This study was conducted to identify high school students' thought of infinitesimals and the resulting commognitive conflict with school mathematics discourse. Data collection was conducted in two stages: an open-ended questionnaire survey and follow-up interviews. The open-ended questionnaire was composed of questions to identify students' thoughts on the existence of infinitesimals and their opinions on conflict situations related to infinitesimals. Interviews were conducted with students who showed infinitesimal opinion in answering open-ended questionnaires. As a result of the study, some students revealed the idea that infinitesimals and infinitely large numbers exist, and showed conflicts by presenting narratives that contradicted the narratives of school mathematics. In addition, some students expressed their disagreement with the meta-rules of school mathematics, which adopts an intuitive explanation in the justification method of 0.999...=1 and the expression of the relationship between points, lines, and planes. The appearance of students experiencing conflict and the phenomenon of refuting and questioning the meta-rules of school mathematics could be interpreted as a commognitive conflict between students' discourse and school mathematics discourse. The specific appearance of commogntive conflict that emerged as a result of this study can serve as basic data for the exploration of teaching and learning methods that help students recognize the need for rigorous mathematical definitions and justifications and promote the transition to new discourse.