Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears Research Articles

A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70years old.

The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70years old. Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age andgender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along withpreoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males). CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain. The results of our work show that patients older than 70years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.

Rate of graft retear is higher in over-the-top superior capsular reconstruction for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with subscapularis tear.

To compare side-to-side superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with over-the-top SCR in terms of functional outcomes, pain relief and allograft survival rates. Patients who had undergone arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and clinical follow-up for ≥2 years were recruited. All patients underwent postoperative assessment with routine radiographic analysis for acromiohumeral distances, ultrasound imaging 1 and 3 months after SCR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 12 months after SCR. The outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores. SCR was performed in 56 patients including side-to-side SCR in 32 and over-the-top SCR in 24. Postoperative MRI showed that the grafts were intact in 46 patients (82.1%; 26 who underwent side-to-side SCR and 20 who underwent over-the-top SCR). The proportion of nonhealing grafts in the over-the-top group was significantly higher with concomitant subscapularis tears (60% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.02). VAS scores and functional outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups and postoperative VAS (1.4 vs. 1.7; n.s.), Constant (74.8 vs. 76.0; n.s.), mean ASES (87.4 vs. 89.1; n.s.) and mean SANE (81.7 vs. 84.3; n.s.) scores did not differ significantly. For massive rotator cuff tears, over-the-top and side-to-side SCR achieve similar pain relief and functional improvement, and the rate of healing allografts is high. However, over-the-top SCR is not recommended for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with repairable subscapularis tendon tears due to a higher nonhealing rate. Level III.

The remaining teres minor and subscapularis may contribute to preventing superior migration of the humeral head and progression of osteoarthritic change in rotator cuff tears

Superior migration of the humeral head is common in large and massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Humeral heads migrate superiorly according to an increase in the RCT size; however, the relevance of the remaining cuff has not been elucidated. This study investigated the relation between superior migration of the humeral head and the remaining rotator cuff, especially the teres minor (TM) and subscapularis (SSC), in RCTs involving tears and atrophy of the infraspinatus (ISP). Plain anteroposterior radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed on 1345 patients between January 2013 and March 2018. A total of 188 shoulders with tears of the supraspinatus and ISP with atrophic ISP were evaluated. Gradings of superior migration of the humeral head and osteoarthritic change were evaluated using the acromiohumeral interval, Oizumi classification, and Hamada classification on plain anteroposterior radiographs. The cross-sectional area of the remaining rotator cuff muscles was evaluated using oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging. The TM was classified as hypertrophic (H) and normal and atrophic (NA). The SSC was classified as nonatrophic (N) and atrophic (A). All shoulders were classified as groups A (H-N), B (NA-N), C (H-A), and D (NA-A). Age- and sex-matched patients with no cuff tears were also enrolled (control). The acromiohumeral intervals of the control group and groups A-D were 11.4±2.4, 9.5±3.8, 7.8±4.1, 7.2±4.0, and 5.4±3.5 mm (84, 74, 64, 21, and 29 shoulders, respectively), with significant differences between groups A and D (P<.001) and groups B and D (P=.016). Grade 3 of the Oizumi classification and grades 3, 4, and 5 of the Hamada classification were significantly higher in group D than in others (P<.001). The group showing hypertrophic TM and nonatrophic SSC prevented significantly migration of the humeral head and cuff tear osteoarthritis compared to the group showing atrophic TM and SSC in posterosuperior RCTs. The findings indicate that the remaining TM and SSC may prevent superior migration of the humeral head and progression of osteoarthritic change in RCTs. In treating patients with large and massive posterosuperior RCTs, the status of the remaining TM and SSC muscles should be assessed.

