Antibody Mean Fluorescence Intensity Research Articles

Anti-HLA Class II Antibodies Are the Most Resistant to Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive Living-donor Kidney Transplantations: A Patient Series.

In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, the efficacy of desensitization in terms of anti-HLA antibody kinetics is not well characterized. We present an overview of the course of anti-HLA antibodies throughout plasma exchange (PE) desensitization in a series of crossmatch-positive patients. All consecutive candidates in the Dutch HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation program between November 2012 and January 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria were a positive crossmatch with a living kidney donor and no options for compatible transplantation. Desensitization consisted of 5-10 PE with low-dose IVIg. A total of 16 patient-donor pairs were included. Patients had median virtual panel-reactive antibody of 99.58%. Cumulative donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (cumDSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 31 399 median, and immunodominant DSA (iDSA) MFI was 18 677 for class I and 21 893 for class II. Median anti-HLA antibody MFI response to desensitization was worse in class II as compared with class I (P < 0.001), particularly for HLA-DQ. Class I cumDSA MFI decreased 68% after 4 PE versus 53% in class II. The decrease between the fifth and the 10th PE sessions was modest with 21% in class I versus 9% in class II. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 85% of patients, with the iDSA directed to the same mismatched HLA as before desensitization, except for 3 patients, of whom 2 had vigorous rebound of antibodies to repeated mismatches (RMMs). Rebound was highest (86%) in RMM-DSA with prior grafts removed (transplantectomy n = 7), lower (39%) in non-RMM-DSA (n = 30), and lowest (11%) for RMM-DSA with in situ grafts (n = 5; P = 0.018 for RMM-DSA transplantectomy versus RMM-DSA graft in situ). With a median follow-up of 59 mo, 1 patient had died resulting in a death-censored graft survival of 73%. Patients with class II DSA, and particularly those directed against HLA-DQ locus, were difficult to desensitize.

Immunology Status of Patients During Kidney Transplant.

The immunology status of a patient has a crucial role in kidney transplant. We investigated the effectiveness of a desensitization protocol, guided by the immunology status of patients, for kidney transplant candidates. Antibody screening for human leukocyte antigens was conducted with the Luminex single-antigen microsphere bead assay method for 34 patients from June 2021 to June 2022. Donor human leukocyte antigen genotypes at 8 loci (A*, B*, С*, DRB1*, DQA1*, DQB1*, DPA1*, and DPB1*) were determined, to correlate the specificities of recipient human leukocyte antigen antibodies with donor antigens and identify unacceptable donor antigen combinations. Specialized immunology studies measured panel reactive antibody levels and human leukocyte antigen class I and class II antibodies. A crossmatch compatibility test using complementdependent cytotoxicity was conducted. Of the 34 patients, 10 completed all 3 stages of the desensitization therapy. Most patients experienced decreased sensitization to human leukocyte antigen class I and class II antibodies. Two patients achieved complete clearance of A1 and DQ5 antibodies, respectively, whereas 1 patient exhibited an increase in donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity. Prior to desensitization therapy, the crossmatch compatibility test yielded positive results with T and B lymphocytes. After completing the therapy, the crossmatch test showed negative results in 4 cases with T lymphocytes and positive results with B lymphocytes. Plasmapheresis sessions effectively reduced circulating antibodies. However, the combination of rituximab and plasmapheresis alone did not achieve a negative crossmatch test required for kidney transplant. It is crucial to assess the reduction of donor-specific antibody quantity, considering both the percentage and the mean fluorescence intensity. To avoid false-positive results in crossmatch analysis, drug half-life must be considered. Laboratories should have various crossmatch techniques, such as flow cytometry and single-antigen microsphere bead assay technology, available for research and urgent cases that require crossmatch analysis.

