MDM2 Immunohistochemistry Research Articles

MDM2 Gene Amplification and Expression of MDM2 and CDK4 are Rare in Ossifying Fibroma of Craniofacial Bones.

Ossifying fibroma of the craniofacial bones is a fibro-osseous lesion characterized by varied patterns of bone formation in a fibroblastic stroma. Ossifying fibroma is a putatively benign lesion with no reports of malignant transformation or metastasis. Differentiation from other fibro-osseous lesions can be challenging necessitating synthesis of clinical, radiological and pathological findings. The molecular pathogenesis of ossifying fibroma is poorly understood but recent studies have reported MDM2 gene amplification and chromosomal copy number changes in a subset of ossifying fibromas. MDM2 amplification in ossifying fibroma, if true, presents a diagnostic problem because this genetic event, at least among craniofacial fibro-osseous lesions, was previously considered specific for low-grade osteosarcoma. In the present study, we investigated the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification, in the diagnosis of 44 craniofacial bone ossifying fibromas. Focal MDM2 and CDK4 nuclear immunoreactivity was found in 11 and 1 ossifying fibromas, respectively, but none demonstrated MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A single tumor displayed MDM2 amplification without nuclear immunoreactivity to either MDM2 or CDK4. Our data suggest that while focal MDM2 and CDK4 nuclear expression may be detected in a minority of ossifying fibromas, this expression does not correlate with MDM2 amplification. In addition, MDM2 amplification is extremely rare in ossifying fibroma so the detection of this genetic abnormality should continue to raise concern for osteosarcoma.

MDM2 amplification in malignant Brenner tumors may play a role in progression to malignancy and aid in separation from urothelial and other ovarian carcinomas

Malignant Brenner tumor (MBT) is diagnosed in the setting of invasive high-grade carcinoma with urothelial-like morphology and the presence of an adjacent benign Brenner tumor (BBT) or borderline Brenner tumor (BLBT). MDM2 amplification was recently detected by next-generation sequencing on a small number of MBTs, potentially significant for future targeted therapy. Experience is limited, however, and evaluation of widely available MDM2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has not been performed to determine clinical utility. After confirming all diagnoses morphologically and immunohistochemically, we performed MDM2 IHC on 4 MBTs, 3 BLBTs, 26 BBTs, 142 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 6 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas (OEC) with urothelial-like morphology, and 49 high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). MDM2 IHC was considered positive with diffuse (>25%) nuclear reactivity; in cases of patchy staining (10-25% nuclear reactivity), MDM2 was considered equivocal. Positive staining in <10% of cells was considered negative. In cases with positive or equivocal staining, MDM2 amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Three MBTs (75%) showed diffuse nuclear reactivity for MDM2 by IHC, a finding corroborated by amplification of MDM2 in all three cases. One MBT and 2 BLBTs showed equivocal MDM2 IHC, but all three were negative for MDM2 amplification. The final BLBT, as well as all BBTs, HGSC, OEC, and HGUC, were negative for MDM2. In conclusion, our limited cohort confirms MDM2 amplification in MBT and suggests that MDM2 IHC may have an influence in rare diagnostically challenging cases.

The Utility of MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry and MDM2 FISH in Craniofacial Osteosarcoma.

Craniofacial osteosarcoma is rare (2-10% of all osteosarcomas). Most low grade fibroblastic osteosarcomas of the long bones are characterized by amplification of chromosome12q including MDM2 and CDK4 genes. This study aims to investigate the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunostains as well as MDM2 FISH in craniofacial osteosarcomas as a means of distinguishing them from benign fibro-osseous lesions. Cases of primary osteosarcoma and benign fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial bones were identified in the diagnostic pathology archives. MDM2 (SMP14 and/or IF2) and CDK4 (D9G3E and/or DCS-31) immunostains were performed on a representative block from each osteosarcoma and benign case. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MDM2 was performed on non-decalcified osteosarcomas. In osteosarcomas, the rate of expression of either MDM2 IF2, MDM2 SMP14, CDK4 DCS-31, or CDK4 D9G3E was 72.7% (8/11 cases), usually focal and weak. Using the MDM2 IF2 clone and the CDK4 DCS-31 clone, MDM2 and CDK4 were negative in lesional cells in all 14 benign fibro-osseous lesions. Using the IF2 and SMP14 clones, MDM2 nuclear expression was present in associated osteoclast-like giant cells in both benign and malignant cases. Of 4 successful cases, 1 high grade osteosarcoma was positive for MDM2 amplification. MDM2 or CDK4 expression or MDM2 amplification may aid in a diagnosis of head and neck osteosarcoma. However, when absent, sarcoma is not excluded. Due to focal weak expression of MDM2 in tumor cells in conjunction with nuclear expression in associated giant cells, caution should be exercised when interpreting positive stains.

A tüdőartériák intimájából kiinduló sarcoma

Pulmonary arterial intimal sarcoma is a rare tumour with high mortality. Due to its localisation, the symptoms can mimic pulmonary thromboembolism and pneumonia, therefore assessing the diagnosis and choosing the adequate therapy is never easy. Its therapy mainly consists of surgery combined with radiochemotherapy. A 46-year-old male patient with testicular seminoma, pulmonary embolism, bronchial asthma and pollen allergy in his history had a follow-up thoracic CT. On the left side of the lung, a pleura-infiltrating 7-8 cm lesion, which occluded the pulmonary artery, was described. The first biopsy specimen showed fragments of spindle cell tumour. The primary diagnosis was leiomyoma, leiomyomatous hyperplasia, yet the presence of leiomyosarcoma could not have been ruled out. Due to the arterial obstruction, the patient underwent left sided pulmonectomy. Histological examination showed a tumour mostly composed of spindle cells that were diffusely positive with SMA, focally diffuse with MDM2 immunohistochemistry together with high proliferation activity. h-Caldesmon, S-100, ERG and pancytokeratin expressions were not detected. With fluorescent in situ hybridization 10% of tumour cells showed polysomy and MDM2 amplification. According to the results, high-grade pulmonary arterial intimal sarcoma diagnosis has been made. The precise incidence of pulmonary arterial intimal sarcoma is unknown. Some literature data suggest it can be the cause of chronic pulmonary hypertension in 1-4% of the cases. Weight loss can draw attention to the malignant nature of the disease. Imaging techniques and histology are the gold standard in setting the diagnosis. The prognosis is poor. Early recognition and surgery combined with chemotherapy can prolong survival. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(6): 232-236.

MDM2 RNA In Situ Hybridization for the Diagnosis of Atypical Lipomatous Tumor: A Study Evaluating DNA, RNA, and Protein Expression.

The distinction of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) from its benign counterpart, lipoma, may represent a challenge. MDM2 DNA amplification is used as the gold standard as MDM2 immunohistochemistry lacks specificity and sensitivity. Herein, we investigate the diagnostic utility of MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) and compare the test with MDM2 immunohistochemistry and MDM2 DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in benign and malignant lipomatous neoplasms. We evaluated 109 neoplasms including 27 lipomas, 25 spindle cell lipomas, 32 ALTs/WDLs, and 25 dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDL). The validation cohort included 14 lipoma-like neoplasms that lacked unequivocal features of ALT/WDL and in which MDM2 immunohistochemistry was either equivocal, negative or falsely positive. Immunohistochemistry, automated RNA-ISH and DNA-FISH for MDM2 were performed. Tumors with diffuse nuclear staining or >50 dots per cell on RNA-ISH were considered positive. All lipomas and lipoma variants were negative for RNA-ISH while all ALTs/WDLs and DDLs were positive. Eighty percent (24/30) and 92% (22/24) of ALTs/WDLs and DDLs were positive for MDM2 immunohistochemistry. Lipomas and its variants were negative for MDM2 amplification; 92% and 100% of ALTs/WDLs and DDLs showed MDM2 DNA amplification. The mean percentage of ALT/WDL tumor cells showing MDM2 RNA-ISH positivity was 73% compared with 24% on MDM2 immunohistochemistry. RNA-ISH correctly classified all 10 ALTs/WDLs and all 4 lipomas in the validation cohort. The performance of MDM2 RNA-ISH and MDM2 DNA-FISH are equivalent. MDM2 RNA-ISH can be of diagnostic value in histologically challenging lipomatous neoplasms. The automated MDM2 RNA-ISH assay should allow for more widespread use of MDM2 testing and for a more sensitive and specific diagnosis of ALT/WDL.

Hibernoma Mimicking Atypical Lipomatous Tumor: 64 Cases of a Morphologically Distinct Subset.

