MBT Bracket Research Articles

Rotational Control and Retraction of Maxillary Canine Using Self-Ligating Empower Brackets: An In Vivo Study.

Interest in self-ligating brackets is generally smoother and more comfortable. To compare rate of retraction and rotational control of maxillary canines with self-ligating MBT brackets on one side and conventional MBT brackets on the other side of the maxillary arch. Ten subjects with a mean age range of 18 to 25 years were selected. For each patient in the maxillary arch, bonding was performed with 0.022-inch slot conventional MBT brackets on one side and 0.022-inch slot self-ligating MBT brackets on the other side. Stainless steel 0.009-inch ligatures are used for conventional ligation. Retraction of canines was performed with 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel wires using NiTi closed coil springs with eyelets of 12 mm and 9 mm. The force of retraction was measured using a dynamometer. Dental casts were made at each time interval to record the canine retraction rate (in mm) and rotation (in degrees). The mean difference in the retraction rate was 0.045 mm/month between self-ligating and conventional brackets, respectively (P > 0.05). The mean difference of total rotation of canines with self-ligating and conventional brackets was 1.5°, which gives evidence that there was less rotation of canines with self-ligating brackets. There was no statistically significant difference in canine retraction rates between conventional and self-ligating brackets. Secure ligation with the self-ligating brackets showed better rotational control than the conventional brackets.

A Review on Orthodontic Brackets and Their Application in Clinical Orthodontics.

Braces are undoubtedly a blessing for those whose teeth are misaligned in various ways, yet many people may not enjoy the traditional metal braces. However, some people are totally fine with having their teeth fused with the set of metal brackets and various metal components flowing through. A few people may simply not feel comfortable in that way. Orthodontists have developed a huge array of bracket styles by concentrating on the wide range of preferences and financial constraints that their patients present. These various dental bracket types are all advantageous from one point of view or another. Orthodontic supplies and materials are being produced using technology that is advancing exponentially. Every day, more technologies, processes, and designs emerge. These tools assist the orthodontist in providing patients with the best functional and cosmetic outcomes. Since Edward Hartley Angle's time through MBT brackets and then lingual brackets, orthodontic brackets have advanced significantly. Orthodontists' lives have been greatly facilitated by these brackets. Numerous new materials and designs will be developed as technology progresses. The purpose of this article was to give a general overview of the different orthodontic brackets and demonstrate how the logic underlying them helps orthodontists in their day-to-day jobs.

Evaluation of effectiveness of low level laser therapy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement-An in vivo study

To assess the acceleration of tooth movement in canine retraction and to assess the interleukin 1β level in Gingival Crevicular Fluid. 0.022 slot MBT brackets, 0.018 inch stainless steel arch wire, Low level laser (Gallium-Aluminium-Arsenide Laser), ELISA kit, Micro-capillary tube, Digital Vernier calliper, Dontrics gauge, NiTi closed coil springs Open labelled split mouth, non-experimental interventional institutional based study. By coin toss method, each of the participant’s mouth was randomly assigned either to the laser therapy (group 1) and 40 reference sites (group 2). On the experimental site orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance, a combination with low level laser therapy (Gallium-Aluminium-Arsenide laser) to the canine on the days 3,7,14 and then every 15 days for 2 months was initiated. Then 5µL of Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) was collected to analyse the interleukin 1β levels using the ELIZA kit. The measurements were made with the help of a digital Vernier calliper. The laser group showed a significant greater reduction in the canine to molar distance than the site treated with conventional technique. The interleukin 1 β levels raised significantly for the site treated with laser as compared to the other. We observed that: Increased inflammatory response in the form of raised interleukin levels and Faster distalization of the canine when adjunct with low level soft tissue laser. The entire data was statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 21.0, IBM Corporation, USA) for MS Windows. In Statistics, unpaired t-test is a used to compare equality of two population means and F-test is used to compare the equality of two population variance using that the samples were drawn from different populations. There was a clinically appreciable amount of retraction seen resulting in faster space closure between the canine and the first permanent molar in the group that had low level laser than the other group that was treated by the conventional therapy. We also observed a considerable rise in the interleukin 1 β levels in the laser group.