Comparison of suture-bridge and independent double-row techniques for medium to massive posterosuperior cuff tears: a two-year retrospective study

BackgroundTransosseous-equivalent suture-bridge (TOE-SB) and independent double-row (IDR) repair techniques were developed to treat rotator cuff tears. The study was designed to prove that both TOE-SB and IDR techniques provided comparable clinical results and retear rate for medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, while the surgical time and number of suture anchor used were less in the IDR group.Study designLevel of evidence: level III, Retrospective comparative study.MethodsPatients with medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears receiving arthroscopic TOE-SB and IDR between November 2016 to October 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were confirmed to have grade ≤ 2 fatty infiltration in the muscles of the torn tendons. Revision, concomitant subscapularis tear, acromiohumeral distance < 7 mm, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, partial repair, incomplete repair, partial thickness, or irreparable posterosuperior cuff tear were excluded. Surgical time, number of suture anchor used for the surgery, pre-operative, and post-operative clinical scores such as Constant-Murley score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) were compared. The retear rates between groups were evaluated by ultrasound.ResultsThirty-five IDR and thirty-five TOE-SB repairs were enrolled. The IDR technique required much fewer anchors than TOE-SB did to complete the cuff repair. The mean operation time in IDR and TOE-SB group were 86(18.23), and 114(18.7) (min), respectively (P < 0.01). The mean number of anchors used to complete the cuff repair was 2(0.17) in IDR and 3(0.61) in TOE-SB (P < 0.01). The Constant-Murley score improved from 34.9 ± 6.6 to 80.6 ± 9.4 in the IDR group, and 37.4 ± 6 to 81.9 ± 4.6 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001). SSV improved from 24.6 ± 9.6 to 79.3 ± 10.6 in the IDR, and 27.9 ± 9 to 82.9 ± 6.9 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001). VAS improved from 7.9 ± 0.6 to 1.5 ± 0.7 in the IDR, and 8 ± 0.5 to 1.3 ± 0.6 in the TOE-SB group (both P < 0.001) at final follow-up. No significant difference was found between the retear rates (14.3% in the IDR vs. 17.1% in the TOE-SB, respectively) in the 2-year follow-up.ConclusionsBoth IDR and TOE-SB group provided comparable clinical results and retear rates for medium to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. The surgical time and number of anchors used were less in the IDR group than in the TOE-SB group.

Early postoperative recovery comparisons of superior capsule reconstruction to tendon transfers.

The management of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is controversial, with no gold standard. Two recently developed techniques that have shown promising initial results include arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and tendon transfers (latissimus or lower trapezius). However, there remains a scarcity of studies examining each procedure's early postoperative clinical outcomes individually or in comparison to each other. The purpose of this study is to compare the early postoperative recovery outcomes of tendon transfers (TTs) to SCR. Using the surgical outcomes system global database (Arthrex Inc.), we assessed the postoperative recovery outcomes for all patients who had outcomes recorded at least 6 months after SCR or TT. The time points analyzed included preoperative and postoperative (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years). The outcomes analyzed included pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, VR-12 physical, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). Overall, 163 patients underwent SCR and 24 arthroscopically assisted TT. The mean age for SCR and TT was 60 and 56 years, respectively. Postoperative recovery curves demonstrate that both procedures produced improved outcomes at each postoperative time point compared to preoperative. The pain and functional outcomes measures, including VAS, ASES, SANE, and VR-12 physical, were comparable for TT and SCRs, with similar recovery curves between the 2 techniques. Ultimately at 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 2 techniques. Analysis of the early outcomes associated with arthroscopic treatment of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears demonstrated that the arthroscopically assisted tendon transfers and arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction had similar pain and functional outcomes throughout the 2-year postoperative recovery period. Overall, the process of recovery appears equivalent between the 2 techniques. Future studies are needed to assess the outcomes of each technique and specific indications in an attempt to delineate an algorithm for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Allograft Secured at 45° of Glenohumeral Abduction Improves the Superior Stability of the Glenohumeral Joint in Irreparable Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

The purpose of the current study was to create a dynamic cadaveric shoulder model to determine the effect of graft fixation angle on shoulder biomechanics following SCR and to assess which commonly used fixation angle (30° vs 45° of abduction) results in superior glenohumeral biomechanics. Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a dynamic shoulder testing system. Humeral head translation, subacromial and glenohumeral contact pressures were compared among 4 conditions: 1) Intact, 2) Irreparable supra- and infraspinatus tendon tear, 3) SCR using acellular dermal allograft (ADA) fixation at 30° of abduction, and 4) SCR with ADA fixation at 45° of abduction. SCR at both 30° (0.287 mm, CI:-0.480 - 1.05 mm; P < .0001) and 45° (0.528 mm, CI:-0.239-1.305 mm; P= .0006) significantly decreased superior translation compared to the irreparably torn state. No significant changes in subacromial peak contact pressure were observed between any states. The average glenohumeral contact pressure increased significantly following creation of an irreparable RCT (373 kPa, CI: 304-443 vs 283 kPa, CI 214-352; P= .0147). The SCR performed at 45° (295 kPa, CI: 226-365, P= .0394) of abduction significantly decreased the average glenohumeral contact pressure compared to the RCT state. There was no statistically significant difference between the average glenohumeral contact pressure of the intact state and SCR at 30° and 45°. SCR improved the superior stability of the glenohumeral joint when the graft was secured at 30° or 45° of glenohumeral abduction. Fixation at 45° of glenohumeral abduction provided more stability than did fixation at 30°. Grafts attached at 45° of glenohumeral abduction biomechanically restore the glenohumeral stability after SCR using ADA better than fixation at 30° of glenohumeral abduction.

