Maternal Vaccination Rates Research Articles

Postpartum Interventions to Increase Maternal Vaccination Uptake: Is It Worth It?

Background/Objectives: Vaccination of pregnant and postpartum women for pertussis, influenza and COVID-19 not only protects themselves but also offspring. Despite the benefits of this approach, vaccination uptake remains suboptimal in pregnancy. Where the opportunity to be vaccinated in pregnancy is missed, the offer of vaccination in the post-partum period may be an alternative strategy. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the impact of interventions to increase vaccination uptake in the postpartum period on vaccination uptake. Methods: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, including interventional studies promoting vaccination uptake in postpartum women published between 2009 and 2024. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO. Results: We finally included 16 studies in the review, and the primary outcome was vaccination uptake in the postpartum period. The most significant factors for increasing uptake were recommendation from healthcare providers, type of interventions used, and delivery of vaccines in the maternity wards or the community. Conclusions: In conclusion, maternal vaccination rates in the postpartum period may increase with targeted education by healthcare professionals and positive reinforcement. The interventions described in these studies could be applied in the healthcare systems worldwide.

Maternal vaccination provision in NHS maternity trusts across England

BackgroundVaccinations for seasonal influenza and pertussis have been recommended for pregnant women in England since 2010 and 2012, respectively. Uptake rates are suboptimal with large regional variations. To improve uptake, from 2016 onwards maternity trusts were commissioned to offer pertussis (and other) vaccinations in addition to these being available in primary care. Since 2021, Covid-19 vaccination has also been recommended for pregnant women. Overall maternal vaccination rates are routinely available, but not the relative provision by maternity trusts. We aimed to describe the national picture of maternity trust provision of maternal vaccinations, including how the maternity trust vaccination programme has progressed. MethodsCross-sectional survey plus comparisons with 2017–18 figures for maternity trust provision of pertussis vaccination, and with UKHSA data for total pertussis vaccination. ResultsTwelve NHS commissioners participated (from 13/06/22 to 31/03/23) providing data for 120 (of a total 124) maternity trusts across England. All 120 (100%) trusts were commissioned to deliver influenza, and 107 (89%) to deliver pertussis vaccinations, though not all actually administered the vaccines; 29% offered Covid-19 vaccinations. For 2021–22 we found a mean of 25% (range 0–81.3%) women were vaccinated for pertussis (a large increase compared with previous estimates for 2017–18); and 11% (range 0–74.2%) for influenza, via their maternity trust. Commissioners reported a negative impact of the pandemic on routine vaccination provision. There was indication of efficiency by vaccinating women attending for other appointments. There are diverse mechanisms for reporting pertussis and influenza vaccinations administered at maternity trusts back to primary care, which may be inefficient for maternity staff workload and accuracy of data transfer (especially for pertussis). ConclusionA high proportion of maternity trusts provide both pertussis and influenza vaccinations, despite a negative impact of the pandemic. Reasons for large between-trust variation in vaccination rates should be explored to improve uptake and equity.

US Infant Pertussis Incidence Trends Before and After Implementation of the Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Pertussis Vaccine

ABSTRACT Many illnesses can become especially serious when contracted within the first year of life; pertussis remains quite deadly despite recent medical advances in disease prevention. Current guidance on vaccination in the United States includes 3 doses of the DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis) vaccine beginning at 2 months of age, but this regimen leaves infants younger than that very vulnerable to illness. Research has shown both that vaccinating mothers with tetanus toxoid reduces tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) between 27 and 36 weeks of gestation significantly reduces instances of pertussis in infants younger than 2 months, and that maternal vaccination rates have risen in the last few years. However, research is lacking in analyzing the relationship between vaccination rates in pregnant mothers and the burden of pertussis in infants in the United States. This study was designed to assess data from 2000 to 2019 and examine the association of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy with trends in infant pertussis. This analysis included data obtained from the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System between 2000 and 2019. This included a total of 57,460 cases of pertussis in infants younger than 1 year and a total of 19,322 cases in infants younger than 2 months. The rate of pertussis incidence for infants younger than 2 months in the time period before the implementation of prenatal Tdap was calculated to be 165.3 per 100,000 individuals, with no significant trend observed annually (P = 0.28). After the implementation of routine maternal Tdap, incidence decreased to 80.9 per 100,000 infants between 2017 and 2019. Accounting for both time periods, the mean annual incidence was calculated as 121.8 per 100,000 infants younger than 2 months. Annual incidence also showed a significant decreasing trend in the period after implementation of maternal Tdap vaccination (slope: −14.53 per 100,000 infants per year; P = 0.001). The change in trends before and after this implementation was also significant (P = 0.01). In a slightly older age group of 6 to 12 months of age, mean annual incidence of pertussis was 19.7 per 100,000 infants. In the time period before implementation of maternal Tdap, incidence among infants aged 6 to 12 months was consistently 4 to 12 times less than infants younger than 2 months and did not significantly change after the implementation of the maternal vaccine. Comparing the 2 age groups, there was no significant change in the difference in incidence between infants younger than 2 months and those between 6 and 12 months in the period before the maternal vaccine, and after its implementation, there was a significant decrease in the incidence difference between the 2 groups (P < 0.001). These results suggest an association between the maternal Tdap vaccination and trends of pertussis incidence in infants younger than 2 months. This also indicates a possible reduction in disease burden attributable to maternal Tdap vaccination before delivery. Limitations of this study include limited availability of individual maternal vaccination status, as well as an inability to identify if any infants were vaccinated before the age of 2 months. Further research should focus on clinical impact of the Tdap vaccination in context with the later DTaP vaccination and on analyzing the trends in disease associated with both vaccinations. Clinical guidelines should also be examined to ensure that public health trends and individual health trends are in alignment.

