Prevalence Of Masked Hypertension Research Articles

Home Blood Pressure Compared With Office Blood Pressure in Relation to Dysglycemia.

BackgroundMasked hypertension is more common in individuals with type 2 diabetes than in individuals with normoglycemia. We aimed to explore if there is a discrepancy between office blood pressure (office BP) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) in relation to HbA1c as well as glycemic status in 5,029 middle-aged individuals.MethodsHBPM was measured in a subsample of 5,029 participants in The Swedish CardioPulmonary BioImage Study (SCAPIS), a population-based cohort of 50–64 years old participants. Both office BP and HBPM were obtained after 5 minutes’ rest using the semiautomatic Omron M10-IT oscillometric device. White coat effect was calculated by subtracting systolic HBPM from systolic office BP. Participants were classified according to glycemic status: Normoglycemia, prediabetes, or diabetes based on fasting glucose, HbA1c value, and self-reported diabetes diagnosis.ResultsOf the included 5,025 participants, 947 (18.8%) had sustained hypertension, 907 (18.0%) reported taking antihypertensive treatment, and 370 (7.4%) had diabetes mellitus. Both systolic office BP and HBPM increased according to worsened glycemic status (P for trend 0.002 and 0.002, respectively). Masked hypertension was more prevalent in participants with dysglycemia compared with normoglycemia (P = 0.036). The systolic white coat effect was reversely associated with HbA1c (P = 0.012).ConclusionsThe systolic white coat effect was reversely associated with HbA1c, and the prevalence of masked hypertension increased with dysglycemia.

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Masked Hypertension Among Children With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is routinely performed in children with chronic kidney disease to identify masked hypertension, a risk factor for accelerated chronic kidney disease progression. However, ABPM is burdensome, and developing an accurate prediction of masked hypertension may allow using ABPM selectively rather than routinely. To create a prediction model for masked hypertension using clinic blood pressure (BP) and other clinical characteristics, we analyzed 809 ABPM studies with nonhypertensive clinic BP among the participants of the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children study. Masked hypertension was identified in 170 (21.0%) observations. We created prediction models for masked hypertension via gradient boosting, random forests, and logistic regression using 109 candidate predictors and evaluated its performance using bootstrap validation. The models showed C statistics from 0.660 (95% CI, 0.595-0.707) to 0.732 (95% CI, 0.695-0.786) and Brier scores from 0.148 (95% CI, 0.141-0.154) to 0.167 (95% CI, 0.152-0.183). Using the possible thresholds identified from this model, we stratified the dataset by clinic systolic/diastolic BP percentiles. The prevalence of masked hypertension was the lowest (4.8%) when clinic systolic/diastolic BP were both <20th percentile, and relatively low (9.0%) with clinic systolic BP<20th and diastolic BP<80th percentiles. Above these thresholds, the prevalence was higher with no discernable pattern. ABPM could be used selectively in those with low clinic BP, for example, systolic BP<20th and diastolic BP<80th percentiles, although careful assessment is warranted as masked hypertension was not completely absent even in this subgroup. Above these clinic BP levels, routine ABPM remains recommended.

Prevalence and Related Factors of White Coat Hypertension and Masked Hypertension in Shunde District, Southern China.

Background: White coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) can increase the risk of target organ damage. Home blood pressure monitoring is an important method for detecting WCH and MH. However, the prevalence and related factors of WCH and MH in China have been rarely reported. Objective: To explore the prevalence and related factors associated with white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in Shunde District, Southern China. Methods: This study recruited subjects from the Physical Examination Center in Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University. Office blood pressure and home blood pressure values were collected using the home blood pressure monitor with telemedicine device and office blood pressure monitor, and the prevalence of WCH and MH was calculated by the values. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the related factors for WCH and MH. Results: Four-hundred and sixty-one participants (61% male), with an average age of 49 years, were included. The prevalence of WCH and MH was 5.1 and 15.2%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that smoking (OR = 4.71, 95% CI = 1.05–21.15) and family history of coronary heart disease (OR = 4.51, 95% CI = 1.08–18.93) were associated with higher odds of WCH. The associated factors for higher odds of MH were smoking (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.11–7.23), family history of hypertension (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.11–4.26) and family history of coronary heart disease (OR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.07–7.45). Conclusion: WCH and MH are highly prevalent in the Physical Examination Center in Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University. We found smoking and family history of coronary heart disease were related factors for WCH, and smoking, family history of hypertension and coronary heart disease were associated with the odds of MH. Home blood pressure monitoring with a telemedicine device should be recommended to identity abnormal BP phenotype.

