Matched Unrelated Donor Research Articles

Does recipient body mass index inform donor selection for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation?

It is not known whether obesity has a differential effect on allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes with alternative donor types. We report the results of a retrospective registry study examining the effect of obesity [body mass index (BMI)>30] on outcomes with alternative donors (haploidentical related donor with two or more mismatches and receiving post-transplant cyclophosphamide [haplo] and cord blood (CBU)] versus matched unrelated donor (MUD). Adult patients receiving haematopoietic cell transplantation for haematologic malignancy (2013-2017) (N=16 182) using MUD (n=11 801), haplo (n=2894) and CBU (n=1487) were included. The primary outcome was non-relapse mortality (NRM). The analysis demonstrated a significant, non-linear interaction between pretransplant BMI and the three donor groups for NRM: NRM risk was significantly higher with CBU compared to haplo at BMI 25-30 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.66-1.71, p<0.05] and MUD transplants at a BMI of 25-45 (HR, 1.61-3.47, p<0.05). The results demonstrated that NRM and survival outcomes are worse in overweight and obese transplant recipients (BMI≥25) with one alternative donor type over MUD, although obesity does not appear to confer a uniform differential mortality risk with one donor type over the other. BMI may serve as a criterion for selecting a donor among the three (MUD, haplo and CBU) options, if matched sibling donor is not available.

Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide in Haploidentical and HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention but is associated with an increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The effect of PTCy on CMV infection in matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is unclear, and whether there is any difference in CMV risk with 1 or 2 doses of PTCy is not well established. This study aimed to compare the incidence of CMV infection and the association between T cell recovery in patients who received PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis and those who received non-PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the risk of CMV infection in 3 cohorts: cohort A (n=94), matched related donor (MRD)/MUD HSCT with calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis; cohort B (n=103), MRD/MUD HSCT with 1 dose of PTCy, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); and cohort C (n=28), haploidentical donor HSCT with 2 doses of PTCy, tacrolimus, and MMF. The day +100 cumulative incidence of CMV infection was 29% for cohort A, 39% for cohort B, and 61% for cohort C (P=.009), with no difference among the cohorts in the duration of viremia (P=.46). CD3+ and CD4+ T cell counts were significantly higher in cohort A at day +30 but not at days +60 and +90. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) trended higher and relapse was significantly lower with PTCy. There was no difference in survival among the 3 cohorts. There is an increased risk of early CMV infection in patients receiving PTCy irrespective of donor type and number of PTCy doses compared with those not receiving PTCy. Strategies focusing on CMV prevention in PTCy recipients to mitigate the risk of NRM may lead to improved long-term outcomes.

Comparison of Quality of Life and Outcomes between Haploidentical and Matched Related/Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Haploidentical (haplo) donor grafts are a well-established alternative donor source for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT); however, data comparing health-realted quality of life (HRQOL) measures between haplo-HCT and HCT using other donor sources are lacking. We hypothesized that post-transplantation HRQOL might not differ between haplo-HCT and HCT with other graft sources. We conducted a single-institution retrospective analysis comparing HRQOL of haplo-HCT with matched-related donor (MRD) HCT and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT for hematologic diseases. We included 90 haplo, 102 MRD, and 229 MUD adult first allogeneic HCTs performed between May 2014 and December 2019. HRQOL for haplo-HCT, MRD-HCT, and MUD-HCT were compared separately for myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). HRQOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale pretransplantation and at days +100 and +180 post-transplantation. MAC haplo-HCT showed no difference in all domains of HRQOL and other transplantation outcomes, including overall survival, compared with MAC MRD/MUD-HCT, except for a higher incidence of non-cytomegalovirus infections (P=.003). RIC haplo-HCT was associated with significantly better emotional well-being (P=.008) and functional well-being (P=.011) compared with MUD-HCT. RIC haplo-HCT was associated with higher rates of non-cytomegalovirus infections (P < .001) and relapse mortality (P=.044) but a lower rate of nonrelapse mortality (P=.008) compared with RIC MUD-HCT. Haplo-HCT had comparable total HRQOL scores and overall survival to MRD/MUD-HCT in both the MAC and RIC cohorts. Interrogation of HRQOL among disease-specific groups may further elucidate the existence of any additional benefits with these different transplantation modalities.