Donor-Specific Antibody Mean Fluorescence Intensity Threshold Predicts Platelet Transfusion Response in HLA-Alloimmunized Patients

Introduction:Patients with platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) due to HLA-alloimmunization respond to HLA-matched platelets. However, 4/4 HLA-matched platelets or platelets without donor-recipient antigenic mismatches are rarely available. Further, in severe HLA-alloimmunization, it is difficult to find donor products which do not contain antigens to which the recipient has developed antibodies ( i.e. antibody specificity prediction, ASP method). Hence, studies have evaluated platelet transfusion responsiveness in the presence of ≥1 donor specific antibodies (DSAs) to widen donor pools, a strategy termed permissive mismatching (PERMM). Using established semi-quantitative techniques for HLA-antibody detection, we sought to identify a cumulative DSA threshold which predicted platelet corrected count increment (CCI) failure despite PERMM. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed platelet transfusions among patients with HLA-alloimmunization and suspected PTR at the University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center from 2021-2023. HLA Class I antibodies were detected using a solid-phase single antigen bead assay (One Lambda) on the Luminex platform with individual antibody strengths measured by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). The calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) were defined as the proportion of donors against whom recipients had antibodies. Transfusions were categorized as HLA matched, PERMM (DSA MFI&amp;gt;0), or random donor platelets (HLA-type unknown). CCI was calculated as described by Cohn ASH 2020. Results: Of 420 patients suspected to have PTR, 75 had cPRA &amp;gt; 50% and received ≥3 HLA-selected platelet transfusions. Of the 2726 transfusions these patients received, 1198 were excluded due to unavailability of post-transfusion platelet counts within 2 hours or due to multiple transfusions occurring between platelet counts. Ultimately, 1528 transfusions were analyzed (Panel A). In 1031 PERMM transfusions, the cumulative MFI was a stronger predictor of CCI at 2 hours than cPRA or the number of mismatched DSA (coefficients of determination or R2 of 7.3%, 2%, and 0.4%, respectively). We then examined the spectrum of cumulative MFIs to identify a threshold MFI predicting transfusion success/failure among the PERMM products. PERMM platelet transfusions in recipients with DSA MFIs of up to 5000 generated CCIs similar to HLA-matched platelets. However, CCI was significantly different between MFI &amp;lt;10,000 (median CCI 17,783) and MFI ≥10,000 (median CCI 3753) (Panel B). We then stratified data by splenomegaly, a significant non-immunologic cause of PTR (23.2% of transfusions, R2 15.8% for CCI prediction). Of the transfusions not affected by splenomegaly, 9.6% did not generate an adequate platelet response (defined as a CCI &amp;gt;5000) across all MFIs. This failure rate increased to 33.3%, 40.8%, and 52.8% among transfusions in recipients with MFIs &amp;gt;5000, &amp;gt;7500, and &amp;gt;10,000, respectively. After multiple testing correction, MFI of several individual DSAs (A1, A2, A24, A68, B8, B37, B39, B44, B51, B57, and B62) were also found to be significant predictors of CCI using linear regression ( n ranging 32-193, R2 ranging 6-33%). Conclusions: This is the largest study to date evaluating optimal MFI thresholds of DSAs for permissive HLA mismatching in the context of platelet transfusions. Cumulative DSA MFIs demonstrated a dose response effect with lower MFIs generating better CCIs. In our patient cohort overall, and when stratified by splenomegaly, we identified a threshold for cumulative DSA MFIs of 10,000, under which &amp;gt;50% of transfusions resulted in an adequate CCI. This MFI threshold (&amp;gt;10,000) has been implicated in HLA mismatched solid organ transplant rejections (Kallon, Transf. Med. 2020) as well as in a pooled analysis of smaller HLA-selected platelet transfusion studies conducted by our group (unpublished). If incorporated into a transfusion strategy, this MFI threshold may perform better than units chosen based on the number of mismatched DSAs alone or random donor platelets and widen the donor pool. Identifying the impact of specific HLA antibodies on CCIs needs further study. Studies are also underway to correlate cumulative DSA MFIs with complement activation (C1q levels) as a possible mechanistic explanation for the differences noted across the MFI threshold of 10,000 in our study.

Desensitization using IVIG alone for living-donor kidney transplant: impact on donor-specific antibodies.

Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen is a barrier to. Few data have been published on desensitization using polyvalent human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) alone. We retrospectively reviewed the of 45 patients with a positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) or flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) against living donors from January 2003 to December 2014. Of these, 12 were excluded. Patients received monthly IVIG infusions (2 g/kg) only until they had a negative T-cell and B-cell FCXM. During the 33 patients, 22 (66.7%) underwent living donor kidney transplantation, 7 (21.2%) received a deceased donor graft, and 4 (12.1%) did not undergo transplantation. The median class I and II panel reactive antibodies for these patients were 80.5% (range 61%-95%) and 83.0% (range 42%-94%), respectively. Patients (81.8%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell CDCXM and 4 (18.2%) had a positive T-cell and/or B-cell FCXM. Patients underwent transplantation after a median of 6 (range 3-16). The median donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity sum was 5057 (range 2246-11,691) before and 1389 (range 934-2492) after desensitization (p = 0.0001). Mean patient follow-up time after transplantation was 60.5 (SD, 36.8) months. Nine patients (45.0%). Death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant was 86.4, 86.4, and 79.2%, respectively and patient survival was 95.5, 95.5, and 83.7%, respectively. Desensitization using IVIG alone is an effective strategy, allowing successful transplantation in 87.9% of these highly sensitized patients.

A Comparative Study on the Variation in Seropositivity Rates After 2-Dose COVID-19 Vaccination Before or After Transplant: A Single-Center Analysis

Many researchers have demonstrated that the seropositivity rate after SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus vaccination is lower in patients receiving oral immunosuppressants. In this article, we report on a comparative study on the seropositivity rate after 2 doses of coronavirus vaccine before or after kidney transplant. We studied 111 recipients vaccinated after transplant, 19 patients vaccinated before transplant, and 10 healthy patients. We retrospectively measured antibody titers using preserved serum samples. The antibody testing was performed 1 month and 3 months after vaccination. The measurement was via LABScreen COVID Plus, which enables simultaneous determination of 5 coronavirus protein antigens. Seropositivity to coronavirus antibodies was observed in all 19 patients vaccinated before transplant (100%) and in all the 10 healthy patients (100%). Forty- six of the 111 recipients (42%) vaccinated after transplant developed seropositivity. Analyzed at each time point after vaccination, the mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies was unchanged between 1 month and 3 months after vaccination in transplant recipients who were vaccinated after transplant and developed seropositivity. On the other hand, the antibody mean fluorescence intensity in patients vaccinated before transplant was markedly lower at 3 months (posttransplant). All patients with renal failure who were vaccinated before transplant showed a high seropositivity rate, similar to that in healthy patients. The seropositivity rate for each of the viral fragment antibodies in patients vaccinated before transplant was maintained, as seen in healthy patients. However, in patients vaccinated before transplant who tested positive for antibody production at 1 month after vaccination,the antibody mean fluorescence intensity at 3 months after vaccination (posttransplant) was remarkedly lower than the mean fluorescence intensity at 1 month, which was probably caused by the types of immunosuppressive regimens used atthe time of transplant.

Predictive Potential of Flow Cytometry Crossmatching in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Subjected to Peritransplant Desensitization.

Recipient sensitization is a major risk factor of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and inferior graft survival. The predictive effect of solid-phase human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in the era of peritransplant desensitization remains poorly understood. This observational retrospective single-center study with 108 donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive deceased donor kidney allograft recipients who had undergone peritransplant desensitization aimed to analyze variables affecting graft outcome. ABMR rates were highest among patients with positive pretransplant FCXM vs. FCXM-negative (76 vs. 18.7%, p < 0.001) and with donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity (DSA MFI) > 5,000 vs. <5,000 (54.5 vs. 28%, p = 0.01) despite desensitization. In univariable Cox regression, FCXM positivity, retransplantation, recipient gender, immunodominant DSA MFI, DSA number, and peak panel reactive antibodies were found to be associated with ABMR occurrence. In multivariable Cox regression adjusted for desensitization treatment (AUC = 0.810), only FCXM positivity (HR = 4.6, p = 0.001) and DSA number (HR = 1.47, p = 0.039) remained significant. In conclusion, our data suggest that pretransplant FCXM and DSA number, but not DSA MFI, are independent predictors of ABMR in patients who received peritransplant desensitization.

Impact of high body mass index on allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with presensitization to human leukocyte antigen.

