Maximum Squeeze Research Articles

The Prevalence of Enteropathy Symptoms from the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract and the Evaluation of Anorectal Function in Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

Complications affecting the gastrointestinal tract often occur in the course of diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate enteropathy symptoms and anorectal function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM). Fifty DM patients and 20 non-DM controls were enrolled into the study. Clinical data and laboratory tests were collected, physical examination and HRAM were performed. Symptoms in the lower gastrointestinal tract were reported by 72% of patients. DM patients with a long disease duration reported anal region discomfort (p = 0.028) and a sensation of incomplete evacuation (p = 0.036) more often than patients with shorter diabetes duration. Overall, DM patients had a lower maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) (p = 0.001) and a higher mean threshold of minimal rectal sensation (p < 0.01) than control subjects. They presented with enhanced features of dyssynergic defection than the control group. MSP and maximal resting pressure (MRP) were significantly lower in the group of long-term diabetes (p = 0.024; p = 0.026 respectively) than in patients with a short-term diabetes. The same observation was noted for patients with enteropathy symptoms that control for MSP (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p = 0.03) and MRP (p < 0.001; p = 0.0036; p = 0.0046), respectively, for incontinence, constipation, and diarrhea. Symptoms in the lower gastrointestinal tract are often reported by DM patients. All DM patients have impaired function of the external anal sphincter and present enhanced features of dyssynergic defecation and also impaired visceral sensation. Patients with long-standing DM and patients with enteropathy symptoms have severely impaired function of both anal sphincters.

Fissurectomy and anoplasty in posterior normotensive chronic anal fissure.

Purpose:Anal Fissure (AF) is the second most frequent proctological disease in Italy. Chronic AF (CAF) most common located at the posterior anal commissure (CAPF). CAPF are thought to be associated with hypertonic internal anal sphincter (IAS) but manometric findings showed that a normotonic IAS is present in the 20-40%. Sphincterotomy is often recommended as treatment of choice for CAF independently from IAS tone; nevertheless, this approach appears less logical for CAF with normotonic IAS, as in those cases there’s a higher risk of post-operative anal incontinence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of fissurectomy and anoplasty with V-Y cutaneous advancement flap, as treatment for patients suffering from CAPF without hypertonic IAS.Methods:We enrolled 30 patients affected by CAPF without IAS hypertonia. All patients were followed up for 2 years after the surgical procedure, with evaluation of anal continence, recurrence rate and maximum resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, ultraslow wave activity.Results:All patients healed within 40 days after surgery. We didn’t observe any “de novo” post-operative anal incontinence cases. We reported 2 cases of recurrences, within 18 months from surgery, all healed after conservative therapy. We didn’t record statistically significant differences in pre- and post-operative manometry findings.Conclusion:At 2 years after the surgical procedure we achieved good results, these evidences shows that sphincter preserving procedures are more suitable for CAPF without hypertonic IAS.

Effect of a subsequent pregnancy on anal sphincter integrity and function after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI)

Introduction and hypothesisEndoanal ultrasound (EAUS) and anal manometry are used in the assessment women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), both postpartum and in a subsequent pregnancy, to aid counselling regarding mode of delivery (MOD).MethodsA prospective observational study between 2012 to 2020 was completed. Women were reviewed 3 months postpartum following OASI and in the second half of a subsequent pregnancy. Anorectal symptoms were measured using the validated St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS: asymptomatic to mild symptoms = ≤ 4). Anal manometry (incremental maximum squeeze pressure [iMSP: normal = > 20 mmHg]) and EAUS (abnormal = sphincter defect > 1 h in size) were performed.ResultsOne hundred forty-six women were identified and 67.8% had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h in size postnatally. In those with a defect ≤ 1 h, postpartum mean iMSP and SMIS significantly improved in a subsequent pregnancy (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). In women with a defect > 1 h, there was no significant difference between the mean iMSP or SMIS score postnatally compared to a subsequent pregnancy. At both time points, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and SMIS of ≤ 4 (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively) compared to those with a defect < 1 h. In addition, significantly more women had an anal sphincter defect ≤ 1 h and iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg (p < 0.001). Overall, out of the 146 women included in this study, 76 (52.1%) with a defect ≤ 1 h also had an iMSP ≥ 20 mmHg and SMIS ≤ 4 at 3 months postpartum.ConclusionsWomen who remain asymptomatic with normal anal manometry and no abnormal sphincter defects on EAUS postnatally do not need to have these investigations repeated in a subsequent pregnancy and can be recommended to have a vaginal delivery. If our protocol was modified, over half of the women in this study could have had their MOD recommendation made in the postnatal period alone.

