Manometry Studies Research Articles

Utility of Monitoring Fasting Phase During Pediatric Colonic Manometry Studies.

Colonic manometry (CM) is a diagnostic procedure used to evaluate pediatric patients with refractory constipation, fecal incontinence, Hirschsprung disease, and pediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction. Pan-colonic high-amplitude propagated contractions (HAPCs), measured by CM, reflect an intact neuromuscular function of the colon. Current guidelines recommend starting CM with fasting recording for 1-2 h, but no prior evaluation has determined the diagnostic yield of the fasting phase. We aimed to determine the utility of the fasting phase during CM studies. We evaluated CM studies conducted at a tertiary pediatric center (2018-2022). Fasting phases of normal CM studies were evaluated. In 433 included studies 241 (55.7%) females, median age (9.7 years), the average fasting recording lasted 126 min. A total of 193 (44.6%) studies exhibited fasting HAPCs, with 123 (28.4%) being pan-colonic. The presence of pan-colonic HAPCs was based solely on the fasting phase in 11 (2.5%) studies. Patients with fasting pan-colonic HAPCs were younger (median age of 6.9 vs. 9.8 years, p = 0.0001) and had a higher rate of postprandial HAPCs (69.1% vs. 25.2%, p < 0.0001). Most fasting pan-colonic HAPCs presented during the first 60 min (94/123, 76.4%). All studies demonstrated HAPCs after stimulation with bisacodyl. In analyzing just the initial 30 min of fasting on CM, only 2 (0.5%) studies would have been misclassified as abnormal, with no bisacodyl administration in these studies. Shortening the fasting phase minimally affects next-day CM results and could reduce patient inconvenience, hospital-related costs, and potential side effects.

Anorectal manometry and urodynamics in children with spina bifida: can we predict the colonic dysmotility from bladder dysfunction?

IntroductionSpina bifida is a condition that impacts the development of the neural tube leading to urological and gastrointestinal symptoms. Both systems are influenced together due to their shared innervation and embryological origin. Despite its impact on health and well-being there has been limited research on the relationship between manometry results and urodynamic tests, in this patient population. The aim of this study was to delineate the association of neurogenic bladder/bowel dysfunction with anorectal manometry and urodynamics.Materials and methodsUrodynamics and anorectal manometry were used to analyse the neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunctions in 29 paediatric patients with spina bifida. Those children who had previous anorectal surgical interventions were excluded from the study. Patients were grouped according to the level of spinal defect to lower or upper defect. In this study, parameters such as bladder compliance, postvoid residual volume, detrusor activity, anorectal pressures, and rectal compliance were considered. Group comparison tests were performed using standardized paediatric protocols for data analysis as well as correlation tests. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant at all levels.ResultsA total of 29 patients with spina bifida were identified. Of these, 14 were male and 15 were female. Bladder function differed among the patients in the lower defect (LD, n:18) and upper defect (UD, n:11) groups. LD group exhibited lower bladder volumes (175.45 ± 106.19 mL) compared to the UD group (266.83 ± 102.54 mL, p < 0.05). All LD and 72.7% of UD had detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. There was positive correlation between functional bladder parameters and bowel dysfunction, such as rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) and maximum filling pressures of the bladder (rho = 0.569, p < 0.05). There was also a significant correlation between rectal compliance and bladder volumes.ConclusionsAssociation of neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction is a complex issue which requires personalized approach for managing the consequences. In children with neurogenic bladder dysfunction increased RAIR activity may be a sign for colonic dysmotility of neurogenic origin. This study may also pave the way for delineation of the mechanism under the generation of RAIR which is thought to be only intrinsic in origin. To optimize treatment modalities, full assessment with anorectal manometry and urodynamic studies should be done in patients with spina bifida.Clinical trial registrationThis study was not performed on volunteer patients. Clinical study enrolment is not required as this study was obtained from urodynamics and anorectal manometry performed in patients with neurogenic bladder/bowel and during clinical follow-up.

Comparison of colonoscopic versus fluoroscopic colonic manometry catheter placement in children.

