MDM2 amplification in malignant Brenner tumors may play a role in progression to malignancy and aid in separation from urothelial and other ovarian carcinomas

Abstract

Malignant Brenner tumor (MBT) is diagnosed in the setting of invasive high-grade carcinoma with urothelial-like morphology and the presence of an adjacent benign Brenner tumor (BBT) or borderline Brenner tumor (BLBT). MDM2 amplification was recently detected by next-generation sequencing on a small number of MBTs, potentially significant for future targeted therapy. Experience is limited, however, and evaluation of widely available MDM2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has not been performed to determine clinical utility. After confirming all diagnoses morphologically and immunohistochemically, we performed MDM2 IHC on 4 MBTs, 3 BLBTs, 26 BBTs, 142 high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), 6 ovarian endometrioid carcinomas (OEC) with urothelial-like morphology, and 49 high-grade urothelial carcinomas (HGUC). MDM2 IHC was considered positive with diffuse (>25%) nuclear reactivity; in cases of patchy staining (10-25% nuclear reactivity), MDM2 was considered equivocal. Positive staining in <10% of cells was considered negative. In cases with positive or equivocal staining, MDM2 amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Three MBTs (75%) showed diffuse nuclear reactivity for MDM2 by IHC, a finding corroborated by amplification of MDM2 in all three cases. One MBT and 2 BLBTs showed equivocal MDM2 IHC, but all three were negative for MDM2 amplification. The final BLBT, as well as all BBTs, HGSC, OEC, and HGUC, were negative for MDM2. In conclusion, our limited cohort confirms MDM2 amplification in MBT and suggests that MDM2 IHC may have an influence in rare diagnostically challenging cases.