dose of tirzepatide 5 mg (n=159), 10 mg (n=158), or 15 mg (n=160), or dulaglutide 0·75 mg (n=159). 615 (97%) participants completed the study and 21 (3%) discontinued. Participants had a mean age of 56·6 years (SD 10·3) and were mostly male (481 [76%]). At week 52, HbA1c decreased from baseline by a least squares mean of -2·4 (SE 0·1) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -2·6 (0·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, -2·8 (0·1) for tirzepatide 15 mg, and -1·3 (0·1) for dulaglutide. Estimated mean treatment differences versus dulaglutide were -1·1 (95% CI -1·3 to -0·9) for tirzepatide 5 mg, -1·3 (-1·5 to -1·1) for tirzepatide 10 mg, and -1·5 (-1·71 to -1·4) for tirzepatide 15 mg (all p<0·0001). Tirzepatide was associated with dose-dependent reductions in bodyweight with a least square mean difference of -5·8 kg (SE 0·4; -7·8% reduction) for 5 mg, -8·5 kg (0·4; -11·0% reduction) for 10 mg, and -10·7 kg (0·4; -13·9% reduction) for 15 mg of tirzepatide compared with -0·5 kg (0·4; -0·7% reduction) for dulaglutide. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (19 [12%] participants in the 5 mg group vs 31 [20%] in the 10 mg group vs 32 [20%] in the 15 mg group all receiving tirzepatide vs 12 (8%) in the group receiving dulaglutide), constipation (24 [15%] vs 28 [18%] vs 22 [14%] vs 17 [11%]), and nasopharyngitis (29 [18%] vs 25 [16%] vs 22 [14%] vs 26 [16%]). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal (23 [4%] of 636). Tirzepatide was superior compared with dulaglutide for glycaemic control and reduction in bodyweight. The safety profile of tirzepatide was consistent with that of GLP-1 receptor agonists, indicating a potential therapeutic use in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Eli Lilly and Company. For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Impact of talk test based aerobic exercise on glycaemic control and anthropometric measures among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterised by the chronic hyperglycaemia which leads to various micro and macrovascular complications. The aim of present study was to evaluate the impact of talk test based aerobic exercise on glycaemic control and anthropometric measures among adults with (T2DM). In this double blind randomised controlled trial (RCT), aerobic exercises/walking was used as intervention. The patients were divided into three groups based on the tool of exercise intensity prescription: a talk test-based group (TTG, n=30), a rating of perceived exertion-based group (RPEG, n=30), and a control group (CG, n=30). Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated at baseline and after 8 weeks. Anthropometric measures, i.e. body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC) were evaluated at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Wilcoxon rank-sum/repeated measure of ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test/ANOVA were used for within and between group comparison, respectively, on the basis of normality of the data. The mean HbA1c change in TTG, RPEG, and CG was -0.29, -0.28, and -0.04, respectively, and it was significantly greater in TTG and RPEG as compared to CG. The reduction of HbA1c, BMI, and WC was reported in each group. However, the reduction in the experimental groups, i.e. TTG and RPEG was significantly greater than in the control group (P≤0.01). However, there was no significant difference found between the experimental groups (P&gt;0.05). TT based aerobic exercise is effective in improving glycaemic control and anthropometric measures. Therefore, TT can be used for the exercise prescription of these patients. The study is registered at the Clinical Trial Registry-India under no. CTRI/2019/02/017531.

Use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes is associated with better clinical engagement but not glycaemic control.

Limited studies have compared outcomes between emerging adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) attending a diabetes transition support programme using multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). To assess glycaemic control and service utilisation in emerging adults with T1D on MDI or CSII attending a young adult diabetes clinic (YAC). A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted from January 2013 to December 2015. Data collected included clinic visits per year, after-hours mobile telephone use, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) admissions and all HbA1c levels. Independent t-test was used to compare continuous variables whilst Pearson's Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables. Linear mixed effects models explored mean changes in HbA1c levels over time. Over 3 years, 318 youth with T1D (176 MDI, 121 CSII, 21 switched from MDI to CSII) attended our YAC. Aggregated mean HbA1c levels remained similar between modalities (CSII 9.1% vs MDI 9.3%; P = 0.23); however, mean change in HbA1c at 3 years was significantly increased in CSII users at 0.55% (95% CI 0.15-0.95; P < 0.01) compared with no significant change in MDI users. Clinic visits per year were improved in CSII users (CSII 2.8 vs MDI 2.5; P = 0.02), while DKA admissions remained similar between MDI and CSII users (3.6 admissions per 100 patient-years). In our YAC cohort, glycaemic control in CSII and MDI users was similar but well below recommended international glycaemic targets (HbA1c level < 7.0%). Despite increased clinical engagement occurring in CSII users, glycaemic deterioration was observed over the 3 years.