Hibernoma is a benign adipocytic tumor with predilection for subcutaneous tissue of the thigh, upper trunk, and neck of middle-aged adults. 11q13 rearrangement resulting in MEN1/AIP codeletion is characteristic. Hibernomas are composed, in varying proportions, of brown fat cells, mature adipocytes, and microvacuolated lipoblast-like cells. Examples containing predominantly multivacuolated lipoblast-like cells are uncommon and distinction from atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) is important for clinical management. We herein present the clinicopathologic features of 64 hibernomas histologically mimicking ALT. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry as well as MDM2 fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed in a subset of cases. Clinical and follow-up information were obtained from referring pathologists. Thirty-four patients were male and 30 female, with a median age of 43 years (range, 24 to 78 y). The tumors were well circumscribed and mostly deeply located (53/64 cases, 83%) with a median tumor size of 12.9 cm (range, 3.5 to 23 cm) and predilection for the thigh (42/64 cases, 66%). Histologically, large cells with prominent lipoblast-like cytoplasmic fatty vacuoles and small central nuclei were present to a prominent degree in all cases, along with mature univacuolated adipocytes and smaller numbers of large, finely vacuolated cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm. Nuclear atypia and mitoses were absent. None of the 39 cases tested showed CDK4 and MDM2 overexpression or MDM2 amplification. Follow-up, available for 16/64 cases (median, 47 mo; range, 1 to 165 mo), revealed no recurrences or metastases. Hibernoma mimicking ALT shows predilection for deep soft tissue, especially in the thigh. These tumors behave in a benign manner and MDM2/CDK4 negativity may be useful in excluding ALT.

Lipomas of the Oral Cavity: Utility of MDM2 and CDK4 in Avoiding Overdiagnosis as Atypical Lipomatous Tumor.

Traumatized lipomas with degenerative change may demonstrate histopathologic features that mimic atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT). Previously reported series of ALT involving the oral cavity preceded routine use of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry. Our aim is to evaluate MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemical expression in adipocytic tumors arising in this site, in conjunction with the histiocytic marker PU.1, to determine whether MDM2 and CDK4 impacts classification. 17 cases originally diagnosed as ALT were retrieved and immunohistochemical studies for MDM2, CDK4 and PU.1 were performed. FISH analysis for MDM2 amplification was performed in select cases. For this study group, the male:female ratio was 9:8 and the median age was 62 (range 41-88). All 17 cases presented as well- or predominantly well-circumscribed proliferations of variably sized, mature adipocytes exhibiting uni- or multi-vacuolation with occasional scalloped nuclei and mild nuclear atypia. Variable amounts of fibrous stroma with focal myxoid change and bland spindle cells were identified in 14/17 cases. Lipoblasts or atypical hyperchromatic stromal cells were not identified in any cases. 14 of 17 cases were negative for MDM2 and CDK4 in tumor cells and 11 of these 14 showed weak nuclear positivity for MDM2 in histiocytes. 3 of 17 cases showed weak, multifocal immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 and CDK4. PU.1 highlighted histiocytes in all 17 cases. FISH analysis for MDM2 amplification was negative in all 3 cases with weak MDM2/CDK4 expression. All cases were reclassified as lipoma with degenerative changes. ALT, in all likelihood, is less common than previously thought in this anatomic location and best diagnosed with ancillary studies. MDM2 expression in histiocytes is best interpreted in conjunction with CDK4 immunohistochemistry and confirmatory FISH for MDM2 amplification.

PENILAIAN EKSPRESI PROTEIN MDM2 DAN P53 SEBAGAI PREDIKTOR RESPON RADIOTERAPI PADA KANKER SERVIKS

Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy in Indonesia, and most of cases were already in advanced stage where radiotherapy is a tratement to given. Apoptosis is one of the markers for survival assessment of therapeutic response. In animal experiments MDM2 expression in various cell types to act as a survival factor by inhibiting the apoptotic function of p53 that is played by apoptosis can lead to malignant transformation and result in resistance to radiotherapy. Therefore, MDM2 is overexpressed due to alleged damage to p53 can also be used to assess the success of radiotherapy. This study aimed to assess the expression of MDM2 and p53 immunohistochemistry in cervical cancer and its relation to radiotherapy response. This study is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive. The sample consisted of 23 cases of advanced cervical cancer were biopsied, 17 cases with complete response to radiation and 6 cases of partial radiation response. This study showed complete radiotherapy group MDM2 expression was found in 70.59% (12 cases) and p53 expression was found in 94.11% (16 cases), while the expression of MDM2, a partial response was found in 100% (6 cases), while the expression p53 66.67% (4 cases). MDM2 and p53 expression with SPSS 16 chi square test showed no association with response to radiotherapy in cervical cancer.

MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry: Should It Be Used in Problematic Differentiated Lipomatous Tumors?: A New Perspective.

Although most cases of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDL) can be diagnosed solely on the basis of histologic features, those lacking diagnostic histologic features require ancillary studies for accurate classification. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for amplification of MDM2 has been considered the gold standard for diagnosis in these situations. Immunostaining for MDM2 and/or CDK4 has been adopted as a surrogate method because of its high concordance rate with FISH and lower cost. However, studies examining the concordance of the 2 methods have been based preferentially on cases in which the diagnosis could be established histologically. No study has explored the concordance between the 2 methods in histologically ambiguous cases or in cases in which the diagnosis of ALT/WDL is not apparent after a review of all slides. To address this, we performed immunostaining for MDM2 and CDK4 on 183 well-differentiated lipomatous tumors that could not be diagnosed on purely histologic grounds and that were, therefore, subjected to FISH analysis. These included ALT/WDLs (n=56), lipomas (n=96), and lipoma variants (n=31). Staining for MDM2 and CDK4 was noted in 25/56 and 23/56 ALT/WDL, respectively, giving a sensitivity of 45% and 41% and a specificity of 98% and 92%. Staining was noted exclusively in the nuclei of atypical cells and not in the nuclei of adipocytes. Staining for MDM2 and CDK4 occurred in 2/125 and 10/117 benign lipomatous lesions, respectively. False-positive staining was equivalent in intensity to ALT/WDL. We conclude that MDM2 and CDK4 staining is a relatively insensitive method for diagnosing ALT/WDL in cases that are histologically ambiguous, as staining is restricted to neoplastic cells with atypia that are underrepresented in these cases. Therefore, in cases like ours that closely simulate clinical practice, FISH is the more reliable and cost-effective option.

Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry

The differential diagnosis between atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) from their morphologic counterparts is challenging. Currently, the diagnosis is guided by MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and is confirmed by the amplification of the corresponding genes. Recently, p16 IHC has been proposed as a useful diagnostic biomarker. The objective was to assess the utility of p16 IHC in the differential diagnosis of ALT/WDLPS and DDLPS. Our series included 101 tumors that were previously analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 and CDK4 amplification. We compared sensitivity and specificity of p16 IHC to MDM2 and CDK4 IHC in the differential diagnosis of ALT-WDLPS (n=19) versus benign adipocytic tumors (n=44) and DDLPS (n=18) versus mimicking sarcomas (n=20). In the differential diagnosis of ALT-WDLPS, p16 had a sensitivity of 89.5% but a specificity of 68.2%, which was impaired by false-positive lipomas with secondary changes, especially in biopsies. Likewise, in the differential diagnosis of DDLPS, p16 had a sensitivity of 94.4% and a specificity of 70%, which hampered its use as a single marker. However, adding p16 to MDM2 and/or CDK4 increased diagnostic specificity. Indeed, MDM2+/p16+ tumors were all ALT-WDLPS, and MDM2-/p16- tumors were all benign adipocytic tumors. Moreover, all MDM2+/CDK4+/p16+ tumors were DDLPS, and the MDM2-/CDK4-/p16- tumor was an undifferentiated sarcoma. Although the use of p16 as a single immunohistochemical marker is limited by its specificity, its combination with MDM2 and CDK4 IHC may help discriminate ALT-WDLPS/DDLPS.

Pericytic mimicry in well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumor

Pericytes are modified smooth muscle cells that closely enwrap small blood vessels, regulating and supporting the microvasculature through direct endothelial contact. Pericytes demonstrate a distinct immunohistochemical profile, including expression of smooth muscle actin, CD146, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β, and regulator of G-protein signaling 5. Previously, pericyte-related antigens have been observed to be present among a group of soft tissue tumors with a perivascular growth pattern, including glomus tumor, myopericytoma, and angioleiomyoma. Similarly, malignant tumor cells have been shown to have a pericyte-like immunoprofile when present in a perivascular location, seen in malignant melanoma, glioblastoma, and adenocarcinoma. Here, we examine well-differentiated liposarcoma specimens, which showed some element of perivascular areas with the appearance of smooth muscle (n = 7 tumors). Immunohistochemical staining was performed for pericyte antigens, including smooth muscle actin, CD146, platelet-derived growth factor receptor β, and regulator of G-protein signaling 5. Results showed consistent pericytic marker expression among liposarcoma tumor cells within a perivascular distribution. MDM2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 revealed that these perivascular cells were of tumor origin (7/7 tumors), whereas double immunohistochemical detection for CD31/CD146 ruled out an endothelial cell contribution. These findings further support the concept of pericytic mimicry, already established in diverse malignancies, and its presence in well-differentiated liposarcoma. The extent to which pericytic mimicry has prognostic significance in liposarcoma is as yet unknown.