HLA-Haploidentical Family Donors: The New Promise for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia?

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is indicated in children with high-risk, relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). HLA-matched grafts from cord blood and stem cell repositories have allowed patients without suitable sibling donors to undergo HSCT. However, challenges in procuring matched unrelated donor (MUD) grafts due to high cost, ethnic disparity and time constraints have led to the exponential rise in the use of stem cells from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical family donors. Whilst HLA-haploidentical HSCT (hHSCT) performed in adult patients with acute leukaemia has produced outcomes similar to MUD transplants, experience in children is limited. Over the last 5 years, more data have emerged on hHSCT in the childhood ALL setting, allowing comparisons with matched donor transplants. The feasibility of hHSCT using adult family donors in childhood ALL may also address the ethical issues related to selection of minor siblings in matched sibling donor transplants. Here, we review hHSCT in paediatric recipients with ALL and highlight the emergence of hHSCT as a promising therapeutic option for patients lacking a suitable matched donor. Recent issues related to conditioning regimens, donor selection and graft-vs.-host disease prophylaxis are discussed. We also identify areas for future research to address transplant-related complications and improve post-transplant disease-free survival.

The impact of donor type on resource utilisation and costs in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Netherlands.

BackgroundAllogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasingly used, but this treatment is complex and costly. As clinical outcomes of HSCT with matched unrelated donor (MUD) and haploidentical donors are similar, costs could influence donor choice.MethodWe retrospectively compared resource utilisation and costs of HSCT using the three different donor types (matched related donor (MRD) (n = 32), haploidentical related (n = 30) and MUD (n = 60)) within the first year after transplantation. Costs were analysed through a bottom‐up method. Non‐parametric bootstrapping was applied to test for statistical differences in costs. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify predictors for costs.ResultsCost pre‐transplant for search and acquisition of the graft were significantly higher in MUD HSCT (€35 222) versus MRD and haploidentical HSCT (€15 356 and €16 097 respectively). The costs of haploidentical HSCT were the highest in the transplant phase. Main cost factors were inpatient days and medication. Overall, the costs for haploidentical and MUD HSCT were similar (€115 724 for MUD, €113 312 for haploidentical).ConclusionOur study suggests no difference in total transplantation costs between allogeneic HSCT using a MUD or a haploidentical donor. Since clinical outcomes seem similar as well, the choice of donor type might be based on availability, speed and logistics.

Relapse and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Older Matched Sibling Donors vs Younger Matched Unrelated Donors

Matched sibling donors (MSDs) are preferred for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in myelodysplastic syndrome even if they are older. However, whether older MSDs or younger human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated donors (MUDs) are associated with better outcomes remains unclear. To investigate whether allo-HCT for myelodysplastic syndrome using younger MUDs would be associated with improved disease-free survival and less relapse compared with older MSDs. This retrospective cohort study assessed data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database from 1761 adults 50 years or older with myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent allo-HCT using an older MSD or younger MUD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017, with a median follow-up of 48 months. Data analysis was performed from January 8, 2019, to December 30, 2020. Allo-HCT from an older MSD (donor age ≥50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ≤35 years). The primary outcome was disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, relapse, nonrelapse mortality, acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival. Of 1761 patients (1162 [66%] male; median [range] age, 64.9 [50.2-77.6] years in the MSD cohort and 66.5 [50.4-80.9] years in MUD cohort), 646 underwent allo-HCT with an older MSD and 1115 with a younger MUD. In multivariable analysis, the rate of disease-free survival was significantly lower in allo-HCTs with older MSDs compared with younger MUDs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02-1.34; P = .02), whereas the difference in overall survival rate of allo-HCT with younger MUDs vs older MSDs was not statistically significant (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.98-1.29; P = .07). Allo-HCT with older MSDs was associated with significantly higher relapse (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.32-1.97; P < .001), lower nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96; P = .02), lower acute GVHD (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42-0.65; P < .001), chronic GVHD (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92; P = .005), and a lower rate of GVHD-free relapse-free survival beyond 12 months after allo-HCT (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02-1.98; P = .04). This cohort study found higher disease-free survival and lower relapse for allo-HCT in myelodysplastic syndrome using younger MUDs compared with older MSDs. The risk of nonrelapse mortality and GVHD was lower with older MSDs. These results suggest that the use of younger MUDs should be considered in the donor selection algorithm for myelodysplastic syndrome, in which it is pivotal to minimize relapse given limited treatment options for managing relapsed disease.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Haploidentical versus Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Myeloablative Targeted Busulfan-Based Conditioning for Pediatric Acute Leukemia

