Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a common and potentially severe complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation. TA-TMA-directed therapy with eculizumab, a complement C5 inhibitor, has resulted in a survival benefit in some studies. However, children with TA-TMA refractory to C5 inhibition with eculizumab (rTA-TMA) have mortality rates exceeding 80%, and there are no other known therapies. Narsoplimab, an inhibitor of the MASP-2 effector enzyme of the lectin pathway, has been studied in adults with TA-TMA as first-line therapy with a response rate of 61%. Although there are limited data on narsoplimab use as a second-line agent in children, we hypothesized, that complement pathways proximal to C5 are activated in rTA-TMA, and that narsoplimab may ameliorate rTA-TMA in children. In this single-center study, children were enrolled on single-patient, Institutional Review Board-approved compassionate use protocols for narsoplimab treatment. Clinical complement lab tests were obtained at the discretion of the treating physician, although all patients were also offered participation in a companion biomarker study. Research blood samples were obtained at the time of TA-TMA diagnosis, prior to eculizumab treatment, at the time of refractory TA-TMA diagnosis prior to the first narsoplimab dose, and 2 weeks after the first narsoplimab dose. Single ELISA kits were used to measure markers of complement activation according to the manufacture's instructions. Five children with rTA-TMA received narsoplimab; 3 were in multiorgan failure and 2 had worsening multiorgan dysfunction at the time of treatment. Additional comorbidities at the time of treatment included sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS; n = 3), viral infection (n = 3), and steroid-refractory stage 4 lower gut grade IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD, n = 3). Two infants with concurrent SOS and no aGVHD had resolution of organ dysfunction; 1 also developed transfusion-independence (complete response), and the other's hematologic response was not assessable in the setting of leukemia and chemotherapy (partial response). One additional patient achieved transfusion independence but had no improvement in organ manifestations (partial response), and 2 patients treated late in the course of disease had no response. Narsoplimab was well tolerated without any attributed adverse effects. Three patients consented to provide additional research blood samples. One patient with resolution of organ failure demonstrated evidence of proximal pathway activation prior to narsoplimab treatment with subsequent declines in Ba, Bb, C3a, and C5a and increases in C3 in both clinical and research lab tests. Otherwise, there was no clear pattern of other complement markers, including MASP-2 levels, after therapy. In this cohort of ill children with rTA-TMA and multiple comorbidities, 3 patients benefited from narsoplimab. Notably, the 2 patients with resolution of organ involvement did not have steroid-refractory aGVHD, which is thought to be a critical driver of TA-TMA. Additional studies are needed to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from narsoplimab and which markers may be most helpful for monitoring lectin pathway activation and inhibition.