Quantitative MRI indicators and features for partial subscapularis tendon tears on conventional shoulder MRI

BackgroundDiagnosing partial subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears still faces challenges. A failure rate of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear repair will be highly increased when extending more than one-third of SSC tendon. This study aims to investigate the quantitative indicators and features of partial SSC tears on conventional shoulder MRI and improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy.Materials and methodsFour hundred and thirty-seven patients underwent MRI and arthroscopy were retrospectively reviewed; 89 patients with partial SSC tears in case group and 50 patients with normal SSC in control group were included. Six MRI features with the explicit definition of some quantitative indicators were evaluated.ResultsFissure sign showed the highest diagnostic efficiency for the partial SSC tears, with a specificity of 92%, sensitivity of 75.3%, and accuracy of 81.3%. Thinning of SSC, fluid collection under the coraco-glenoid arch (CGA), and combined SSP complete tear also showed high specificity of 86%, 80%, and 80%, respectively, while the sensitivity and accuracy were moderate, with a sensitivity of 38.2%, 50.6%, and 48.3%, respectively, an accuracy of 55.4%, 61.2%, and 59.7%, respectively. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of lesser tuberosity cysts were all moderate with values of 68%, 56.2%, and 60%, respectively. However, fat accumulation under the CGA showed no significant difference between the partial SSC tears group and the control group.ConclusionSeveral specific MRI features with quantitative indicators defined in this study can be used to improve the accuracy of preoperative MRI diagnosis of partial SSC tears.

Partial Superior Capsular Reconstruction to Augment Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Using Autogenous Biceps Tendon: Effect on Retear Rate

Background: Massive rotator cuff tears have a high incidence of postoperative retear that can reach 90%. It is still unclear which intervention may reduce the incidence of retear and improve the functional and clinical outcomes. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and structural outcomes at 2 years after repair of reparable massive rotator cuff tears with and without the use of partial superior capsular reconstruction (pSCR), using the autologous long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) as a graft. It was hypothesized that augmentation with a pSCR would decrease retear rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors compared arthroscopic repair of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with and without augmentation using the LHBT for pSCR between 2015 and 2017. After applying the selection criteria, 106 patients were included in the study and distributed into 2 groups of 50 and 56 patients. Patients in the first group (50 patients) underwent arthroscopic repair without use of the LHBT (AR group), and patients in the second group (56 patients) underwent arthroscopic repair with use of the LHBT for pSCR (AR-LHBT group). The structural outcome was evaluated by ultrasound at 2 years of follow-up. Function and pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS). Pre- and postoperative active range of motion, including forward elevation, external rotation, and abduction, were also documented. Results: No significant differences were found between groups regarding the baseline characteristics. After 24 months, both groups showed significant improvement from preoperative ASES scores, VAS score, and active range of motion (P < .01 for all). Patients in the AR-LHBT group showed significant improvements in postoperative functional and pain scores compared with the AR group in all measurements at the 2-year follow-up (ASES score: 77.23 ± 7.45 vs 71.04 ± 9.28, P < .01; VAS score: 1.64 ± 1.03 vs 2.12 ± 1.06, P < .01). Final range of motion was significantly increased for the AR-LHBT group for forward elevation (155 [interquartile range {IQR}, 150-160] vs 150 [IQR, 140-170]; P < .01) and abduction (150 [IQR, 140-157.5] vs 120 [IQR, 100-140]; P < .01), but external rotation was significantly greater for the AR group (54.43 ± 10.55 vs 59.5 ± 10.55; P < .01). Postoperative ultrasonography at the 2-year follow-up revealed a higher retear rate in the AR group than in the AR-LHBT group (46% vs 14%; P < .01). Conclusion: Use of the LHBT for pSCR to augment massive rotator cuff tears resulted in markedly lower retear rates and modestly improved pain and function outcomes compared with repair alone.

