Maximum Manual Force Research Articles

High initial graft tension increases external tibial rotation on the axial plane after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of applying different amounts of initial graft tension on the femorotibial positional relationship on the axial plane after anatomical ACL reconstruction. Eighty patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstructions using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts were included in this study. In 40 of the 80 patients, the grafts were fixed at full knee extension with maximum manual force (high graft tension; Group H), whereas in the other 40 patients, the grafts were fixed at full knee extension with force of 80N (low graft tension; Group L). One week postoperatively, all patients underwent computed tomography (CT) on bilateral knee joints with knee extension. The femorotibial positional relationship in axial CT images were retrospectively evaluated. Side-to-side differences (the surgical side minus the unaffected side) were calculated in these variables. The side-to-side differences in anterior tibial translation distances were - 1.8 ± 2.1mm in Group H and - 1.9 ± 2.0mm in Group L, with no significant difference between the two groups. The side-to-side differences in tibial lateral shifts were - 0.2 ± 1.5mm in Group H and 0.0 ± 1.4mm in Group L, with no significant difference between the two groups. The side-to-side differences in tibial external rotation angles were 2.7 ± 4.5° in Group H and 0.3 ± 3.3° in Group L, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). Applying high initial graft tension (maximum manual force) resulted in the external rotation of the tibia against the femur just after anatomical ACL reconstruction. In contrast, applying low initial graft tension (80N at full knee extension) did not change the femorotibial rotational relationship.

Anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provides excellent clinical outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes following anatomical rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device with enough patients and a high follow-up rate. This study included 125 patients who underwent anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. A BTB TightRope® was used for femoral graft fixation. Clinical evaluations were performed more than 2years after surgery using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form. Patients interviewed by telephone were only subjectively evaluated. The side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at a manual maximum force was measured using the KT-2000 Arthrometer®. Among the 125 patients, 99 were ultimately included and 26 were lost to follow-up (follow-up rate: 79%). Eight patients had re-tear (re-tear rate: 8%) and six patients had ACL injuries to the contralateral knee. Three patients did not follow our rehabilitation programme. One patient suffered septic arthritis. These 18 patients were considered ineligible for clinical evaluations. Therefore, clinical evaluations were performed in 81 of the 99 patients (64 were available for direct follow-up and 17 were available for a telephone interview). The follow-up period was 30 ± 10months (range 24-68months). According to the IKDC subjective assessment, 48 (59%) and 33 (41%) knees were graded as normal and nearly normal, respectively. A loss of extension (3°-5°) was observed in five patients (8%), whereas one patient (2%) exhibited a loss of flexion (3°-5°). The Lachman test was negative in 63 patients (98%). The pivot shift test was negative in 59 patients (92%). The side-to-side difference in KT value was 0.4 ± 0.7mm (range - 1-4mm). Anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft using an adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device provided excellent clinical outcomes both subjectively and objectively more than 2years after surgery, whereas 8 of the 99 patients had re-tear of the graft. The adjustable-length femoral cortical fixation device could be safely used in anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. III.

Anatomical Triple Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions With Hamstring Tendon Autografts: Tunnel Locations and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes

To anatomically clarify the location of the tunnel apertures created using the bony landmark strategy and toelucidate clinical outcomes after anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Thirty-two patients with unilateral ACL injury who had consented to undergo computed tomography (CT) at 3 weeks, as well as 2-year follow-up evaluation, were enrolled. At the time of surgery, remnant tissues were thoroughly cleared to create 2 femoral and 3 tibial tunnels inside the ACL attachment areas bordered by the bony landmarks. Two double-looped semitendinosus tendon autografts were prepared and fixed on the femur with two EndoButton-CLs and secured to the tibia with pullout sutures and plates with 10-20N of tension. The location of the tunnel aperture areas was assessed using 3-dimensional CT images, and 2-year postoperative clinical outcomes were evaluated. The CT evaluation showed 100% of the femoral tunnel aperture area and at least 79% of the tibial tunnel aperture area were located inside the anatomic attachment areas. Thirty patients were available for clinical evaluation. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective assessment showed all of the patients were classified as "normal" or "nearly normal." Lachman and pivot-shift tests were negative in 100% and 93%, respectively. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior laxity at the maximum manual force with a KT-1000 Knee Arthrometer was 0.7 ± 0.7 mm, ranging from 0 to 2 mm. In ATB ACL reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts, the tunnels can be created in proper locations using the arthroscopically-identifiable bony landmarks. Moreover, ATB ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon grafts via the proper tunnels result in consistently satisfactory clinical outcomes. Level IV, case series.