The use of haploidentical related donors (HRDs) is a common alternative donor strategy used when matched sibling or unrelated donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, there have been no studies comparing HRD HSCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT with antithymocyte globulin using similar busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimens in pediatric acute leukemia. Here we compared the outcomes in children and adolescents with high-risk acute leukemia who underwent HRD HSCT with PTCy (n=35) or MUD HSCT (n=45) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning using intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring. The median duration of follow-up was 3.7 years in the HRD group and 4.6 years in the MUD group. No engraftment failure was observed in either group. There were no significant between-group differences in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (34.3% versus 48.9%; P=.142), grade III-IV acute GVHD (2.9% versus 8.9%; P=.272), moderate to severe chronic GVHD (11.4% versus 18.3%; P=.417), relapse (25.6% versus 28.0%; P=.832), and nonrelapse mortality (0% versus 2.2%; P=.420). The 3-year severe chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 62.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.8% to 80.0%) versus 49.8% (95% CI, 34.9% to 64.7%; P=.318), 74.4% (95% CI, 58.7% to 90.1%) versus 67.5% (95% CI, 53.4% to 81.6%; P=.585), and 88.6% (95% CI, 78.0% to 99.2%) versus 83.7% (95% CI, 72.5% to 94.9%; P=.968), respectively. In a subgroup analysis of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HRD, n=17; MUD, n=26), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 49.4% (95% CI, 24.3% to 74.5%) versus 39.5% (95% CI, 19.7% to 59.3%; P=.601), 61.8% (95% CI, 37.5% to 86.1%) versus 63.6% (95% CI, 44.4% to 82.8%; P=.872), and 82.4% (95% CI, 64.4%, 100%) versus 84.2% (95% CI, 70.1% to 98.3%; P=.445), respectively. In patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (HRD, n=16; MUD, n=16), the 3-year GRFS, LFS, and OS rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 80.8% (95% CI, 61.2% to 100%) versus 61.9% (95% CI, 37.8% to 86.0%; P=.326), 87.1% (95% CI, 70.2% to 100%) versus 73.9% (95% CI, 51.8% to 96.0%; P=.478), and 93.8% (95% CI, 81.8% to 100%) versus 85.6% (95% CI, 67.0% to 100%; P=.628), respectively. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the number of patients was small, the promising outcomes of HRD HSCT in AML patients were encouraging. Our results demonstrate that HRD HSCT with PTCy using a targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen has outcomes similar to those of MUD HSCT with antithymocyte globulin. HRD HSCT with PTCy could be a feasible option for pediatric high-risk acute leukemia patients who lack an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor.

Psychosocial outcomes of parents in pediatric haploidentical transplant: parental hematopoietic cell donation as a double-edged sword.

Parents are increasingly used as donors for their child's haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant, creating a dual role for parents that may increase the stress of caring for their ill child. Empiric research on the psychological adjustment of parental donors is lacking. We conducted a retrospective survey of parents (n = 136) whose child underwent transplant with a parental donor or a matched-unrelated donor, including both donor and nondonors, and both parents of survivors and bereaved. All parents completed standardized measures of quality of life, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and life satisfaction. Bereaved parents also completed measures of their grief response, while parents of survivors completed measures of the parent-child relationship. The overall sample reported psychological functioning near normative levels, but bereaved parents demonstrated significantly poorer outcomes across all measures. The effect of donor status differed by transplant outcome: for parents of survivors, donors reported better mental health than nondonors, but amongst bereaved parents, donors fared more poorly than nondonors. Bereaved donors reported greater difficulties with grief than nondonors. Results suggest that serving as donor can be a double-edged sword, acting as a protective factor when there is a successful outcome but a significant risk factor when the child does not survive.

