Today, El Greco, Velázquez and Goya are unanimously regarded as the leading exponents of Spanish painting. During the romantic era, however, Murillo and Ribera were considered the unsurpassed interpreters of the Spanish temperament. In this paper, I describe the prevalence of Spanish Old Master painters in Finnish art historical writing from the nineteenth to the early twentieth century. The writings of two leading Finnish art historians, J. J. Tikkanen (1857-1930) and Ludvig Wennervirta (1882-1959), show the survival of Romantic values well into the twentieth century. At the same time shifts in the approach towards Murillo and El Greco, in particular, identify changes in the writers's outlook, reflecting current, normative variations in taste and the recognition of many different artists. Contrasting those painters who have been acknowledged with those who have not reveals a development from a Murillo-centred admiration in the nineteenth century to a veneration of El Greco in the early twentieth century. Realism had established the fame of Velázquez and the Spanish Baroque in Finland mainly through the genre painter Adolf von Becker (1831-1909). However, C.G. Estlander (1834- 1910) set himself against Becker, and Estlander's attitude to art history is marked by idealism. One explanation for this retardation is the fact that Finnish writers depended on obsolete texts; as late as 1901, Magnus Enckell (1877-1925) quoted Charles Blanc's (1813-1882) characterisation of the Spanish School from his École Espagnole of 1869. The replacement of Murillo with Velázquez and later El Greco, is also visible in Albert Edelfelt's (1854- 1905) letters from Spain, published in the daily press in 1881. By this time, Tikkanen had established himself as an art historian. Like Edelfelt, he preferred a naturalistic attitude towards art instead of an idealistic one. However, as late as 1910, his general art history still shows signs of early nineteenth century Romanticism, in particular regarding his view on El Greco. Wennervirta's article on El Greco, on the other hand, published only two years later, is a sign of the increasing veneration of the Greek-Italian Spaniard, who was revered for his "expressionist" and "transcendental" art. Only Tikkanen's revised edition of his general art history in 1925, adopts a viewpoint similar to Wennervirta's as regards El Greco's expressionism, a feature that by now was widely accepted. To a large extent, Finnish general art-history writing reflects the tastes that were directed from Paris. Wennervirta's lifelong engagement with El Greco, on the other hand, is an early example of the rising admiration of the eccentric painter from Toledo. The attitude towards Spanish art, created and maintained by Finnish art historical writing, is characterised by clichés. Spanish Old Master painting became canonised as a desirable love-affair for a progressive painter.