Graft-Preserving Arthroscopic Debridement With Hardware Removal Is Effective for Septic Arthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical, Arthrometric, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation

Background: Arthroscopic debridement with graft preservation has been advocated as the treatment of choice for septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but no previous studies have investigated if hardware removal, while retaining the graft in situ, improves the success rate. Moreover, it is unclear whether the premature removal of fixation devices may affect graft integration and knee stability. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction who underwent arthroscopic debridement, while retaining the graft in situ but removing fixation devices, and to determine if premature hardware removal affects graft integrity and function. The hypothesis was that arthroscopic debridement with hardware removal would be effective in eradicating infections while not compromising graft integration and function. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From a cohort of 2384 cases of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, 24 patients with postoperative septic arthritis were included for the analysis; 18 patients were available for a clinical evaluation using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, and Tegner score at a minimum 12-month follow-up. Knee laxity was assessed clinically with standardized manual laxity tests and instrumentally using an arthrometer and a triaxial accelerometer. Additionally, 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at final follow-up was performed, focusing on the graft signal, the cartilage status, and the occurrence of arthrofibrosis. Results: Eradication of the infection was achieved in all cases, and only 1 graft removal was performed because of insufficient tension. Among the remaining 23 patients, a single arthroscopic debridement procedure with hardware removal while preserving the graft was effective in 21 cases (91%) at a mean of 30 ± 37 days from ACL reconstruction to debridement. At last follow-up, 2 patients required a further ACL revision procedure. The mean IKDC, WOMAC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores of the patients available for the clinical evaluation were 75 ± 19, 90 ± 8, 79 ± 21, and 6 ± 2, respectively. No abnormal laxity was reported on manual testing, and arthrometric and accelerometer tests also demonstrated good knee stability (mean KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was 1.6 ± 1.2 mm at manual maximum force). On MRI, a good graft signal was found in 50% of cases, while concomitant signs of arthrofibrosis were detected in 81% of patients. Severe cartilage defects (International Cartilage Repair Society grade ≥3) were reported in 63% of cases. Conclusion: Arthroscopic debridement with hardware removal was effective in the eradication of infections after ACL reconstruction with extra-articular fixation while preserving graft integrity without compromising knee stability. Patients and surgeons should be aware of complications that might affect the outcome, particularly arthrofibrosis and chondrolysis.

Preliminary assessment of knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone patellar tendon bone and hamstring graft

Introduction: Laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the troublesome problems lasting many years. Laxity can be tested by clinical and arthrometer preoperatively as well as postoperatively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate postoperative laxity in Nepalese population.&#x0D; Materials &amp; methods: This retrospective study was carried out in Grande International Hospital, Kathmandu. All cases which had completed six-months follow up and presented in outpatient department were included in the study. Laxity was tested by Karl Storz Arthrometer using anterior force in 20 degrees of knee flexion with maximum manual force by the same doctor. The statistical significance level was set at p=0.05. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 16.&#x0D; Results: 21 cases operated via arthroscopic method were eligible for the study. Mean age was 28.3±10.44. There were 14 (66.7%) male 7 (33.3%) female. A total of eight cases of laxity (36.36%) were identified - six males (75%) and two females (25%). Hamstring grafts accounted for three cases of laxity (37.5%) while Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft (BPTB) accounted for five cases (62.5%). The mean follow-up was one and half years. Hamstring and bone patellar tendon bone graft were used in 6 (28.6%) and 15 (71.4%) cases respectively.&#x0D; Conclusion: Previous studies have concluded that &gt;3mm of laxity difference is associated with difficulties in vigorous activities. However, our patients were comfortable in their daily activities without significant clinical outcome.