Evaluation of the Anopress® device in assessment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a specialist urogynaecology service

ObjectivesTHD Anopress® is a new portable anal manometry device which can be used in an outpatient clinic setting. In this study, we aimed to:•Evaluate anal canal resting average pressure (RAVP) and maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) as measured with Anopress in women with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI).•Study the relationship between anal canal pressures measured with Anopress with patient symptoms and Endoanal Ultrasound Scan (EAUSS) findings. Study designA retrospective analysis was conducted of women with OASI seen in a specialist clinic at 3- and 6-months post-delivery from November 2016 to December 2019. 72 women who attended their 6-month appointment and underwent anal manometry with Anopress were included. St Mark’s Faecal incontinence score (FI) was calculated and for the purpose of analysis patients were classified into two groups – FI score less than 5 and 5 or more. EAUSS findings were classified as sphincter defect or no defect. RAVP and MSP were measured with Anopress and compared with the variables (symptoms and EAUSS findings) using the Mann-Whitney U test. ResultsA total of 72 women were included in the study. There were 19 (27 %), 41 (57 %), 6 (8 %) and 6 (8 %) 3a, 3b, 3c and 4th degree perineal tears respectively. The median RAVP was 17 mm Hg (Inter-Quartile Range 10.75–24 mmHg) and median MSP was 47.5 mm Hg (IQR 33−68 mmHg).38 patients (53 %) had a demonstrable sphincter defect on EAUSS. 37 patients (51.3 %) had FI score < 5 and 35 patients (48.6 %) had FI score of 5 or more. RAVP and MSP were significantly lower with EAUSS demonstrable sphincter defect (p < 0.001). Symptom severity correlated with RAVP (p = 0.016) though its correlation with MSP was not statistically significant (p = 0.096). ConclusionAnopress seems promising in the assessment of anal sphincter function in women with OASI and can potentially make anal manometry testing easily accessible to urogynecologists.

Comparison of clinical and paraclinical characteristics of patients with urge, mixed, and passive fecal incontinence: a systematic literature review.

Two subgroups of fecal incontinence (FI) are described in literature and used in clinical practice. However, the pertinence of this classification of FI is still unknown as there are no clear established guidelines. To a better understanding, we performed a systematic review to characterize the different types of FI (active, passive, or mixed) on the basis of clinical presentation and complementary explorations. This systematic literature review was performed in reference to recommendations for systematic review using PRISMA guidelines without date restriction, until May 2020. This systematic review was performed without temporal limitation using MEDLINE-PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. Six hundred nine unique citations were identified from all the databases combined. Of those, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 8 retrospective observational studies and 13 prospective observational studies. There was a lack of homogeneity in definitions of passive and urge (active) FI among studies. Prevalence of passive and urge FI was respectively of 4.0-5.0 and 15.0-35.0%. Clinical characteristics, physical examination, and endoanal imaging were not evaluated in most studies. In anorectal manometry, maximal squeeze pressure was higher in passive FI subgroup in most studies and results regarding maximal resting pressure remain discordant. There seemed to be no difference regarding first sensation volume and maximal tolerable volume among subgroups. A few studies evaluated pudendal terminal nerve motor latency with no difference among subgroups. There is a lack of well-conducted prospective studies comparing the different subtypes of FI with validated definitions in both clinical and paraclinical examinations.

A prospective study of anal symptoms and continence among obese patients before and after bariatric surgery.

The effects of bariatric surgery on anal continence are not known. Data about proctologic lesions are very rare and do not include clinical data. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate anal continence and anal lesions before and after sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We prospectively included all patients presenting for bariatric surgery consultation at Bichat-Claude Bernard University Hospital, Paris, France, between 20 April 2015 and 16 December 2017. The patients were evaluated with questionnaires, anorectal manometry and clinical examination before SG (at enrollment) and between 12 and 24months after (SG). Anal incontinence was defined as a Vaizey score above 4. Of 118 enrolled patients, 98 had SG. The patients were mostly women (n = 99, 84.6%). Median patient age was 45years (IQR 34-54years). The median follow-up period after surgery among the 86 patients who completed follow-up was 15months (IQR 12.5-17.3months). There was no significant change in the prevalence of anal incontinence after SG (12.8% preoperatively vs 24.4% postoperatively, p = 0.06). The median Vaizey score was 4 (IQR 4-4) both before and after SG (p = 0.1). No patient had de novo anal incontinence but worsening of anal incontinence was noted in 10 patients. Manometry revealed significantly lower median resting pressure (29mmHg [IQR 22-68mmHg] vs 22mmHg [IQR 15-30mmHg], p = 0.0015) and maximal squeeze pressure (IQR 29-74mmHg vs IQR 30-60mmHg, p = 0.0008) after SG. Anismus was more frequent after SG and was associated with constipation and Bristol type 1-2 stool consistency. Quality of life was unchanged. Proctologic lesions were rare and were present in 11 patients (12%) at enrollment and in 2 (2.4%) at follow-up. SG affected clinical anal continence but not significantly, and manometric measurements for anal pressures were lower postoperatively. Proctologic lesions were rare in this study population.

