Abstract

This prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare the short-term results of arthroscopic double-bundle with single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. One hundred and eight patients with a symptomatic ACL rupture were randomized to either double-bundle (Group DB) or single-bundle (Group SB) ACL reconstruction. Follow-up was conducted at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postoperatively. At the 24-month follow-up, 94 of the 108 patients (87%) were available for evaluation. The rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly superior in the Group DB to that in the Group SB. No significant difference with regard to ACL revisions, total flexion work, mean peak flexion torque and extension work between the groups was detected. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the Tegner activity score, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score, the Lysholm functional score, anterior knee pain or mobility, subjective knee function. In addition, no significant difference in laxity on the Lachman test or the KT-1000 maximum manual force test was investigated. All the results were significantly more satisfactory at each follow-up period than preoperatively, in both groups. Both SB- and DB-ACL reconstruction resulted in satisfactory subjective outcome and objective stability. Both these techniques can therefore be considered as suitable alternatives for ACL reconstruction. Moreover, as it seems to be according to the pivot shift test, the risk for the development of degenerative changes of the knee joint in a long run could be smaller in the Group DB.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call