ABSTRACT The findings from field research on armed actors reach wider audiences through single or multi-authored publications, but it is widely known that the research process involves engaging a large community of people on the ground. These expansive research networks are maintained by researchers for sustained engagement with conflict contexts and for mitigating risks in the field. However, this field research is a multi-directional and asymmetrical experience in knowledge production. There is an extractive political economy between contracting researchers from the Global North (including privileged researchers of the Global South) and facilitating researchers from conflict-affected areas in the Global South. Drawing from our insights and field research on the Maoist insurgency in the state of Jharkhand in India, we examine the contributions and impact of facilitating researchers upon fieldwork in terms of their roles and tasks and how their positionalities and embeddedness in armed insurgencies shape the research process and results. In this paper, we highlight how the three-way power dynamics between contracting and facilitating researchers, and the research subjects contribute to the hierarchies of knowledge production.