Healthy knee KT1000 measurements of anterior tibial translation have significant variation.

The most commonly used arthrometer for measuring and reporting anterior tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the KT1000. Reports on its consistency and reproducibility vary in the literature, but it remains the "gold standard". The purpose of this study was to assess agreement of KT1000 measurements in a daily clinical setting. A retrospective analysis of anterior knee translation in the healthy knee of 770 patients over a 17-year time period was performed. In this cohort, a total of 24 investigators performed 1890 measurement sets at 89 Newtons (N), 134N and at maximum manual force (MMax) level. To assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement, the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The "investigator effect" was a difference between two examiners in the same patient and the "device effect'' a difference within one examiner in the same patient. Minimally important difference (MID) was calculated as 0.5 of the standard deviation. Thirteen investigators were female, performing 1099 measurements and 11 were male, performing 791 measurements. ICC ranged between 0.558 and 0.644. At the MMax level, male investigators had a higher mm reading than female investigators (p < 0.001). Increased experience did not correlate with a higher ICC. MID ranged between 0.85 and 1.65mm. This study investigated the KT1000 arthrometer in a clinical setting with a large number of investigators. This device delivers moderate agreement of results. Both the device and investigator effect are present. The MMax level has shown the lowest agreement and a dependency on the investigator gender. Level III diagnostic study.

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization of anterior cruciate ligament repair: hardware removal has no effect on knee laxity at 2-year follow-up.

Dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) stabilizes the knee joint during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) healing. After 6 months, tibial hardware removal is offered to the patients if local discomfort at the implant site is present. This study compared knee laxity and functional scores 2 years after DIS between patients with and without hardware removal. It is hypothesized that it does not affect ACL healing. The study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 173 patients with either hardware removal (n = 47) or no additional intervention (n = 126). Inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was applied to balance the groups for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the side-to-side difference in knee laxity measured with the rolimeter at manual maximum force (Δ-Lachman). Secondary outcomes were the pivot-shift test and subjective scores. Mean age was 34years in both groups, and female gender was 47% (hardware removal group) and 50% (control group), respectively. No significant differences were found for Δ-Lachman (p = 0.09), pivot-shift test (p = 0.41), and subjective scores (p > 0.10) two years after DIS. Knee laxity 2 years after DIS in patients with tibial hardware removal and patients without hardware removal was not significantly different. The groups were also similar regarding all the assessed functional scores. This study confirms the hypothesis that the healing ACL resumes its stabilizing role, and the hardware can be removed beginning 6months after surgery without adverse consequences for joint stability. Case-control study, Level III.

Excellent bone plug–socket integration at 8 weeks after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an adjustable-length loop cortical fixation device

