You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP54-01 DISCORDANCE BETWEEN CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGIC CARCINOMA IN SITU FOR TURBT AND RADICAL CYSTECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER: IMPLICATIONS FOR BCG UNRESPONSIVE CLINICAL TRIAL DESIGN AND INTERPRETATION Manuel R. de Jesus Escano, Carissa Chu, Song Jiang, Wesley Yip, Nima Almassi, Peter Reisz, Andrew Lenis, Nicole Benfante, Eugene Cha, Timothy F Donahue, Guido Dalbagni, Alvin Goh, Bernard Bochner, and Eugene Pietzak Manuel R. de Jesus EscanoManuel R. de Jesus Escano More articles by this author , Carissa ChuCarissa Chu More articles by this author , Song JiangSong Jiang More articles by this author , Wesley YipWesley Yip More articles by this author , Nima AlmassiNima Almassi More articles by this author , Peter ReiszPeter Reisz More articles by this author , Andrew LenisAndrew Lenis More articles by this author , Nicole BenfanteNicole Benfante More articles by this author , Eugene ChaEugene Cha More articles by this author , Timothy F DonahueTimothy F Donahue More articles by this author , Guido DalbagniGuido Dalbagni More articles by this author , Alvin GohAlvin Goh More articles by this author , Bernard BochnerBernard Bochner More articles by this author , and Eugene PietzakEugene Pietzak More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002633.01AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The FDA recommends non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) trials stratify patients into two groups: carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary disease (CIS±Ta/T1) and papillary only disease (Ta/T1). Complete response rate is used as indicator of drug efficacy for approval in Phase II BCG unresponsive trials, yet limited data supports this classification. Moreover, effects of TURBT on response rate is not well stablished in NMIBC trials. To address this, we analyzed the concordance of CIS between TURBT and corresponding radical cystectomy (RC) specimens in NMIBC patients. METHODS: Patients treated with immediate RC at our center for high grade NMIBC between 2005-2015. Pre-RC TURBT/EUA and RC were performed at our center for study inclusion. Enhanced cystoscopy techniques during TURBTs were recorded. BCG unresponsive was defined using FDA criteria. BCG relapsing was defined as prior BCG treatment, but not meeting BCG unresponsive criteria. Clinical CIS (cCIS) was defined as histologic CIS in TURBT specimen, and pathologic CIS (pCIS) as histologic CIS in RC specimen. RESULTS: Of 610, 302 (49%) were BCG naïve and 308 (51%) had prior BCG. 358 (59%) had positive cCIS, 419 (69%) had positive pCIS, and 486 (80%) had any CIS (either+cCIS or +pCIS). In those with +cCIS, 289 (81%) had residual pathologic CIS (+cCIS/+pCIS), while eradication of CIS (+cCIS/−pCIS) was seen in 69 (19%). For those without cCIS at TURBT, concordance with RC (−cCIS/−pCIS) was seen in 124 (49%), while occult pathologic CIS (−cCIS/+pCIS) was detected in 128 (51%). In those BCG unresponsive (n=99), eradication of CIS by TURBT was seen in 16% (8/51) who would have been included in CIS±Ta/T1 cohorts, while occult pathologic CIS was seen in 52% (25/48). A similar frequency of CIS eradication (18%) and occult pathologic CIS (46%) was seen in the BCG relapsing subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: We report the potential utility of CIS as a marker of residual disease. Based on our findings, >15% of NMIBC patients in single-arm FDA registration trials might experience complete responses from the effects of TURBT alone, raising concerns about the interpretation of these trials. Furthermore, occult pathologic CIS was found in half of NMIBC patients who would incorrectly be placed into the papillary Ta/T1 only cohort of current NMIBC clinical trial stratification schema. Better measures of residual CIS after TURBT are needed to improve patient stratification and drug efficacy evaluations in NMIBC trials. Source of Funding: SKC for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, NIH/NCI to MSKCC through CCSG award #P30 CA008748, MJ and HRK CMO, MSKCC SPORE in BC P50-CA221745, MSKCC SPORE CE A., MSKCC Dept. of Surgery FR A., Bochner-Fleisher Scholars in BC Award, NIH/NCATS #UL1-TR-002384, NIH/NCI K12 Paul Calabresi CD A. for C Onc (K12 CA184746), Wofchuck Family A © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e926 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Manuel R. de Jesus Escano More articles by this author Carissa Chu More articles by this author Song Jiang More articles by this author Wesley Yip More articles by this author Nima Almassi More articles by this author Peter Reisz More articles by this author Andrew Lenis More articles by this author Nicole Benfante More articles by this author Eugene Cha More articles by this author Timothy F Donahue More articles by this author Guido Dalbagni More articles by this author Alvin Goh More articles by this author Bernard Bochner More articles by this author Eugene Pietzak More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract