694 Feminist Studies 46, no. 3. © 2020 by Feminist Studies, Inc. Eve Ng Unmasking Masculinity: Considering Gender, Science, and Nation in Responses to COVID-19 In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reluctance of many men—including political leaders—to wear face masks became apparent , with normative masculinity coding the protective value of masks as indicative of a wearer’s weakness.1 Commentators pointed to nations with women as heads-of-state doing better than several prominent nations led by men, highlighting an association between “strong leadership ” and “swaggering masculinity.”2 Male leaders who are “authoritarian , vainglorious and blustering,” such as British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Iran, and President Donald Trump in the United States, have presided over some of the world’s highest COVID-19 infection and mortality numbers , in contrast to, for example, New Zealand under Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, Germany under Chancellor Angela Merkel, and Taiwan under President Tsai Ing-wen.3 1. Valerio Capraro and Hélène Barcelo, “The Effect of Messaging and Gender on Intentions to Wear a Face Covering to Slow Down COVID-19 Transmission ,” PsyArXiv Preprints, May 11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tg7vz; Monica Hesse, “Making Men Feel Manly in Masks Is, Unfortunately, a Public -Health Challenge of Our Time,” Washington Post, June 27, 2020. 2. See Amanda Taub, “Why Are Women-Led Nations Doing Better with Covid-19?” New York Times, May 15, 2020. 3. See Nicholas Kristof, “What the Pandemic Reveals about the Male Ego,” New York Times, June 13, 2020. For per capita rates, see Hannah Ritchie, Eve Ng 695 Yet, beyond the relationship between the gender of a country’s leader and its coronavirus statistics, the gendered dimensions of COVID-19 responses reflect and comprise the shifting authority of science and discourses of national identity. Amid global contestation over economic and political dominance, there is an urgent need for expansive feminist approaches to culturally and historically specific constructions of masculinity .4 At the level of policy, there are issues not just for equitably and successfully addressing the pandemic, but also for informed, multilateral approaches to other pressing global issues, such as immigration, labor, and the environment. For feminist theory, this essay highlights the productiveness of bringing together studies of media discourses, science and technology, and globalization to analyze the contingent feminization of scientific research and knowledge. The coronavirus crisis has also amplified a masculinist nationalism in some countries that is tied to both projections of invulnerability by individual male leaders and the purported strength of the nation. Esteban Ortiz-Ospina, Diana Beltekian, Edouard Mathieu, Joe Hasell, Bobbie Macdonald, Charlie Giattino, Max Roser, Breck Yunits, Ernst van Woerden, Daniel Gavrilov, Matthieu Bergel, Shahid Ahmad, and Jason Crawford, “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) Statistics and Research,” Our World in Data, University of Oxford, https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus (accessed November 3, 2020). 4. For example, see Judith Kegan Gardiner, ed., Masculinity Studies and Feminist Theory: New Directions (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002). It is also worth noting here that the specific characteristics of hegemonic masculinity are just as contingently defined as marginalized forms of masculinity and that valorized and stigmatized masculinities are co-constructed in particular contexts. R. W. Connell originated and developed the term “hegemonic masculinity” in Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1987) and Masculinities (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995). See also Michael Kimmel, Manhood in America : A Cultural History, 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, 4th ed.); and Mrinalini Sinha, Colonial Masculinity: The “Manly Englishman” and the “Effeminate Bengali” in the Late Nineteenth Century (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 1995). Furthermore, behavioral characteristics associated with normative masculinity are not necessarily instantiated by cis male-bodied individuals, as discussed in work on female masculinity and trans masculinities. For example, see Jack Halberstam, Female Masculinity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998); and Salvador Vidal-Ortiz , “Queering Sexuality and Doing Gender: Transgender Men’s Identification with Gender and Sexuality,” Gendered Sexualities 6 (2002): 181–233. 696 Eve Ng Masks versus Malaria Drugs: Hegemonic Masculinity and “Strength” In examining the gendering of healthcare responses to...
Read full abstract