Mean Angular Bias Research Articles

Comparison of tracheal temperature and core temperature measurement in living donor liver transplant recipients: a clinical comparative study

BackgroundBody temperature is a vital sign, and temperature monitoring during liver transplantation is important. Tracheal temperature can be measured via an endotracheal tube with a temperature sensor on the cuff of the tube. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and trending ability of tracheal temperature measurement compared to those of the core temperature measured at the esophagus and pulmonary artery (PA) in living donor liver transplant recipients.MethodsTwenty-two patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were enrolled. Patients were intubated using an endotracheal tube with a temperature sensor placed on the inner surface of the tube cuff. Tracheal, esophageal, and PA temperatures were recorded at five time points corresponding to the different phases of liver transplantation. The tracheal and esophageal, tracheal and PA, and esophageal and PA temperatures were compared using Bland–Altman analysis, four-quadrant plot/concordance analysis, and polar plot analysis.ResultsBland–Altman analysis showed an overall mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between tracheal and esophageal temperatures of -0.10 °C (-0.37 °C to 0.18 °C), with a percentage error of 0.27%; between tracheal and PA temperatures, -0.05 °C (-0.91 °C to 0.20 °C), with a percentage error of -0.15%; and between esophageal and PA temperatures, 0.04 °C (-0.27 °C to 0.35 °C), with a percentage error of 0.12%. The concordance rates between tracheal and esophageal temperatures, tracheal and PA temperatures, and esophageal and PA temperatures were 96.2%, 96.2%, and 94.94%, respectively. The polar plot analysis showed a mean angular bias (radial limits of agreement) of 4° (26°), -3° (13°), and 2° (21°).ConclusionsMonitoring core temperature at the inner surface of the endotracheal tube cuff is accurate in all phases of LDLT with good trending ability; thus, it can be an excellent alternative for monitoring during LDLTs.

Comparison of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and plethysmographic variability index in pediatric patients undergoing craniotomy

Objective To compare well-known preload dynamic parameters intraoperatively including stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and plethysmographic variability index (PVI) in children who underwent craniotomy for epileptogenic lesion excision. Methods A total of 30 children aged 0 to 14 years undergoing craniotomy for intracranial epileptogenic lesion excision were enrolled. During surgery, we measured PPV, SVV (measured by the Flotrac/Vigileo device), and PVI (measured by the Masimo Radical-7 monitor) simultaneously and continuously. Preload dynamic parameter measurements were collected at predefined steps: after induction of anesthesia, during opening the skull, intraoperative electroencephalogram monitoring, excision of epileptogenic lesion, skull closure, at the end of the operation. After exclusion of outliers, agreement among SVV, PPV, and PVI was assessed using repeated measures of Bland-Altman approach. The 4-quadrant and polar plot techniques were used to assess the trending ability among the changes in the three parameters. Results The mean SVV, PPV, and PVI were 8%±2%, 10%±3%, and 15%±7%, respectively during surgery. We analyzed a total of 834 paired measurements (3 to 8 data sets for each phase per patient). Repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis identified a bias of -2.3 and 95% confidence intervals between -1.9 and -2.7 (95% limits of agreement between -6.0 and 1.5) between PPV and SVV, showing significant correlation at all periods. The bias between PPV and PVI was -5.0 with 95% limits of agreement between -20.5 and 10.5, and that between SVV and PVI was -7.5 with 95% limits of agreement between -22.7 and 7.8, both not showing significant correlation. Reflected by 4-quadrant plots, the con-cordance rates showing the trending ability between the changes in PPV and SVV, PPV and PVI, SVV and PVI were 88.6%, 50.4%, and 50.1%, respectively. The concordance rate between PPV and SVV was higher (92.7%) in children aged less than 3 years compared with those aged 3 and more than 3 years. The mean angular bias, radial limits of agreement, and angular concordance rate in the polar analysis were not clinically acceptable in the changes between arterial pressure waveform-based parameters and volume-based PVI (PPV vs. PVI: angular mean bias 8.4°, angular concordance rate 29.9%; SVV vs. PVI: angular mean bias 2.4°, angular concordance rate 29.1%). There was a high concordance between the two arterial pressure waveform-based parameters reflected by the polar plot (angular mean bias -0.22°, angular concordance rate 86.6%). Conclusion PPV can be viewed as a surrogate for SVV, especially in children aged less than 3 years. The agreement between arterial pressure waveform-based preload parameters (PPV and SVV) and PVI is poor and these two should not be considered interchangeable. Attempt to combine PVI and PPV for improving the anesthesiologist's ability to monitor cardiac preload in major pediatric surgery is warranted.