ObjectivesRecently, adjustable-length loop cortical fixation devices (ALCFDs) have been developed. However, they are not frequently used for bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) grafting, mainly because it is uncertain whether an ALCFD enables sufficient integration of the bone plug. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate bone plug–socket integration in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) with an ALCFD.MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with a mean age of 25±10 years underwent primary anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL-R with a BTB graft using BTB TightRope. The operated knees were evaluated by CT at 4 weeks and 8 weeks postoperatively. Union between the bone plug and the socket wall were assessed on 30 evaluation planes. No border between the plug and the socket wall, or trabecular continuity, were defined as complete union and a visible gap of >1 mm as incomplete union. When complete union was observed on >20, 11–20, 5–10 or <5 of the evaluation planes, bone integration was graded as excellent, good, fair or poor, respectively. In addition, the interface area between the plug and the socket wall was assessed by CT value index. Clinical evaluation was performed at 2 years postoperatively using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form.ResultsThe proportion of patients with excellent bone integration was 20% at 4 weeks and 85% at 8 weeks, showing a significant difference (p=0.00015). Moreover, the CT value index of the interface area at 4 weeks was 25.8%±11.8% and that at 8 weeks was 15.3%±9.0%, again showing a significant difference (p=0.005). These suggest that bone integration of the interface area progresses over time and adequate at 8 weeks. Clinically, all 16 patients examined directly were rated their knees as normal or nearly normal with a mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force by KT-2000 of 0.2±0.3 mm.ConclusionExcellent bone plug–socket integration was observed at 8 weeks after ART ACL-R using an ALCFD with satisfactory clinical results. An ALCFD could be safely applied for ART ACL-R.Level of evidence4 (case series).

Anatomical rectangular tunnels identified with the arthroscopic landmarks result in excellent outcomes in ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft.

To elucidate tunnel locations and clinical outcomes after anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft. Sixty-one patients with a primary unilateral ACL injury were included. Tunnels were created inside the ACL attachment areas after carefully removing the ACL remnant and clearly identifying the bony landmarks. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3-D CT) images, the proportion of the tunnel apertures to the anatomical attachment areas was evaluated at 3 weeks. The clinical outcomes were evaluated at 2years postoperatively. Geographically, the 3-D CT evaluation showed the entire femoral tunnel aperture; at least 75% of the entire tibial tunnel aperture area was consistently located inside the anatomical attachment areas surrounded by the bony landmarks. In the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective assessment, all patients were classified as 'normal' or 'nearly normal'. The Lachman test and pivot-shift test were negative in 98.4% and 95.1% of patients, respectively. The mean side-to-side difference of the anterior laxity at the maximum manual force with a KT- 1000 Knee Arthrometer was 0.2 ± 0.9mm, with 95.1% of patients ranging from - 1 to + 2mm. By identifying arthroscopic landmarks, the entire femoral tunnel aperture and at least 75% of the entire tibial tunnel aperture area were consistently located inside the anatomical attachment areas. With properly created tunnels inside the anatomical attachment areas, the ART ACLR using a BTB graft could provide satisfactory outcomes both subjectively and objectively in more than 95% of patients. Case series, Level IV.

No difference in initial fixation or 1-year outcomes with outside in metallic or bioabsorbable interference femoral screws in rectangular tunnel bone-patellar tendon-bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ObjectivesTo compare the rate of initial fixation failure and clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) surgery with a rectangular tunnel bone-patellar tendon-bone (RT-BTB) graft (RT-BTB ACL-R) using metallic interference screws (M-IFSs) and bioabsorbable interference screws (B-IFSs) for femoral fixation.MethodsData were prospectively collected from patients undergoing RT-BTB ACL-R and CT within 2 weeks after surgery. Femoral fixation was performed using M-IFSs (M-IFS group) or B-IFSs (B-IFS group). Screw selections were historically controlled. The following parameters were intraoperatively assessed: IFS breakage and initial fixation failure examined by movement of the graft pulled with maximum manual force. Posterior wall breakage was assessed using CT. Lysholm Score, the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Examination Form and the KT-2000 arthrometer was evaluated as the clinical outcome measures.ResultsThe study included 116 patients. Of these, 26 were included in the M-IFS group and 92 in the B-IFS group. The rate of IFS breakage was not significantly different between the M-IFS and B-IFS groups (0.0% vs 2.2%). The rate of initial fixation failure was not significantly different between the M-IFS and B-IFS groups (3.8% vs 5.6%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only posterior wall breakage predicted initial fixation failure (p=0.02). No significant difference of the clinical outcomes was observed between the M-IFS and B-IFS groups.ConclusionInitial fixation failure or clinical outcomes is not different between M-IFS and B-IFS use for femoral fixation in RT-BTB ACL-R.Level of evidenceProspective study using historical controls, level IV.