Turn around time in matched unrelated donor search workup national versus international registries: Retrospective study

Background: Timeline is a key factor for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient. HSCT by matched unrelated donor (MUD) is a standard definitive therapeutic approach for many hematological disorders which are not amenable to chemotherapy and other conventional treatment. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the turnaround time (TAT) involved in completion of MUD HSCT workup from an Indian registry (Genebandhu) with international registries. Materials and Methods: On receipt of pre-transplant matching request through a transplant physician, patient's human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type was entered in both Genebandhu and World Marrow Donor Association search tool for initiating a “search.” The software gave the descending order of the best possible matches by performing computational analysis. The search result was considered a “match” when potential 10/10 HLA match was found. The average TAT was calculated in the middle of search request and HLA confirmatory typing (CT) and infectious disease marker (IDM). Further, TAT was also determined between the infusion of harvested stem cell product and CT and IDM. At last, the total time engaged in completion of each MUD HSCT workup was determined and compared in national versus international registries. Results: The average TAT involved in between search request and CT and IDM was 71 days in case of global registry and 67 days in case of Genebandhu. Similarly, the average TAT involved between infusion of harvested cell product and CT and IDM testing in case of donor identified in global stem cell registry was 65 days whereas 45 days in case of Genebandhu. At last, the average time associated with the finishing of a MUD workup was 136 days in case of global registry, whereas 112 days in the case of Genebandhu at P ≤ 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Conclusion: To conclude, the average TAT obtained through this study clearly demonstrates the advantages in terms of donor availability for MUD HSCT through the national registry.

The effect of HLA-DPB1 TCE matching on the outcomes of patients undergoing matched-unrelated donor transplantations for myeloid malignancies

Introduction: Mortality and morbidity have been reduced with high-resolution typing and matching of major-immunogenic HLA alleles. Despite this, risks of transplant-related complications and relapse remain undesirably high. Evidence supports that additional matching of HLA-DPB1 promotes event-free survival. However, with an 80% mismatch rate it is not feasible to only select DPB1-matched unrelated donors. Revelations suggest permissive mismatching and avoidance of non-permissive mismatching can achieve similar benefits to DPB1 matching.

Anti-thymocyte Globulin and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide do not abrogate the inferior outcome risk conferred by human leukocyte antigen-A and -B mismatched donors.

In donor selection for allogeneic stem cell transplant, several factors are considered for potential impact on transplant outcome. Previous publications suggested single HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) may be equivalent to 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUDs). We retrospectively examined factors affecting outcome in a single-center study using ATG followed by post-transplant cyclophosphamide, termed ATG-PTCy, GvHD prophylaxis. Fifty-two patients who received grafts from MMUD and 188 patients transplanted from MUD between January 2015 and December 2019, at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Canada, were enrolled. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning. Overall survival for 9/10 recipients at 2years was significantly worse, 37.2% versus 68.5% for 10/10 MUDs, p<.001, as were NRM at 1year 39.5% versus 11.7%, p<.001, and GRFS at 2years 29.8% versus 58.8%, p<.001, respectively, potentially due to higher incidence of infections including CMV. By multivariable analysis, factors correlating with survival negatively were DRI, and MMUD, whereas for NRM MMUD and increasing age were unfavorable. For GRFS significant unfavorable factors included donor age ≤32years, female donor to male recipient, DRI high-very high and MMUD. These data suggest that MMUD, primarily HLA-A and HLA-B MMUD, confer significantly inferior outcome despite use of ATG-PTCy. Further development of novel conditioning regimens and GvHD prophylaxis is needed to mitigate these risks.