Postoperative Functional Management Contributes to Anal Functional Recovery in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer After Robotic Total Intersphincteric Resection.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the comprehensive post-operative management including low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation and daily suppository usage on post-operative anal functional recovery for low rectal cancer patients who underwent robotic total intersphincteric resection (ISR).Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 42 low rectal cancer patients who underwent robotic total ISR, of which 23 patients received comprehensive post-operative management, including biofeedback low-frequency endo-anal electrical stimulation and daily suppository usage (management group). Wexner score and anorectal manometric values, including resting pressure (RP), maximum squeeze pressure (MSP), initial perceived volume (IPV), and maximum tolerated volume (MTV), were assessed and compared.Results: A total of 42 low rectal cancer patients were included in our study. The RP at 6 months after ISR (40.95 ± 6.95 mmHg vs. 33.29 ± 5.40 mmHg, p = 0.002) and MSP at 3 and 6 months after ISR (72.05 ± 10.16 mmHg vs. 69.05 ± 8.67 mmHg, p = 0.031; 91.57 ± 15.47 mmHg vs. 84.05 ± 12.94 mmHg, p = 0.039, respectively) were significantly higher in the management group. The median IPV at 1 and 3 months after ISR (17.81 ± 3.61 ml vs. 15.43 ± 5.08 ml, p = 0.038; 20.19 ± 4.35 ml vs. 17.67 ± 5.16 ml, p = 0.044, respectively) and MTV at 3 months after ISR (83.71 ± 5.44 ml vs. 76.10 ± 8.42 ml, p = 0.012) were significantly higher in the management group. Wexner scores at 1 and 3 months after closure of stoma (COS) in the management group were significantly lower (11.3 ± 2.9 vs. 13.4 ± 3.0, p = 0.041; 8.9 ± 2.0 vs. 10.6 ± 2.4, p = 0.036, respectively).Conclusions: Comprehensive post-operative management could accelerate the recovery of sphincteric function and anal sensitivity after robotic total ISR and could also contribute to treatment of fecal incontinence followed by COS.

Percutaneous electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of fecal incontinence: manometric results after 6months of treatment.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a minimally invasive approach with little adverse effects, but obtaining good results as shown in the different scales for the evaluation of the severity of incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of PTNS based on manometric determinations of the anal sphincter and severity during a period of treatment of 6months (18 sessions). A prospective interventional study of patients with fecal incontinence was performed. Subjects underwent one 30-min session every week for 12weeks, followed by 6 sessions every 2weeks. The effect on incontinence was evaluated by means of St. Marks and defecatory urgency scales, and manometry. Seventy-three patients were included. At baseline, 28.8% of the patients had a retention time of less than 1min. At 12weeks, 39.7% of the patients presented a retention time to 5-10min and at 18weeks 37% presented it over 10min. At baseline, mean St Marks score was 15.1+5.1, improving after 12weeks of treatment to 8.9+5 (p < 0.001). After 18 sessions, a greater improvement was observed up to 4+4.8 (p < 0.001). Maximum resting pressure showed a significant increase after treatment (mean increase 9.8mmHg; p = 0.006). Similarly, maximum squeeze pressure also presented a significant augmentation (mean increase 25.3mmHg; p = 0.002). Eighteen sessions of PTNS, divided in 12 weekly sessions and 6 sessions every 2weeks, have shown to obtain benefits, reducing the St. Marks and the defecatory urgency scores, and increasing the manometric values.

Implantable Agents for Fecal Incontinence: An Age-Matched Retrospective Cohort Analysis of GateKeeper versus SphinKeeper.