Latissimus dorsi transfer with amodified single-incision Herzberg technique and description of its arthroscopic advancement

Latissimus dorsi transfer aims to reduce pain and improve function for irreparable tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff by restoring the transversal force couple to improve external rotation and delaying superior migration of the humeral head. Surgery is advocated in patients with unbearable shoulder pain and limited external rotation caused by an irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Usually, alatissimus transfer is recommended in the presence of superior migration of the humeral head, higher grade fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff and arestriction of range of motion and strength for abduction and external rotation. Advantages of the arthroscopically assisted technique are the missing need of detaching the deltoid from its origin, smaller incisions and therapy of concomitant intraarticular lesions. Little pain and sufficient shoulder function in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears do not necessitate latissimus transfer. In the presence of subscapularis tears, osteoarthritis and deltoid dysfunction as well as shoulder stiffness tendon transfer are associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgery is performed in prone position. The incision is made about 5 cm caudal of the posterolateral corner of the acromion and extends over 6 cm at the inferior border of the deltoid muscle. After exploration and protection of the axillary and radial nerve the latissimus tendon is peeled off of the humerus. The medial part of the latissimus is then mobilized to gain length for the later transfer. Afterwards the footprint of the infraspinatus is visualized and debrided. Two or three suture anchors are placed into the posterosuperior aspect of the greater tuberosity. The sutures are stitched through the tendon in ahorizontal mattress stitch configuration and the tendon tied onto the bone. In arthroscopic advancement, the patient is placed in an upright beach-chair position with the arm attached to an arm holder. After debridement of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus footprint, arthroscopic preparation at the anterior border of the subscapularis tendon is performed. The latissimus tendon is visualized and detached with electrocautery. Afterwards the interval between posterior rotator cuff and deltoid muscle is prepared to allow the transfer of the latissimus tendon to the posterosuperior footprint. This marks the transition to the open approach, in which the arm is placed in aflexed and internally rotated position. Immobilization in ashoulder sling for 3weeks. Early passive range of motion (ROM: flexion30°, internal rotation60°, abduction0°, external rotation0°) was immediately allowed. After 3weeks, passive ROM was increased to90° of flexion, 60° of abduction, whereas external rotation was still restricted. After 7weeks, free passive ROM and after 8weeks active ROM (assisted) were allowed. In all, 67patients (mean age 63years) were examined 54months (± 28) after open transfer of the latissimus dorsi tendon. Constant score improved from 24 (± 6) points to 68 (± 17) points. Active flexion increased from 83° (± 47°) to 144° (± 35°), abduction from 69° (± 33°) to 134° (± 42°) and external rotation from 24° (± 18°) to 35° (± 21°). The VAS score decreased from 6.3 (± 1.1) to 1.8 (± 2). However, osteoarthritis worsened over time and the Hamada-Fukuda stage increased from1.4 to2.1 and the acromihumeral distance decreased from 7.9 (± 2.6) to 5.1 (± 2.2) at final follow-up.

Does arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using porcine dermal xenograft represent a viable option in case of massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear?

