Marijuana Legalization Research Articles

Latent class analysis of attitudes towards drug use and well-being among South Korean young adults

Abstract Background The surge in drug use and lack of awareness about drug-related dangers among young adults have become major public health concerns in South Korea. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior, understanding attitudes towards drugs is crucial, as permissive attitudes may lead to drug use. Thus, the study aims to identify latent classes of drug use attitudes among Korean young adults and evaluate how their well-being influences each class. Methods A total of 301 college students in Seoul, South Korea, participated in the study. Latent class analysis (LCA) was employed to identify unique patterns of attitudes towards drug use. Subsequently, we examined the relationships between auxiliary variables (i.e., well-being, including life satisfaction, self-control, quality of life, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, childhood trauma, self-esteem, stress, family strengths, perceived social support, and stigmatization) and latent classes (i.e., attitudes towards drug use subgroups) by conducting multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results LCA categorized attitudes towards drug use into three groups: Class 1 (Permissive Drug Attitude Group), Class 2 (Moderate Drug Attitude Group), and Class 3 (Critical Drug Attitude Group). Class 2 showed a particularly permissive view on marijuana legalization. In multivariate logistic regression, higher stigmatization (β = .900, p < .05) was associated with membership in Class 1 compared to Class 3. Furthermore, being male (β = 2.272, p < .001) and having higher self-esteem (β = .989, p < .05) were linked to membership in Class 2 compared to Class 3. Conclusions The study enhances understanding of the complex relationship between Korean young adults’ well-being and their drug use attitudes. Effective interventions by frontline social workers aimed at preventing drug use should continuously monitor and address social stigmatization and self-esteem while providing accurate information and education regarding drug use. Key messages • Latent Class Analysis sorted drug attitudes into three groups: ‘Permissive,’ ‘Moderate,’ and ‘Critical’ Attitude Groups. • Individuals experiencing social stigmatization had a higher risk of permissive attitudes, while higher self-esteem increased the likelihood of being in the moderate group over the critical group.

Pandangan Masyarakat Aceh tentang Penggunaan Ganja

This study aims to explore the views of the Acehnese people regarding the use of marijuana, with a special focus on the perspectives of traditional leaders and clergy in the region. Aceh, known for its strict application of sharia law, has a distinctive view of prohibited substances, including marijuana. This research method uses a qualitative approach with in-depth interview techniques with traditional leaders and clergy as well as literature studies to strengthen their views on the legality, social impact, and moral implications of cannabis use. The results of this study show that medically, marijuana can overcome long-term pain, mental health problems, slow the development of cancer cells, and improve symptoms of epilepsy and multiple sclerosis. However, there are health risks such as mental health problems, testicular cancer, and respiratory diseases if used. In Indonesia law, marijuana is considered a drug with a high addictive effect and is prohibited from use. By teaching the community and working with law enforcement, Acehnese traditional and religious leaders play an important role in preventing marijuana abuse. In general, although marijuana has potential medical benefits, marijuana use in Indonesia must continue to be controlled and restricted to prevent abuse. If the legalization of medical marijuana is discussed, the benefits and risks should be carefully considered, with strict regulation to reduce its adverse effects.

Cannabis Use Disorder Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

With the legalization of marijuana in the United States, the number of patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD) in the joint arthroplasty population has increased markedly. The primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether there were differences in clinical and economic outcomes after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) between patients with and without perioperative CUD. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to July 2018 to identify all eligible studies investigating the association of CUD with postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TJA. Postoperative outcomes assessed consisted of complications, readmission, length of stay (LOS), implant revision, and cost of care. For dichotomous outcomes, pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. We identified 10 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 17,981,628 study participants. Patients with CUD had significantly higher odds of medical complications (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.07 to 1.66], P = 0.01) and implant-related complications (OR 1.75 [95% CI: 1.64 to 1.88], P < 0.00001) than noncannabis users. Specifically, CUD was associated with significantly increased odds of cardiac complications (OR 1.95 [95% CI 1.50 to 2.54], P < 0.00001), cerebrovascular accidents (OR 2.06 [95% CI 1.66 to 2.57], P < 0.00001), postoperative infections (OR 1.68 [95% CI 1.34 to 2.10], P < 0.00001), periprosthetic fracture (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.70], P < 0.0001), mechanical loosening (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.42 to 1.66], P < 0.00001), and dislocation/instability (OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.32 to 2.68], P = 0.0005). Longer LOS and higher cost of care were also found in patients with CUD. This study strengthens the body of evidence that patients with CUD face higher risk of postoperative complications and greater financial burden after knee and hip arthroplasties. Physicians should inform patients about adverse outcomes and undertake appropriate risk adjustments before elective orthopaedic surgery. Level III.