Loop Length Change of an Adjustable-Length Femoral Cortical Suspension Device in Anatomic Rectangular Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Graft and Associated Clinical Outcomes

To evaluate loop length changes of an adjustable femoral cortical suspensory fixation device and assess the clinical results after anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ART-ACL) reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone (BTB) graft. The study included 50 patients who underwent ART-ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft fixed using the adjustable-length device BTB TightRope for femoral fixation between July 2013 and December 2014. Computed tomography examinations were performed at 1 and 12weeks after the surgery. Loop length was measured in the reconstructed plane just parallel to the femoral tunnel, including the bone plug and the button. Measurement was performed thrice, and the mean value was used. Loop length change was defined as the difference in loop length between 1 and 12weeks after the surgery. A paired t test was conducted with the effect size for statistical analysis. At 2years postoperatively, clinical evaluations, including subjective and objective assessments, were performed. The mean loop lengths at 1 and 12weeks were 25.77 ± 3.88mm and 25.81 ± 3.89mm, respectively, with a significant difference (P= .01). However, the effect size was 0.01, suggesting that the difference was not meaningful. The mean individual loop length change was 0.04 ± 0.13mm. All individual loop length changes were within the measurement error range. At 2years postoperatively, 49 patients (98%) were graded as normal or nearly normal according to the International Knee Documentation Committee form. The mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force was 0.2 ± 0.5mm. The loop length change of an adjustable-length femoral cortical suspension device was negligible after ART-ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft. This ART-ACL reconstruction with a BTB graft using an adjustable-length device could safely provide sufficient stability to the operated knee. Level Ⅳ, therapeutic case series.

Static anteroposterior knee laxity tests are poorly correlated to quantitative pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee: a prospective multicentre study

ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between preoperative static knee joint laxity and non-invasive quantitative pivot shift (QPS) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.MethodsPatients with an ACL injury participating in a multicentre trial were analysed if they had complete preoperative data on the following laxity tests: the rolimeter, the KT-1000 (134 N and manual maximum force), the Lachman, the anterior drawer and QPS. The QPS was assessed via a non-invasive inertial sensor system and an image analysis system for tibial acceleration and lateral tibial translation, respectively. Awake examination and examination under anaesthesia (EUA) were performed. Correlation between absolute values of static laxity and the QPS for each leg was assessed by Spearman’s rho. The Lachman and the anterior drawer were dichotomised into low- and high-grade, and differences between the groups in terms of continuous values of QPS were assessed.ResultsA total of 58 patients were included (41.4% women, mean age 27.1±9.8 years). Awake static laxity and QPS acceleration were negatively correlated in the ACL-deficient knee, meaning that a greater acceleration correlated to a lesser static tibial translation, and vice versa. The mean QPS acceleration correlated with the static tests as follows: the rolimeter r=−0.30 (P=0.024), the KT-1000 134 N r=−0.25 (P=0.06) and the KT-1000 manual maximum r=−0.37 (P=0.004). A negative correlation between awake QPS acceleration and the static tests was also shown for the non-involved knee. Patients with a high-grade Lachman’s test in the EUA had significantly greater QPS acceleration (P=0.0002) and QPS translation (P<0.001) compared with patients with a low-grade. The corresponding analysis for the anterior drawer showed a significantly greater QPS translation in the high-grade group (P=0.01), while no differences were found in the QPS acceleration.ConclusionStatic anteroposterior and dynamic knee laxities, as presented by QPS, are poorly correlated in the ACL-deficient knee and should therefore be considered as separate entities of the knee examination. These findings strengthen the implementation of non-invasive technology for quantification of the pivot shift when establishing treatment algorithms for ACL reconstruction.Level of evidenceLevel III, prospective cohort.