Pertussis and influenza immunization: perceived attitude and decision of postpartum patients

BackgroundVaccination of pregnant patients with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) and influenza vaccine during influenza season can reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality; nevertheless, vaccination rates remain suboptimal in this patient population. To investigate the effect of a brief educational counseling session on maternal Tdap and influenza vaccination and determine factors influencing women’s decision in regards to receiving Tdap and or influenza vaccine during their pregnancy.MethodsA face-to-face semi-structured cross-sectional survey was administered to postpartum patients on their anticipated day of discharge (June 11-August 21, 2018). A brief educational counseling session about maternal pertussis and Tdap vaccine was provided to interested patients after which the Tdap vaccine was offered to eligible patients who did not receive it during their pregnancy or upon hospital admission. Medical records were reviewed to determine if surveyed patients were vaccinated prior to discharge.ResultsTwo hundred postpartum patients were surveyed on their day of anticipated discharge. Of those who were surveyed, 103 (51.5%) had received Tdap and 80 (40.0%) had received influenza vaccinations prior to hospitalization. Among immunized patients, the common facilitators were doctor’s recommendation (Tdap: 68, 54.4%; influenza: 3, 6.0%), to protect their baby (Tdap: 57, 45.6%; influenza: 17, 34.0%) and for self-protection (Tdap: 17, 13.6%; Influenza: 17, 34.0%). Of the 119 participants who had not received either Tdap or influenza vaccine prior to the survey, the barriers cited were that the vaccine was not offered by the provider (Tdap: 36, 52.2%; influenza: 29, 27.6%), belief that vaccination was unnecessary (Tdap: 5, 7.2%; influenza: 9, 8.5%), safety concerns for baby (Tdap: 4, 5.8%; influenza: 2, 1.9%). Of 97 patients who were not immunized with Tdap prior to admission but were eligible to receive vaccine, 24 (25%) were vaccinated prior to survey as part of routine hospital-based screening and vaccination program, 29 (38.2%) after our survey.ConclusionInterventions to educate pregnant patients about the benefits of vaccination for their baby, addressing patient safety concerns, and vaccine administration in obstetricians’ offices may significantly improve maternal vaccination rates.

106. High Maternal Tdap Vaccine Uptake During Early Part of Vaccination Window: Implications for Future Maternal Vaccines