Unmanipulated haploidentical donor and matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: a single-center study

We analyzed the outcomes of 32 patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) who underwent either a haploidentical donor (HID) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Seventeen patients received an HSCT from an HID and 15 patients received an HSCT from an MUD. The median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 36 months (range: 12–96 months). No significant differences were observed in the 3-year overall survival (OS) between the HID and MUD cohorts (74.1%±11.4% vs. 93.3%±6.4%, respectively, p=.222) or in the 3-year failure-free survival (68.8%±11.8% vs. 86.7%±8.8%, respectively, p=.307). Treatment-related mortality occurred in five patients. A univariate analysis of risk factors revealed platelet engraftment failure negatively impacted OS and FFS. We conclude that HID and MUD-HSCT are feasible and can be effective options for those PNH patients with concomitant bone marrow failure, recurrent life-threatening thrombosis, and uncontrollable hemolysis.

Optimal Donor Selection for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Bayesian Machine Learning.

Donor selection practices for matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) vary, and the impact of optimizing donor selection in a patient-specific way using modern machine learning (ML) models has not been studied. We trained a Bayesian ML model in 10,318 patients who underwent MUD HCT from 1999 to 2014 to provide patient- and donor-specific predictions of clinically severe (grade 3 or 4) acute graft-versus-host disease or death by day 180. The model was validated in 3,501 patients from 2015 to 2016 with archived records of potential donors at search. Donor selection optimizing predicted outcomes was implemented over either an unlimited donor pool or the donors in the search archives. Posterior mean differences in outcomes from optimal donor selection versus actual practice were summarized per patient and across the population with 95% intervals. Event rates were 33% (training) and 37% (validation). Among donor features, only age affected outcomes, with the effect consistent regardless of patient features. The median (interquartile range) difference in age between the youngest donor at search and the selected donor was 6 (1-10) years, whereas the number of donors per patient younger than the selected donor was 6 (1-36). Fourteen percent of the validation data set had an approximate 5% absolute reduction in event rates from selecting the youngest donor at search versus the actual donor used, leading to an absolute population reduction of 1% (95% interval, 0 to 3). We confirmed the singular importance of selecting the youngest available MUD, irrespective of patient features, identified potential for improved HCT outcomes by selecting a younger MUD, and demonstrated use of novel ML models transferable to optimize other complex treatment decisions in a patient-specific way.

Clinical Features, Cancer Biology, Transplant Approach and Other Integrated Management Strategies for Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome.

Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare X-linked recessive inborn error of immunity (IEI) first described in 1937. Classic WAS is characterized by the triad of thrombocytopenia with small platelets, recurrent infections due to combined immunodeficiency, and eczema. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was the only curative option available for five decades, with excellent outcomes reported for matched sibling donors (MSD) and matched unrelated donors (MUD). More recently, alternative donor transplants such as umbilical cord blood (UCB) and haploidentical transplant have emerged as viable options due to improvements in better graft selection, cell dosing, and effective allograft manipulation measures. Gene therapy is another potential curative option with promising results, yet currently is offered only as part of a clinical trial.

Outcome of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Allografts Using Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Compared to Matched Sibling and Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Allografts in Pediatric Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Single-Center Analysis

The introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has made haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) a common approach in adults, but pediatric experience is limited. Based on the encouraging adult data and with the aim of decreasing the risk of graft failure, our center is increasingly using peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) from haplo donors with PTCy. Here we compare outcomes of bone marrow (BM) transplantation with traditional donor choices, including matched sibling donors (MSDs) and 10/10 HLA matched unrelated donors (MUDs), with those of haplo PBSC grafts in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. In this retrospective single-center study, the primary endpoint was the comparison of GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS; defined as absence of acute GVHD [aGVHD] grade III-IV, relapse, death, or chronic GVHD [cGVHD] requiring systemic therapy) for the 3 cohorts. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and incidence of aGVHD and cGVHD). A total of 104 consecutive patients underwent first allogeneic (allo)-HSCT for a hematologic malignancy or myelodysplastic syndrome between January 2014 and December 2020 using a haplo family donor (PBSCs; n=26), an MSD (BM; n=31), or an MUD (BM; n=47). Patient demographic and transplantation characteristics were not significantly different across the cohorts, apart from remission status, with the haplo cohort having more patients in third or later complete remission before HSCT (P < .01). The median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 573 days. The cumulative incidence of aGVHD (grade II-IV or grade III-IV) was not significantly different among the cohorts; however, the cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 18 months was highest in the MUD cohort (31.7%, versus 10.0% in the MSD cohort and 9.2% in the haplo cohort; P=.02). There were no differences in the 18-month cumulative incidence of relapse or NRM. OS and RFS at 18 months were 80.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7% to 100%) and 73.8% (95% CI, 55.5% to 98.1%) for the haplo cohort, 83.4% (95% CI, 72.8% to 95.5%) and 70.3% (95% CI, 57.9% to 85.3%) for the MUD cohort, and 80.9% (95% CI, 66.9% to 97.7%) and 66.5% (95% CI, 50.5% to 87.5%) for the MSD cohort, with no statistically significant differences among the cohorts. GRFS at 18 months was 61% (95% CI, 43.3% to 85.9%) for the haplo cohort, 44.6% (95% CI, 31.8% to 62.5%) for the MUD cohort, and 62.1% (95% CI, 45.7% to 84.3%) for the MSD cohort (P=.26). Haploidentical PBSC HSCT with PTCy had comparable outcomes to MSD and MUD BM HSCT and less cGVHD compared with MUD BM HSCT in children. The logistical advantages and lower resource burden of haplo HSCT with PBSCs make it a feasible alternative to MUD HSCT in children with hematologic malignancies. Given that this is a retrospective comparison of transplantation platforms rather than donor types, further prospective studies are warranted. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Cost Utility of Lifelong Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy vs Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant to Treat Agammaglobulinemia

Lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) is standard-of-care treatment for congenital agammaglobulinemia but accrues high annual costs ($30 000-$90 000 per year) and decrements to quality of life over patients' life spans. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) offers an alternative 1-time therapy, but has high morbidity and mortality. To evaluate the cost utility of IRT vs matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT to treat patients with agammaglobulinemia in the US. This economic evaluation used Markov analysis to model the base-case scenario of a patient aged 12 months with congenital agammaglobulinemia receiving lifelong IRT vs MSD or MUD HSCT. Costs, probabilities, and quality-of-life measures were derived from the literature. Microsimulations estimated premature deaths for each strategy in a virtual cohort. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated uncertainty around parameter estimates performed from a societal perspective over a 100-year time horizon. The threshold for cost-effective care was set at $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). This study was conducted from 2020 across a 100-year time horizon. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy vs MSD or MUD HSCT for treatment of congenital agammaglobulinemia. The primary outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in 2020 US dollars per QALY gained and premature deaths associated with each strategy. In this economic evaluation of patients with congenital agammaglobulinemia, lifelong IRT cost more than HSCT ($1 512 946 compared with $563 776 [MSD] and $637 036 [MUD]) and generated similar QALYs (20.61 vs 17.25 [MSD] and 17.18 [MUD]). Choosing IRT over MSD or MUD HSCT yielded ICERs of $282 166 per QALY gained over MSD and $255 633 per QALY gained over MUD HSCT, exceeding the US willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. However, IRT prevented at least 2488 premature deaths per 10 000 microsimulations compared with HSCT. When annual IRT price was reduced from $60 145 to below $29 469, IRT became the cost-effective strategy. Findings remained robust in sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. In the US, IRT is more expensive than HSCT for agammaglobulinemia treatment. The findings of this study suggest that IRT prevents more premature deaths but does not substantially increase quality of life relative to HSCT. Reducing US IRT cost by 51% to a value similar to IRT prices in countries implementing value-based pricing may render it the more cost-effective strategy.