Midterm results of combined intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstruction compared to historical ACL reconstruction data. Multicenter study of the French Arthroscopy Society

IntroductionDuring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction procedures, anterolateral reconstruction (ALR) can also be performed to improve the knee's rotational stability. However, the effectiveness of this supplemental technique and its impact on the risk of retears and on the onset of secondary degenerative changesare controversial. HypothesisALR improves control over the pivot shift, reduces the retear risk and delays the appearance of secondary degenerative lesions. Material and methodsClinical examination, knee laxity measurements and X-ray evaluations were done in 478 patients with more than 3years’ follow-up after combined ACL and ALR from 11 participating hospitals. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 28years. Eighty-eight percent of the patients participated in pivot sports and 45% were competitive athletes. The findings of this study were compared to historical isolated ACL reconstruction data. ResultsThe average follow-up was 6.8years. No detectable pivot shift was found in 83% of patients, while 12.8% of patient had a smooth glide. The side-to-side difference in anteroposterior knee laxity with maximum manual force was less than 3mm in 66% of patients and less than 5mm in 95%. The retear rate was 5.4%, with half of these patients undergoing revision ACL surgery. Secondary meniscus damage requiring surgery occurred in 6.3% of patients; the radiological osteoarthritis rate was 17.5%. DiscussionWhen compared to historical ACL reconstruction data, combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction does not increase the complication rate. At a mean follow-up of 6.8years, it provides better control over the pivot shift along with a low retear rate and low occurrence of secondary meniscus injuries. Level of evidenceIV, multicenter study.

Outcome of Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Trials

To compare clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and investigate whether the clinical results of 4-strand hamstring tendon (HT) reconstruction are still inferior to that of the patellar tendon (PT). We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the English literature on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane register for papers that compared clinical outcomes of PT versus HT for ACL reconstruction. Outcome measures analyzed included rate of rerupture, KT-1000, International Knee Documentation Committee grade, Lachman, pivot shift, Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale, anterior knee pain, and discomfort on kneeling. We included 19 studies from an initial 1,168 abstracts for the systematic review, and, eventually, 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The study population consisted of a total of 1784 patients. The average follow-up duration was 58.8months. We found significant differences in favor of the HT technique in the domains of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain, and restriction in the range of active extension ("extension deficit"). We found no differences between the PT and HT technique in terms of rerupture rate. There were no clinically significant differences for the outcomes of Lysholm score and Tegner Activity Scale as well as the KT-1000 side-to-side at maximum manual force. Contemporary 4-strand HT ACL reconstruction is comparable with the PT technique in terms of clinical stability and postoperative functional status across most parameters studied. The HT technique carries lower risk of postoperative complications such as anterior knee pain, kneeling discomfort, and extension deficit. Primary ACL reconstruction using the 4-strand HT technique achieves clinical results that are comparable with the PT technique with significantly less postoperative complications. Level I, systemic review and meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Preliminary Results in Anatomic All-inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common lesions in knee traumatology; therefore the number of ACL reconstructions is increasing worldwide. Usually, an anteromedial (AM) accessory portal is required in anatomical positioning of the femoral tunnel, which is not absolutely necessary in this technique. Aim: Assessment of all-inside ACL reconstruction preliminary clinical results with adjustable loops and buttons on both femoral and tibial surfaces. Method: Our prospective study included 28 subjects (19 male, 9 female) with chronic ACL ruptures. The mean age of the study population was 27.72 ± 8.23 years. In all cases ACL reconstruction was carried out with the use of quadrupled semitendinosus auto-grafts with adjustable loops and buttons on the femoral and tibial surfaces and anatomic placement of both tunnels, using an outside-in technique, with flipcutters (Arthrex®). Clinical and radiological evaluations were carried out before surgery and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, with the Lysholm scoring system, the Tegner activity scale and anterior-posterior and latero-lateral X-rays. Anterior knee laxity was measured in 25° of flexion using a portable arthrometer (RolimeterTM, Aircast®) and maximum manual force. Results: During the final follow-up, the Lysholm score was good and excellent in 27 cases, with a mean Lysholm score of 95.55 ± 4.63; all results were classified as good. The mean preoperative Tegner activity score was 3.46 ± 1.71 (range: 1-7), and the post-operative mean score was 5.75 ± 2.24 (range: 2-10). We found no graft ruptures. Preoperative knee laxity measurements showed a mean displacement of 11.5 ± 3.1 mm and side-to-side differences of 5.6 ± 3.5 mm, while the postoperative measurements at the last follow-up were 6.3 ± 1.54 mm and 2.65 ± 1.86 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Short-term clinical outcomes of all-inside ACL restoration with anatomic placement femoral and tibial tunnels seem to recommend this surgical option, with good subjective and objective results. Additional research will have to prove the long-term success.