Evaluating the Economic Impact of Marijuana Legalization: A Difference-in-Differences and Regression Analysis of Household Expenditures in Colorado and Utah

The legalization of marijuana in Colorado in 2014 marked a significant policy shift with potential economic implications. This study examines the impact of this legalization on household expenditures using Utah as a control group. The research employs a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) methodology, analyzing data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CEX) from 2012 to 2016. The findings indicate a significant increase in household expenditures in Colorado relative to Utah following marijuana legalization. The DiD estimate reveals an approximate increase of $898 in total household expenditures post-legalization. These results are supported by regression models that account for various household characteristics, ensuring robustness. In conclusion, marijuana legalization in Colorado has led to a measurable increase in household spending. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers and contributes to the understanding of the economic effects of marijuana policy changes. For household departments, it's essential to consider the potential shifts in budget allocation due to increased discretionary spending. Government agencies should monitor these economic impacts closely to inform future regulatory decisions and ensure balanced economic growth.

Association between state-level medical marijuana legalization and marijuana use during pregnancy: A population-based study.

Despite marijuana's association with adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, its use during pregnancy increased over the last two decades. During this period, medical marijuana has been legalized in 38 states and the District of Columbia. States with legalized medical marijuana have observed increased marketing of marijuana and related products. This study aims to examine the association between state-level medical marijuana legalization and marijuana use during pregnancy in the United States. Using the 2015-2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, we evaluated the association between marijuana use in the past month among currently pregnant mothers (N = 4338) and legalized medical marijuana in their state of residence. Survey-weighted descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyzes were performed. About 5.7% of pregnant women reported using marijuana in the past month, and 59.0% lived in a state where medical marijuana was legalized across 2015-2021. Compared to those living in states without marijuana legalization, more pregnant women living in states with marijuana legalization reported using marijuana (4.6% vs. 6.5%). In the multivariable model, pregnant women residing in states with medical marijuana legalization were more likely to use marijuana than residents of states without legalization (adjusted Odds Ratio: 1.56; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.11-2.18). This is the first known study to find that pregnant women living in states where medical marijuana is legalized are more likely to use marijuana during pregnancy. Pregnant women should be informed of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes linked to marijuana use during pregnancy.

Hot Dab Associated Pneumonitis - a case report

BackgroundDabbing is recently getting popular among young adults. It is a new method of using the most active form of marijuana where large amounts of concentrated tetrahydrocannabinol are inhaled. Tetrahydrocannabinol is associated with a feeling of ‘High’ which makes the user feel joyous and relaxed. With increasing use of such techniques, dabbing becomes an important differential for evaluation of acute respiratory failure with pneumonitis especially in the adult population.Case presentationA Fifty-one years old Caucasian man presented to the hospital with chest pressure and shortness of breath. The patient was noted to be hypoxic, desaturating down to 82–83% on nasal cannula oxygen. Imaging revealed bilateral lung infiltrates. Patient was started on high flow oxygen, broad spectrum antibiotics and intravenous corticosteroids. The patient gradually improved and was able to come off oxygen completely. He was discharged home on prednisone taper.ConclusionsDabbing is a newer technique which has been gaining popularity for marijuana usage. With the legalization of marijuana, newer techniques are getting popular. Our case report emphasizes the importance of keeping dabbing as a differential when a patient presents with respiratory failure and has concerns for pneumonitis. Patients might not reveal until specifically asked about their practices.