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate whether high body mass index (BMI) and presensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) affected allograft outcomes.MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2018, 1,290 kidney transplantations (KTs) were performed at the Seoul St Mary’s Hospital. Of these, 682 cases of ABO-compatible living donor KT patients were enrolled. They were divided into four groups (low BMI-non-sensitized, high BMI-non-sensitized, low BMI-sensitized, and high BMI-sensitized) according to the median BMI value (22.7 kg/m2) and HLA presensitization status (anti-HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity > 3,000). Short-term and long-term allograft outcomes were compared between groups.ResultsIn the high BMI-sensitized group, the decline in allograft function was higher than that in the other three groups. Death-censored graft loss (DCGL) rates were highest in the high BMI-sensitized group (4 of 21 [19.0%], p = 0.04). In the multivariable Cox regression hazard regression model analysis, the hazard ratio (HR) for DCGL was intensified when high BMI and presensitization statuses were combined (HR, 3.75; p = 0.03); these statuses significantly interacted with each other (p-value for interaction = 0.008).ConclusionOur results suggest that presensitization to HLA and high BMI might have an interactive adverse impact on allograft outcomes in KTRs.

Comparison of De Novo Donor Specific and Non-Specific Antibodies on the Outcome after Heart Transplantation

Purpose Studies have shown that donor specific antibodies (DSA) have great impact on the clinical course and overall survival of patients after heart transplantation (HTx). De-novo non-DSA (NSA) were associated with graft loss after kidney transplantation, but it remains unclear to what extent NSA play a role in rejection, graft function and overall mortality after HTx. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the outcome of patients with DSA and NSA after HTx. Methods Surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) were taken after 1, 3, 6 months and yearly for 5 years after HTX, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) was evaluated via coronary angiography. Serum HLA-class I and II antibodies were collected for analysis of donor specifity twice yearly. The antibody mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cut-off values were set at >1000. Study data was collected retrospectively from internal medical records. End points of the study were death of any cause, primary graft failure (PGF), biopsy proven acute cellular rejection (BPACR) ≥2R according to ISHLT, antibody mediated rejection (AMR) and CAV. Complete data was obtained only from patients with a survival of 12 months or greater. Results 69 patients with a follow-up time of min. 18 months to max. 6 years after HTx were divided into two groups (G1: no DSA or NSA present, n=41, G2: DSA and / or NSA present, n=27). G2 was further divided into two subgroups, patients with both DSA + NSA (n=9) and only NSA(n=26) status.All-cause mortality was n=21 (30.9%), with significant difference amongst the groups (G1: n=17 (41.5%), G2: n=4(18.4%)). This trend was also seen amongst cardiovascular mortality (G1: n=7 (17.1%), G2: n=0). No statistically significant difference was seen regarding CAV (G1: n=3 (7.3%), G2: n=2 (7.4%)), BPACR (G1: n=19 (27.9%) or G2: n=9 (22%)). Surprisingly, AMR was seen in patients in G1 n=3 (4.4%), but not in G2 (n=0), however, without statistically relevant difference. Conclusion Our study shows that DSA and NSA had no negative impact on the outcome up to 6 years after HTx. This might be due to a closer monitoring of the patients after detection of DSA and NSA, and, consequently, an adequate and early adjustment of immunosuppressive therapy including specific DSA treatments to preserve graft function.

P6314Left- versus Bi-Ventricular Assist Device-mediated anti-HLA alloantibody induction in bridge-to-transplantation patients

