Abstract Background Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery (RV/PA) uncoupling, which depicts the inability of RV contractility to match the increasing RV afterload, has recently gained recognition as a simple echocardiography parameter to aid prognosis judgment in patients with RV dysfunction. In Aortic Stenosis (AS) patients, the extent of RV dysfunction and Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) has been linked with poor outcomes, but the prognostic value of RV/PA uncoupling in AS patients undergoing TAVI has not been well-defined. Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of RV/PA uncoupling and its association with echocardiographic parameters in AS patients undergoing TAVI. Methods We conducted a systematic search through Pubmed and Embase to include studies up to February 2024. Studies were eligible if they evaluated the prognostic performance of RV/PA uncoupling in AS patients undergoing TAVI. Random-effects model were employed to pool the adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) with inverse-variance weighting method or Relative Risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) using Mantel-Haenszel test for categorical outcomes or Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) for numerical outcomes. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results Thirteen studies were included. Out of 4,146 patients, 55.21% were reported to have RV-PA uncoupling prior to TAVI. RV/PA uncoupling was customarily assessed with TAPSE/PASP ratio, with threshold for uncoupling ranging between <0.31–<0.63 mm/mmHg. Follow-up period ranged between 6–65 months. Patients with baseline RV/PA uncoupling had lower LVEF (WMD -9.94% [-4.36– -15.53%]; I2 = 78%), lower TAPSE (WMD -4.98 mm [95% CI -1.15– -8.80]; I2 = 95%), and higher PASP (WMD 19.77 [95% CI 17.02–22.51]; I2 = 0%) compared to patients with RV/PA coupling at baseline. Baseline RV-PA uncoupling was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (pooled aHR = 2.26 (95% CI 1.36–3.76); I2 = 77%) and composite endpoint of mortality and adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (pooled aHR = 2.07 (1.30–3.29); I2 = 24%). However, RV/PA uncoupling was not significantly associated with a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI (pooled Risk Ratio 1.02 [0.70–1.47]; I2 = 0%). Conclusion Pre-procedural RV/PA uncoupling emerges as an independent predictor of worse prognosis in AS patients undergoing TAVI, contributing to a better understanding of the impact of this parameter on patient outcomes.