Background. We aim to evaluate morphofunctional changes of the sphincter complex after GateKeeper (GK) and SphinKeeper (SK) procedures and correlate these with symptom improvement. Methods. Ten consecutive females undergoing SK implant were age-matched with a cohort of 10 females who previously underwent the GK procedure. Patients in the SK and GK groups underwent implantation of 10 and 6 prostheses, respectively. Muscle tension (Tm), expressed in millinewtons per centimetre squared, mN (cm2)-1, was calculated using the equation Tm = P(ri)(tm)-1, where P is the average maximum squeeze pressure and ri and tm the inner radius and thickness of the external anal sphincter, respectively. The pre- and postimplant changes in Tm and Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS) were tested by linear and Poisson regression models, respectively. Results. The CCFIS significantly improved in both groups at 12-month postimplantation. Although not reaching statistical significance, symptom improvement after SK was 33% above that observed after GK (P = .088). Compared to the baseline, a significant increase in Tm was observed in both groups at 12months (GK, 508.1 [478.8-568.0] vs 864.4 [827.0-885.8]mN (cm2)-1; SK, 528.0 [472.7-564.0] vs 858.6 [828.0-919.6]mN (cm2)-1, P = .005). Compared to the GK group, Tm was significantly higher in patients after SK implant (158.3mN (cm2)-1 [95% confidence interval, 109.6-207.0]; P < .001), after controlling for baseline values, at 12-month postimplantation. Conclusions. GK and SK are safe and effective treatments for FI with good short-term clinical outcomes. Comparative analysis showed superiority of SK over GK in terms of gain in Tm, with borderline significantly better improvement in symptoms. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Outcome of anal symptoms and anorectal function following two obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)\u2014a nested case-controlled study

Introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant risk factor for developing anal incontinence. It can therefore be hypothesised that recurrent OASI in a subsequent delivery may predispose women to further anal sphincter dysfunction.MethodsA nested case-controlled study based on data collected prospectively between 2006 and 2019. Women matched for age and ethnicity, with a history of one OASI and no sphincter damage in a subsequent delivery (control) were compared to women sustaining a second OASI. Assessment was carried out using the St Mark’s score (SMIS), anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound scan (findings quantified using the modified Starck score).ResultsEighty-four women were included and equally distributed between the two groups, who were followed up 12 weeks postnatally. No difference in SMIS scores was found. Maximum resting pressure (MRP, mmHg) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP, mmHg) were significantly reduced in the study group. Median (IQR) MRP in the study group was 40.0 (31.3–54.0) versus 46.0 (39.3–61.5) in the control group (p = 0.030). Median (IQR) MSP was 73.0 (58.3–93.5) in the study group versus 92.5 (70.5–110.8) (p = 0.006) in the control group. A significant difference (p = 0.002) was found in the modified Starck score between the study group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–6.0]) and control group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0–0.0]).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that women with recurrent OASI do not have significant anorectal symptoms compared to those with one OASI 12 weeks after delivery, but worse anal sphincter function and integrity. Therefore, on long-term follow-up, symptoms may possibly develop. This information will be useful when counselling women in a subsequent pregnancy.

High-resolution anorectal manometry in children with functional constipation with or without fecal incontinence.

High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) is expected to be better than conventional manometry. Our aim was to characterize HR-ARM pressures in children with functional constipation (FC), with or without fecal incontinence (FI). Children with diagnosis of FC, with or without FI, according to Rome-IV criteria, were enrolled. All patients underwent HR-ARM using 24-channel water-perfused catheter. Twenty-nine consecutive children (M/F: 21/8; mean age±SD: 9.5±3.1years; range 4-15), of whom 21 affected by FC without FI (mean age±SD: 9.3±3.23years) and 8 affected by FC with FI (mean age±SD: 10.2±3.08years), were enrolled. No significant differences were found regard to gender and age. The analysis of HR-ARM 3D plots demonstrated asymmetry of the anal canal, with higher pressures in distal halves. Comparing pressures between the two groups, we found lower values in FC with FI than in FC without FI group, with a statistically significance for maximum and mean resting pressures (P=.032 and P=.008, respectively). When evaluating our study population respect to asymptomatic children, we found lower resting pressures, lower maximum squeeze pressure, and higher rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) values. Our data demonstrate that HR-ARM pressures at rest and during squeezing in FC with FI children are lower than FC without FI subjects, particularly in anteroposterior quadrants. Compared to children without lower gastrointestinal symptoms, children with FC with or without FI show lower pressures and higher values of RAIR.

The efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has become one of the main treatment options in patients with fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted using the Pubmed, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases, restricted to the English language and to articles published from 2000 to November 2018. A total of 434 articles on the efficacy of SNM in the treatment of LARS were retrieved, and 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 114 patients treated with SNM for LARS The overall success rate excluding study heterogeneity was 83.30% [95% CI (71.33-95.25%)]. Improvement in anal continence was seen in several clinical and functional parameters, including the Wexner Score [10.78 points, 95% CI (8.55-13.02), p < 0.0001], manometric maximum resting pressure [mean improvement of 6.37mm/Hg, 95% CI (2.67-10.07), p = 0.0007], maximum squeeze pressure [mean improvement of 17.99mm/Hg, 95% CI (17.42-18.56), p < 0.0001] and maximum tolerated volume [mean improvement of 22.74ml, 95% CI (10.65-34.83), p = 0.0002]. Quality of life questionnaires also demonstrated significant improvement in patients' quality of life, but were reported only in a small group of included patients. SNM significantly improves symptoms and quality of life in patients suffering from fecal incontinence following low anterior resection.

Reliability of manometry for assessing pelvic floor muscle function in healthy men.

ObjectivesTo the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the reliability of assessment methods for male pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the reliability of manometry with an anal sensor (Peritron cat 9300A) to assess PFM function in healthy men.MethodsHealthy male subjects (n = 21) without urinary leakage underwent testing to assess PFM function, and intra‐ and interrater reliability tests among examiners were performed. The PFM function included maximal anorectal squeeze pressure, endurance, mean anorectal squeeze pressure, gradient, and area under the curve during PFM voluntary contraction.ResultsParticipants had a median age of 38 years (range 26‐51), and a mean BMI of 23.2 ± 2.0 kg/m2. Satisfactory intra‐ and interrater reliability scores were found for resting pressure, anorectal squeeze pressure, and endurance. The intra‐rater reliability of resting pressure, anorectal squeeze pressure, and endurance were 0.71, 0.89, and 0.75 for examiner 1 and 0.72, 0.89, and 0.87 for examiner 2. The interrater reliability for resting pressure, anorectal squeeze pressure, and endurance were 0.58, 0.93, and 0.61, respectively.ConclusionsThis is the first prospective study showing the favorable intra‐ and interrater reliability of manometry for PFM function in healthy men. Our findings demonstrated that manometry can provide both reliable and reproducible data regarding PFM function in continent men, suggesting Peritron cat 9300A can be used to evaluate the PFM function in men.

HIGH-RESOLUTION ANORECTAL MANOMETRY IN TESTING ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER COMBINATION TREATMENT FOR RECTAL CANCER

The purpose of the study was to evaluate anorectal function with high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients receiving combination treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods. We analyzed literature data (PubMed, Scopus, eLIBRARY databases) and our treatment outcomes in 50 rectal cancer patients receiving combination or surgical treatment at Rostov Research Institute of Oncology. Results. The mean anal resting pressure was 1.8 times lower, and the maximal anal squeeze pressure was 1.5 times lower in patients after combination treatment, compared to surgical treatment (p&lt;0.05). 3 months after combination treatment with prolonged radiotherapy, contractile properties of the internal sphincter were decreased in 83.3%, of the external sphincter - in 26.7% of patients. Fatigue rate of external sphincter muscles was increased in 17 (56.7%) patients of this group. We observed a correlation between some anorectal manometry data and the LARS score: in both groups, patients with the maximal LARS score showed the lowest mean anal resting pressure, compared to patients with minimal and average LaRs scores (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion. Due to negative effect of radiation therapy on the anorectal function, careful selection of patients who will benefit from radiation therapy is very important, as well as identification of patients with a high risk of radiation-induced functional problems and development of rehabilitation programs for patients treated for rectal cancer.

Analyzing the Role of Anal Sphincter Pressure in Rectocele Formation.

PurposeConstipation is a common entity in society with various factors in the etiology. In this study, we evaluated the role of anal sphincter pressure of patients who refer to surgery clinic with complaint of constipation.MethodsSixty patients who refer to surgery clinic with complaint of constipation and were diagnosed with constipation due to Rome III criteria between July 2010 and September 2014. These patients were evaluated with defecography and were divided into 2 groups based on presence of rectocele. Both groups’ anal sphincter pressures were evaluated using anal manometry and findings were compared.ResultsThe patients with rectocele and without rectocele using defecography were inspected with anal manometry regarding resting tone pressure, squeeze pressure, maximum squeeze pressure and simulated defecation response pressure, first sensation volume, urge sensation volume, and maximum tolerable volume. Results were compared and no significant difference was found regarding groups with rectocele and without rectocele (P > 0.05).ConclusionWe have proved the hypothesis arguing that increased sphincter pressures do not play a role in the formation of rectocele by inducing an obstruction and the formation of dilation in proximal bowel, and demonstrated that the presence of rectocele is not dependent on an increase in sphincter pressures.