Opinions on the Medical and Recreational Use and Legalization of Marijuana in Mexico: Results of a National Survey

Introduction. The use of medical marijuana was legalized in Mexico in 2017. In June 2021, the Supreme Court authorized personal marijuana use, as well as its planting, cultivation, harvest, preparation, possession, and transportation for recreational purposes by persons aged 18 and over, decriminalizing its use. Objectives. 1) To determine which variables are associated with favorable opinions regarding medical use, recreational use, and the legalization of marijuana use; and 2) to determine whether there are differences in the variables that best predict support for medicinal and recreational use and legalization of marijuana among marijuana users and non-users. Method. Data are drawn from the 2016 National Survey on Drug, Alcohol, and Tobacco Use, administered to a nationally representative sample of Mexican households. A validated questionnaire was used with questions on demographic characteristics, marijuana use (including the number of times it has been used), respondents’ opinions regarding the legalization of marijuana and recreational use, whether they have been offered marijuana without having to pay for it, perception of risk associated with marijuana use, and excessive alcohol consumption. Results. Being male and having a low perception of the risks of marijuana use are the variables mostly strongly associated with approving medical and recreational use and its legalization, irrespective of whether respondents used it. Other variables associated with approval are age, educational attainment, and income level. Discussion and Conclusion. Legislators and policy makers should consider the full range of public opinion concerning the use and legalization of marijuana and incorporate it into their proposals.

Marijuana Legalization and Truck Safety

ABSTRACTMany states have legalized medical and recreational marijuana use in the past decade, which has potential consequences for roadway safety. Using a state‐level panel of heavy truck crash statistics from 2005 to 2021 and a difference‐in‐difference estimation strategy, we test whether legalization has affected crash rates. Our results show that legalization does not increase crash rates on average; however, responses are heterogeneous across states, with Colorado, New Jersey, and Washington (state) showing crash reductions, while Connecticut and Virginia saw crashes increase. These results suggest that marijuana legalization does not have a straightforward relationship with heavy truck accidents, warranting continued research and policy scrutiny.

A National Survey of Marijuana Use Among U.S. Adults According to Obesity Status, 2016-2022.

Background and Objective: Research has linked marijuana use with lower body mass index (BMI). The current study explores the correlation between marijuana use on BMI in the general U.S. population. It reports the prevalence of marijuana in adults in relation to BMI, overall and across the levels of important variables. Materials and Methods: This study used a probability sample of U.S. adults 18 years of age and older from the 2016 through 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a telephone-administered survey. The survey collects data from a representative sample regarding health-related risk behaviors, chronic health conditions, and use of preventive services. The primary outcome variables are current (at least once in the last 30 days) and daily (at least 20 of the last 30 days) marijuana use. Results: The study sample consists of 735,921 participants in the surveys that completed the optional module on marijuana use. Prevalence of marijuana use in adults doubled during the study period (7.48% to 14.91%). The increase directly corresponds with a shift toward legalization of medical and recreational marijuana. On average, the prevalence of use is 9% higher when medical marijuana is legal and 81% higher when recreational marijuana is legal (vs. not legal). For obese individuals, prevalence of current marijuana use is 35% lower than for nonobese individuals on average. Lower prevalence of marijuana use in obese individuals is consistently observed across the levels of certain demographic variables, employment status, tobacco smoking history, marijuana legalization status, and certain medical conditions (asthma, arthritis, and depression). In 2022, the adjusted odds of current or daily marijuana use are significantly lower and similar among obese (vs. non-obese) (0.68, 0.69, respectively), such that reduced obesity does not require daily use. Similarly, the adjusted odds of current marijuana use decrease in similar fashion to daily marijuana use with higher BMI weight classification. Conclusion: Marijuana use is correlated with lower BMI. As legalization and prevalence of the drug in the U.S. increases, the prevalence of obesity may decline. However, clinicians should view this outcome along with the known health risks associated with marijuana use.

Religiosity Influences Legalization of Marijuana among Chaldean Americans.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Chaldean American perspectives towards legalization and moral acceptability of recreational and medicinal marijuana in the state of Michigan. An online survey was created and distributed through various social media groups, churches, and Chaldean organizations which resulted in a total of 637 respondents following the removal of respondents who did not meet criteria. The survey was open from March 20th, 2022 to April 20th, 2022. The independent variable was level of religiosity. The dependent variables were moral acceptability, opinion towards legalization of recreational and medicinal marijuana, and risk of cannabis use disorder. Logistic regression was used to estimate the strength of the association between the independent and dependent variables. Approximately 64% of the sample was female and 54.6% were between the ages of 21 to 29. Almost 80% of respondents reported high religiosity and 83.4% strongly or somewhat supported the legalization of medicinal marijuana. In addition, 85.8% felt medicinal marijuana was morally acceptable and 58.9% believed recreational marijuana was morally wrong. In the fully adjusted models, individuals who reported high religiosity (compared to low/moderate) were more likely to oppose legalization of recreational marijuana (OR = 2.80; 95% CI = 1.46, 5.39) and believed that marijuana was morally wrong (OR = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.16, 4.78). This trend was not observed with medicinal marijuana. These findings have important implications in better understanding a traditionally conservative ethnic minority group in their attitudes towards marijuana and how religion influences their perspectives. Additional studies are needed to examine any changes in opinion overtime as this is the first study of its kind.