COVID-19 IMPACT ON THE PREVALENCE OF SUBCLINICAL HYPERTENSION AMONG PRACTICALLY HEALTHY MEDICAL STUDENTS

Objective: Silent arterial hypertension is not rare among young adults suffering chronic distress like medical students. COVID-19 pandemic with increased fears and anxiety, social isolation, distant learning, and decreased ACE2 receptor activity could boost hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. The study was aimed to compare the frequency of subclinical hypertension in cohorts of ‘apparently healthy’ young adults revealed before the COVID-19 pandemic and two years after its onset. Design and method: Medical students without any known diseases or apparent signs of ‘health problems’ enrolled. 24-hour BP monitoring and test questioning with “International Physical Activity Questionnaire” and “The Perceived Stress Scale-10” were performed in ‘pre-COVID’ November and December of 2019 (Group 1) and the same months of ‘peak-COVID’ of 2021 (Group 2). Results: A total of 160 students aged 19 to 26 years were enrolled (group 1, n = 74; group 2, n = 86). The groups did not differ with respect to gender, age, body mass index (BMI) or physical activity (table). The proportion of participants with high perceived stress level (24 and more points) was higher in group 2 vs group 1 (58.1% vs 11.2%, p &lt; 0.001). Masked hypertension prevalence and average values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) did not differ between groups, however daytime and nighttime BP load index was significantly higher in group 2 vs group 1 for both SBP and DBP. Conclusions: Despite the absence of significant differences in the mean BP variables, when compared with similar group from ‘pre-COVID’ period, ‘apparently healthy’ students examined after two years of the COVID-19 pandemic had significantly worsened day and night BP load indexes. These changes correlated with the increase of perceived stress levels.

Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in detection of masked hypertension and risk of hypertension mediated organ damage in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Purpose In patients with diabetes, unrecognised hypertension is a serious problem risk factor for the development and progression of chronic complications. The study aimed to determine the prevalence of masked hypertension in normotensive diabetic patients, the factors affecting it, and its association with diabetes complications using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Materials and methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on 150 normotensive diabetic patients. Patients were subjected to an interview and clinical examination to record demographic data, epidemiological data, and significant past history. ABPM was performed for each patient. Urine samples, echocardiogram, and ophthalmologic fundoscopy were done to check for diabetes-related complications. Results The mean age of all participants was 56.7 ± 7.8 years. A total of 93 patients (62%) were males. 99 (66%) patients had masked hypertension. A total of 85 (56.7%) were non-dippers, 49 (32.7%) were dippers, 1 (0.7%) was extreme dipper and 15 (10%) were reverse dippers. Non-dipping and reverse dipping were associated with concentric left ventricular hypertrophy LVH (p < .001). Masked hypertension was associated with concentric LVH (p = .001) and nephropathy (p =.008) whereas, nocturnal hypertension was associated with concentric LVH (p = .001) and nephropathy (p =.003). Conclusions A single office blood pressure (BP) reading cannot rule out hypertension in patients with diabetes. Regardless of hypertension, clinicians should have all patients, especially patients with diabetes, undergo ABPM at least once. Masked hypertension, changes in nocturnal dipping and other phenomena that raise the risk of diabetes complications but cannot be measured by office BP can be measured by ABPM, and thus ABPM can provide a good prognostic benefit.

Impact of Asleep and 24-Hour Blood Pressure Data on the Prevalence of Masked Hypertension by Race/Ethnicity.