Abstract Background Maternal vaccines to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) among infants are in development. Uptake of existing maternal vaccines can be used to predict uptake of future maternal RSV vaccines and may be used to inform vaccine policy decisions. Previous reports of maternal vaccination rates do not estimate vaccine uptake by gestational week (wGA) of pregnancy, which is needed for precise estimation of vaccine impact. This study estimated the uptake of maternal Tdap vaccination overall and by wGA in a large electronic health records (EHR) database representing both privately and publicly insured patients over a recent 5-year period. Methods We identified pregnant women aged 15 – 44 years who had a live birth delivery between 01/01/2017 – 9/29/2021 in the Optum EHR database. Continuous activity for 6 months pre-conception through 1 day after delivery were required. Patients with >1 type of pregnancy outcome within 7 days and/or unidentifiable wGA were excluded. We utilized recently published gestational age algorithms to estimate the uptake of maternal Tdap vaccination overall and by wGA of pregnancy. Results were reported by year. Results The population included 1,056,488 live births among 919,510 pregnant women during the study period. The average age at delivery was 29.7 years (SD: 5.6), 72% were white, 82% were non-Hispanic; 58% had private insurance, and 38% had Medicaid. Overall, 56% of the pregnancies included a Tdap vaccine during their pregnancy. Among vaccinated pregnancies, the majority (68%) of Tdap vaccines were administered during the first 6 weeks of the recommended 10-week vaccination window (CDC recommends Tdap vaccination from 27-36 wGA) (Table). Table.Timing of Maternal Tdap Vaccination among Pregnant Women, by Year Conclusion In this analysis using a large EHR database, the overall uptake of maternal Tdap vaccination was consistent with previously published estimates. Notably, the majority of Tdap vaccination occurred during the earliest weeks of the recommended vaccination period. These results may have important implications for estimating potential impact of future maternal vaccines. Disclosures Amy W. Law, PharmD, Pfizer: Employment|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds Jennifer Judy, MS, PhD, Pfizer Inc: Employee|Pfizer Inc: Stocks/Bonds Sarah J. Willis, PhD, MPH, Pfizer: Pfizer supported research at Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute (paid to Institute)|Pfizer: Employment Kimberly M. Shea, Ph.D., M.P.H., Pfizer: Employee|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds.

Obstetric Provider Attitudes and Office Practices for Maternal Influenza and Tdap Vaccination.

Background: Although maternal vaccination with influenza and tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines improve health outcomes for pregnant individuals and infants, maternal vaccination rates are low. This study assessed obstetric providers' attitudes and practices related to influenza and Tdap vaccination in four large health systems in New York (NY) and California (CA). Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all obstetric providers within four health systems (two in NY, two in CA) to evaluate provider attitudes and office systems used for Tdap and influenza vaccination. The survey assessed perceptions of influenza and Tdap vaccination based on the Health Belief Model, and assessed office systems (reminders, prompts, standing orders, and patient education) and communication with pregnant patients related to influenza and Tdap vaccines. Results: We had 112 responses (52% response rate) for analyses. Respondents strongly supported vaccination during pregnancy but viewed influenza disease as less of a concern for newborns than for pregnant individuals (40% vs. 67% considered influenza disease to be very significant, p < 0.001). Only 84% agreed that giving influenza vaccine in the first trimester is very safe. Patient vaccine refusal was the most commonly named barrier for both influenza and Tdap vaccination. Providers frequently used office system prompts, but did not frequently use standing orders, patient educational materials, vaccine champions, and feedback on vaccination rates. Conclusions: While most providers consider influenza and Tdap vaccination important during pregnancy, there is room for improvement in focusing on the importance of maternal vaccination to the health of the infant, and increasing the use of office systems to improve vaccination during pregnancy.

What Will It Take to Increase Maternal Vaccination Rates?

What Will It Take to Increase Maternal Vaccination Rates?

Understanding factors that influence the decision to be vaccinated against influenza and pertussis in pregnancy: Aqualitative study.

To identify how pregnant women perceive pertussis and influenza and the factors that influence their decision to be vaccinated. Suffering from influenza during pregnancy increases complications in the pregnant woman, foetus and newborn. Pertussis in children under six months of age causes severe complications. Maternal vaccination against influenza and pertussis is effective and safe. However, vaccination rates are insufficient. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study, using semi-structured interviews. This research adheres to the COREQ guidelines and checklist. We carried out 18semi-structured face-to-face interviews with pregnant women, using intentional sampling and thematic analysis. We identified an overarching theme, 'factors that influenced participants' decision to be vaccinated or not', which was composed of four subthemes that were in turn made up of 12 categories. The factors that influenced participants' decision to be vaccinated against influenza and pertussis were related to their knowledge of and their perception of risk for these diseases. Participants perceived the risk of pertussis to be greater, and they focused their concern on the newborn. The recommendations and convictions of nurse-midwives were the most important factors encouraging vaccination. Participants trusted their nurse-midwives and most reported that they would have been vaccinated if their midwife had recommended it. Other factors were linked to lack of information, fear and concerns about economic interests. The convictions and actions of the nurse-midwife in recommending vaccination to pregnant women are decisive. Strategies to improve vaccination rates should be directed to helping health professionals understand how their practice affects the final decision of pregnant women. Understanding the factors that limit vaccination rates among pregnant women provides valuable information to nurse-midwives that can help to improve vaccination strategies and practices. Increased maternal vaccination rates would reduce morbidity and mortality among pregnant women and newborns.

