Abstract Since Dr. Röver, in 1913, first formulated the modern theory of the stress distribution in a helical spring, including the effect of bar curvature, pitch angle, direct-shear stress, etc., a number of investigators have treated the problem. Wahl, Göhner, Adams, Vogt, Perkins, and Keysor have all presented interesting analyses. Most of these vary somewhat in the detailed method of treatment, but they all arrive at substantially the same result, in terms of the maximum fiber stress in the section. Wahl, in a notable series of experiments, demonstrated that these maximum stresses postulated by the theory are actually present in the spring. Thus it would appear that we have a satisfactory working theory. But practical spring men feel that there must be something wrong; the theory, when applied to certain standard spring designs with very satisfactory service records, predict stresses which seem far too high to be compatible with good endurance in service. This feeling is supported by the results of a few endurance tests, which indicate rather clearly that the maximum stresses predicted by the theory, though undoubtedly present, do not correctly index the actual endurance. In the author’s opinion, all the evidence points to the conclusion that the problem of design stresses in helical springs is not one for the mathematician, but must be worked out in the laboratories, by actual experiment.
Read full abstract