Bioreactance Cardiac Output Trending Ability in Preterm Infants: A Single Centre, Longitudinal Study

Introduction: It is unknown whether bioreactance (BR) can accurately track cardiac output (CO) changes in preterm neonates. Methods: A prospective observational longitudinal study was performed in stable preterm infants (<37 weeks) during the first 72 h of life. Stroke volume (SV) and CO, as measured by BR and transthoracic echocardiography, were compared. Results: The mean gestational age (GA) was 31.3 weeks and mean birth weight (BW) was 1,563 g. Overall, 690 measurements were analysed for trending ability by 4-quadrant and polar plots. For non-weight-indexed measurements, 377 (54.6%) lay outside the 5% exclusion zone, the concordance rate was poor (77.2%) with a high mean angular bias (28.6°), wide limits of agreement and a poor angular concordance rate (17.4%). Neither GA, BW nor respiratory support mode affected trending data. Patent ductus arteriosus, postnatal age, and CO level had variable effects on trending data. Trending data for 5 and 10% exclusion zones were also compared. Conclusion: The ability of BR to track changes in CO is not interchangeable with CO changes as measured by echocardiography. BR, as a trend monitor for changes in CO or SV to determine clinical decisions around interventions in neonatology, should be used with caution.

Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to detect stroke volume index: Estimated continuous cardiac output estimated by modified pulse wave transit time and measured by an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.

Estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO), a non-invasive technique for continuously measuring cardiac output (CO), is based on modified pulse wave transit time, which is determined by pulse oximetry and electrocardiography. We examined the ability of esCCO to detect stroke volume index (SVI) and changes in SVI compared with currently available arterial waveform analysis methods. We retrospectively reanalysed 15 of the cases from our previous study on esCCO measurement. SVI was calculated using an esCCO system, measured using the arterial pressure-based CO (APCO) method, and compared with a corresponding intermittent bolus thermodilution CO (ICO) method. Percentage error measurement and statistical methods, including concordance analysis and polar plot analysis, were performed. The difference in the SVI values between esCCO and ICO was -3.0 ± 8.8 ml (percentage error, 33.5%). The mean angular bias was 0.8 and the radial limits of agreement were ± 27.3. The difference in the SVI values between APCO and ICO was 0.9 ± 11.2 ml (percentage error, 42.6%). The mean angular bias was -6.8 and the radial limits of agreement were ± 44.1. This study demonstrated that the accuracy, precision, and dynamic trend of esCCO are better than those of APCO.

Evaluating a Dynamic Trend in the Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output Calibrated With Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods.

This study compared the estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) system and an arterial pressure-based CO (APCO) system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the dynamic trend of the esCCO calibrated with an invasive and non-invasive method. We retrospectively identified 12 cases with complete data for the two calibration methods. Two calibration methods were analysed and compared with APCO using polar plots. Polar plotting revealed that the mean angular bias was 10.0°, and the radial limit of agreement was 37.1° when calibrated with the invasive method, while the mean angular bias was 3.5°, and the radial limit of agreement was 28.3° with the non-invasive method. This study suggested that the accuracy of a dynamic trend of esCCO may not be affected by the calibration methods, and the esCCO measurement by the non-invasive calibration method may be an effective device similar to that by the invasive calibration method.

Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in a porcine model using the inspired sinewave technique: a proof-of-concept study

BackgroundCardiac output (Q˙) monitoring can support the management of high-risk surgical patients, but the pulmonary artery catheterisation required by the current ‘gold standard’—bolus thermodilution (Q˙T)—has the potential to cause life-threatening complications. We present a novel noninvasive and fully automated method that uses the inspired sinewave technique to continuously monitor cardiac output (Q˙IST). MethodsOver successive breaths the inspired nitrous oxide (N2O) concentration was forced to oscillate sinusoidally with a fixed mean (4%), amplitude (3%), and period (60 s). Q˙IST was determined in a single-compartment tidal ventilation lung model that used the resulting amplitude/phase of the expired N2O sinewave. The agreement and trending ability of Q˙IST were compared with Q˙T during pharmacologically induced haemodynamic changes, before and after repeated lung lavages, in eight anaesthetised pigs. ResultsBefore lung lavage, changes in Q˙IST and Q˙T from baseline had a mean bias of –0.52 L min−1 (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.41 to –0.63). The concordance between Q˙IST and Q˙T was 92.5% as assessed by four-quadrant analysis, and polar plot analysis revealed a mean angular bias of 5.98° (95% CI, –24.4°–36.3°). After lung lavage, concordance was slightly reduced (89.4%), and the mean angular bias widened to 21.8° (–4.2°, 47.6°). Impaired trending ability correlated with shunt fraction (r=0.79, P<0.05). ConclusionsThe inspired sinewave technique provides continuous and noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output, with a ‘marginal–good’ trending ability compared with cardiac output based on thermodilution. However, the trending ability can be reduced with increasing shunt fraction, such as in acute lung injury.

A preliminary study evaluating cardiac output measurement using Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) in anaesthetized dogs

BackgroundHaemodynamic variations normally occur in anaesthetized animals, in relation to the animal status, administered drugs, sympathetic and parasympathetic tone, fluid therapy and surgical stimulus. The possibility to measure some cardiovascular parameters, such as cardiac output (CO), during anaesthesia would be beneficial for both the anaesthesia management and its outcome. New techniques for the monitoring of CO are aimed at finding methods which are non invasive, accurate and with good trending ability, which can be used in a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to compare the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) with the pulmonary artery thermodilution (TD) for the measurement of cardiac output in 6 anaesthetized critically ill dogs.ResultsFifty-four pairs of CO measurements were obtained with a median (range) of 3.33 L/min (0.81–7.21) for PRAM-CO and 3.48 L/min (1.41–6.56) for TD-CO. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.17 L/min with limits of agreement (LoA) of − 0.46 to 0.81 L/min. The percentage error resulted 18.2%. The 4-quadrant plot analysis showed an acceptable concordance (93%) between the 2 methods. The polar plot showed a good trending ability with the mean angular bias of 3.9° and radial LoA ± 12.1°.ConclusionsThe PRAM resulted in good precision, acceptable concordance and good trending ability for the measure of CO in the anaesthetized dog, representing a promising alternative to thermodilution for the measurement of CO. Among all the pulse contour methods available on the market it is the only one that does not require any calibration or adjustment of the measurement. Further studies are required to verify the ability of this method to accurately measure cardiac output even during unstable hemodynamic conditions.

Performance of a second generation pulmonary capnotracking system for continuous monitoring of cardiac output.

Technologies for minimally-invasive cardiac output measurement in patients during surgery remain little used in routine practice. We tested a redeveloped system based on CO2 elimination (VCO2) by the lungs for use in ventilated patients, which can be seamlessly integrated into a modern anesthesia/monitoring platform, and provides automated, continuous breath-by-breath cardiac output monitoring. A prototype measurement system was constructed to measure VCO2 and end-tidal CO2 concentration with each breath. A baseline measurement of non-shunt cardiac output was made during a brief oscillating change in ventilator rate, according to the differential CO2 Fick approach and repeated at 5-10min intervals. Continuous breath-by-breath monitoring of cardiac output was performed between these intervals from measurement of VCO2, using a derivation of the Fick equation applied to pulmonary CO2 elimination and cardiac output displayed in real time. Measurements were compared with simultaneous measurements by thermodilution in 50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery or liver transplantation. Overall mean bias [sd] for agreement in cardiac output measurement was - 0.3 [1.1] L/min, percentage error ± 38.7%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91. Concordance in measurement of changes of at least 15% in cardiac output was 81.4%, with a mean angular bias of - 1.7°, and radial limits of agreement of ± 76.2° on polar plot analysis. The accuracy and precision compared favourably to other clinical techniques. The method is relatively seamless and automated and has potential for continuous, cardiac output monitoring in ventilated patients during anesthesia and critical care.

A novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment in a porcine model of lung lavage.

We have evaluated a new method for continuous monitoring of effective pulmonary blood flow (COEPBF ), i.e. cardiac output (CO) minus intra-pulmonary shunt, during mechanical ventilation. The method has shown good trending ability during severe hemodynamic challenges in a porcine model with intact lungs. In this study, we further evaluate the COEPBF method in a model of lung lavage. COEPBF was compared to a reference method for CO during hemodynamic and PEEP alterations, 5 and 12cmH2 O, before and after repeated lung lavages in 10 anaesthetised pigs. Bland-Altman, four-quadrant and polar plot methodologies were used to determine agreement and trending ability. After lung lavage at PEEP 5cmH2 O, the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure related to inspired fraction of oxygen significantly decreased. The mean difference (limits of agreement) between methods changed from 0.2 (-1.1 to 1.5) to -0.9 (-3.6 to 1.9)l/min and percentage error increased from 34% to 70%. Trending ability remained good according to the four-quadrant plot (concordance rate 94%), whereas mean angular bias increased from 4° to -16° when using the polar plot methodology. Both agreement and precision of COEPBF were impaired in relation to CO when the shunt fraction was increased after lavage at PEEP 5cmH2 O. However, trending ability remained good as assessed by the four-quadrant plot, whereas the mean polar angle, calculated by the polar plot, was wide.

Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to examine the ability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system to measure cardiac output (CO) and track changes in CO induced by increased vasomotor tone, under different states of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). MethodsForty patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled. Haemodynamic variables including CO measured by the Vigileo-FloTrac system (version 3.02) (APCO), CO measured by a pulmonary artery catheter (ICO), and SVR index (SVRI) were recorded before (T1) and 2 min after (T2) phenylephrine administration (100 μg). Bland and Altman analysis was used to compare ICO and APCO at T1. We used four-quadrant plots and polar plots to compare the trending abilities between ICO and APCO. Patients were divided into three groups according to the SVRI value at T1, with low (<1200 dyn cm−5 m2), normal (1200–2500 dyn cm−5 m2), and high (>2500 dyn cm−5 m2) SVRI states. ResultsA total of 155 paired data were collected. The adjusted percentage error was 46.3%, 26.4%, and 61.4%, and the concordance rate between ΔICO and ΔAPCO was 67.5%, 28.8%, and 7.7% in the low, normal, and high SVRI state, respectively. The polar plot analysis showed that the mean angular bias was −22.3°, −46.0°, and −3.51°, and the radial limits of agreement were 70°, 85°, and 87°, in the low, normal, and high SVRI state, respectively. ConclusionsThese results indicate that the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system to measure CO and track changes in CO induced by phenylephrine administration was not clinically acceptable.

Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method

Non-invasive cardiac output measurement by means of impedance cardiography has been evaluated before, and agreement with other methods has been variable. We decided to study a newly developed tracheal impedance device, that is claimed to be more accurate and reliable. This incorporates new software and mathematical formulae, that are designed to reduce signal noise from diathermy, leading to improved accuracy. In 25 cardiothoracic surgery patients, simultaneous measurements were performed using both pulmonary artery thermodilution and the tracheal impedance device, at five peri-operative time points: before skin incision; after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass; after sternal closure; and 30 min and 2 h after arrival in the intensive care unit. Mean cardiac output, bias and 95% limits of agreement were 5.3, 0.03 and -2.8 to 2.8 l.min(-1) , respectively. Tracheal impedance showed good correlation with measurement trends using thermodilution in 88% of measurements, with a mean (95% limit of agreement) angular bias of -9.0° (-83.3 to 65.3°). However, the wide limits of agreement and high percentage error of 53% that were apparent in this study mean that, in its present guise, tracheal impedance is not an acceptable alternative to thermodilution in cardiac surgical patients.