Investigation of the change in the degree of Frankfort mandibular plane angle after levelling the curve of spee in different malocclusion groups.

The curve of Spee is a naturally occurring phenomenon in the human dentition. Leveling the curve of Spee can affect the Frankfort-mandibular plane (FMP) Angle and thus the lower anterior facial height. This study examined the degree of change in FMP angle after leveling the curve of Spee in different malocclusion groups. In this study, 75 patients who were aged >14 years and had undergone fixed appliance therapy using a 0.022-slot MBT bracket system were included. The pre- and post-treatment casts and lateral cephalograms of the patients were divided into three groups, namely Class I, II, and III malocclusions, with 25 patients in each group. The curve of Spee and FMP angle were measured before and after orthodontic treatment, and their correlation was evaluated. After leveling the curve of Spee, the FMP angle decreased in Class I and II groups and increased in Class III group. These results were statistically significant except in Class I malocclusion group. A mild positive correlation was observed between the curve of Spee and FMP angle in Class I and III malocclusion groups and a negative correlation in Class II malocclusion group. The change in FMP angle, following the leveling of the curve of Spee, in Class II and III malocclusion group, is attributed to alterations in lower anterior facial height. The study observed a mild positive correlation between the curve of Spee and FMP angle in Class I and III malocclusion groups and a negative correlation in Class II malocclusion group.

Comparative evaluation of different loops for individual canine and en-masse retraction-a finite element method (fem) study

The aim and objective was to compare and evaluate the T loop, Mushroom loop and Opus loop for individual canine and en-masse retraction for space closure without preactivation bends using finite element method. The geometric model of maxilla was constructed using CBCT scan. The bracket system simulated was of standard MBT bracket system and arch wire used were 19*25 Stainless Steel and 17*25 TMA for fabrication of loops. There were six different models generated with segmented T loop, Mushroom loop & Opus loop and Continuous T loop, Mushroom loop & Opus loop. The software used for post-processing of the model was ANSYS Hypermesh 2019.0. When retraction forces were given with activation of loops, maximum amount of initial tooth displacement for individual canine retraction was observed for segmented T loop and for en masse retraction it was observed for continuous T loop. Although, there was intrusion of canine for all the three segmented loop, the preferred loop for canine retraction should be segmented T loop and for en masse retraction it should be continuous T loop as it shows least effect of retraction forces on anterior as well as posterior teeth during application of retraction force.

Clinical retrospective study on the digital data of orthodontic cases by Andrews six elements.

Andrews six elements was used to explore the possible influences of gender, extraction/non-extraction, and different bracket types on the evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome. Digital data from 320 selected orthodontic cases in Kunming Medical University Affiliated Stomatological Hospital during the period of 2016-2020 were divided into groups in accordance with gender, tooth extraction, and type of orthodontic brackets (DamonQ self-ligating brackets and MBT brackets). Measurement was performed using Andrews six elements as standard. The mean and standard deviation of each individual score and total score for different groups were calculated and statistically tested. The differences in total scores between female and male cases exhibited no statistical significance (P>0.05). By contrast, the scores in skeletal width change of the maxilla between extraction cases and non-extraction cases presented statistical significance (P<0.05). Moreover, the scores in the anteroposterior change in the position of the maxillary incisors, the bucco-lingual border change of the mandibular arch, and the skeletal width change of the maxilla between the DamonQ self-ligating bracket and MBT bracket cases presented statistical significance (P<0.05). The cases with DamonQ self-ligating brackets had significantly lower scores than the cases with MBT brackets in the bucco-lingual border change of the mandibular arch, the skeletal width change of the maxilla, and the anteroposterior change in position of the maxillary incisors. Digital 3D models can be used in the clinical retrospective studies of patients after orthodontic treatment. These models can be measured repeatedly and have clinical application value. For cases with incomplete orthodontic treatment, the control of the anteroposterior position of the incisor and the width of the arch of the upper tooth is crucial. Total treatment efficiency between female and male cases exhibited no difference, but the skeletal width change of the maxilla between extraction and non-extraction cases may exert an effect on cases with complete orthodontic treatment. The group that used DamonQ self-ligating brackets may achieve good adjustment of the bucco-lingual border change of the arch.

