Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical presentation of massive rotator cuff tears range from pain to loss of active range of motion. Pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis are defined inconsistently in the literature, but both include limited active with maintained passive range of motion. Objective This article aims to provide a consistent definition of pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis of the shoulder and show structural and biomechanical differences between these two types of rotator cuff tear with their implications for treatment. Methods A literature review including key and basic papers discussing clinical symptoms, biomechanical differences, and their impact on therapeutic options for pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis was performed. Results Biomechanically, structural differences between pseudoparalysis (active scapular plane abduction <45°) and pseudoparesis (active scapular plane abduction 45–90°) exist. For massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears, the integrity of the inferior subscapularis tendon is the most predictive factor for active humeral elevation. Patients with pseudoparalysis have a higher grade of subscapularis tendon involvement (>50%) and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle. Treatment options depend on the acuteness and repairability of the tear. Rotator cuff repair can reliably reverse the active loss of active range of motion in acute and reparable rotator cuff tears. In chronic and irreparable cases reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment option in elderly patients. Conclusion The most concise definition of pseudoparalysis is a massive rotator cuff tear that leads to limited active (<45° shoulder elevation) with free passive range of motion in the absence of neurologic deficits as the reason for loss of active elevation. The integrity of the subscapularis tendon is the most important difference between a pseudoparalytic and pseudoparetic (active shoulder elevation 45–90°) shoulder. Decision-making for surgical options depends more on reparability of the tendon tear and patient age than on differentiation between pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis.

Highlights

  • Clinical presentation of massive rotator cuff tears range from pain to loss of active range of motion

  • Despite paresis being defined as weakness with some motion and paralysis as no motion, most authors use the term pseudoparalysis inconsistently to describe a lack of active anterior shoulder elevation greater than 90° with free passive elevation after an Massive rotator cuff tears (mRCT)

  • The definition of pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis of Tokish et al was combined with recent structural and biomechanical findings [16]: pseudoparalysis is defined as mRCT with maintained passive range of motion and limited active scapular plane abduction 45° and

Read more

Summary

Included patients Imaging criteria

Massive Pseudoparalysis: active RCTs: scapular plane abduction >2 ten- 45° and

Clinical presentation
Loss of forward elevation
Bony anatomy
Implications for treatment
Included design
Imaging criteria
Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty
Conservative treatment
Surgical treatment
Tendon transfer
Superior capsular reconstruction
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Conclusion
Findings
Corresponding address
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call