Abstract Background Presence of anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen (anti-HLA) alloantibodies (allosensitization) in a heart transplantation candidate impedes the chance of finding a compatible transplant. Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) have been shown to induce allosensitization. Purpose The purpose of this study is to characterize anti-HLA allosensitization in adult patients receiving left (LVAD) versus biventricular- (BiVAD) assist devices as bridge to transplantation (BTT). Methods This study retrospectively assessed anti-HLA antibody induction in all adult patients who have received either LVAD or BiVAD as BTT at our institution. Anti-HLA alloantibody screening was performed before, and at multiple time-points after VAD implantation. Anti-HLA antibody detection was performed with a cytotoxic panel-reactive antibody (PRA) method until 2003, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) method from 2003 to 2005 and SAB assays on the Luminex platform from 2005 to 2017. Sensitization was defined either as PRA &gt;10%, or as peak anti-HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of more than 1000. Baseline characteristics and sensitization in the two patient groups were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results Between 2003 and 2018, 154 patients were placed on VAD support at our institution as BTT. Sensitization data were available for 130 patients. Fifty five (36.6%) patients were supported with an LVAD (median age, 48 years, 26% female) and 95 (63.4%) with a BiVAD (median age, 45 years, 28% female). Twenty-five (45.4%) of the LVAD and 49 (51.2%) of the BiVAD patients were eventually transplanted (p=0.47) with an average time to transplantation 588 and 562 days respectively. Fifteen (27.2%) LVAD and 35 (36.8%) BiVAD patients died before transplantation (p=0.23) with an average time on VAD support before death 269 and 302 days respectively. Evidence of sensitization pre-VAD was found in 17.1% of the LVAD and 12.5% of the BiVAD patients (p=0.53); these percentages rose to 40.0% (p=0.001) and 43.7% (p=0.0001) respectively at 2 to 12 months post-VAD implantation. However, the post-VAD allosensitization status was not statistically different between the LVAD and the BiVAD group. Among the 25 LVAD patients who were transplanted 7 (30.4%) were sensitized immediately before transplantation, compared to 22 (46.8%) out of 49 BiVAD patients (p=0.16). Conclusion Both LVADs and BiVADs are a factor of de novo anti-HLA antibody development in adult patients after implantation. Sensitization pattern does not seem to differ between LVAD and BiVAD patients. Additionally, patients supported by LVAD or BiVAD have similar chances of finding a suitable donor heart.

Correlation of HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity with C1q binding status in EDTA treated real clinical samples

Correlation of HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity with C1q binding status in EDTA treated real clinical samples

Investigation of Anti-HLA Antibodies of Highly Sensitized Patients by Single Antigen Bead and C1q Tests

PurposeThe single antigen bead (SAB) test contributes to conventional cellular and solid phase crossmatch tests in renal transplantation. However, the determination of anti-HLA antibodies of the patients may not reflect the pathologic features of these antibodies. Highly sensitized patients produce antibodies against a number of HLAs; therefore, their transplantation chance decreases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate SAB and C1q test results of highly sensitized patients. MethodIn this study, 33 end-stage renal failure patients with >80% panel reactive antibody were included. Of the patients, 58% (n = 19) were female, and 42% (n = 14) were male. The mean age was 46.2 ± 12.4. All of the serum samples were inactivated by heat before use. SAB and C1q tests were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. ResultsWe obtained statistically significant results between the positive bead counts and raw mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of 2 tests (P < .01 for class I and II). There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 tests in terms HLA-A, -C, -DR, and -DP MFI values, whereas HLA-B and -DQ MFI values were similar for the 2 tests. ConclusionThe difference of raw MFI values between the 2 tests may be due to the fact that the C1q test detects only IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies, whereas the SAB test can detect all IgG subtypes. We considered that anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibodies have high complement-fixing features; these antibodies should be investigated selectively due to the similarity of anti-HLA-B and -DQ antibody MFI values in the 2 tests.

Systematic Screening Using Luminex for De Novo C3d Fixing of Class II Donor-Specific Antibodies Is Correlated With Luminex Mean Fluorescence Intensity in Renal Transplant Patients.

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection is the main cause of late kidney graft loss. The presence of donor-specific antibodies in the serum is the main criterion for this diagnosis. Single antigen Luminex assays can identify donor-specific antibodies, and semiquantitative estimates of antibodies can be assessed using mean fluorescence intensity. Recent data have shown that patients whose donor-specific antibodies fix C3d have worse clinical outcomes, implying that C3d-specific Luminex assays may provide useful prognostic data. We compared C3d donor-specific antibodies with standard immunoglobulin G donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensities in a cohort of patients with de novo class II donor-specific antibodies and analyzed subsequent graft survival. The included kidney graft recipients received transplants between 2005 and 2015 and had developed de novo class II donor-specific antibodies. Serum was tested using the standard single antigen Luminex technique and the C3d-fixing antibody-detection system (Immucor, Herentals, Belgium). In our patient cohort, 41/924 patients (4.4%) developed class II donor-specific antibodies, and 65 serum samples were analyzed (at baseline and follow-up). Among these samples, 43 (66%) were negative for C3d donor-specific antibodies. A mean fluorescence intensity threshold of 9000 in the single antigen Luminex assay discerned all negative (from positive) C3d donor-specific antibodies, even when all single-bead results were taken into account. Sixteen patients (39%) had poor outcomes (ie, either creatinine levels had doubled or they had lost their graft) over the median follow-up of 5 years. C3d results were significantly associated with graft survival (P = .04). We found a strong correlation between C3d-fixing antibody positivity and mean fluorescence intensity strength in the setting of de novo class II donor-specific antibodies. These results further reinforce the paradigm that the higher the mean fluorescence intensity, the more complement activation occurs. Routine C3d testing is thus unnecessary in this setting.