P972 Quantitative methods for assessing contractile reserve in patients with diastolic heart failure

Abstract Aim The effectiveness of isometric handgrip exercise on changes of cardiovascular hemodynamics parameter in patients with diastolic heart failure is unknown. We assessed the effect of several hemodynamic parameters and it changes during handgrip maneuvers in patients with different stages of diastolic heart failure during chemotherapy and their improvements after 4 months follow up (4mFU) treatment with single pill combination of ACE inhibitor ACE) and beta –blocker(BB) .Methods: The study population included 65 patients- female / mean age of 45 ± 12 years/ 55 with breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy / 30 pts with HFpEF and 25 pts with HFmrEF / and 10 pts with HFnEF and without chemotherapy.The effect of handgrip maneuver on hemodynamic parameters were studied by speckle tracking echocardiography. Following maximal squeeze by 100%, during the next 3 minutes patients were instructed to apply pressure at 50%. The global longitudinal strain were extracted by 3, 4 and 2 chamber apical view images on 70-85 fr/s and MAP and HR were performed at basal level, 1st, 2nd and 3rd minutes during handgrip stress test. The contractility /force/ of LV were also calculate as ratio SBP / ESV . Patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF received for 4 months treatment with single pill combination ACE (perindorpril)/ BB (bisoprolol) 5/5 mg.Results:Heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure(MAP) increased significantly after handgrip maneuver / from 75 ±6 beats /min to 101 ±12 beats/ min, 109 ± 15 mmHg to 118 ± 19mmHg, p &amp;lt; 0,05 / .Pulmonary artery systolic(s) and diastolic (d) pressure(PAP),pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) , cardiac index(CI) , LVEF did not change significantly(p &amp;gt; 0,5) after handgrip maneuvers . On the other hand, LV force (SBP/ ESV ratio) ,MAP and HR decreases significantly (p &amp;lt; 0,01) in group with HFmrEF. In same group were found significantly decreased GLVLS at 2nd and 3rd minutes during stress- test comparable with other 2 groups with HFpEF and HFnEF. After 4mFU and treatment with 5/5 mg doses combination of ACE / BB were found improvement in parameters: HR /p &amp;lt; 0,001/, MAP /p &amp;lt; 0.01/ and contractile reserve as well as LV force /p &amp;lt; 0, 01/ and GLVLS /p &amp;lt; 0,001/.Conclusion: Cardiovascular response to handgrip maneuver may be a marker of failure to respond to compensatory mechanisms. Patients with good LV reserve had a rise in stroke –work with little or no change in LVEDP. Patients with poor contractile reserve had a fall in stroke- work reserve together with a substantial rise in LVEDP. It is concluded that the stress imposed by sustained handgrip provides a simple test for evaluation of LV contractile reserve in patients, who will develop cardiotoxicity during chemotherapy treatment. The treatment with combination with small doses ACE/BB is a big challenge in patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF to improve the contractile reserve.

Rehabilitation program for patients with low anterior resection syndrome

To develop a rehabilitation program for patients with low anterior resection syndrome. The investigation was performed at 2 stages. During the first stage, 29 patients with LARS (17 (58.6%) men, mean age of the participants' 61.5±9.5 years), 12 (41.4%) women (mean age 61.2±7.8 years) were examined and received the course of conservative treatment with the use of biofeedback-therapy performed by the standard protocol. On the second stage, 17 patients (mean age 61.4±12.7 years) - 9 (52.9%) men, 8 (47.1%) women received biofeedback therapy in combination with tibial neuromodulation (TNM). Functional state of the rectum and the locking apparatus in all patients were evaluated by anorectal manometry: sphincterometry and studies of the reservoir function of the rectum before and after treatment. The developed complex of rehabilitation measures led to improved treatment results for patients with rectal cancer by improving the quality of life after low anterior resection, reducing the manifestations of LARS (by 47.8%). Stable positive results of treatment were maintained in 36.4% of patients, positive dynamics from the treatment according to the LARS scale decreased slightly in 54.5%, deterioration of indicators in 3-6 months after conservative rehabilitation was registered in 9.1% of cases. At the first stage maximal squeeze pressure improvement was reached in the whole cohort (p=0.047), at the second stage these trend was seen only for women for the pressure values at rest (p=0.01) and during squeeze (p=0.025). The data obtained allowed us to recommend a repeat course of treatment to 63.6% of patients. The authors modified and optimized a special complex of physical therapy for the rehabilitation of patients both in a medical institution and at home. These exercises are aimed at improving the functional state of the pelvic floor muscles and sphincter apparatus. Rehabilitation program for patients with low anterior resection syndrome should include: 1) biofeedback therapy to improve the holding function; 2) biofeedback therapy aimed at improving the reservoir function and sensitivity of the rectum to filling; 3) tibial neuromodulation. This program may help improving the contractility of the anal sphincter and reservoir function of the rectum, as well as the appearance of the urge to defecate.

Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer

Objective: To explore the technical characteristics and short-term clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection (ISR) for patients with low rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) rigid colonoscopy showed lower margin of the tumor ≤5 cm from the anal verge; (2) preoperative rectal MRI or endorectal ultrasound revealed staging T1-2, or T3 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy; (3) patients less than 70 years old with good function of anal sphincter before surgery; (4) no synchronous multiple primary carcinoma, and no distant metastasis; (5) the method of operation was agreed by the patient. Exclusion criteria: (1) T4 stage tumors; (2) sphincter dysfunction before operation; (3) recurrent tumors; (4) lower edge of tumors beyond the dentate line; (5) death due to non-rectal cancer during follow-up and unsatisfactory follow-up data. The clinical data of 21 patients with low rectal cancer meeting inclusion criteria undergoing robotic-assisted ISR at our department from January 2015 to June 2018 were collected. Parameters during and after operation were observed. Anorectal manometry was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation, and anal function was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after the closure of the stoma by Kirwan classification and Wexner fecal incontinence score. The key steps of the operation are as follows: according to the principle of total mesorectal excision, the robot continued to enter into the levator ani hiatusdistally, and dissectin the sphincter space; according to the scope of sphincter resection, ISRwas divided into partial ISR, subtotal ISR, and total ISR; subtotal and total ISR usually needed to be combined with transanal pathway. The reconstruction of digestive tract was performed by double stapler anastomosis under laparoscope orhand-sewnanastomosis under direct vision, and preventive ileostomy was completed in the right lower abdomen. Results: Of 21 patients, 13 were male and 8 were female with mean age of (57.5±16.3) years. All the patients successfully completed the operation without conversion to laparotomy. Fourteen cases (66.7%) adopted partial ISR through complete transabdominal approach, 6 cases (28.6%) adopted the subtotal ISR through combined transabdominal and transanal approachs, and 1 case (4.8%) adopted the total ISR through the combined transabdominal and transanal approachs. The total operation time was (213.1±56.3) minutes, including (27.3±5.4) minutes for mechanical arm installation and (175.7±51.6) minutes for robotic operation. The amount of intraoperative hemorrhage was (62.8±23.2) ml, and no blood transfusion was performed in any patient. All patients underwent prophylactic ileostomy, and the stoma was closed 3-6 months after the operation. Except one case of anastomotic leakage, all other stomas were closed successfully. The postoperative hospitalization time was (7.6±2.2) days, and time to fluid intake was (3.3±0.9) days. One case of anastomotic leakage, one case of anastomotic stenosis, one case of inflammatory external hemorrhoids and one case of urinary retention occurred after surgery,and all of them were cured by conservative treatment. The mean diameter of tumors was (2.9±1.2) cm, and the number of harvested lymph node was 12.8 ± 3.3. In the whole group, the circumcision margin was negative, the proximal margin was (12.2 ± 2.1) cm, the distal margin was (1.1 ± 0.4) with all negative, and the R0 resection rate was 100%. The results of anorectal manometry showed that the preoperative rest pressure, rectal maximum squeeze pressure, initial sensory volume and maximum tolerated volume were (45.19±8.46) mmHg, (128.18±18.80) mmHg, (44.33±10.11) ml and (119.00±19.28) ml, respectively;these parameters reduced significantly 3 months after operation and they were (23.44±5.54) mmHg, (93.72±12.15) mmHg, (17.72±5.32) ml and (70.44±10.9) ml, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). The resting pressure and the rectal maximum squeeze pressure returned to preoperative levels 12 months after operation, which were (39.33±6.64) mmHg and (120.58±16.47) mmHg, respectively (both P>0.05), while the initial sensory volume and the maximum tolerated volume failed to reach the preoperative state, which were (30.67±7.45) ml and (92.25±10.32) ml, respectively (both P<0.05). The patients were followed up for (22.1±10.6) months without local recurrence and distant metastasis. Eighteen patients were evaluated for anal function: Kirwan classification was grade I for 6 cases, grade II for 7 cases, grade III for 4 cases, and grade IV for 1 case; Wexner incontinence score was 8.6±0.8; 14 cases had good defecation control. Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of ISR with Da Vinci robot in the treatment of low rectal cancer is satisfactory.

Long-term efficacy analysis of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for high and middle imperforate anus

Objective: To explore the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty and conventional anorectoplasty in the treatment of children with high and middle anal atresia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was used. Inclusion criteria: (1) children with high and middle anal atresia; (2) complicated with rectourethral or rectovesical fistula; (3) complete follow-up data. Exclusion criteria: (1) complicated with 21-trisomy; (2) cerebral palsy and other mentaldisabilities; (3) Currarino syndrome; (4) FG syndrome. Clinical data of 88 patients with middle and high anal atresia, who complicated with rectourethral fistula or rectovesical fistula, and underwent anoplasty at Department of Pediatric Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2009 to June 2014 were enrolled in the study and analyzed. There were 24 cases with middle atresia and 64 cases with high atresia. All the cases were divided into 2 groups based on the operative method: laparoscopic group (laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty, 49 cases), pena group (posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, 39 cases). The demographic features of two groups were comparable. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, body mass, classification of anomaly types and sacral ratio (all P>0.05). Student t test and Chi square tests were used to compare the surgical conditions (operative time, postoperative hospital stay and complications), anal function (Kelly score), constipation (Krickenbeck constipation score) and anorectal pressure. Results: Children of both groups all completed operation ssuccessfully. There were no statistically significant differences between laparoscopic group and pena group in the operative time [(120±31) minutes vs. (112±23) minutes, t=1.343, P=0.091] and postoperative hospital stay [(7.1±2.3) days vs. (10.7±3.3) days, t=6.021, P=1.000]. Complications were more common in the pena group [16.3% (8/49) vs. 35.9% (14/39), χ(2)=4.436, P=0.035]. The main complications in laparoscopic group were anal prolapse (8.2%, 4/49) and anal stenosis (6.2%, 3/49), while in pena group were anal stenosis (12.8%, 5/39) and perioperative perianal skin erosion (10.3%, 4/39). As for the anal function, the degree of feces, defecation control and sphincter contractility, the single scoring differences of Kelly scoring system were not statistically significant between the two groups, but the proportion of good function in the laparoscopic group was higher than that in the pena group [67.3% (8/49) vs. 38.5% (15/39), χ(2)=7.308, P=0.007]. Constipation occurred in 6 (12.2%) patients in the laparoscopic group, of whom 5 were improved by diet regulation and 1 required laxatives, while 9 (23.1%) patients developed constipation in the pena group, of whom 4 were improved by diet regulation and 5 required long-term laxatives. The difference of constipation ratio was not statistically significant (χ(2)=1.802, P=0.180). There were no cases of Krickenbeck constipation grade 3. Compared to the pena group, the laparoscopic group had higher anal resting pressure [(33.35±9.69) mmHg vs. (27.68±10.74) mmHg, t=2.599, P=0.011], higher dilating pressure [(9.00±5.61) mmHg vs.(6.51±3.24) mmHg, t=2.462, P=0.016], higher maximal squeeze pressure [(65.80±17.23) mmHg vs. (56.74±18.93) mmHg, t=2.389, P=0.019] and longer maximal contraction time [(21.16±5.02) seconds vs. (18.44±7.24) seconds, t=2.079, P=0.041]. The rectal resting pressure [(5.36±3.00) mmHg vs. (4.61±3.93) mmHg, t=1.015, P=0.312] was not statistically significantly different. Conclusions: Compared with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty, laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty in the treatment of high and middle anal atresia has better long-term efficacy with less perioperative complications.

Preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure as a predictor of fecal incontinence after very low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Very low anterior resection (VLAR) is performed widely, but some patients are left with fecal incontinence (FI), which compromises their quality of life (QOL) severely. This study sought to identify the predictive factors of postoperative FI after VLAR, which remain unclear. We evaluated the anorectal manometry data of patients who underwent VLAR to identify the risk factors for postoperative FI among the various clinicopathological factors and manometric characteristics. FI and QOL were analyzed using the Wexner score and EORTC QLQ-C30, respectively. The subjects of this study were 40 patients who underwent VLAR for low rectal cancer between April, 2015 and May, 2018. There were 11 (27%) patients in the major-FI group and 29 (73%) in the minor-FI group. Multivariate analysis revealed that low preoperative incremental maximum squeeze pressure (iMSP) was an independent risk factor for postoperative major-FI. Postoperative QOL tended to be worse in the major-FI group. Preoperative low iMSP increases the risk of major-FI and impaired QOL after VLAR. This highlights the importance of performing preoperative anorectal manometry to evaluate the patient's anal function as well as to select the most appropriate operative procedure and early multifaceted treatment such as medication, rehabilitation, and biofeedback for postoperative FI.