The use of MRI in pre-operative evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament in chronic ankle instability.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the applicability of MRI for the quantitative assessment of anterior talofibular ligaments (ATFLs) in symptomatic chronic ankle instability (CAI).MethodsBetween 1997 and 2010, 39 patients with symptomatic CAI underwent surgical treatment (22 male, 17 female, mean age 25.4 years (15 to 40)). In all patients, the maximum diameters of the ATFLs were measured on pre-operative T2-weighted MR images in planes parallel to the path of the ATFL. They were classified into three groups based on a previously published method with modifications: ‘normal’, diameter = 1.0 - 3.2 mm; ‘thickened’, diameter > 3.2 mm; ‘thin or absent’, diameter < 1.0 mm. Stress radiography was performed with the maximum manual force in inversion under general anaesthesia immediately prior to surgery. In surgery, ATFLs were macroscopically divided into two categories: ‘thickened’, an obvious thickened ligament and ‘thin or absent’. The imaging results were compared with the macroscopic results that are considered to be of a gold standard.ResultsAgreement was reached when comparison was made between groups, based on MRI and macroscopic findings. ATFLs were abnormal in all 39 cases and classified as ten ‘thickened’ and 29 ‘thin or absent’. As to talar tilt stress radiography, a clear cut-off angle, which would allow discrimination between ‘thickened’ and ‘thin or absent’ patients, was not identified.ConclusionMRI is valuable as a pre-operative assessment tool that can provide the quantitative information of ATFLs in patients with CAI.Cite this article Bone Joint Res 2014;3:241–5.

Outcome of anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach

To evaluate the clinical outcome of anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using multistranded hamstring tendons via an outside-in approach. One hundred and twenty-one patients (mean age 28±10years) who underwent ACL reconstruction were examined. Using an outside-in femoral drill guide, an upper femoral tunnel for the anteromedial (AM) graft was created just below the superior articular cartilage margin of the medial wall of the lateral condyle through a small incision. A lower femoral tunnel for the posterolateral (PL) graft was drilled in the centre of the inferior-posterior half of the attachment area behind the resident's ridge in the same manner. Two tibial tunnels were created at the centre of the AM and PL bundle footprints of a normal ACL. Patients were evaluated at 24months postoperatively. According to the IKDC form, 52 knees (43%) were graded as normal, 64 (53%) as nearly normal, 1 (1%) as abnormal and 4 (3%) as graft rupture due to re-injury. Loss of knee extension of <5° was observed in one patient (1%). Among 111 patients who were directly evaluated, none showed loss of flexion of <5°. Lachman sign was negative in 103 patients (93%), while the pivot shift test result was negative or equivalent to that of the contralateral healthy knee in 103 patients (93%). The mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity at manual maximum force with the KT-2000 arthrometer(®) was 0.9±1.1mm, and 94% of patients showed a range between -1 and +2mm. The anatomical double-bundle outside-in ACL reconstruction provided a satisfactory short-term outcome. Case series, Level IV.

