Marker Of Treatment Effect Research Articles

Clinical Significance of Acellular Mucin in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Patients With a Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of acellular mucin within resected specimens of rectal cancer patients with a pCR following preoperative chemoradiation. The presence of acellular mucin pools in the resected specimens of patients with a complete response to preoperative chemoradiation is frequently reported as a marker of treatment effect. The clinical significance of the presence of acellular mucin with respect to local recurrence and survival outcomes is unknown. Data from a rectal cancer database was used to analyze 562 patients with nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma treated between 1989 and 2004. The presence or absence of acellular mucin within the specimen was identified by the surgical pathology reports and confirmed by re-examination of H&E sections of surgical specimens. Among the 562 patients, 100 patients (18%) had pCR. Acellular mucin was present in 27 (27%) of the 100 patients with pCR. The median follow-up interval was 87 months (range, 1-198 months). Local and distant failures occurred in 0 and 2 patients with acellular mucin, and in 1 and 6 patients without acellular mucin, respectively. The actuarial 7-year overall survival rates were 85% for patients with acellular mucin and 92% for patients without acellular mucin (P = 0.954). The actuarial 7-year disease-free survival rates were 81% and 87% (P = 0.764) and the 7-year freedom from relapse rates were 93% and 91% (P = 0.881) in patients with and without acellular mucin, respectively. Acellular mucin is present within 27% of resected specimens in rectal cancer patients with a pCR after preoperative chemoradiation. However, the presence of acellular mucin has no prognostic significance.

Differential Expression of Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-4δ2 mRNA, but Not Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), TGF-βRII, Foxp3, Gamma Interferon, T-bet, or GATA-3 mRNA, in Patients with Fast and Slow Responses to Antituberculosis Treatment

This study investigated interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-4 delta 2, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), TGF-beta RII, Foxp3, GATA-3, T-bet, and gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) transcription in peripheral blood samples of adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients prior to and after 1 week of therapy. Twenty patients with positive results for sputum culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis were enrolled and treated with directly observed short-course antituberculosis chemotherapy. Early treatment response was assessed. At the end of the intensive phase of treatment (month 2), 12 patients remained sputum culture positive (slow responders) and 8 converted to a negative culture (fast responders). Only the expression levels of IL-4 (4-fold decrease) and IL-4 delta 2 (32-fold increase) changed significantly during the first week of therapy in the 20 patients. No baseline differences were present between the responder groups, but fast responders had significantly higher IL-4 transcripts than slow responders at week 1. Fast responders showed a 19-fold upregulation and slow responders a 47-fold upregulation of IL-4 delta 2 at week 1. Only slow responders also showed a significant decrease in IL-4 expression at week 1. There were no significant differences in expression of TGF-beta, TGF-beta RII, Foxp3, IFN-gamma, and GATA-3 between the groups. These data show that differential IL-4-related gene expression in the early stage of antituberculosis treatment accompanies differential treatment responses and may hold promise as a marker for treatment effect.

C-reactive protein as a prognostic marker for men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC): Results from the ASCENT trial

5074 Background: Concentrations of blood proteins such as PSA, hemoglobin (HGB), and LDH are associated with survival in men with AIPC. We sought to identify additional blood proteins associated with prognosis in chemotherapy-treated AIPC patients. Methods: Baseline plasma samples were stored (-80°C) from 160 patients enrolled in the ASCENT trial, a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2 trial comparing weekly docetaxel plus DN-101, an oral high-dose formulation of calcitriol, to weekly docetaxel. Multiplex immunoassays measured 16 cytokine/chemokine or cardiovascular/inflammation markers including IL-1a, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFa, MCP-1, EGF, VEGF, PAI-1, MMP-9, sE-Selectin, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1 and C-reactive protein (CRP). Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to assess association between baseline biomarkers and survival or skeletal-related event (SRE)-free survival, and logistic regression for PSA Working Group Criteria response. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar to those of the 90 patients without samples, except for age (mean 68.0 vs. 70.6 yrs) and HGB (12.8 vs. 12.2 g/dL). CRP was the only biomarker that significantly predicted shorter overall survival (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.20–1.65, p < 0.0001). When CRP (continuous) was entered into a multivariate model using 13 baseline variables (including PSA, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, HGB, ECOG Performance Status, age) only elevated CRP remained a significant predictor (p<0.0001) of shorter survival. When categorized as normal (= 8 mg/L) or abnormal (> 8 mg/L), elevated CRP was a significant predictor of shorter survival (HR 2.96 95% CI 1.52–5.77, p = 0.001) as was HGB (p=0.007). Elevated CRP was also associated with a lower probability of PSA response (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60–0.92, p = 0.007) and a shorter SRE-free survival (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15–1.48, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Elevated levels of plasma CRP appear to be a strong predictor of poor survival and development of SREs in AIPC patients receiving docetaxel-based therapy. The use of CRP as a risk marker and its potential as a surrogate marker of treatment effect should be prospectively evaluated in future clinical trials in advanced prostate cancer. [Table: see text]

Recommendation for the assessment of tobacco craving and withdrawal in smoking cessation trials.

This paper addresses methodological issues in the assessment of nicotine withdrawal and craving in clinical trials of smoking cessation therapies. We define withdrawal as a syndrome of behavioral, affective, cognitive, and physiological symptoms, typically transient, emerging upon cessation or reduction of tobacco use and causing distress or impairment of behavioral function. Offset effects (effects related to removal of a direct nicotine effect) are sustained effects of cessation or reduction of tobacco use that cause distress or impairment. Withdrawal and craving are important as potential predictors of relapse, as mediators and markers of treatment effects, and as clinical phenomena in their own right. Symptoms recommended for assessment include craving, irritability, depression, restlessness, sleep disturbance, difficulty concentrating, increased appetite, and weight gain; anxiety deserves further study. We recommend reporting of data on each of these individual symptoms, and use of multiple-item assessments. Although some standardized measures of withdrawal have promising psychometric properties, no measure has yet fully established its reliability, validity, and broad applicability and, therefore, we do not currently favor universal adoption of any one measure. Assessment of objective indices of withdrawal (e.g., hormonal changes) is currently technically challenging and of unknown value. Although weekly assessment may suffice in some large trials, more intensive measurement can provide better sensitivity. Analyses of withdrawal should include baseline measures and be sensitive to potential instability in baseline. Analytic approaches should take into account potential bias when only abstinent subjects are examined. Conversely, heterogeneity should be considered when smoking subjects are included in intent-to-treat analyses. Withdrawal data from clinical trials focused on assessing abstinence rates may be biased because of progressive subject loss to dropout and relapse; different designs and approaches are needed to investigate the process and natural history of craving and withdrawal.