The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and structural outcomes of patients with a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear treated with arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using an acellular porcine dermal xenograft. We hypothesized that this procedure would lead to improvement in clinical and functional results and that structural failure would not influence the final clinical results. A retrospective analysis on arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction performed from October 2016 to January 2019 was conducted. The procedure was performed in patients with a massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear without a severe glenohumeral arthropathy (Hamada I and II) and complaining a painful pseudoparalysis. Clinical evaluation and MRI study were performed before surgery and after at least 14months. A comprehensive group of 21 patients with 11 females and 10 males and a mean age of 57 ± 8.5years underwent arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction. The graft had a thickness of 1.5mm in the first 9 cases (43%) since it was used in a single layer. The graft was thereafter doubled for technique evolution in the following 12 cases (57%) achieving a graft thickness of 3mm. Active ROM significantly improved with a mean increase of active forward flexion from 72.8° ± 7.5° to 120.6° ± 4.5°, active abduction from 68.3° ± 10.2° to 140.2° ± 8.8° and external rotation from 38.2° ± 11.2° to 56.7° ± 6.8° at the last follow-up. The mean Constant score significantly improved from 40.4 ± 6.7 to 73.3 ± 8.2. A graft tear revealed in 52% (11/21) of overall patients was significantly more frequent in single layer graft when compared to double layer (77% vs 33%, p < 0.05). Location and type of graft tear significantly influenced final outcomes. Patients with a healed (graft continuity with bone at medial and lateral insertion) or medial graft tear showed statistically significant better outcomes when compared with patients in which the graft was completely reabsorbed or torn on humeral side (p < 0.05). Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using an acellular porcine dermal xenograft may be a viable alternative to treat massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear in patients with a painful pseudoparalysis without anterosuperior escape. Structural failure may strongly influence final outcomes with significant role played by tear location.

Allograft and autograft provide similar retear rates for the management of large and massive rotator cuff tears: a review and meta-analysis.

Currently, autografts and allografts are largely used to treat large or massive rotator cuff tear (RCT), without any evidence in favour of one graft or the other. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of retear of autograft and allograft in the treatment of large or massive posterosuperior RCT. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis of the results in the literature as well as the presentation of results. A search of the literature was performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. Inclusion criteria were studies in English evaluating clinical and radiological results of surgical treatment with autograft or allograft for large or massive RCT since 2008. The main criterion was the retear rate of the graft assessed on MRI or US scan at 1-year minimum follow-up. Partial tear were classified as "tear". The overall retear rate was 23.6% (15.5-32.7) at a mean follow-up of 18.4 ± 7.8 (12-36) months. There was no significant difference between the two kinds of graft, with a retear rate of 27.0% (15.4-40.2) and 20.9% (9.9-34.2) with autograft and allograft respectively (n.s.). Similar improvements of functional scores (+ 28.8 to 38.4 points for the Constant score, + 33.6 to 38.4 points for the ASES, and - 4.0 to - 4.1 points for pain-VAS) were reported in the two groups after at 27.2 ± 11.1 (12-48) months. The rate of complications except retear was 1.8% (0.2, 3.7) with autograft and 0.5% (0.8, 1.8) with allograft (n.s.). The use of autograft and allograft for the treatment of large or massive RCT leads to similar retear rate and clinical outcomes at short to medium terms. Level IV.

Pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis of the shoulder

Abstract Background Clinical presentation of massive rotator cuff tears range from pain to loss of active range of motion. Pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are defined inconsistently in the literature, but both include limited active with maintained passive range of motion. Objective This article aims to provide a consistent definition of pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis of the shoulder and show structural and biomechanical differences between these two types of rotator cuff tear with their implications for treatment. Methods A literature review including key and basic papers discussing clinical symptoms, biomechanical differences, and their impact on therapeutic options for pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis was performed. Results Biomechanically, structural differences between pseudoparalysis (active scapular plane abduction &lt;45°) and pseudoparesis (active scapular plane abduction 45–90°) exist. For massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, the integrity of the inferior subscapularis tendon is the most predictive factor for active humeral elevation. Patients with pseudoparalysis have a higher grade of subscapularis tendon involvement (&gt;50%) and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle. Treatment options depend on the acuteness and repairability of the tear. Rotator cuff repair can reliably reverse the active loss of active range of motion in acute and reparable rotator cuff tears. In chronic and irreparable cases reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment option in elderly patients. Conclusion The most concise definition of pseudoparalysis is a massive rotator cuff tear that leads to limited active (&lt;45° shoulder elevation) with free passive range of motion in the absence of neurologic deficits as the reason for loss of active elevation. The integrity of the subscapularis tendon is the most important difference between a pseudoparalytic and pseudoparetic (active shoulder elevation 45–90°) shoulder. Decision-making for surgical options depends more on reparability of the tendon tear and patient age than on differentiation between pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction With a 3 mm–Thick Dermal Allograft Partially Restores Glenohumeral Stability in Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Deficiency: A Dynamic Robotic Shoulder Model