P143 Development and validation of LSAB MFI cutpoints for use in the virtual crossmatch test to predict flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) and cdc crossmatch (CDC XM) results

Aim Luminex Single Antigen bead assay (LSAB) derived mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of anti-HLA antibodies directed at the potential donor’s HLA are the primary parameter used in the virtual crossmatch to predict physical crossmatch (XM) outcome. We aimed to develop statistically validated LSAB MFI cutpoints for predicting CDC XM and FCXM results. Methods We leveraged the ASHI proficiency testing (PT) 80% consensus results of 7156 T FCXM, 6758 B FCXM, 2917 T CDC XM and 2233 B CDC XM as the reference results to investigate whether LSAB MFI of IgG anti-HLA antibodies predict validated physical XM results. LSAB MFI was determined in our laboratory using One Lambda Single Antigen HLA Class I and Class II beads. The 80% consensus results are from 8 consecutive challenges during 2013 to 2016, and 107 laboratories across USA tested sera and HLA typed cells distributed by ASHI, and reported the results to ASHI for assessment of the laboratory’s proficiency. Data analysis included: summing of MFI of IgG antibodies directed at HLA-A, B and C for investigating their association with T FCXM and T CDC XM results; summing of MFI of antibodies directed at HLA-A, B, C, DR, DQ and DP for investigating their association with B FCXM and B CDC XM results; assigning alternate ASHI challenges to the Discovery set and the Validation set; investigating the association between LSAB MFI and physical XM results by logistic regression analysis corrected for overdispersion; and identification of LSAB MFI cutpoint for maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity. LSAB MFI cutpoints derived from the Discovery set to predict FCXM and CDC XM results were investigated in an independent validation set. Results Table 1 demonstrates that LSAB MFI cutpoints from the Discovery set predicts XM outcomes in the Validation set (ROC AUC range from 0.974 to 0.999). Conclusions We have developed and validated LSAB MFI cutpoints for use in the virtual crossmatch to accurately predict physical T FCXM, B FCXM, T CDC XM and B CDC XM results.

Comprehensive assessment for serum treatment for single antigen test for detection of HLA antibodies

The single antigen test is widely used in the field of transplantation to determine the specificity of HLA antibodies. It will be beneficial to standardize the procedure of the single antigen test among HLA laboratories. It is not uncommon that single antigen testing on native sera fails to detect antibodies with very high concentrations. It has been shown that cleavage products of activated complement components may mask strongly binding antibodies in single antigen testing. To overcome inhibition by the activated complement products, sera are pretreated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), dithiothreitol (DTT), or heat inactivation before single antigen testing. However, no studies have been published to systemically compare the impact of these treatments on single antigen testing. The aim of this study is to understand the different effects these treatments may have on single antigen test results. We found that mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) obtained from sera treated with EDTA and heat inactivation were nearly identical, while DTT treatment was less potent to remove the inhibition. In addition, sera dilution did not further increase MFI of antibodies after EDTA treatment. Our results provide guidance to choose a pretreatment reagent for single antigen testing, and to compare studies obtained from laboratories using different treatments.

Comparative analysis of Luminex-based donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity values with complement-dependent cytotoxicity & flow crossmatch results in live donor renal transplantation.

