Objectives: Endosonographic imaging of the pancreas is a widely accepted method of evaluating patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy. Patients with pancreatic neoplasia often have dilated pancreatic ducts which are easily sampled with FNA facilitated by EUS guidance.We reviewed retrospectively a consecutive series of patients over a 28 months who had EUS guided pancreatic duct aspiration for diagnostic yield, ease of performance, and complications. Methods: All patients who underwent EUS guided FNA of the pancreatic duct from July 1997 to November 1999 were reviewed. Cytologic diagnosis was compared to initial EUS interpretation and final diagnosis (surgical pathology on pancreatic resection or diagnostic FNA of a pancreatic mass). Results: Thirty-three consecutive pancreatic duct FNA's were identified during a 28 month interval. Of these, three aspirates (9%) were deemed unsatisfactory for cytologic analysis. Eight aspirates (24%) were interpreted as negative, five patients were later proven to have adenocarcinoma, and three had chronic pancreatitis. Nine (27%) aspirates were cytologically diagnostic and confirmed the initial EUS findings: six with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and three with IPMT. Thirteen aspirates (39%) were interpreted as indeterminate; 11 of these proved to be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 2 IPMT's. Nineteen aspirates were obtained from pancreatic mass lesions. Sixteen were diagnostic for adenocarcinoma, 1 unsatisfactory for evaluation and 3 were indeterminate. Six aspirates were obtained from pancreatic mass lesions in patients later proven to have IPMT: 4 were diagnostic, 1 unsatisfactory and 1 indeterminate. All were performed successfully with one pass of a 22 gauge needle through the working channel of the echoendoscope. None of the patients had complications related to the procedure (bleeding, pancreatitis, or infection). Conclusions: Although technically straightforward, safe and specific, EUS-guided FNA of the pancreatic duct is an insensitive test for the presence of malignancy. Objectives: Endosonographic imaging of the pancreas is a widely accepted method of evaluating patients with suspected pancreatic malignancy. Patients with pancreatic neoplasia often have dilated pancreatic ducts which are easily sampled with FNA facilitated by EUS guidance.We reviewed retrospectively a consecutive series of patients over a 28 months who had EUS guided pancreatic duct aspiration for diagnostic yield, ease of performance, and complications. Methods: All patients who underwent EUS guided FNA of the pancreatic duct from July 1997 to November 1999 were reviewed. Cytologic diagnosis was compared to initial EUS interpretation and final diagnosis (surgical pathology on pancreatic resection or diagnostic FNA of a pancreatic mass). Results: Thirty-three consecutive pancreatic duct FNA's were identified during a 28 month interval. Of these, three aspirates (9%) were deemed unsatisfactory for cytologic analysis. Eight aspirates (24%) were interpreted as negative, five patients were later proven to have adenocarcinoma, and three had chronic pancreatitis. Nine (27%) aspirates were cytologically diagnostic and confirmed the initial EUS findings: six with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and three with IPMT. Thirteen aspirates (39%) were interpreted as indeterminate; 11 of these proved to be associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 2 IPMT's. Nineteen aspirates were obtained from pancreatic mass lesions. Sixteen were diagnostic for adenocarcinoma, 1 unsatisfactory for evaluation and 3 were indeterminate. Six aspirates were obtained from pancreatic mass lesions in patients later proven to have IPMT: 4 were diagnostic, 1 unsatisfactory and 1 indeterminate. All were performed successfully with one pass of a 22 gauge needle through the working channel of the echoendoscope. None of the patients had complications related to the procedure (bleeding, pancreatitis, or infection). Conclusions: Although technically straightforward, safe and specific, EUS-guided FNA of the pancreatic duct is an insensitive test for the presence of malignancy.