Background: Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) has been shown to improve shoulder function and reduce pain in patients with isolated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears. However, the effects of SCR on biomechanics in a shoulder with an extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear pattern remain unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to (1) establish a dynamic robotic shoulder model, (2) assess the influence of rotator cuff tear patterns, and (3) assess the effects of SCR on superior humeral head translation after a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. It was hypothesized that a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear would increase superior humeral head translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon–deficient state and that SCR would reduce superior humeral head translation in shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a robotic arm. Kinematic testing was performed in 4 conditions: (1) intact, (2) simulated irreparable supraspinatus tendon tear, (3) simulated irreparable supra- and infraspinatus tendon tear, and (4) SCR using a 3 mm–thick dermal allograft (DA). Kinematic testing consisted of static 40-N superior force tests at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction and dynamic flexion, abduction, and scaption motions. In each test, the superior translation of the humeral head was reported. Results: In static testing, SCR significantly reduced humeral superior translation compared with rotator cuff tear at all abduction angles. SCR restored the superior stability back to native at 60° and 90° of abduction, but the humeral head remained significantly and superiorly translated at neutral position and at 30° of abduction. The results of dynamic testing showed a significantly increased superior translation in the injured state at lower elevation angles, which diminished at higher elevation, becoming nonsignificant at elevation >75°. SCR reduced the magnitude of superior translation across all elevation angles, but translation remained significantly different from the intact state up to 60° of elevation. Conclusion: Massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears increased superior glenohumeral translation when compared with the intact and supraspinatus tendon–insufficient rotator cuff states. SCR using a 3-mm DA partially restored the superior stability of the glenohumeral joint even in the presence of a simulated massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear in a static and dynamic robotic shoulder model. Clinical Relevance: The biomechanical performance concerning glenohumeral stability after SCR in shoulders with large posterosuperior rotator cuff tears is unclear and may affect clinical outcomes in daily practice.

All-Arthroscopic Muscle Slide and Advancement Technique to Repair Massive Retracted Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears

Symptomatic massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears without glenohumeral joint arthritis and chronic medial retraction often are deemed “irreparable.” These patients often are treated with alternative joint-sparing procedures including superior capsular reconstruction or tendon transfer procedures. Open and arthroscopic-assisted muscle advancement techniques allow maximal lateral tendon mobilisation during rotator cuff repair. In this report, we present an all-arthroscopic technique of complete supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle scapular detachment and advancement in retracted massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. This allows for an anatomical tendon footprint reduction and tension-free repair.

The effect of glenosphere lateralization and inferiorization on deltoid force in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

A medialized center of rotation (COR) in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) comes with limitations such as scapular notching and reduced range of motion. To mitigate these effects, lateralization and inferiorization of the COR are performed, but may adversely affect deltoid muscle force. The study purposes were to measure the effect of RTSA with varying glenosphere configurations on (1) the COR and (2) deltoid force compared with intact shoulders and shoulders with massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (PS-RCT). We hypothesized that the highest deltoid forces would occur in shoulders with PS-RCT, and that RTSA would lead to a decrease in required forces that is further minimized with lateralization and inferiorization of the COR but still higher compared with native shoulders with an intact rotator cuff. In this study, 8 cadaveric shoulders were dissected leaving only the rotator cuff muscles and capsule intact. A custom apparatus incorporating motion capture and a dynamic tensile testing machine to measure the changes in COR and deltoid forces while simultaneously recording glenohumeral abduction was designed. Five consecutive testing states were tested: (1) intact shoulder, (2) PS-RCT, (3) RTSA with standard glenosphere, (4) RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenosphere, and (5) RTSA with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere. Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to analyze the deltoid force as a function of the abduction angle. One-way repeated-measures within-specimens analysis of variance was conducted, followed by post hoc t-tests for pairwise comparisons between the states. All RTSA configurations shifted the COR medially and inferiorly with respect to native (standard: 4.2 ± 2.1 mm, 19.7 ± 3.6 mm; 4 mm lateralized: 3.9 ± 1.2 mm, 16.0 ± 1.8; 2.5 mm inferiorized: 6.9 ± 0.9 mm, 18.9 ± 1.7 mm). Analysis of variance showed a significant effect of specimen state on deltoid force across all abduction angles. Of the 10 paired t-test comparisons made between states, only 3 showed significant differences: (1) intact shoulders necessitated significantly lower deltoid force than specimens with PS-RCT below 42° abduction, (2) RTSAs with standard glenospheres required significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres above 34° abduction, and (3) RTSAs with 2.5 mm inferiorized glenospheres had significantly lower deltoid force than RTSA with 4 mm of glenosphere lateralization at higher abduction angles. RTSA with a 2.5 mm inferiorized glenosphere and no additional lateralization resulted in less deltoid force to abduct the arm compared with 4 mm lateralized glenospheres. Therefore, when aiming to mitigate downsides of a medialized COR, an inferiorized glenosphere may be preferable in terms of its effect on deltoid force.