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL APICAL ROOT RESORPTION IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH DAMON BRACKET SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONALMBT BRACKET SYSTEM- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Background: Resorption of the external apical root is a common iatrogenic side effect of orthodontic therapy (EARR). The loss of cementum and dentine is caused by root resorption, which can be a normal or pathologic process. A complicated combination of individual biology and mechanical forces is assumed to be the cause. Aims &amp;Objectives: The purpose of this research was to assess the degree of external apical root resorption (EARR) in patients treated with the Damon self-ligating bracket system to those treated with the conventional MBT bracket system. Methods: For the study, twenty patients were divided into two groups. Ten patients were treated with MBT equipment in Group I. Damon self-ligating appliances were used to treat ten patients in Group 2. The Levander and Malmgren scores were used to assess root resorption on periapical radiographs of the maxillary incisors at the completion of orthodontic therapy. The chi-square test was used to compare root resorption between groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the degree of root resorption between the two groups, according to the findings. Conclusion: Non-extraction therapy with Damon self-ligating or standard preadjusted equipment resulted in similar root resorption, according to the findings.

Bilateral posterior open bite due to failure of primary eruption-a treatment approach

Posterior open bite is a challengeable anomaly and the treatment outcome depends very much on its etiology. In the present case, we describe the therapeutic management of a bilateral posterior open bite due to failure of eruption of molars and premolars. Moreover, the patient had partially reincluded deciduous molars, all four second premolars anodontia, a biretrusive profile and high angle facial pattern. Before starting the orthodontic treatment, the patient was removed all deciduous molars, following MBT brackets bonding aiming for tractioning down to the occlusal plane the upper right molars, closing all the spaces, flatten the curve of Spee and protrude both arches. After the active treatment (2 years and 10 months), essix retainers were given to wear 12/24. Assessment of the medical and dental history, trauma or other clinical conditions resulted in a therapeutic diagnosis that could be addressed with the proper orthodontic treatment achieving satisfactory results.

Comparison of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Efficiency Using MBT vs. ROTH Prescription Brackets of Slot Size 0.018 Inch in Class I Maloc clusions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment Efficiency Using MBT vs. ROTH Prescription Brackets of Slot Size 0.018 Inch in Class I Maloc clusions: Randomized Controlled Trial

Misplaced or Intentionally Misplaced – A Bracket Positioning Overview

In orthodontics, bracket positioning is the utmost part of the treatment planning. Ideally if the clinician using MBT prescription then they should follow the MBT bracket positioning charts to achieve more aesthetic result. Deflection in a bracket positioning to MBT chart may alter the final result as well as may prolong the finishing and detailing stage. Although in some conditions alteration in a bracket positioning may reduce the treatment time as well as reduces chances of the relapse. Generally in a first look it seems that the particular bracket was misplaced but with the help of proper understanding of the basic biomechanics and well planned treatment strategy that the bracket position was justified as intentionally misplaced. This article discussing all those conditions in which the alteration in a bracket positioning can helps clinician to achieve a desired result comparatively in less time with more stability.

A Comparative Evaluation of Space Closure Rate Between Newer Generation Ceramic Brackets and Conventional Straight Wire Appliances

Background: With the emerging concept of aesthetics in orthodontics, ceramic brackets play a major role especially in the anterior region of the dental arch. However, the duration of the orthodontic treatment is one of the most important issues in treating patients with ceramic brackets. Objectives: This study is conducted to compare space closing rate between conventional MBT and Symetri ClearTM bracket systems. Methods: This study is comprised of 18 subjects who were equally separated into two groups. The first group was treated with conventional MBT pre-adjusted bracket and the second group with Symetri ClearTM brackets. Space closure was performed via 0.019 × 0.025 inch stainless steel wires using 9-mm nickel-titanium Sentalloy coil springs with a constant force of 150 g. The distance between the distal of the first molar buccal tube and the mesial of the canine bracket was measured by a digital caliper. The difference of the first and last values was determined to assess the sheer quantity of space closure. The value was then divided by the number of months during which the space closure was carried out to examine the ratio of space closure in mm per month. For the statistical analysis we used paired t test as well as independent t test and the P-value &gt; 0.05 was deemed significant. Results: The MBT group showed a 0.85 mm/appointment retraction rate while the Symetri ClearTM bracket group had a 0.83 mm/appointment retraction rate. The difference in space closing between MBT and Symetri ClearTM groups was not statistically and clinically significant (P-value &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: As the rate of space closure was almost similar in the two types of brackets, we can use Symetri ClearTM brackets instead of MBT brackets without any concern about the duration of treatment and use the esthetic benefits of these brackets simultaneously.