Comparative efficacy and safety of two insulin aspart formulations (Rapilin and NovoRapid) when combined with metformin, for patients with diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial

Objective This phase 3 confirmatory diabetes mellitus treatment study compared the safety and efficacy of Rapilin and NovoRapid insulin asparts in combination with metformin. Methods This 24-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority phase 3 confirmatory study conducted across centers in China aimed to enroll patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and blood sugar glucose inadequately controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. Randomized patients received subcutaneous mealtime Rapilin or NovoRapid (3:1) injections, with metformin. The primary objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (margin of 0.4%) in HbA1c change from baseline and compare safety profiles of Rapilin versus NovoRapid after 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% and ≤6.5%. Results 590 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to Rapilin (n = 441) and NovoRapid (n = 149) groups. After 24 weeks, the mean HbA1c change from baseline was −2.20% (Rapilin) and −2.32% (NovoRapid); the estimated treatment difference based on least-square means was 0.04% (95% CI: −0.17, 0.26), meeting the noninferiority criteria for Rapilin versus NovoRapid. Comparable improvements were reported for mean 2-hour PPG (6.14 and 6.29 mmol/L), FPG (2.02 and 1.70 mmol/L), and patients with HbA1c <7.0% (52.6% and 51.0%) and ≤6.5% (34.2% and 30.9%), in the Rapilin and NovoRapid groups, respectively, with no significant safety or immunogenicity outcome differences. Conclusions Rapilin demonstrated non-inferior glycemic control, and matching safety and immunogenicity to NovoRapid in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus also receiving metformin over 24 weeks. Trial registration ChiCTR20003129041

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Once-Weekly GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice: A Focus on Switching Between Once-Weekly Molecules in Type 2 Diabetes.

AimsThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (OW GLP-1RAs) and to assess the clinical benefits of switching from one GLP-1RA to another (switchers) in a routine clinical setting.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective, real-world cohort study, based on electronic medical records utilized in one Italian diabetes clinic. Estimated mean changes in HbA1c and body weight after 6 and 12 months from the first prescription of a long-acting GLP1-RA were evaluated using longitudinal linear mixed models for repeated measures. The effectiveness of the three long-acting GLP1-RAs was compared separately in the GLP1-RA naive and switchers cohorts, after propensity score adjustment.ResultsInitiating a long-acting GLP1-RA was associated with statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (−1%) and body weight (−2.6 kg) after 6 months, and benefits were maintained after 12 months. In GLP1-RA naive cohort, semaglutide showed the largest effect on HbA1c (−1.55%; 95%CI, −1.77;−1.34) and body weight (−3.76 kg; 95%CI, −5.05;−2.47) at 6 months, maintained at 12 months (−1.55%; 95%CI, −1.82;−1.28 and −6.29 kg; 95%CI, −7.94;−4.63). In the switchers’ cohort, statistically significant reductions at 6 months in HbA1c and body weight were documented with semaglutide and dulaglutide only, with semaglutide associated with the most marked reduction (−0.84%; 95%CI, −1.03;−0.65 and −3.43 kg; 95%, −4.67;−2.19). Dropout rates were 9.2%, 28.5%, and 41.7% in semaglutide, dulaglutide, and exenatide groups, respectively.ConclusionsThe effectiveness and tolerability of the OW GLP-1RAs in the real world were documented. Semaglutide was associated with the highest response without impact on safety. Clinical improvements were obtained even in switchers, especially in those switching to semaglutide.

The Safety of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Monotherapy Among Men With Previous Exogenous Testosterone Use.

Background and objectiveHuman chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is homologous to luteinizing hormone (LH) and stimulates endogenous testosterone (T) production. Current American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend hCG for T-deficient men who wish to preserve their fertility. However, there is no data available regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of hCG monotherapy in men with a history of exogenous T use. We hypothesized that transitioning to hCG would be a safe and effective option in this population.MethodologyWe performed a retrospective analysis involving 28 men with previous exogenous T use who were switched to hCG monotherapy and underwent follow-up lab work at least one month later. We evaluated changes in hormones [T, LH, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and estradiol], hematocrit (HCT), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA).ResultsAmong the entire cohort, we found no significant change in mean hormone levels (including T), HbA1c, or PSA. There was a significant (p<0.05) decrease in HCT (45.27 ±4.06 to 44.16 ±3.48%, n=15). No thromboembolic events were reported. Additionally, among men who had their baseline labs completed outside their previous T therapy therapeutic time window prior to starting hCG monotherapy, there was a statistically significant increase in mean T levels (307.36 ±148.74 to 422.11 ±268.15 ng/dL, n=30 and 31, pre- and post-hCG, respectively) and a statistically significant decrease in mean PSA levels (0.91 ±0.35 to 0.69 ±0.23 ng/mL, n=5).ConclusionsThese results suggest that hCG is a safe and effective alternative to traditional T therapy for men with a history of exogenous T use and may lead to an advantageous decrease in HCT. hCG may serve as an alternative form of T therapy with a lower risk for secondary erythrocytosis, and further research is warranted to gain deeper insights into the topic.