The Thorny Intersection Between Adult Drug Treatment Courts and Medical Marijuana Criminal Immunity Laws

Two revolutionary developments impacted the United States criminal justice system over the past 30 years that are now primed for an institutional reckoning—the legalization of medical marijuana at the state level and the exponential rise of adult drug treatment courts across the country. The states that have legalized medical marijuana also provide criminal immunity protections for qualifying medical marijuana patients, including those serving probationary sentences. Drug treatment courts are a form of intensive probation offering treatment services for participants plagued by substance use disorders. Most drug treatment courts operate on an abstinence‐based model and do not permit the use of medical marijuana. Consequently, challenges by drug court participants to the continued prohibition of medical marijuana are on the horizon. The purpose of this article is to highlight the contours of these knotty issues from a sociolegal perspective. The material for this article stems from a review of existing judicial decisions in addition to qualitative data collected during my case studies of three different adult drug treatment courts.

Medical marijuana legalization and parenting behaviors: An analysis of the time use of parents

SummaryCan access to medical marijuana improve parenting? We examine the consequences of state‐level medical marijuana legalization (MML) on parents' time use. Medical marijuana may increase parenting time by improving parents' health but only if parents do not abuse marijuana. We find that MML increases parenting time, with bigger impacts for those less likely to abuse marijuana. The effects correspond to 12.56% of the gap in active childcare and 8.92% of the gap in passive childcare by parents' education level. MML also reduces inactive time and increases sleep, consistent with medical marijuana's health benefits.

Efforts to Legalize Cannabis for Medicine, Reviewed from Legal Sociology

&lt;p class="TableParagraph"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Indonesia as a country that adopted the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotics and the Protocol that changed it, refers to Political principles. Which was ratified by Law No. 35 of 20009 concerning narcotics. Narcotics abuse is prohibited and threatened with imprisonment as well as narcotics addicts who do not report to recover are also threatened with criminal punishment, but the coercive effort and punishment are in the form of rehabilitation. Modern medicine is a method of treatment that is carried out based on scientific research and based on knowledge from various aspects, medical treatment uses several applied scientific disciplines in treating a disease, the way of examining and diagnosing diseases is more accurate. The problem in this study is how can the potential legalization of cannabis for treatment be realized in Indonesia? How can the legalization of marijuana for treatment be applied in Indonesia? The objectives of this research are. To find out and analyze whether the potential for legalization of cannabis for treatment can be realized in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative research method through a library research approach or a literature review method using the analytical descriptive writing method. From the results of the data collected from the laboratory research.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="TableParagraph"&gt;&lt;em&gt;The results of the study show that. The legalization of marijuana for treatment can be realized in Indonesia in terms of existing laws, in Law No. 35 of 2009 Health Law No. 17 of 2023 article 139. Judging from the benefits, the Narcotics Law and the Health Law, and Islamic religious law are allowed, which through mechanisms or exceptions under certain conditions are allowed, and also from sociology of society there are also marijuana used in daily life. In the application or implementation of the legalization of marijuana for treatment, there are several factors that hinder the legalization of marijuana for treatment, the Convention&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Legal Review in Indonesia Positive Law Concerning Marijuana Use for Medical Purposes

The legalization of marijuana varies across countries, with some prohibiting its use while others are starting to legalize it for medical purposes. Despite its potential therapeutic benefits, marijuana use is often stigmatized due to concerns about addiction. In Indonesia, marijuana is classified as a Class I narcotic, prohibiting its use for medicinal purposes under Law Number 35 of 2009, which restricts access to medical marijuana and raises human rights issues for individuals seeking necessary treatments. This study aims to analyze the potential benefits of legalizing medical marijuana in Indonesia and propose regulatory changes that align with the evolving needs of society and human rights principles. The research method used is a normative legal research method, involving the analysis of legal documents, literature reviews, and interviews with experts in law and health to evaluate the impact of regulatory changes on medical marijuana use. The findings suggest that appropriate legal reforms can reduce stigma, ensure access to treatment, and uphold the right to health without the threat of criminal penalties. Therefore, revising narcotic laws to allow the use of marijuana for medical purposes with proper regulations is crucial to provide those in need of treatment the opportunity to access marijuana legally without fear of criminal punishment, and to help reduce the stigma associated with its use.