Background & objectives:Antibodies specific to donor human leucocyte antigen (HLA) play a critical role in graft rejection and graft loss. In recent years, techniques for their detection have evolved significantly providing an ever-increasing degree of sensitivity and specificity, from the conventional cell-based assays to the advanced solid-phase system based on the Luminex platform. Consensus is still evolving on the routine employment of all these methods, either stand alone or in combination. The objective of this study was to explore the near-accurate mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) cut-off values detected on Luminex platform predicting the strength of cell-based crossmatch results.Methods:Serum samples from 116 primary renal transplant recipients awaiting transplantation were tested for the presence of antidonor antibodies by the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and flow crossmatch (FCXM) methods with their corresponding donors as well as for HLA-donor-specific antibodies (DSA) detection using a sensitive single antigen bead (SAB) assay.Results:None of the patients having HLA Class I DSA with MFI values <1000 showed positivity for T-cell FCXM or CDC crossmatch, while in the group having MFI values between 1000 and 3000, 54 per cent showed positivity for the FCXM but none by the CDC method. However, in the group having MFI values >3000, 95 per cent of cases were positive for FCXM. Further, those groups with MFI values between 3000 and 5000, only 36 per cent were positive for CDC crossmatch, while 90 per cent showed positivity in the group with MFI >7000.Interpretation & conclusions:A cut-off MFI value of 3000 for Luminex SAB-based assay was found to significantly correlate with the FCXM positivity while a MFI value of 7000 and above predicted a positive CDC crossmatch. MFI cut-off value obtained as a surrogate marker for CDC and FCXM tests will help in resolving the limitations of different cell-based techniques.

Rituximab in Combination With Bortezomib, Plasmapheresis, and High-Dose IVIG to Treat Antibody-Mediated Renal Allograft Rejection.

BackgroundCurrent treatment strategies for antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection (AMR) are not sufficiently effective. In most centers, “standard of care” treatment includes plasmapheresis (PPH) and IVIG preparations. Since several years, modern therapeutics targeting B cells and plasma cells have become available. We investigated, whether combined administration of rituximab and bortezomib in addition to PPH and high-dose IVIG is useful.MethodsBetween November 2011 and January 2013, we treated 10 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven AMR with rituximab (500 mg), bortezomib (4× 1.3 mg/m2), PPH (6×), and high-dose IVIG (1.5 g/kg) (group A). This group was compared with a group of 11 consecutive patients treated with an identical regimen without rituximab between July 2010 and November 2011 (group B).ResultsMedian follow-up was 41(33-46) months in group A and 55(47-63) months in group B. At 40 months after treatment, graft survival was 60% in group A and 64% in group B, respectively (P = 0.87). Before and after treatment, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and proteinuria were not different between groups. A significant reduction in donor-specific HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity was observed in group A (25.2%, P = 0.046) and B (38.3%, P = 0.01) at 3 months posttreatment. In group A, more patients suffered from side effects compared with group B (infections: 70% vs 18%, P = 0.02).ConclusionsThe addition of rituximab to bortezomib, PPH, and high-dose IVIG did not further improve graft survival. Instead, we observed an increase of side effects. Therefore, combined administration of bortezomib and rituximab in addition to PPH and IVIG should be regarded with caution.

Sensitization from transfusion in patients awaiting primary kidney transplant

Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) from red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is poorly quantified and is based on outdated, insensitive methods. The objective was to evaluate the effect of transfusion on the breadth, magnitude and specificity of HLA antibody formation using sensitive and specific methods. Transfusion, demographic and clinical data from the US Renal Data System were obtained for patients on dialysis awaiting primary kidney transplant who had ≥ 2 HLA antibody measurements using the Luminex single-antigen bead assay. One cohort included patients with a transfusion (n = 50) between two antibody measurements matched with up to four nontransfused patients (n = 155) by age, sex, race and vintage (time on dialysis). A second crossover cohort (n = 25) included patients with multiple antibody measurements before and after transfusion. We studied changes in HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA). In the matched cohort, 10 of 50 (20%) transfused versus 6 of 155 (4%) nontransfused patients had a ≥ 10 HLA antibodies increase of >3000 MFI (P = 0.0006); 6 of 50 (12%) transfused patients had a ≥ 30 antibodies increase (P = 0.0007). In the crossover cohort, the number of HLA antibodies increasing >1000 and >3000 MFI was higher in the transfused versus the control period, P = 0.03 and P = 0.008, respectively. Using a ≥ 3000 MFI threshold, cPRA significantly increased in both matched (P = 0.01) and crossover (P = 0.002) transfused patients. Among prospective primary kidney transplant recipients, RBC transfusion results in clinically significant increases in HLA antibody strength and breadth, which adversely affect the opportunity for future transplant.