MDM2 Immunohistochemistry and Outcome in Feline Injection Site Sarcomas with Known P53 Status

MDM2 Immunohistochemistry and Outcome in Feline Injection Site Sarcomas with Known P53 Status

Immunohistochemical expression of p16 in lipoblastomas

Lipoblastoma (LB) is a rare benign adipocytic tumor of childhood occasionally showing histological similarities to myxoid liposarcoma (ML) or well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL). p16 immunohistochemistry has proved to be useful in distinguishing various types of liposarcomas, in particular WDL from lipoma, with higher sensitivity and specificity than MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry. In this study, we reported the histologic features of a series of 30 LB with emphasis on the potential diagnostic pitfalls and investigated the immunohistochemical expression of p16. Moreover, p16 immunostaining was performed in 16 liposarcomas (11 WDL and 5 ML), 16 lipomas, and 16 cases of liponecrosis in order to evaluate its usefulness in the differential diagnosis of challenging lesions occurring in older children. Overall, p16 immunostaining was positive in 3 LBs and in 12 out of 16 liposarcomas (10 WDL and 2 ML), with a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 80%, and a negative predictive value of 87%. All lipomas were p16 negative, whereas 5 liponecroses were positive. Accounting altogether the benign lesions versus liposarcomas, p16 showed a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 87%, a positive predictive value of 60%, and a negative predictive value of 93%. Our data suggest that a negative p16 immunostaining may be helpful in excluding a liposarcoma when occurring in unusual clinical contexts, such as in adolescence or late recurrence. However, such finding should be interpreted with caution since also some liposarcomas lack p16 and occasional LBs are positive.

Overexpression and amplification of Murine double minute 2 as a diagnostic tool in large lipomatous tumor and its correlation with Ki67 proliferation index: an institutional experience.

Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is the most common type of liposarcoma and sometimes can be difficult to distinguish from large lipoma due to the similar morphology. This study proposed to evaluate the expression and amplification of Murine double minute 2 (MDM2) gene and determine its correlation with Ki67 proliferation index. This study used cross-sectional design. This study enrolled 37 cases of lipomatous tumors with >5 cm in size. Eighteen cases of WDLPS and 19 cases of lipoma were stained for MDM2 and Ki67 immunohistochemistry, followed by MDM2 in situ hybridization in 12 selected cases. MDM2 overexpression and amplification status for both groups were compared using Chi-square test, with the alternative of Fisher's exact test. Correlation test between MDM2 overexpression and clinical characteristics with the Ki67 proliferation index were performed using Pearson's test with the alternative of Spearman's rho test. MDM2 overexpression was detected in all WDLPS cases and in 3 (16%) of lipoma cases with significance difference (P = 0.000), whereas MDM2 amplification was found in all WDLPS and in 1 of lipoma cases (P = 0.200). There was a strong correlation between MDM2 overexpression and higher Ki67 proliferation index (r = 0.645, P = 0.000). Evaluation of MDM2 overexpression can be used as a useful adjunct to differentiate WDLPS from large lipoma and seems to be related with Ki67 proliferation index.

Pleomorphic fibroma and dermal atypical lipomatous tumor: are they related?

Pleomorphic fibromas represent dome-shaped or polypoid cutaneous lesions characterized by a paucicellular and densely fibrotic background punctuated by scattered atypical to pleomorphic spindle and multinucleated giant cells. Some of these tumors will have incorporated adipose tissue, although these adipocytic areas lack distinct cytologic atypia and may represent entrapped normal periadnexal or subcutaneous adipose tissue. Nonetheless, owing to the similarity of some of the morphologic features of pleomorphic fibroma with cutaneous atypical lipomatous tumor, diagnostic confusion can ensue. The potential diagnostic challenges are further highlighted by a recent report of a lesion with histopathologic features of both. In response, we studied the presence of 12q15/ MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and MDM2 expression by immunohistochemistry in a series of 15 pleomorphic fibromas to investigate whether these two entities share a common pathogenic origin. One case of cutaneous atypical lipomatous tumor was used as positive control for 12q15 amplification. All 15 cases were negative for MDM2 by immunohistochemistry with no demonstrable 12q15/MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Therefore, these two entities are best regarded as pathogenetically distinct. MDM2 immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization studies can be used to differentiate between the two if needed.

MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemical Coexpression in High-grade Osteosarcoma

Low-grade osteosarcomas comprise a distinct subset of osteosarcomas. They may occasionally dedifferentiate into high-grade tumors, typically in the form of high-grade osteosarcoma, which are histologically indistinguishable from conventional osteosarcomas. MDM2 and CDK4 are often amplified in low-grade osteosarcomas and their dedifferentiated counterparts, and the encoded proteins are accordingly overexpressed. As MDM2/CDK4 expression was reportedly rare in conventional osteosarcoma, we hypothesized that these markers may help separate dedifferentiated osteosarcoma from the conventional type. To test this, we performed MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry on 81 primary and 26 recurrent/metastatic high-grade osteosarcomas and correlated these data with the histology of the primary resection material, with particular attention to the potential presence of any coexisting low-grade osteosarcomatous components. MDM2 and CDK4 coexpression was identified in 7 cases, and on careful histologic review 6 of them were discovered to contain foci of coexisting low-grade elements. One case was a known dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma, and the remaining 5 cases were newly identified dedifferentiated osteosarcomas in which the limited low-grade components were originally unrecognized. An additional 11 cases expressed either marker alone, whereas the remaining 89 cases were negative for both markers; no resection material from these 100 cases presented with a low-grade component. MDM2/CDK4 gene amplification status, determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in selected cases, was largely concordant with immunoexpression. Our data suggest that MDM2 and CDK4 coexpression in high-grade osteosarcomas is sensitive and specific to those that progressed from low-grade osteosarcomas, and immunohistochemistry may help identify this dedifferentiated subgroup to facilitate accurate subclassification.

The utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of lipomatous tumours and correlation with fluorescence in situ Hybridisation

<h3>Introduction</h3> Lipomas are characterised by balanced chromosomal rearrangements of 12q13-15 whilst well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumour (WDLPS/ALT) and dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS) have ring and giant chromosomes composed of amplified 12q13-15 sequences. The amplified gene products, (MDM2 and CDK4), detected by fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) or immunohistochemistry (IHC), can help distinguish lipoma from WDLPS/ALT, and DDLPS from other soft tissue tumours (STT). <h3>Objective</h3> To determine the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 IHC in the above scenario and compare IHC results with FISH. <h3>Methodology</h3> 61 lipomatous tumours and mimics were reviewed and subject to MDM and CDK4 FISH and IHC. Cases with MDM2 and/or CDK4/CEP12 signal ratio >1.5 were considered as FISH amplified and positive IHC was defined as strong nuclear staining of >1cells/HPF (x400) or moderate staining of >10% cells. <h3>Results</h3> 13 tumours were reclassified as lipoma, WDLPS or DDLPS from their original diagnoses. The sensitivity/specificity of MDM2 and CDK4 IHC for WDLPS versus lipoma was 0.80/0.91 and 0.40/1.0, respectively, and for DDLPS versus STT was 1.0/0.75 and 0.67/0.83. In three of 20 WDLPS cases and in one of six DDLPS, IHC was positive but FISH was negative. MDM2 and CDK4 IHC and FISH had 87% and 95% concordance, respectively. <h3>Discussion</h3> IHC and FISH sensitivity and specificity for MDM2 and CDK4 were comparable to those published in the literature. MDM2-IHC had better sensitivity but lower specificity than CDK4-IHC in the WDLPS versus lipoma group. Both were found complementary to each other and best results were obtained when IHC was used in conjunction with FISH. A similar trend was observed in the DDLPS versus STT group.

The utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of lipomatous tumours and correlation with fluorescence in situ hybridisation

Introduction Lipomas are characterised by balanced chromosomal rearrangements of 12q13-15 whilst well-differentiated liposarcoma/atypical lipomatous tumour (WDLPS/ALT) and dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS) have ring and giant chromosomes composed of amplified 12q13-15 sequences. The amplified gene products, (MDM2 and CDK4), detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or immunohistochemistry (IHC), can help distinguish lipoma from WDLPS/ALT, and DDLPS from other soft tissue tumours (STT). Objective To determine the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 IHC in the above scenario and compare IHC results with FISH. Methodology 61 lipomatous tumours and mimics were reviewed and subject to MDM and CDK4 FISH and IHC. Cases with MDM2and/or CDK4/CEP12 signal ratio >1.5 were considered as FISH amplified and positive IHC was defined as strong nuclear staining of >1cells/HPF (x400) or moderate staining of >10% cells. Results 13 tumours were reclassified as lipoma, WDLPS or DDLPS from their original diagnoses. The sensitivity/specificity of MDM2 and CDK4 IHC for WDLPS versus lipoma was 0.80/ 0.91 and 0.40/1.0, respectively, and for DDLPS versus STT was 1.0/0.75 and 0.67/0.83. In three of 20 WDLPS cases and in one of six DDLPS, IHC was positive but FISH was negative. MDM2 and CDK4 IHC and FISH had 87% and 95% concordance, respectively. Discussion IHC and FISH sensitivity and specificity for MDM2 and CDK4 were comparable to those published in the literature. 1–3 MDM2-IHC had better sensitivity but lower specificity than CDK4-IHC in the WDLPS versus lipoma group. Both were found complementary to each other and best results were obtained when IHC was used in conjunction with FISH. A similar trend was observed in the DDLPS versus STT group.

Immunohistochemical analysis of MDM2 and CDK4 distinguishes low-grade osteosarcoma from benign mimics

Parosteal osteosarcoma and low-grade central osteosarcoma are two types of low-grade osteosarcoma that show similar clinical behaviors, histological features, and genetic background (ie, amplified sequences of 12q13–15, including MDM2 and CDK4). Low-grade osteosarcoma is often confused with benign lesions, and ancillary techniques to enhance diagnostic accuracy have been awaited. This study explores the use of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry for the histological diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma. We studied 23 cases of low-grade osteosarcoma from 21 patients (parosteal osteosarcoma (n=14), low-grade central osteosarcoma (n=9)) and 40 cases of benign histological mimics (myositis ossificans (n=11), fibrous dysplasia (n=14), osteochondroma (n=6), desmoplastic fibroma (n=1), florid reactive periostitis (n=4), Nora's lesion (n=3), and turret exostosis (n=1)). Low-grade osteosarcoma labeled for MDM2 in 16 cases (70%) and for CDK4 in 20 cases (87%). All low-grade osteosarcomas expressed one or both markers (100%), with 13 cases (57%) expressing both. Staining pattern was diffuse in most cases, and the majority expressed moderate or strong intensity for either antibody. MDM2/CDK4 immunostaining was shown irrespective of low-grade osteosarcoma histological subtype. In contrast, only 1 Nora's lesion out of the 40 miscellaneous benign processes showed immunoreactivity for MDM2 or CDK4. The combination of these two markers thus shows 100% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity for the diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostains therefore reliably distinguish low-grade osteosarcoma from benign histological mimics, and their combination may serve as a useful adjunct in this difficult differential diagnosis.

Is it safe to utilize in vitro reconstituted human oral epithelium? An oncogenetic pathway study

Cell therapy is a therapeutic strategy used to replace or repair damaged tissue. The epithelium transplantation of cultivated keratinocytes has been applied to several modalities of reconstruction, like oral, urethra and ocular surface. Life and death signals work coordinately to ensure cellular quality control and the viability of an organism. The aim of this study is to verify that culture conditions did not induce genetic mutations through the analysis of the key genes: pAKT, Pten, p53 and MDM2 and investigate the presence of the related proteins in human oral keratinocytes obtained by primary culture and in vitro cultivated. Formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissues from the oral cavity were utilized as control for normal expression of the related markers and two oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines provided the expression pattern of the proposed markers in the event of cellular transformation. Akt, PTEN, p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry and Western-Blotting analyzes were performed. The results showed the expression levels and intracellular localizations of the four proteins evaluated. These analyzes confirmed that the produced in vitro epithelium is bio-compatible for its utilization as reconstruction and reparatory tissue, however further analyses and additional research on other biomarkers should be performed to analyse the long term engraftment of transplantable primary culture of oral keratinocytes and the long term resistance to cellular transformation.