Assessment of Marijuana Use During Pregnancy and its Effects on Neonatal Outcomes

Background: According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), marijuana is the most used drug during pregnancy, and its self-reported prevalence ranges from ~2% to 7%. ACOG currently recommends against marijuana use during pregnancy due to inconclusive data regarding its safety and health effects. However, we know that THC readily crosses the placenta and can reach high fetal concentrations on repeated exposures. Several reports have linked adverse infant outcomes, such as low birth weight and abnormal neurological development, to marijuana use in pregnancy. Yet, many pregnant women continue to use marijuana throughout gestation as they believe it is safe, highlighting the role that education on marijuana use in pregnancy may aid in decreasing its usage. Furthermore, the growing legalization of marijuana may lead to further increase in marijuana use during pregnancy. Purpose: We aimed to identify the reported use of marijuana during pregnancy in our patient population, prior to legalization, and examine its effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes. We hypothesized that those who reported using marijuana during pregnancy would have higher rates of maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review (IRB #21-823) was conducted which included pregnant women and their neonates who were admitted and delivered in 2019 at HSHS St. John’s Hospital in Springfield, Illinois to assess marijuana use prior to legalization and to investigate neonatal outcomes of infants who were exposed to marijuana, including the need for respiratory support or assisted ventilation after delivery. Other data extracted included demographic characteristics, the mother’s medical and obstetrical history, intrapartum and postpartum events and all documented substance use during pregnancy including tobacco, marijuana and illicit drugs. A logistic regression was used to assess marijuana use as a predictor of respiratory outcomes in infants. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Results: In our study, 599 charts were reviewed. Of those, 69 reported marijuana use during pregnancy, or 11.5%, which importantly, is higher than the reported national average of 2-7%. Previous studies have shown a high correlation between marijuana, tobacco and illicit drug use. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that tobacco and illicit drug use result in poor neonatal outcomes. Therefore, we focused on a subpopulation of mothers who only reported marijuana use during pregnancy to remove these confounders. As a result, 112 subjects were removed from the analysis who reportedly used tobacco and/or other illicit drugs in addition to marijuana in order to exclusively focus on the effect of maternal marijuana use on neonatal outcomes. In this subpopulation of 477 subjects, the rate of marijuana use was 5.5% (lower than the overall population), but the effects of marijuana on neonatal outcomes was found to be significant. Demographics were as follows: mean age 28.2 ± 0.25 years; race, ethnicity: 76% White, non-Hispanic and 23% were other (i.e., African American/black, Asian, native Hawaiian/pacific islander, white and Hispanic, non-white and Hispanic or another race). In this subpopulation, admission to the NICU and small for gestational age were not significantly different between marijuana users and non-users. However, marijuana users did have higher odds of preterm birth (OR=3.8, CI: 1.5-9.6; p=0.004). Additionally, marijuana users had increased odds of having an infant that required respiratory support (OR=3.9, CI: 1.4-10.3; p=0.005) and assisted ventilation (OR=4.6, CI: 1.6-13.1; p=0.003). Yet, no adverse maternal outcomes were associated with exclusive marijuana use. Conclusion: Rates of marijuana use during pregnancy in our population is higher than the reported national average. Moreover, infants whose mothers exclusively used marijuana during pregnancy experienced higher rates of neonatal complications. Thorough screening and counseling regarding marijuana use in pregnancy and during breastfeeding is recommended, although there is no uniform process at this time. Implementing a standardized screening methodology and approach to education on the adverse neonatal effects of marijuana use in pregnancy during prenatal visits may be an effective intervention to improve neonatal outcomes in our patient population. This education is of particular importance in light of the recent legalization of marijuana.

