I34 SEER, 8o, I, 2002 workedmainly in Prague(andarethereforeentitledto be includedin a 'study' of Czechoslovak cinema?). Of the writers,only LadislavMnacko is mentioned, presumably because his works were translated into Czech, and one of his novelswas adaptedby a Czech director. What then, precisely, is the aim of this booklet?It has been publishedwith the support of the Jan Hus Educational Foundation as part of the 'Life-time Learning for Teachers of Czech Language and Literature'project. In her introduction, Koudelkova states that film 'is one of the best didacticmethodological aids to encourage students to read' (p. 3) since she believes that it is easier to watch a film than to read a book. However, it is hard to see how the handfulof synposesin thisvolume is going to achieve either. School ofSlavonic andEastEuropean Studies CESAR BALLESTER University College London Edmunds, Neil. TheSovietProletarian MusicMovement. Peter Lang, Oxford, Bern, and Berlin, 2000. 407 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Discography. Index. f36.oo: $57.95 (paperback). NEIL EDMUNDS's detailed study of the proletarian episode in Soviet music historymakesan extremelywelcome addition to the meagre body of Western scholarshipin this area. In recent years, attention has focused on the popular cultureof thisperiod (RichardStites:Russian Popular Culture, Cambridge, I 992, S. F. Starr:RedandHot.7heFateofJazz intheSoviet Union I9I17-I980, New York and Oxford, I983) rather than on the 'serious' music written for the masses. This music has tended to fall between two stools:neglected by music historians interested in major figures such as Shostakovichand Prokofievas well as by those attractedto the subversivepotential of genuine, ratherthan State-produced,popularmusic. Edmunds'sapproachto his subjectis necessarilyinterdisciplinary,claiming allegiance to the 'new historicism' which has posited a challenge to the supposedly narrow, canonic orientation of traditional scholarship. Edward Said,Roger Scruton,ChristopherNorrisand musicologistsLawrenceKramer and Susan McClary are approvinglycited as examples of culturalcommentators and scholarswho have advocated looking 'beyond the score' to gauge the social significanceof music. How 'new' these approacheshave reallybeen is open to debate, as Edmunds himself acknowledges; but it is true that musicology has so farbeen content to leave thisparticularbody of music well alone. The reasons for its sidelining are clear enough: the little of it that is known is so third-rate and some of its composers so tainted by their ingloriousbehaviour in the Stalinperiod that studyof theirmusic has been a singularlyunattractiveprospect. Edmundsmakesno exaggeratedclaimsfor this music'squality.Rather, for him, its chief value lies in what it can tell us about the society thatproduced it. A persistentthread is his contention that much mass artwas motivated by an idealism more deserving of respect than scorn; few, I suspect, would regard that assertion as controversial today. But there are times when Edmunds's REVIEWS I35 revisionistbias weakens, ratherthan reinforces,his arguments.For example, the quotations from French Revolutionary songs in Nikolai Miaskovskii's Sixth Symphony are cited merely as evidence of 'common ground' (p. I73) between composers affiliated to the Association for Contemporary Music (ASM) and proletarian composers who regularlyexploited this material.Yet the musical context of these quotations may well suggest a quite different conclusion: they are woven into one of Miaskovskii'smost tragicworks, and followedby a Dies Iraequotation and an old Russianfuneralchant (seeDavid Fanning:'The Soviet Russian Symphony' in Robert Layton, ed., A Companion totheSymphony, London, I993, pp. 295-96). Issues of bias aside, this is still a study that no-one interested in Soviet culture would want to be without. Although most of Edmunds's sources are published, some archivalmaterial mostly unpublishedarticlesand printed music has been used to supplement the considerablebody of information collected from Soviet journals of the I920S and early '30s. It fleshes out informationin the chapterson proletarianmusic in BorisSchwarz'sMusicand MusicalLifeinSoviet Russia, I9I7-Ig8I, enlargededition, (Bloomington,I 983) and Levon Hakobian's recent Musicof theSoviet AgeI9I7-1987 (Stockholm, I998) in fascinatingdetail, and goes some way towardsachieving the author's goal of eliciting admiration for many pioneers of mass culture. Musical examples, though frequentlyinadequatelypresented, are especiallyvaluable, and may well provoke further investigation. One brief citation of VasilievBuglai 's Starinnaia pesniapro bratsa-soldatika ('Old song about a soldier-boy') (p. I83) is enough to indicate cross-fertilization between mass song and mainstream symphonic music: the song's opening went on to become a key theme in the...
Read full abstract