Comparison of Changes in Incisors Inclination and Dental Arch Dimensions in Damon and MBT Systems Using Dolphin Software

Background: There is great controversy regarding the effect of MBT and Damon bracket systems on dental arch dimensions and incisor position. Objectives: We aimed to study the effects of two different brackets (MBT and Damon) on dental arch dimensions and incisors position after orthodontic treatment. Methods: In this retrospective study, the records of 20 patients who underwent orthodontic treatment with MBT or Damon bracket systems were studied. All patients had class I skeletal and dental malocclusion and were treated without extraction. The patients were treated either with Damon or MBT bracket systems (n = 10). Lateral cephalograms were traced using the Dolphin software to determine the position of incisors. In addition, transverse dimensions of dental arches were measured on occlusal photographs. Fishers’ exact test, independent-test, Man-Whitney, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon were used for statistical analysis. P &lt; 0.05 was set as significant. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding age, sex, and initial values of the variables studied. U1-Apog (mm), upper inter-canine, lower inter-second premolar distance showed a significant difference before and after treatment in the Damon system. However, no significant difference was observed between initial and post-treatment values in the MBT group. L1-Apog (°), IMPA (°), maxillary inter-first and second premolars, inter-canine, and mandibular inter-canine distance was higher in the Damon system after treatment compared to MBT. Changes of the upper and lower transverse dimensions of the dental arches and the incisor positional did not reveal a notable difference in the Damon and MBT systems (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference regarding changes in dental arches and incisor positions between the Damon and MBT systems.

A Comparison of the Effects of Extraction and Nonextraction Orthodontic Treatments on Cephalometric Parameters and Arch Widths

Objectives: To compare the effects of two different treatment approaches on cephalometric measurements and arch widths. Materials and Methods: The retrospective study evaluated pre- and post-treatment cephalometric radiograms and dental models of 45 patients with Class I malocclusions and moderate-severe dental tooth size arch length discrepancies that underwent extraction or nonextraction treatment between 2015 and 2020. Group I (n=22 [9 female, 13 male]; mean age, 18.0 ± 1.68 years) was treated with the Damon Q bracket system and Group II (n=23 [11 female, 12 male]; mean age, 17.9 ± 1.34 years) was treated with the conventional MBT bracket system. Pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiograms were obtained and arch widths were measured for each subject. Paired samples t-test was used to evaluate the treatment changes within each group. To compare the changes between groups, independent samples t-test was performed. Results: No significant change was detected in the sagittal and vertical skeletal parameters in both groups (p&amp;gt;0.05). The upper and lower incisors proclined significantly in Group I (p&amp;lt;0.01) and the mandibular incisors retroclined significantly in Group II (p&amp;lt;0.05). The lips protruded significantly and the upper lip thickness decreased significantly in Group I (p&amp;lt;0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in Group II (p&amp;gt;0.05). All the transversal dimensions increased significantly in Group I (p&amp;lt;0.01), while only the intermolar distance decreased significantly in Group II (p&amp;lt;0.01). Conclusions: Both treatment methods provided significantly different outcomes with regard to soft tissue parameters and arch widths.

A Comparative Study on the Effect of Different Methods of Recycling Orthodontic Brackets on Shear Bond Strength.