We pooled ambulatory blood pressure monitoring data from 5 US studies, including the Jackson Heart Study (JHS), the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, the Masked Hypertension Study, the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, and the North Carolina Masked Hypertension Study. Using a cross-sectional study design, we estimated differences in the prevalence of masked hypertension by race/ethnicity when out-of-office blood pressure (BP) included awake, asleep, and 24-hour BP vs. awake BP alone. We restricted the analyses to participants with office systolic BP (SBP) <130 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) <80 mm Hg. High awake BP was defined as mean SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mm Hg, high asleep BP as mean SBP/DBP ≥110/65 mm Hg, and high 24-hour BP as mean SBP/DBP ≥125/75 mm Hg. Among participants not taking antihypertensive medication (n = 1,292), the prevalence of masked hypertension with out-of-office BP defined by awake BP alone or by awake, asleep, or 24-hour BP was 34.5% and 48.7%, respectively, among non-Hispanic White, 39.7% and 67.6% among non-Hispanic Black, and 19.4% and 35.1% among Hispanic participants. After multivariable adjustment, non-Hispanic Black were more likely than non-Hispanic White participants to have masked hypertension by asleep or 24-hour BP but not awake BP (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.14 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-3.15) and by asleep or 24-hour BP and awake BP (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.12-2.32) vs. not having masked hypertension. Assessing asleep and 24-hour BP measures increases the prevalence of masked hypertension more among non-Hispanic Black vs. non-Hispanic White individuals.

Paradoxical increase in ambulatory SBP in coarctation of aorta a compared to essential hypertension.

The relationship between office vs. ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices are well-studied in patients with essential hypertension and based on these data, it is known that the average 24-h ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office SBP underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and a minimal increase in stroke volume during low-intensity exercise results in an exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with essential hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with essential hypertension. Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with essential hypertension matched by age, sex, BMI and office SBP. Although both groups had similar office SBP (132 ± 17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-h ambulatory SBP (135 ± 14 vs. 126 ± 13; P < 0.001) and daytime ambulatory SBP (142 ± 16 vs. 130 ± 13; P < 0.001), and less nocturnal dipping (-3 ± 5 vs. -9 ± 4; P < 0.001). The COA group also had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension [36 (31%) vs 14 (12%); P < 0.001), and worse arterial function indices. These findings underscore the potential limitations of relying on office SBP for screening/monitoring of hypertension in COA and potential pitfalls in extrapolating essential hypertension guidelines recommendations to the treatment of COA. It also provides the rationale for further studies to determine if pharmacologic BP interventions guided by ambulatory BP data will improve clinical outcomes in the COA population.

The prevalence of masked hypertension in a group of young healthy soldiers.

To assess the prevalence of masked hypertension (MH) in young Saudi National Guard soldiers based on 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A prospective study of 196 soldiers, aged between 21-50 years, without a history of hypertension or antihypertensive medication use. Each participant was fitted with a 24h-ABPM. Patients were considered to have MH if the office blood pressure (OBP) was <140/90 mm Hg and the 24h-ABPM average was ≥130/80 mmHg. The mean age of the MH group was 34.5 years compared to 32.4 years of the normotensive group. By pairing the average OBP with the 24h-ABPM, the prevalence of MH was estimated to be 29/196 (14.8%), with the SBP (systolic blood pressure) and DPB MH (diastolic BP) prevalence 12.8% and 7.7%, respectively. For the systolic BP, the OBP compared with the 24h-ABPM was 120.0±8.1 vs. 134.7±4.5 (P<0.001) and for the diastolic BP, 70.7±7.0 vs. 79.9±4.2 (P<0.001). The prevalence of MH among this sample of healthy military soldiers was 14.8%. It is important not to rely solely on the OBP and to consider MH when screening for hypertension in apparently healthy individuals.

Paradoxical increase in ambulatory systolic blood pressure in coarctation of aorta as compared to idiopathic hypertension

Abstract Background The relationship between office vs ambulatory blood pressure (BP) indices is well-studied in patients with idiopathic hypertension, and based on these data, it is known that average 24-hour ambulatory BP is typically lower than office BP. However, emerging data show that office systolic BP (SBP) underestimates arterial afterload in patients with coarctation of aorta (COA), and minimal increase in stroke volume during low intensity exercise results in exaggerated rise in SBP as compared to those with idiopathic hypertension. We hypothesized that COA patients will have higher ambulatory SBP and a higher prevalence of masked hypertension compared to patients with idiopathic hypertension. Methods Case-control study of 118 COA patients and 118 patients with idiopathic hypertension matched by age, sex, body mass index and office SBP. Results Although both groups had similar office SBP (132±17 mmHg) by design, the COA group had paradoxical increases in 24-hour ambulatory SBP (135±14 vs 126±13, p&amp;lt;0.001) and daytime ambulatory SBP (142±16 vs 130±13, p&amp;lt;0.001), and less nocturnal dipping (−3±5 vs −9±4, p&amp;lt;0.001). The COA group also had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension (36 [31%] vs 14 [12%], p&amp;lt;0.001), and worse arterial function indices. Conclusion These findings underscore the potential limitations of relying on office SBP for screening/monitoring of hypertension in COA and potential pitfalls in extrapolating idiopathic hypertension guidelines recommendations to the treatment of COA. It also provides rationale for further studies to determine if pharmacologic BP interventions guided by ambulatory BP data will improve clinical outcomes in the COA population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Is Office Blood Pressure Measurement Reliable in Obese Adolescents?