Gender-responsive language in the National Policy Guidelines for Immunization in Kenya and changes in prevalence of tetanus vaccination among women, 2008–09 to 2014: A mixed methods study

Global evidence suggests that maternal vaccination rates are partly related to intersectional gender-related disparities. Kenya recently eliminated maternal and neonatal tetanus, but previously had low rates of tetanus vaccination in many districts. Examining both national data and gender-responsive language in policies can potentially illuminate this progress. This study used mixed-methods approach: content analysis to identify gender-responsive language in Kenya's National Policy Guidelines for Immunization 2013, and logistic regression to analyze data from the Kenya Demographic and Health Surveys: 2008–09 (pre-policy) and 2014 (post-policy) to determine whether vaccination utilization significantly changed pre- and post-policy. Kenya's vaccine Guidelines highlighted a comprehensive life-cycle approach with several mentions of targeted immunization sensitization interventions for diverse sub-populations of women and gatekeepers. Logistic regression suggested an association between year of survey administration and prevalence of tetanus vaccination, with greater adjusted odds post policy implementation (e.g., 2014). Further in-depth research, like elite interviews, might prove valuable.

Adapting Center for Disease Control and Prevention's immunization quality improvement program to improve maternal vaccination uptake in obstetrics

IntroductionMaternal vaccination is critical for improving maternal and child health. Quality Improvement (QI) models11Abbreviation QI: Quality Improvement, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, eXchange (AFIX)22Abbreviation AFIX: Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, eXchange model, have not yet been adapted to maternal vaccinations. This study assesses the impact of AFIX-OB, an adapted version of AFIX for obstetric settings, on maternal vaccination rates. MethodsBetween December 2016 and May 2018, state health departments and obstetric practices in Colorado and Georgia implemented the adapted AFIX-OB model. The model addressed unique patterns in patient encounters, practice flow, health records systems and competing clinical priorities in the obstetric setting through a menu of clearly-defined QI strategies, bi-weekly technical assistance meetings with designated immunization champions, incentives for champions/staff, and adapted tools to aid each practice during implementation. Vaccination rates were assessed by random chart reviews pre- and post-intervention. ResultsThe AFIX-OB model was evaluated in eleven obstetric practices in two states as part of a multi-level intervention to increase maternal vaccination. Post AFIX-OB implementation, documented influenza vaccination rates increased from 56% at baseline to 65% (p < 0.01); and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination rates increased from 77% at baseline to 84% (p < 0.02) across all practices. ConclusionsThe AFIX-OB model showed improvement in maternal vaccination rates for both influenza and Tdap vaccines. AFIX-OB may provide a useful framework for obstetric practices, as well as for other health care specialties. The focused goal should be on broader dissemination among those interested in adopting an evidence-based model for increasing vaccine uptake.

Influenza and pertussis vaccination of women during pregnancy in Victoria, 2015–2017

Objectives: To assess variations by time of year and hospital in the uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccinations by pregnant women in Victoria; to identify factors associated with vaccination uptake. Design, setting: Retrospective analysis of data in the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection (VPDC), a population surveillance system for obstetric conditions, procedures, and pregnancy and birth outcomes. Participants: Women whose pregnancies ended in a live or stillbirth during July 2015-June 2017. Main outcome measures: Influenza and pertussis vaccinations during pregnancy. Results: 153 980 pregnancies in 67 hospitals ended during July 2015-June 2017; 59 968 pregnant women (39.0%) were vaccinated against influenza and 98 583 (64.0%) against pertussis. Coverage varied by pregnancy end date, rising for influenza during winter and spring, but for pertussis rising continuously across the two years from 37.5% to 82.2%. Differences between hospitals in coverage were marked. Factors associated with vaccination included greater maternal age, primigravidity, early antenatal care, and GP-led care. The odds of vaccination were statistically significantly lower for women born overseas and those who smoked during pregnancy; the odds of vaccination were also lower for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Conclusions: Pertussis vaccination of pregnant women in Victoria has increased, but influenza vaccination rates remain moderate and variable. Structural changes at the system level may improve maternal vaccination rates. Embedding the delivery of maternal vaccination programs in antenatal care pathways should be a priority.

