The material in this paper has been culled from many sources, espe cially in psychology, semantics, linguistics and pedagogy. This organiza tion of the structure of English with an eye to maximal rationalization of its spelling is only in small part my own. First there were the pioneering insights of Orton, then the prodigious work of organization and detail of Gillingham and Stillman through seven editions from 1930 till 1964—a monumental contribution. Sally Childs, through her Spelling Curriculum published in 1954, supplemented by other works and soon, happily, to appear in a revised edition, has focused attention on reorganization of approach and refinements of pedagogic technique in line with new develop ments in psychology and linguistics. Their work has enormously facilitated the practical implementations of the designers of texts, guides, materials and workbooks. They have inspired and guided the programs of schools and clinic services and such complete programs as that of the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital Language Unit in Dallas and the Remedial Reading Center in Rochester, Minnesota. Those of us who have come into the field on tributaries from the '30's to the '60s, have been able to join the main stream, each in his or her own way, for such is the structured flexibility of this approach that there is ample room for individuality. The constraints are provided by the nature of the language to be taught, the ways a human being learns, and the unique needs of language-disabled learners as a group and as individuals. The focus in this paper, by request of the group for whom it was written, is on the first of these constraints, especially the spelling patterns of English, with accommodation to it, in the light of the other strictures, by one teacher and pupil working together. Within practical limits one never can—nor should one try to—"tell it all." If what Dan and I have coordinated here, with the help of those on whose shoulders we gratefully stand, is of help to some readers and their students, we shall be glad. Better yet, other teams can improve and elaborate what we suggest here. The field is open.