BackgroundAlthough it is not reflected in the OBP measurement in obese children, ambulatory BP changes are known to occur. MH, non-dipper pattern and nocturnal hypertension have been reported to increase in obese children. On the other hand, the factors that indicate a high risk of hypertension are still unclear. The aim of our study is to especially detect masked hypertension by 24-hour BP measurement in obese adolescents and to evaluate the relationship of masked hypertension with metabolic syndrome parameters, anthropometric measurements and hepatosteatosis in these patients.MethodsA total of 63 adolescents diagnosed with obesity were evaluated between January 2019 and December 2019. Office blood pressure was measured for all children, and all of them underwent ABPM. Patients with and without hypertension in ABPM were compared in terms of clinical and laboratory findings.ResultsThe mean age was 14.0 ± 1.7 years, females composed 49.2% of the study population. Office blood pressure measurement revealed hypertension in 4 (6.3%) patients and prehypertension in 15 (23.8%) patients. Thirteen patients (20.9%) were diagnosed with masked hypertension, white coat hypertension was diagnosed in 3 (4.7%) patients. Abnormal ABPM patterns were found to be significantly more frequent in patients with severely obesity (with obesity: 26.4% vs severe obesity: 55.6%, p = 0.03) and patients with a higher waist circumference and waist circumference/height ratio.ConclusionThe prevalence of masked hypertension in obese adolescents has been found to be quite high. Therefore, we recommend ABPM in adolescents with high waist circumference/height ratio and severe obesity, even if their office blood pressure measurements are normal.

Masked hypertension and correlation between body composition and nighttime blood pressure parameters in children and adolescents with obesity.

Masked hypertension is defined as having a normal blood pressure (BP) in the office but elevated BP outside the office. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of masked hypertension in participants with obesity and to examine the correlation between body composition, dietary intake and ambulatory blood pressure parameters. The cross-sectional study of participants with obesity was conducted in the pediatric nutrition clinic of a University Hospital in Thailand. Demographic and anthropometric data, dietary intake, body composition analysis and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were assessed in all participants. All parameters were compared between the group with masked hypertension and the normotensive group. Correlations between the parameters were analyzed. Among 49 children with obesity, 23 (47%, 95% confidence interval 34.7, 59.2%) had masked hypertension. Compared with the normotensive group, the group with masked hypertension had a greater mean BMI z-score (4.7 vs. 3.0, P = 0.003), a greater mean of body fat percentage (45 vs. 40, P = 0.012) and a greater total energy intake percentage of dietary reference intake (115 vs. 93, P = 0.034). Multivariate analysis showed that BMI z-score was significantly associated with masked hypertension. Interestingly, mean nighttime SBP positively correlated with BMI z-score and body fat percentage. Moreover, there were negative correlations between fruit intake portion per week and nighttime and 24-h SBP index. However, multivariate linear regression did not show significant correlation between these parameters. Masked hypertension was frequent in participants with obesity. The greater BMI z-score and percentage of body fat mass correlated with higher nighttime SBP.