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of different methods of recycling stainless steel orthodontic brackets on shear bond strength. Methods One hundred twenty human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose were randomly divided into four groups. Standard MBT (0.022″) brackets were bonded on the buccal surface of all samples with light cured adhesive primers using an LED curing unit for 10 seconds. Group I was assigned as control, and the brackets of Group II, Group III, and Group IV were subjected to recycling by flaming, flaming with sandblasting, and flaming with ultrasonic cleaning, respectively. The recycled brackets were rebonded, and final debonding of all brackets was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and shear bond strength was determined. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and post hoc tests. The adhesive remnant index was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Results The highest shear bond strength was obtained with Group I (10.35 ± 0.46 MPa), followed by Group III (9.36 ± 0.55 MPa) and Group IV (5.97 ± 0.66 MPa), and the least value was obtained with Group II (4.30 ± 0.55 Mpa). Significant differences among the groups were detected by analysis of variance. Tukey's post hoc multiple comparison test showed that the shear bond strength of each group was significantly different from one another (p < 0.001). Conclusions Shear bond strength of new brackets was significantly higher than that of the recycled brackets. Among recycled brackets, flaming with sandblasting provided adequate shear bond strength, flaming with ultrasonic cleaning provided a borderline value for clinical use, and flaming alone led to a significantly lower value.

Do orthodontists aim to decrease the duration of fixed appliance treatment?

OBJECTIVES:The aim of the present study was to investigate the trends in the use of fixed appliance and accelerated orthodontics to decrease the treatment duration. Further, this study aimed to assess the effect of demographic factors on the participant's choice of treatment modality.METHODS:This was a cross-sectional study in the form of questionnaire-based online survey especially designed and distributed to 265 orthodontists via email. The questions aimed to collect basic information about the participants and respondents’ choices for decreasing the treatment duration. The data were analyzed according to gender, level of academic education and years of clinical experience using Chi-square test.RESULTS:A response rate of 85.2% was reported. Most of the orthodontists aimed to reduce the treatment duration by the biomechanical (66.8%) and surgical approaches (27.4%). The use of sliding mechanics (69.4%) and one-step retraction was more common (66.3%). MBT bracket prescription was more prevalent (51.7%), followed by Roth (41.1%). Conventional brackets were used more than self-ligating brackets, and aesthetic brackets were avoided by one third of the respondents. NiTi wires were the most commonly used wires during the alignment stage (44.2%). However, the effect of gender, years of clinical experience and specialty level of education showed some effects on the use of certain techniques and clinical practice of the respondents.CONCLUSIONS:Most of the orthodontists aimed to decrease orthodontic treatment duration by using biomechanical and surgical approaches. Gender and clinical experience to a certain extent affected the participants’ choice during orthodontic treatment.

TREATMENT OF CLASS I MALOCCLUSION WITH MILD CROWDING AND MIDLINE SHIFT

ABSTRACT Background: The main goal of orthodontic treatment is to obtain a normal relationship of the teeth with facial structures and it is generally accepted that orthodontic treatment will have effects on facial proportion. Nowadays, facial appearance has a big influence on someone's appearance. Aesthetic facial appearance will produce a proportional, harmonious, and youthful facial profile. Case: this case report aims to describe that non extraction orthodontic treatment in class I malocclusion with mild crowding and mildline shift is a treatment with considerable success. Case management: A 19 years old female came with a chief complaint of crowding in upper and lower jaw. Intraoral examination revealed bilateral Class I molar and canine relationship. Patient had crowding in upper and lower jaw, and midline shift in lower jaw. Extra oral findings included a flat profile with competent lips. Cephalometric analysis showed skeletal class I with orthognati maxilla and mandible. Patient was bonded with 0.022-inch MBT brackets orthodontic appliance without extraction. After 20 months of treatment, an ideal arch coordination was achieved, the patient felt confident and satisfied with the treatment outcome. Conclusion: Decision to extract a tooth has to be made, not only by considering the amount of crowding, but also the eventual influence of orthodontic tooth displacement on the soft tissue surface of the face. Keywords: Crowding, Midline shift, Non – extraction.