Anatomic and Nonanatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: There have been no direct in vivo biomechanical comparisons performed between an anatomic double-bundle (ADB) and a nonanatomic double-bundle (NADB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Hypothesis: There are differences in kinematic outcomes between ADB and NADB ACL reconstruction techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age, 30 years; range, 18-32 years; 23 men, 3 women; 17 right knees, 9 left knees) with an isolated ACL injury were included in the study. The first 13 consecutive patients underwent NADB reconstruction (combination of a single-bundle and an over-the-top reconstruction), and the following 13 consecutive patients were treated with an ADB approach (using 2 tibial tunnels and 2 femoral tunnels placed in the center of the native femoral and tibial insertion sites). Grafts were pretensioned at 80 N and secured with cortical fixation systems under manual maximum force tension. Standard clinical laxity and pivot-shift tests were quantified at time zero before and after ACL reconstruction by means of a surgical navigation system dedicated to kinematic assessment; displacement of the medial and lateral compartments during the tests was also analyzed. Results: The ADB-reconstructed knees showed a larger preoperative-to-postoperative difference in anterior-posterior tibial plateau displacement of the medial and lateral compartments when compared with the NADB-reconstructed knees during the internal-external rotation test at 30° of flexion (P < .050). No other significant differences in laxity or pivot-shift values were noted. The mean surgical time for ADB reconstruction was significantly higher than that for NABD reconstruction (62 ± 13 and 43 ± 10 minutes, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion: Results showed a greater anterior-posterior translation of both compartments during the rotational passive laxity test in the ADB reconstruction group or overconstraint caused by the NADB technique. The 2 analyzed double-bundle ACL reconstructions did not show any significant quantitative difference in isolated anterior-posterior laxity and pivot-shift phenomenon at time zero. Clinical Relevance: Nonanatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction can control anterior-posterior laxity and the pivot-shift phenomenon as well as ABD ACL reconstruction.

Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up

This prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare the short-term results of arthroscopic double-bundle with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. One hundred and eight patients with a symptomatic ACL rupture were randomized to either double-bundle (Group DB) or single-bundle (Group SB) ACL reconstruction. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. At the 24-month follow-up, 94 of the 108 patients (87%) were available for evaluation. The rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly superior in the Group DB to that in the Group SB. No significant difference with regard to ACL revisions, total flexion work, mean peak flexion torque and extension work between the groups was detected. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the Tegner activity score, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, the Lysholm functional score, anterior knee pain or mobility, subjective knee function. In addition, no significant difference in laxity on the Lachman test or the KT-1000 maximum manual force test was investigated. All the results were significantly more satisfactory at each follow-up period than preoperatively, in both groups. Both SB- and DB-ACL reconstruction resulted in satisfactory subjective outcome and objective stability. Both these techniques can therefore be considered as suitable alternatives for ACL reconstruction. Moreover, as it seems to be according to the pivot shift test, the risk for the development of degenerative changes of the knee joint in a long run could be smaller in the Group DB.

Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests

The aims of this meta-analysis were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer, Stryker Knee Laxity Tester and Genucom Knee Analysis System for ACL rupture. It was hypothesized that the KT 1000 test is the most sensitive and specific. Secondly, it was hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 arthrometer increase when the amount of Newton force is increased. An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. All cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing one or more instrumented examination tests for diagnosing acute complete ACL rupture in living human subjects to an accepted reference standard such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy and MRI were included. The sensitivity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer with 69 N was 0.54. With 89 N, the sensitivity was 0.78 and the specificity 0.92, and with maximum manual force, the sensitivity was 0.93 and the specificity 0.93. For the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester, the sensitivity was 0.82 and the specificity 0.90. And for the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the sensitivity was 0.74 and the specificity 0.82. The KT Arthrometer performed with maximum manual force has the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value for diagnosing ACL rupture. Meta-analysis, level I.