Arthroscopic lower trapezius tendon transfer provides equivalent outcomes to latissimus dorsi transfer in the treatment of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare early postoperative recovery following open and arthroscopic-assisted latissimus dorsi tendon (aa-LDT) transfer to arthroscopic-assisted lower trapezius tendon (aa-LTT) transfer for patients with massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff pathology.MethodsA multicentre retrospective analysis comparing the postoperative outcomes after open LDT, arthroscopic-assisted LDT (aa-LDT) or arthroscopic-assisted LTT (aa-LTT) was performed. Active range of motion and patient-reported subjective outcomes were reported preoperatively and postoperatively. Overall, there were 10 patients who underwent open LDT transfer, 16 aaLDT transfers and 8 aa-LTT transfers with mean age of 55±3, 57±6 and 53±13, respectively. Mean follow-up was 22±10 months.ResultsArthroscopic-assisted LDT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (85–124, p<0.003) and external rotation (29–38, p<0.005), whereas aa-LTT had significantly improved postoperative forward flexion (101–146, p<0.04). Arthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Function scores and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) at 2 years (p<0.03). Arthroscopic-assisted LTT compared with open LDT demonstrated significantly improved ASES Shoulder Index score (20.0 vs 12.6; 84.8 vs 55.6) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (0.66 vs 4.14; 1.17 vs 3.88) at postoperative 6 months and 2 years, respectively. Arthroscopic-assisted LDT transfer compared with open LDT had improved VAS at 6 months (0.66 vs 2.11, p<0.05). In total, 6 (17.6%) complications were noted. These included two infections with Cutibacterium acnes, two axillary nerve injuries, complex regional pain syndrome and a postsurgical adhesive capsulitis.ConclusionsArthroscopic-assisted LDT and aa-LTT transfers provided improvement in pain and function at 2-year follow-up. The aa-LTT transfer provided significantly improved outcomes at 2 years compared with the open-LDT (latissimus dorsi tendon transfer) transfer. This study demonstrates superiority of arthroscopic-assisted tendon transfer techniques over traditional open techniques while establishing the aa-LTT transfer as a safe and effective alternative in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.Level of evidenceIV.

Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Large to Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears: Medialization of the Attachment Site of the Rotator Cuff Tendon.

BackgroudThe goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair with medialization of the attachment site of the rotator cuff tendon and to identify prognostic factors affecting rotator cuff healing in patients with irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.MethodsBetween July 2012 and March 2016, 42 patients with irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears underwent an arthroscopic partial repair with medialization of the attachment site of the rotator cuff tendon. All patients had a minimum of 2-year follow-up (mean, 35.4 ± 7.3 months). Clinical evaluation was performed using the visual analog scale, the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, Constant score, and active range of motion. Radiological evaluation was performed using magnetic resonance imaging and simple radiography.ResultsClinical outcomes at the final follow-up improved significantly compared with the preoperative values (all p < 0.001). The failure rate was 23.8% (10/42); however, clinical outcomes significantly improved regardless of cuff healing (all p < 0.001). The mean acromiohumeral distance was 6.5 ± 1.7 mm (range, 3.2–9.7 mm) before surgery and 6.3 ± 1.6 mm (range, 2.8–9.5 mm) at the final follow-up. Preoperative acromiohumeral distance was associated with failure of cuff healing in the univariate analysis (p = 0.043) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.048). A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive cutoff value for the smallest preoperative acromiohumeral distance for successful healing, which was calculated as 5.3 mm.ConclusionsDespite healing failure, arthroscopic partial repair with medialization can be a possible treatment option for irreparable large to massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears because of the improvement in clinical outcome. The shorter preoperative acromiohumeral distance was the single most important factor negatively affecting cuff healing, and the likelihood of success of healing might be improved if a repair is performed when the preoperative acromiohumeral distance is < 5.3 mm.