L’hypertension artérielle masquée chez les obèses : facteurs associés et atteinte myocardique infraclinique

IntroductionObesity is a worldwide health problem. Masked hypertension is a relatively recent reported entity with a diagnostic problem. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and paraclinical characteristics and to identify the predictive factors of masked hypertension in obese patients. MethodsIt is a prospective study including obese patients with normal arterial pressure at office. All of these patients were given ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) to screen for masked hypertension, laboratory tests and a complete echocardiography study. ResultsA total of 50 patients were included. The mean age was 46.52±10.4 years. The mean systolic blood pressure (BP) at office was 120.8±8.8mmHg and the mean diastolic BP was 75±7.3mmHg. The prevalence of masked hypertension in obese adults was 36% with a predominantly non-dipper profile (38%). The study of echocardiographic parameters found dilated left atrium (LA) in 16 patients (32%). The left ventricle (LV) was hypertrophied in 32 patients (64%). The overall LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was on average −18.85±0.9% and the LA GLS was on average 37.35±4.5%. In our study, metabolic syndrome, low HDL cholesterol, elevated fasting blood glucose, hyperuricemia, LA dilatation, LV hypertrophy, diastolic LV dysfunction and altered myocardial deformities were factors associated with masked hypertension in obese adults. ConclusionIt is important to screen for hypertension by ambulatory measurement in at-risk obese patients who present associated cardiovascular risk factors to reduce morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography and speckle tracking analysis could be helpful in detection sub-clinical myocardial deterioration in obese patients with masked hypertension.

The prevalence of masked hypertension in the obese

The prevalence of masked hypertension in the obese

Prevalence and characteristics of isolated nocturnal hypertension in the general population.

Background/AimsAscertaining the prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension (INHT) in the general population and identifying the characteristics of patients with INHT may be important to determine patients who should receive 24- hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of INHT in the general population.MethodsOf 1,128 participants (aged 20 to 70 years), we analyzed 823 who had valid 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements and were not on antihypertensive drug treatment.ResultsThe prevalence of INHT in the study was 22.8%. Individuals with INHT had a higher office, 24-hour, and daytime and nighttime ambulatory systolic and diastolic BPs compared to individuals with sustained day-night normotension. INHT was more prevalent in individuals with masked hypertension (MH) than in those with sustained hypertension (59.8% vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001). Among individuals with INHT, 92.6% had MH. Among individuals with office BP-based prehypertension, 34.5% had both INHT and MH. The prevalence of INHT was highest in individuals with office BP-based prehypertension. INHT was an independent determinant of MH after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP, systolic and diastolic BP dipping, and systolic and diastolic BP non-dipping.ConclusionsThe present study showed that INHT is not uncommon and is a major determinant of MH. Our findings strongly suggest the use of 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement for individuals within the prehypertension range of office BP owing to the high prevalence of INHT and MH in this population.

Blood pressure phenotypes based on ambulatory monitoring in a general middle-aged population

Background Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is increasingly recommended for clinical use, but more knowledge about the prevalence and variability in ABPM-derived phenotypes in the general population is needed. We describe these parameters in the community-based Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) cohort. Methods We examined 5881 men and women aged 50–64 with 24-hour ABPM recordings using validated monitors. ABPM phenotypes were defined according to European guidelines. White coat hypertension was defined as elevated office BP (≥140/90 mmHg) with normal mean ambulatory BP (<135/85 mmHg in day-time, <120/70 mmHg in night-time, <130/80 mmHg over 24-h); and masked hypertension as normal office BP (<140/90 mmHg) with elevated mean ambulatory BP (≥135/85 mmHg in day-time, ≥120/70 mmHg in night-time, ≥130/80 mmHg over 24-h). Blood pressure variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), and average real variability. Results Based on the ABPM recordings, 36.9% of participants had 24-h hypertension, 40.7% had day-time hypertension, and 37.6% nocturnal hypertension. Among participants treated with anti-hypertensive drugs, one in three had elevated office blood pressures, and more than half had elevated 24-h, day-time or nocturnal blood pressures. Among participants without anti-hypertensive drugs, only one in six had elevated office blood pressures, but one in three had elevated 24-h, day-time or nocturnal blood pressures. Men had higher 24-h blood pressures, more masked hypertension, but less white-coat hypertension than women. The prevalence of white-coat hypertension increased with age, but not the prevalence of masked hypertension. A positive association between blood pressure level and variability was observed, and within-person and between-person SD and CV were of similar magnitude. The variance in ABPM on repeated measurements was substantial. Conclusions In the middle-aged general population, masked hypertension is an underappreciated problem on the population level.

