The authors discuss the results of building interreflections (matches) of research specialty codes and GRNTI subject headings based on the comparative intellectual analysis. The current master version of the State Rubricator of Scitech Information (SRSTI, GRNTI) and the verified version of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC, VAK) are compared. The interreflection of specialty codes of these two classifications are defined as the relations of logical match, inclusion and overlapping of extensions within the subject scope of studies as indicated in the profiles of specialties and corresponding GRNTI subject headings. To illustrate the algorithm of the HAC and GRNTI classifications comparative analysis and building the conversion table of code matches, the authors provide the example of sematic matches between the specialty codes within Section 1.1.6 Hydrobiology and GRNTI subject headings. The study to form the aggregate of interreflections of codes is accomplished in full for every group of research specialties within Section 1 Natural Sciences of the HAS Classification. In total, 97 researcher specialty codes are indexed with 1,958 matches assigned; the comparison with GRNTI thematic structure is accomplished for 1,755 study areas as indicated in 128 profiles of 6 specialty groups. The general and specific patterns of semantic match distribution between HAS codes and GRNTI subject headings are identified for Section 1 Natural Sciences.