Haploidentical Vs. Matched Unrelated Donor Transplants Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Lymphoma: A Joint CIBMTR/EBMT Study

Introduction: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is a standard GVHD prophylactic approach for haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haploHCT). Retrospective studies in patients with lymphoma showed lower chronic GVHD in haploHCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis compared to matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with calcineurin-based GVHD prophylaxis (+/- ATG). Recent retrospective studies showed that using MUD donors was better than haplo donors when PTCy and reduced-intensity conditioning are used for ALL, AML or MDS. However, no studies to date have compared haploHCT and MUD HCT when PTCy is used in the setting of lymphomas.Methods: 2155 adults (730 CIBMTR, 1425 EBMT) aged =/>18 years who received their first haploHCT or MUD HCT (8/8 match at HLA-loci A, B, C and DRB1) using PTCy from 2010-2019 for lymphoma were included. The majority of both MUD (n=312; 14%) and haplo (n=1843; 86%) HCTs received reduced intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (n=1655; 77%) using a peripheral blood stem cell graft (n=1379; 64%) and a three-drug GVHD prophylaxis (PTCy + calcineurin inhibitor + MMF, n=1805; 84%). Hodgkin's lymphoma was the most common indication (n=899; 42%) followed by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=525; 24%), T-cell lymphomas (n=328; 15%), mantle cell lymphoma (n=234; 11%) and follicular lymphoma (n=169; 8%). Most had chemosensitive disease at transplant (n=1781; 83%). Some main characteristics of the two cohorts are shown in Figure 1. Median follow-up among survivors was longer for haplo-HCT (36 and 31 months for the CIBMTR and EBMT cohort, respectively) than MUD-HCT (24 and 17 months, respectively). Cox proportional hazards models were built using stepwise forward and backward selection with a selection/retention threshold of 0.05. Any clinical variables that did not meet the proportional hazard assumption were adjusted for by stratification, and regression models were built to compare outcomes between donor types. Center effect was adjusted in all the models.Results: Figures 2 and 3 show the multivariate analysis results. Overall survival was 73% (71-75%) at 1 year and 65% (63-67%) at 2 years. Relapse was 21% (20-23%) at 1 year and 26% (24-28%) at 2 years. All outcomes favored MUD over haplo donors with the use of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for both.Conclusions: Patients with lymphoma receiving PTCy HCT from MUDs demonstrated better outcomes than those with haplo donors in this retrospective study of CIBMTR and EBMT data Future prospective studies are needed to confirm and clarify the reasons for these differences. [Display omitted] DisclosuresMussetti: GILEAD: Other: Clinical trials participation, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trials participation. Hamadani: Janssen, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, Morphosys, Kite: Consultancy; Sanofi, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Glass: Novartis: Consultancy; Riemser: Research Funding; Helios Klinik Berlin-Buch: Current Employment; Kite: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Paczesny: Medical University of South Carolina: Patents & Royalties: inventor on the ST2 bispecific antibody patent application. Dreger: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Riemser: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lee: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Other; Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sureda: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Speakers Bureau; Bluebird: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy; Roche: Other: Support for attending meetings and/or travel; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

KIR-HLA Interactions Lack Clinical Utility in Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for AML: An Analysis of the CIBMTR and DRST Registries

KIR-HLA Interactions Lack Clinical Utility in Matched Unrelated Donor Transplantation for AML: An Analysis of the CIBMTR and DRST Registries

Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Haploidentical Vs Matched Unrelated Donor Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Using Myeloablative Targeted Busulfan-Based Conditioning for Pediatric Acute Leukemia

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) is a common alternative donor strategy used when matched sibling or unrelated donors are not available for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis is an attractive option when performing a HRD HSCT because of its promising outcomes and easy application. However, there have been no studies comparing HRD HSCT with PTCy and MUD HSCT with antithymocyte globulin, using similar busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen in pediatric acute leukemia. Herein, we compared the outcomes in children and adolescents with acute leukemia after HRD HSCT with PTCy (n=35) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT (n=45) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning using intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring. The median follow-up times of the HRD and MUD groups were 3.7 and 4.6 years. No engraftment failure was observed. The cumulative incidence of GVHD grades II-IV (34.3% versus 48.9%, p=0.142), grades III-IV (2.9% vs. 8.9%, p=0.272), extensive chronic GVHD (11.4% vs. 18.3%, p=0.417), relapse (25.6% vs. 28.0%, p=0.832), and non-relapse mortality (0% vs. 2.2%, p=0.420) were not significantly different. The 3-year severe chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free, leukemia-free and overall survival rates in the HRD and MUD groups were 62.9±8.7% versus 49.8±7.6% (p=0.318), 74.4±8.0% versus 67.5±7.2% (p=0.585), and 88.6±5.4% versus 83.7±5.7% (p=0.968), respectively. In subgroup analyses of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, there were no significant differences in outcomes between the groups. Our results demonstrated that HRD HSCT with PTCy using a targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning shows outcomes similar to those of MUD HSCT. HRD HSCT with PTCy could be considered for pediatric acute leukemia patients who lack an HLA-matched donor. DisclosuresKang: Cartexell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Korea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen Korea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Graft-Vs-Host Disease (GvHD) Prophylaxis with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Thymoglobulin (ATG) Are More Important Determinants of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) Than Ex-Vivo T-Cell Depletion in the Era of Pre-Emptive Therapy