MEAN ANNUAL TEMPERATURE IN VARIOUS REGION IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREVALENCE OF MASKED MORNING HYPERTENSION: THE J-HOP STUDY

Abstract Objective: Although previous studies have been reported home BP (HBP) is higher in cold region than that in warm region, regional variation in prevalence of masked hypertension remains unclear. We hypothesized that the prevalence of masked hypertension would be higher in cold region than that in warm region. Thus, we assessed the regional variation in the prevalence of masked hypertension using the dataset of the Japan Morning Home-Surge BP (J-HOP) study. Design and method: This is a cross-sectional, post-hoc analysis using the dataset of the J-HOP study, which recruited patients with a history of or risk factors of cardiovascular disease. Participants underwent consecutive 14-day HBP measurements (morning and evening). We divided participants into three regions, which were divided by mean annual temperature (&lt; 13 degree [Celsius], 13–15 degree, 15 degree &lt; ) in each participated facility. Masked morning or evening hypertension was defined as controlled office BP (systolic BP [SBP] &lt; 140 mmHg and diastolic BP [DBP] &lt; 90 mmHg) and uncontrolled morning or evening HBP (SBP &gt; = 135 or DBP &gt; = 85 mmHg). These criteria of BP levels were based on the Japanese guidelin on the management hypertension 2014 (JSH2014). Results: In the present study, 4268 participants (mean age, 64.9 ± 10.9 years; 46.9% male; 91.4% hypertensives) were divided 453, 1955, and 1860 partcipants into cold, moderate, and warm region, respectively. Office SBP was higher in cold region than others and morning home SBP was also higher in cold region than others. Whereas, evening home SBP had no significant differences between three regions. Moreover, in participants with normal (well-controlled) office BP, the prevalence of masked morning hypertension was higher in cold and moderate region than in warm region. However, the prevalence of masked evening hypertension had no significant differences between three regions. These relationships were also demonstrated after adjusted for traditional host factors in multivariate logistic regression analysis (All results are shown in Table). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that the prevalence of masked morning hypertension was higher in colder regions than in warmer regions.

WHITE-COAT HYPERTENSION AND MASKED HYPERTENSION IN HYPERTENSIVE KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS

Objective: Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) have inadequate control of blood pressure (BP) ranging between 30 to 40%. In addition 35% of them have white-coat hypertension or masked hypertension. Recent epidemiologic data in the general population associate both of the aforementioned BP patterns with poor outcomes. The objective of this study is to examine the prevalence of these hypertension phenotypes in hypertensive kidney transplant recipients. Design and method: 150 kidney transplant recipients were included in this study. They underwent 24-hour ABPM with the Mobil-O-Graph NG device. Hypertension was defined as: (1) office BP (oBP) &gt; or = 140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents, (2) ambulatory BP &gt; or = 130/80 mmHg or use of antihypertensive agents. Patterns of BP control were defined as follows: (1) truly controlled BP (oBP &lt; 140/90 and 24-hr BP &lt; 130/80mmHg), (2) uncontrolled hypertension (oBP &gt; or = 140/90 and 24-hr BP &gt; or = 130/80mmHg), (3) white-coat hypertension (oBP &gt; or = 140/90 and 24-hr BP &lt; 130/80mmHg), (4) masked hypertension (oBP &lt; 140/90 and 24-hr BP &gt; or = 130/80mmHg). Results: The prevalence of hypertension was 88.0% according to office BP readings and 93.3% according to ABPM (p = 0,112). 125 individuals (89,3% of the total) were hypertensives receiving antihypertensive agents. Among them, according to office BP readings and 24-hr ABPM, 44 (31,0%) hypertensive patients had BP control and 30 (21,1%) had uncontrolled hypertension. Moreover, among the hypertensive patients, 10 (7,0 %) had the white-coat hypertension phenotype and 58 (40,8%) had masked hypertension (Fig 1). Conclusions: The use of ABPM in kidney transplant recipients reveals low control of BP, low prevalence of white-coat hypertension and markedly high prevalence of masked hypertension. The last finding is particularly important, considering the established association between masked hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk.

Hypertension in Children and Adolescents with Turner Syndrome (TS), Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), and Williams Syndrome (WS).