Latissimus dorsi transfer for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: what affects the postoperative outcome?

The management of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cufftears (IPSRCTs) in young active individuals is still a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex, surgical technique, previous surgical procedures, tear genesis, and presence of a preoperative external rotation lag sign on the functional outcome after latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) for IPSRCTs. Retrospectively, all patients with IPSRCTs treated with LDT during a 10-year period were followed up. Preoperative evaluation included the visual analogscale (VAS) score, range of motion, and the Constant score (CS). Postoperatively, the VAS score, range of motion, CS, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Subjective Shoulder Value were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative radiologicevaluation was performed using the Hamada-Fukuda classification and the acromiohumeral interval. In total, 67 of 79 patients (85%), with a mean age of 63 years, were available for follow-up at 54 ± 28 months. The CS improved from 24 ± 6 points preoperatively to 68 ± 17 points at follow-up (P < .001). Active flexion increased from 83° ± 47° to 144° ± 35°; abduction, from 69° ± 33° to 134° ± 42°; and external rotation, from 24° ± 18° to 35° ± 21°. Postoperatively, the Subjective Shoulder Value was 69% ± 19% and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 76 ± 21. The VAS score decreased from 6.3 ± 1.1 to 1.8 ± 2 (P < .001). Abduction strength increased from 0.4 ± 0.4 kg to 3.6 ± 2.2 kg (P < .001). The acromiohumeral interval decreased from 7.9 ± 2.6 mm to 5.1 ± 2.2 mm, and arthropathy worsened from Hamada-Fukuda stage 1.4 to stage 2.1. The rate of conversion to a reverse prosthesis was 6%. LDT represents a reliable and reproducible treatment option with good clinical midterm results after surgical treatment. Sex, genesis, preoperative presence of an external rotation lag sign, and previous surgical procedures do not affect the overall clinical outcome.

Clinical and MRI Outcomes 10 Years After Repair of Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Massive rotator cuff tears are challenging to treat, with few or no studies on long-term outcomes of repair. The purpose of this study was to report 10-year outcomes following repair of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, with and without extension into the subscapularis, and to determine prognostic factors that could influence clinical scores and retear rates. The records of 234 patients who underwent repair of a massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear at a total of 15 centers were retrieved. Patients were asked to return for evaluation at 10 years; 78 patients could not be contacted, 7 had died, and 19 had undergone a reoperation. A total of 130 patients (68% men) with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 56.1 ± 7.7 years (range, 26 to 79 years) were evaluated clinically, and 102 of them were also evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The tear was confined to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons in 94 shoulders and also involved the superior portion of the subscapularis in 36 shoulders. Univariable and multivariable regressions were performed to determine whether 10-year total Constant-Murley scores and repair integrity were associated with patient characteristics, tear patterns, or repair techniques. In the study cohort, complications were noted in 14 shoulders (11%) (stiffness in 10 and infection in 4). For the 130 shoulders evaluated clinically, the mean total Constant-Murley score improved from 53.1 ± 15.9 (range, 14 to 83) preoperatively to 78.5 ± 11.3 (range, 36 to 98) at 10 years. Of the 102 shoulders evaluated using MRI, 32 had a retear (Sugaya type IV or V). Of the 19 shoulders that underwent a reoperation (excluded from the study cohort), 9 had a retear. The overall prevalence of retears was 34%. Multivariable regression analysis revealed a significant association between the 10-year Constant-Murley score and preoperative retraction of the infraspinatus tendon, but no association between retears and any of the variables. Involvement of the subscapularis had no significant effect on preoperative or postoperative Constant-Murley scores or retear rates. Patients who had repair of a massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tear maintained considerable improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes at 10 years. Partial concomitant tears of the subscapularis did not affect the total postoperative Constant-Murley scores or retear rates. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Durability of Massive Rotator Cuff Repair: Commentary on an article by Philippe Collin, MD, et al.: "Clinical and MRI Outcomes 10 Years After Repair of Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears".

Durability of Massive Rotator Cuff Repair: Commentary on an article by Philippe Collin, MD, et al.: "Clinical and MRI Outcomes 10 Years After Repair of Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears".