Hurricane disasters and radiation treatment delays among patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

98 Background: Hurricanes can disrupt cancer care and adversely affect health outcomes, especially for patients needing daily radiation therapy, which depends on stable electricity and safe facility access. Among patients diagnosed with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), disruptions in radiation can decrease survival. This study evaluates the associations of exposure to a hurricane disaster and radiation delays and total dose received among patients diagnosed with NSCLC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years who initiated radiation therapy for non-operable stage III NSCLC between 2004-2021 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Exposure was defined as a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hurricane disaster declaration at the county of the treating facility during radiation treatment. Patients treated at the same facility, but at a time when no hurricane happened (i.e. unexposed) were propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio with exposed patients on age at diagnosis, sex, lymph node involvement, comorbidity score, season, and era (radiation start year 2004 – 2009, 2010 – 2015, 2016 – 2021), to account for more active hurricane seasons in recent years. Delays in radiation treatment completion were defined as > 8 weeks between date when radiation started and ended. A two-way t-test and Mantel-Haenszel test were used to examine associations of hurricane exposure and radiation dose and treatment delays respectively. Results: 6,260 matched patients were included, of whom 3,130 were treated at facilities exposed to hurricanes during radiation and 3,130 completed treatment at the same facilities but at a time when no hurricane exposure happened. Patients treated during hurricanes had 1.95 higher odds (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71 – 2.24) of experiencing treatment delays compared to unexposed patients (23% of exposed patients experienced delays compared to 13% of unexposed patients). Exposed patients were more likely to have received higher radiation doses compared to unexposed patients (mean 5221.81 cGy vs. 4962.75 cGy; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC who received radiation during a hurricane disaster were more likely to experience treatment completion delays. Patients treated during a hurricane were also more likely to receive higher total doses of radiation, possibly suggesting compensation to mitigate the detrimental biological impact of radiation delays. As severe weather events become more common, comprehensive emergency preparedness plans that incorporate evidence-based strategies for mitigating adverse effects of treatment delays are essential.