You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Basic Research (V)1 Apr 2013978 PTEN DELETION AND MUTATION IN CLINICALLY INSIGNIFICANT AND SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: AN ANALYSIS BY MATE-PAIR NEXT GENERATION AND SANGER SEQUENCING R. Jeffrey Karnes, john cheville, george vasmatzis, and william sukov R. Jeffrey KarnesR. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author , john chevillejohn cheville Rochester, MN More articles by this author , george vasmatzisgeorge vasmatzis Rochester, MN More articles by this author , and william sukovwilliam sukov Rochester, MN More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.560AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Deletion of PTEN is associated with worse prognosis in prostate cancer. However, little is known about the impact of PTEN mutations, and there is limited data regarding the frequency and clinical impact of deletion and mutation in clinically insignificant tumors compared to significant tumors. METHODS We identified 40 prostatectomy cases with adenocarcinoma consisting of 9 clinically insignificant tumors (defined as GS6 and tumor volume <0.5 cm3), 7 cases of large volume (>1.0 cm3) GS6, 23 cases of GS7, and 1 case of GS8) and performed massively parallel mate-pair next generation sequencing (NGS) on whole genome-amplified DNA extracted from laser capture microdissected tumor tissue. Sequence analysis of exonic regions was performed using standard Sanger methodology. Follow-up information was available for 31 patients. Tumor-free survival from date of prostatectomy was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS PTEN deletion detected by mate-pair NGS occurred in 10 cases and three of these cases showed additional deleterious mutations (2 nonsense and 1 frameshift) in the remaining PTEN allele by Sanger sequencing. Although not mutually exclusive, alterations in PTEN occurred more frequently in the setting of ERG rearrangements (70%). PTEN abnormalities were absent in clinically insignificant GS6, and large volume GS6 but were common in GS7 or higher tumors (10 of 23 cases; 43%)(p=0.032). Radiographic or biochemical recurrence occurred in 5 patients with PTEN abnormalities (HR=4.65, p=0.036), including metastatic recurrences in 2 of the 3 patients with confirmed bi-allelic loss of PTEN. The overall 5-year tumor-free survival rate among patients with Gleason 7-8 tumors was 57% with PTEN abnormalities and 79% in the remaining cases (p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS PTEN abnormalities were absent in clinically insignificant and large volume GS6 tumors, but occurred in a significant number of GS7 cases, Although our series is small, patients that had PTEN deletion and mutation has a significantly worse outcome.. These results suggest that PTEN abnormalities identify a subset of prostatic adenocarciomas at higher risk for progression, for which molecular and cytogenetic testing for PTEN abnormalities may provide significant prognostic information. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e402 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information R. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author john cheville Rochester, MN More articles by this author george vasmatzis Rochester, MN More articles by this author william sukov Rochester, MN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...