Analysis of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates Subjected to Desensitization with Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rituximab

Preexisting donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens are major risk factors for acute antibody-mediated and chronic rejection of kidney transplant grafts. Immunomodulation (desensitization) protocols may reduce antibody concentration and improve the success of transplant. We investigated the effect of desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab on the antibody profile in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. In 31 transplant candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA], 34%-99%), desensitization included intravenous immunoglobulin on days 0 and 30 and a single dose of rituximab on day 15. Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were analyzed before and after desensitization. Reduction of cPRA from 25% to 50% was noted for anti-class I (5 patients, within 20-60 days) and anti-class II (3 patients, within 10-20 days) antibodies. After initial reduction of cPRA, the cPRA increased within 120 days. In 24 patients, decrease in mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies by more than 50% was noted at follow-up, but there was no reduction of cPRA. Rebound occurred in 65% patients for anti-class I antibodies at 350 days and anti-class II antibodies at 101 to 200 days. Probability of rebound effect was higher in patients with mean fluorescence intensity of more than 10,700 before desensitization, anti-class II antibodies, and history of previous transplant. The desensitization protocol had limited efficacy in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate because of the short period with antibody reduction and high frequency of rebound effect.

Reduced HLA Class II Antibody Response to Proteasome Inhibition

Purpose One major function of the 26S proteasome is antigen processing for HLA class I presentation. Following proteasome inhibition with bortezomib (Bzb), one would expect down regulation of class I expression. We explored the differential effect on donor specific and third-party antibodies in Bzb-treated OHT patients. We postulated that compared to class II responses, Bzb is more effective in preventing de novo antibody production to class I alloantigens. Methods and Materials Pearson correlations among Ab per and across patients were performed for patients receiving Bzb desensitization/AMR therapy from August 2010 to January 2012. Hierarchical clustering was used to find antibody groups of similar response. Treatment consisted of plasmapheresis then Bzb (0.7-1mg/m² IV) on days 1, 4, 7, 10 then a 3-day course of plasmapheresis beginning day 13. Anti-HLA antibody mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was determined via single antigen Luminex® assay. Results Evaluation of the antibody response patterns to Bzb was done on 9 patients. Out of these, 4 patients shared common antibodies, tested multiple times before and after transplantation. Antibody levels are depicted as a heatmap for the intersection of antibody sets. We found that compared to HLA class I locus A and B, HLA class II antibodies demonstrated a significantly decreased response to Bzb. [ figure 1 ] Conclusions We have identified clusters of antibodies with differing degrees of response to Bzb therapy that could be indicative of a class-specific effect. Class I antibodies show a preferential response to bortezomib, while Class II (specifically HLA-DQ) appeared to respond poorly. Our findings suggests that individualized, HLA-specific therapies targeting specific antibody clusters merits further study.

Predicting Operational Tolerance in Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplantation by Absence of HLA Antibodies

The role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in operational tolerance (OT) after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains inconclusive. We investigated whether the presence of HLA antibodies impeded the development of OT. We retrospectively examined the prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in pediatric LDLT recipients before transplantation and at 3 weeks after transplantation and analyzed the significance of those antibodies in relation to later OT. Forty pediatric LDLTs were performed between April 1996 and December 2000 and followed up through July 2011, with sera available for measurement of HLA antibodies. Seventeen patients achieved OT (mean follow-up, 4571.9±544.7 days) and 23 patients did not achieve OT (mean follow-up, 4532.0±425.4 days). Protocol liver biopsy was done for 14 OT patients and 16 non-OT patients. Their sera were tested for anti-HLA class I and II antibodies using the LABScreen single antigen beads test, in which a 1000 mean fluorescence value was considered positive. The prevalence of antibodies after transplantation in non-OT patients was higher than in OT patients (95.2% vs. 73.3%; P<0.001). The highest mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies was significantly higher in non-OT patients than in OT patients. The prevalence of HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR antibodies was significantly higher in non-OT patients than in OT patients. The highest mean fluorescence intensity of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DQ observed in non-OT patients was significantly higher than those in OT patients. In our study, posttransplantation HLA antibodies were associated with the future absence of OT. A prospective study with more patients is necessary to confirm the predictive value of HLA antibodies for OT.