Background:Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) despite major advances in diagnostic techniques and antiviral prophylactic strategies. The relative impacts of donor/recipient CMV serologic status, disease-specific and transplant-related prognostic factors on the risk of CMV reactivation and survival are undefined.Methods:We studied the outcome of 199 patients (median age, 46 years; range 17-71 years) receiving allogeneic HCT at National University Cancer Institute of Singapore (NCIS) between January 2016 and December 2020. Their hematologic diseases included AML (n=92), ALL (n=46), MDS (n=19), lymphomas (n=19), MPN (n=7) and others (n=16) such as refractory myelomas and aplastic anemias. The conditioning regimens used were either myeloablative (n=80) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=119) prior to an allograft from different donor sources. T-cell depletion (TCD) was used for GVHD prophylaxis in 124 patients; and this included post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy, n=31), ex-vivo T-cell receptor alpha-beta / CD45RA depletion (TCRab/CD45RA) (ex-vivo TCD, n=31) for haploidentical HCT, or thymoglobulin (ATG, n=62) for matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT.Results:With a median follow-up duration of 15.6 months (range, 0.2-63.6 months), 136 (68.3%) patients had CMV reactivation (median onset, 27.5 days) while 6 (3.0 %) patients developed clinically significant CMV disease, such as colitis, retinitis and encephalitis. The cumulative incidences of CMV reactivation within the first 100 days among the recipients of matched unrelated donor (MUD) (n=60), mismatched related donor or unrelated donor (MMRD/MMUD) (n=60), umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n=18) and matched related donor (MRD) (n=61) HCT were 71.6 %, 61.7 %, 50.0 % and 32.7 %, respectively (p<0.001).There were no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS, p=0.830) and disease-free survival (DFS, p=0.983) at 5 years between CMV-seropositive (D+/R+ or D-/R+, n=181) and CMV-seronegative recipients (D-/R- or D+/R-, n=18). There were also no significant differences in the cumulative incidences of CMV reactivation within 100 days (p=0.879), CMV end-organ disease (p=0.522) and non-relapse mortality (NRM, p=0.202), respectively. HCT-CI score of ≥1 (p=0.005) and the use of reduced intensity conditioning regimen (p<0.001) were associated with a higher NRM at 2 years. There was also a trend towards higher NRM among patients with peak CMV DNA titers of above 1000 IU/ml, but this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.188).The secondary objective of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with CMV reactivation within the first 100 days post-transplant. There was no statistically significant impact of the donor or recipient CMV serostatus (p=0.790) on the risk of CMV reactivation. In multivariable analysis, the use of any T-cell depletion (p<0.001) was a significant predictor of CMV reactivation. In a subset analysis comparing the 3 different methods of TCD, the use of ATG (p=0.004) and PTCy (p=0.005) was found to be associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation, but not in patients receiving ex-vivo TCD (p=0.184) (Figure 1). Notably, patients receiving ex-vivo TCD haploidentical HCT was not associated with a higher risk of CMV reactivation as compared to the recipients of MRD HCT without any TCD.Conclusions:Our study concluded that CMV serologic status did not affect the incidence of CMV reactivation, NRM, OS and DFS in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. The use of PTCy and ATG for GVHD prophylaxis, remains the most important risk factor for CMV reactivation in the era of pre-emptive therapy and hence, the need for aggressive prevention strategies in this vulnerable group of patients. [Display omitted] DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.