Distalization of the entire maxillary arch with mini-implants in the posterior palatal alveolus- A case report

A 22 year old male patient reported to the hospital with a chief complaint of forwardly placed teeth. On examination patient had Angle’s Class I malocclusion and proclination of the anterior teeth. There were signs of frictional keratosis on the buccal mucosa. Treatment plan was to extract the third molars alone and distalize the entire maxillary arch with palatal mini-implants. 0.022 MBT brackets were bonded on the buccal aspect. 0.019” x 0.025” stainless steel wire was placed sequentially. Mini-implants were placed on the posterior alveolus on the palatal surface of maxilla. Retractive force was applied from an attachment bonded on the palatal aspect of the maxillary canine. Patient was reviewed periodically. Comparison of pre-treatment and posttreatment results revealed that the entire maxillary arch intruded and translated distally with a counterclockwise rotation of the mandible with reduction in LAFH. There was a mild reduction in inter-canine with marginal expansion in the premolar and molar region. An improvement in facial profile was noted with no sign of root resorption. Thus, the posterior alveolus may be considered as a new and appropriate site for placement of mini-implant to bring about distal movement of the entire maxillary dentition.KeywordsOrthodontic anchorage procedures; Bone screw; Palate.

Comparing the Effect of Low-Intensity Laser Therapy (LILT) In Decrowding Lower Anteriors Using Conventional and Self-Ligating MBT Bracket Systems - An In Vivo Study

Introduction Orthodontic treatment is a type of care which often involves pre-adolescents, adolescents and adult who requires higher compliance due to long treatment duration1. Reduction in active treatment time can result in a reduction in patient discomfort and fatigue and improve patient compl

An update on orthodontic brackets – A review

Orthodontics is been at great service to mankind. Orthodontics is a field that has been around since the early 18th century. Modern day orthodontists have generations of predecessors to learn their techniques. Technology used in orthodontic treatment continues to progress at an incredible pace. New discoveries and inventions have allowed orthodontists to bring better experiences to their patients with less of the hassle. If we want to continue providing fast, efficient, and effective treatment to our patients, we need to make sure that we stay up-to-date with changes in the field. Orthodontic brackets have evolved from Angle's era to the MBT brackets followed by lingual brackets. These brackets have made the life of the orthodontists much easier. As technology advances many more new materials and designs will be coming forward. The purpose of this article is to review the recent advancements in orthodontic brackets and how the science behind them helps the orthodontist in the day-to-day practice.

Periodontal Parameters Alterations with Use of Conventional Bracket and Self-ligating Brackets

Introduction: Different bracket systems are available in the market claiming to have some advantage over the other. Conventional brackets and the self-ligating brackets are the most common. Though both the systems work basically similarly, the difference between the two system is principally in the ligating technique. The advantage of conventional brackets claimed are faster tooth movements and improved oral health of the patient.&#x0D; Materials &amp; Method: A total number of 20 patients were shorted from the waiting list meeting the selection criteria. With the help of random number generator, two groups with 10 subjects each were created for conventional brackets (0.022 Slot MBT brackets) and self-ligating brackets (0.022 Slot DAMON prescription) respectively. The patients were blinded regarding the selection of the brackets. The brackets were bonded according to the random number allocation. After the bonding, the periodontal parameters i.e. gingival index (GI), plaque Index (PI) were measured again at an interval of 60 (T1) and 120 days (T2). Periodontal indices were calculated by summing the mean score of each examined tooth and dividing by the number of the evaluated teeth. Data collection was done with the help of a periodontal probe. All the records were taken by the same periodontist to avoid inter-examiner variability. To reassure that there is no any intra-examiner variation for periodontal status, the same periodontist re-measured the periodontal parameters again of 10 individuals selected randomly after 7 days from the initial measurements. To examine the intra-examination variability, Dahlberg’s formula was used between the two readings taken at a span of 7 days of the same subjects. The mean value of Plaque index and Gingival index was checked for normal distribution applying Kolmogorov- Smirnov test. One-way ANOVA test was applied for comparison between and within groups for plaque index and Gingival index during three different period in Conventional brackets and Self-ligating brackets. Post hoc Bonferroni test was applied for multiple comparison. Independent t-test was applied for comparison between conventional brackets and self-ligating brackets to compare the plaque index and gingival index. All data were test were analyzed at P&lt;0.05.&#x0D; Result: There was no any significant difference between T0 and T1 and between T1 and T2 in both the conventional brackets and self-ligating brackets. However, there was statistical difference between the time period from T0 to T2. There was also no any significant difference between conventional bracket and self-ligating brackets in terms of plaque index and gingival index.&#x0D; Conclusion: There are no advantages of self-ligating brackets over conventional brackets in terms of periodontal status.