When Bitcoin is high: cryptocurrency value, illicit markets and US marijuana bills

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to estimate the implications of illicit market use for the value of Bitcoin in an event studies framework.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a data set of 58 state-level marijuana decriminalisation and legalisation bills and referenda in the USA in 2010–2022.FindingsDecriminalisation is associated with a strong and consistent positive Bitcoin price response around the event, recreational legalisation induces a more ambiguous reaction and medical legalisation is found to have a negative albeit small impact on Bitcoin value. This suggests decriminalisation enhances shadow economy use value of Bitcoin, whereas recreational and medical legalisation are not consistently reducing illicit drug cryptomarket activity. The effects are robust to various estimation windows, in subsamples, and also when outliers, heavy tails, conditional heteroskedasticity and state size are accounted for.Originality/valueNew to the literature, the choice of US marijuana bills, specifically as sample events, is based on both theoretical and empirical grounds.

Public opinion on legalisation of marijuana and it’s impact on the society

The main problem of this Research is that whether decriminalisation of the drugs in india allows people to use it in an correct way or it may lead to socialistic problems in the future and the main issue of this research is that whether this decriminalisation influence the students and minors in usage of those drugs and the comparative study of this topic is that several provinces of United States Of America ,several drugs including cannabis are legal with several procedures which has to be followed accordingly for the consumption of such drugs, the outcome of the research is that legalisation may lead many socialist problems and may influence into the students and they may use the drugs.To analyse whether this legalisation of drugs are applicable for the society of India ,To analyse whether this legislation influence students and minors more, To analyse whether this legalisation bring problems in the society, To analyse whether this legalisation have positive impacts in the society, To analyse whether this legalisation opens up an new sector in the society. This research is analysed by using the sampling method called ‘simple random sampling’ method . This research is made with a sampling size of 200 responses. The conclusion is although legalising drugs has many positive aspects as India is a country with a larger population which shares 34 % of the youth population which may result in this legalisation of such drugs may influence the minors and younger population.

Half Banked: The Economic Impact of Cash Management in the Marijuana Industry

ABSTRACTWe investigate the economic value of cash management. In the legal marijuana industry, where only half of businesses have access to cash management services from a financial institution, we examine dispensary profitability using administrative and survey data. Our results show that businesses with cash management charge higher retail prices (8.3%), pay lower wholesale prices (7.3%), and have higher sales volume (19%). Together, these advantages create a 40% increase in profitability. These results support our model in which reputational capital and administrative costs drive profitability regardless of whether national banks, credit unions, or fintech provide the cash management functions.

News

Research: Marijuana legalization may affect a state's college enrollment Yeshiva University: Jewish student transfers soared after Hamas attack Community college push ends 10‐year enrollment slump for Massachusetts public higher education

Select Minor Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa Are Cannabimimetic and Antinociceptive in a Mouse Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain.

Chronic pain conditions affect nearly 20% of the population in the United States. Current medical interventions, such as opioid drugs, are effective at relieving pain but are accompanied by many undesirable side effects. This is one reason increased numbers of chronic pain patients have been turning to Cannabis for pain management. Cannabis contains many bioactive chemical compounds; however, current research looking into lesser-studied minor cannabinoids in Cannabis lacks uniformity between experimental groups and/or excludes female mice from investigation. This makes it challenging to draw conclusions between experiments done with different minor cannabinoid compounds between laboratories or parse out potential sex differences that could be present. We chose five minor cannabinoids found in lower quantities within Cannabis: cannabinol (CBN), cannabidivarin (CBDV), cannabigerol (CBG), Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC), and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV). These compounds were then tested for their cannabimimetic and pain-relieving behaviors in a cannabinoid tetrad assay and a chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) pain model in male and female CD-1 mice. We found that the minor cannabinoids we tested differed in the cannabimimetic behaviors evoked, as well as the extent. We found that CBN, CBG, and high-dose Δ8-THC evoked some tetrad behaviors in both sexes, while THCV and low-dose Δ8-THC exhibited cannabimimetic tetrad behaviors only in females. Only CBN efficaciously relieved CIPN pain, which contrasts with reports from other researchers. Together these findings provide further clarity to the pharmacology of minor cannabinoids and suggest further investigation into their mechanism and therapeutic potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Minor cannabinoids are poorly studied ligands present in lower levels in Cannabis than cannabinoids like THC. In this study, we evaluated five minor cannabinoids (CBN, CBDV, CBG, THCV, and Δ8-THC) for their cannabimimetic and analgesic effects in mice. We found that four of the five minor cannabinoids showed cannabimimetic activity, while one was efficacious in relieving chronic neuropathic pain. This work is important in further evaluating the activity of these drugs, which are seeing wider public use with marijuana legalization.