2633. Influenza and Tdap Vaccination Coverage among Pregnant Women in the PREVAIL Cohort

BackgroundThe ACIP recommends influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy to reduce the risk of influenza and pertussis in the mother and her infant. We assessed influenza and Tdap vaccination coverage and associated factors among pregnant women enrolled in PREVAIL, a prospective birth cohort study in Cincinnati, OH. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of self report for both vaccines against state registry, maternal healthcare provider, and work-place records.MethodsWe enrolled and interviewed 265 pregnant women regarding self-reported receipt of influenza and Tdap vaccines, and obtained vaccine records from registry, electronic medical record, provider, employer, or pharmacy. We grouped subjects by documented vaccination status and analyzed demographic variables and vaccine attitudes regarding efficacy, safety, and hesitancy using unadjusted Fisher exact tests. We analyzed sensitivity and specificity of maternal recall.ResultsWe identified documentation of influenza and Tdap vaccine receipt during pregnancy in 172/265 (64.9%) and 238/265 (89.8%) of women, respectively (Figure 1); by self report, 177/265 (66.8%) reported receiving influenza and 221/265 (83.4%) Tdap vaccine. The two most common primary reasons cited for receiving influenza vaccine were “to protect my baby” (36.7%) and “to protect myself” (26%; Figure 2). Pregnant women were more likely to get Tdap vaccine if a healthcare worker recommended it (OR 5.4). Subjects were more likely to get influenza vaccine if they believed it was effective in preventing influenza in themselves (OR 9.0) or their babies (OR 8.1). While positive recall had a high concordance (95.2% and 93.4% for influenza and Tdap, respectively), 12.5% and 32.1% of mothers incorrectly recalled not receiving an influenza or Tdap vaccine, respectively, that was documented as received in the records (Figure 3).ConclusionWe found high concordance between maternal recall and verification for both influenza and Tdap vaccines. In this single-site cohort of 265 women, self report was a reliable measure of vaccination status among pregnant women. Provider communication to pregnant women regarding effectiveness of influenza and Tdap vaccinations for themselves and their infants may lead to higher maternal vaccination rates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Influenza and pertussis vaccination of women during pregnancy in Victoria, 2015-2017.

To assess variations by time of year and hospital in the uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccinations by pregnant women in Victoria; to identify factors associated with vaccination uptake. Retrospective analysis of data in the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection (VPDC), a population surveillance system for obstetric conditions, procedures, and pregnancy and birth outcomes. Women whose pregnancies ended in a live or stillbirth during July 2015 - June 2017. Influenza and pertussis vaccinations during pregnancy. 153980 pregnancies in 67 hospitals ended during July 2015 - June 2017; 59968 pregnant women (39.0%) were vaccinated against influenza and 98583 (64.0%) against pertussis. Coverage varied by pregnancy end date, rising for influenza during winter and spring, but for pertussis rising continuously across the two years from 37.5% to 82.2%. Differences between hospitals in coverage were marked. Factors associated with vaccination included greater maternal age, primigravidity, early antenatal care, and GP-led care. The odds of vaccination were statistically significantly lower for women born overseas and those who smoked during pregnancy; the odds of vaccination were also lower for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Pertussis vaccination of pregnant women in Victoria has increased, but influenza vaccination rates remain moderate and variable. Structural changes at the system level may improve maternal vaccination rates. Embedding the delivery of maternal vaccination programs in antenatal care pathways should be a priority.

Rates and determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy and association with neonatal outcomes.

There is growing evidence that seasonal influenza vaccination in pregnancy has benefits for mother and baby. We determined influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women during the 2 nonpandemic influenza seasons following the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, explored maternal factors as predictors of influenza vaccination status and evaluated the association between maternal influenza vaccination and neonatal outcomes. We used a population-based perinatal database in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada, to examine maternal vaccination rates, determinants of vaccination status and neonatal outcomes. Our cohort included women who gave birth between Nov. 1, 2010, and Mar. 31, 2012. We compared neonatal outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated women using logistic regression analysis. Overall, 1958 (16.0%) of 12,223 women in our cohort received the influenza vaccine during their pregnancy. Marital status, parity, location of residence (rural v. urban), smoking during pregnancy and maternal influenza risk status were determinants of maternal vaccine receipt. The odds of preterm birth was lower among infants of vaccinated women than among those of nonvaccinated women (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.94). The rate of low-birth-weight infants was also lower among vaccinated women (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.95). Despite current guidelines advising all pregnant women to receive the seasonal influenza vaccine, influenza vaccination rates among pregnant women in our cohort were low in the aftermath of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. This study and others have shown an association between maternal influenza vaccination and improved neonatal outcomes, which supports stronger initiatives to promote vaccination during pregnancy.