Turner syndrome (TS), neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1), and William Syndrome (WS) are 3 genetic conditions that are all associated with a substantial increase in risk of hypertension. In this review, we focus on factors leading to hypertension and on clinical manifestations and management of hypertension in children and adolescents with these genetic conditions RECENT FINDINGS: In most instances, hypertension is secondary. There is a high prevalence of masked hypertension in TS; however, the extent to which control of the BP helps reduce the risk of aortic dissection/aneurysm in TS is not yet fully elucidated. Vasculopathies are the least emphasized but most important manifestation of NF1. Of note, routine screening for pheochromocytoma in NFI is not recommended as it is not cost-effective. Cardiovascular complications are the major cause of death in patients with WBS. ABPM identifies patients without overt aortic or renovascular narrowing. Antihypertensive agents such as ARBs that have direct vascular wall effects and agents that inhibit oxidative stress (minoxidil) should be considered, even in those who do not exhibit overt hypertension. Elevated blood pressure in children and adolescence manifests early with end-organ changes and when left untreated, increases risk for premature onset of cardiovascular disease. Vigilant monitoring of the blood pressure is recommended. Accurate early diagnosis and management of hypertension will delay or prevent target organ damage and ensure a healthier transition to adulthood among children afflicted with these conditions.

Prevalence of masked hypertension evaluated by home blood pressure monitoring in a large sample of patients with office blood pressure

Patients with masked hypertension have a higher incidence of target organ damage, including increased left ventricular mass and carotid atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events when compared with normotensive patients. The adverse cardiovascular risks are even greater in patients already taking antihypertensive medication. To identify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of masked hypertension in a large multicenter Brazilian sample that underwent office and home blood pressure monitoring. This was an observational cross-sectional analytical study based on secondary data from the teleMRPA online platform, which included 32 cities from 15 states in the five regions of Brazil. The database included 3704 outpatient participants with office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg who performed home blood pressure monitoring for diagnostic investigation (diagnosis group; n = 1819) or treatment (treatment group; n = 1885) of hypertension in 2018. The prevalence of masked hypertension was 18.0% in the whole studied population and 15.4% and 20.4% in the diagnostic and treatment group, respectively. Masked hypertension was more frequently detected in patients with office blood pressure classified as high normal [systolic blood pressure (SBP) = 130-139 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) = 85-89 mmHg], followed by those classified as normal (SBP = 120-129 mmHg or DBP = 80-84 mmHg) and optimal (SBP < 120 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg), with respective prevalence of 28.3, 13.4 and 4.4% in the diagnostic group and 30.8, 18.8 and 7.1% in the treatment group. Masked hypertension has a significant prevalence among individuals with office blood pressure <140/90 mmHg, which is greater with patients with high normal office blood pressure and even higher in patients already using antihypertensive medication.

Prevalence and Determinants of Masked Hypertension in Nigeria: The REMAH Study.

Estimating the burden of hypertension in Nigeria hitherto relied on clinic blood pressure (BP) measurement alone. This excludes individuals with masked hypertension (MH), i.e., normotensive clinic but hypertensive out-of-clinic BP. In a nationally representative sample of adult Nigerians, we obtained clinic BP using auscultatory method and out-of-clinic BP by self-measured home BP with semi-automated oscillometric device. Clinic BP was average of 5 consecutive measurements and home BP was average of 3 days duplicate morning and evening readings. MH was clinic BP <140 mm Hg systolic and 90 mm Hg diastolic and home BP ≥135 mm Hg systolic and/or 85 mm Hg diastolic. Among 933 participants, the prevalence of sustained hypertension, MH, and white-coat hypertension was 28.3%, 7.9%, and 11.9%, respectively. Among subjects whose clinic BP were in the normotensive range (n = 558), the prevalence of MH was 13%; 12% among untreated and 27% among treated individuals. The mutually adjusted odds ratios of having MH among all participants with normotensive clinic BP were 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.60) for a 10-year higher age, 1.59 (1.09-2.40) for a 10 mm Hg increment in systolic clinic BP, and 1.16 (1.08-1.28) for a 10 mg/dl higher random blood glucose. The corresponding estimates in the untreated population were 1.24 (1.03-1.51), 1.56 (1.04-2.44), and 1.16 (1.08-1.29), respectively. MH is common in Nigeria and increasing age, clinic systolic BP, and random blood glucose are the risk factors.