Colonic manometry catheter placement can be performed by colonoscopy or fluoroscopy. Our objective was to compare outcomes of colonoscopic to fluoroscopic catheter placement in children based on the extent of colon study and the likelihood of catheter displacement. Colonic manometry studies performed between May 2015 and May 2022 were reviewed. All studies with catheter placement per rectum were included. Data on patient demographics, medical and surgical history, and information on catheter placement (type of catheter, placement technique, position, and displacement) were recorded. We reviewed 555 studies and included 482 studies performed on 453 children (51% female, median age 10 years, IQR: 7-14 years). The catheter was placed during colonoscopy in 274 studies and using fluoroscopy in 208 studies. Children with colonoscopic placement were significantly older (median age 11 vs. 8 years, p < 0.001), more commonly male (55% vs. 41%, p = 0.003), and more commonly had functional constipation (85% vs. 69%, p < 0.001). Children with fluoroscopic placement more often had pediatric intestinal pseudo-obstruction (10% vs. 1%, p < 0.001), a diverting ostomy (21% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), and a cecostomy (10% vs. 4%, p = 0.023). A successful catheter placement (reaching ascending colon) was significantly more common using colonoscopy (49% vs. 23%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in frequency or extent of catheter displacement between colonoscopic and fluoroscopic placement. Colonoscopic placement was superior to fluoroscopic placement in terms of the extent of the colon studied with no differences in frequency of catheter displacement. Colonoscopic placement should be the preferred method in most children with refractory constipation.

BN SO25 - Laparoscopic Management of Achalasia and Iatrogenic Mucosal Perforation in a Patient with Severe Reflux Following Multiple Therapeutic Dilatations

Abstract Background Laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy (LHC) is the gold standard intervention for achalasia. Owing to its well-established complications of reflux symptoms, some surgeons perform an additional fundoplication surgery, although the consensus regarding the clinical benefits of this approach remains unclear.1 A meta-analysis showed that posterior fundoplication has proven to be superior to anterior fundoplication in controlling reflux symptoms.2 Method A gentleman in his 60s reported ongoing severe reflux symptoms following multiple Rigiflex ballon dilatations for achalasia, on manometry and pH studies showed features of pathological acid reflux, incomplete lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and defective peristalsis. As shown in the video, type 1 sliding hiatus hernia, submucosal fibrosis and peri-oesophagitis were seen intraoperatively. A short cardiomyotomy was performed, which was complicated by iatrogenic oesophageal perforation. Anterior fundoplication with mucosal closure was performed. Results Following the surgery, no leak was observed on the swallow test and the patient reported a massive improvement in reflux symptoms. The addition of fundoplication to LHC in patients with achalasia and reflux symptoms has improved clinical outcomes. Conclusion Concomitant LHC and anti-reflux surgery should be considered in patients presenting with achalasia and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms.

Effect of hiatal hernia and esophagogastric junction morphology on esophageal motility: Evidence from high-resolution manometry studies.

High-resolution Manometry (HRM) is the most sensitive and specific test available for clinical assessment of hiatal hernia (HH), a common condition defined as the separation between the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD). While the link between HH and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is established, the potential association of HH with esophageal dysmotility, independently from GERD, is uncertain. This study aimed to analyze if HH, with or without GERD, can associate with esophageal motility disorders. Consecutive patients without previous esophageal surgery who underwent HRM between 2018 and 2022 were enrolled. All patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD underwent impedance-pH testing off-therapy. HH was defined as a separation >1 cm between LES and CD, and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology was classified as: Type I, when there was no separation between LES and CD; Type II, in case of minimal separation (>1 and <3 cm); Type III, when ≥3 cm of separation was present. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline, including Age, Gender, Alcohol-, Coffee- and Smoke-habits, GERD diagnosis and symptoms' duration. Two cohorts of patients, with and without HH, were retrospectively individuated, and their association with Ineffective Peristalsis, Hypercontractile Esophagus and Outflow Obstruction was analyzed with univariate and multivariate Logistic regressions using the statistical software R. 848 consecutive patients were enrolled, and 295 cases of HH (34.8%), subdivided into 199 (23.5%) Type II- and 96 (11.3%) Type III-EGJ patients, were identified. Ineffective peristalsis was diagnosed in 162 (19.1%) subjects, Hypercontractile esophagus in 32 (3.8%), and Outflow Obstruction in 91 (10.7%), while GERD was present in 375 (44.2%) patients. HH was significantly associated with Ineffective Peristalsis (p < 0.001) and GERD (p < 0.001). Furthermore, HH resulted to be a risk factor for Ineffective peristalsis (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8, p < 0.001) both when the analysis was conducted in all the 848 subjects, independently from GERD, and when it was carried out in patients without GERD (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.02-5.3, p = 0.04). The risk for Ineffective Peristalsis increased 1.3 times for every centimeter of HH. No statistically significant association was found between HH and Outflow obstruction or Hypercontractile Esophagus. An increasing separation between the LES and CD may lead to a gradual and significant elevation in the risk of Ineffective Peristalsis. Interestingly, this association with HH is true in patients with and in those without GERD, suggesting that the anatomical alteration seems to play a major role in motility change.

Quantifying Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions in the Self-Assembly of Photoresponsive Azobenzene Amphiphiles at the Air-Water Interface.

Amphiphilic azobenzene molecules offer ample scope to design functional supramolecular systems in an aqueous medium that can be controlled by light. Despite their widespread applications in photopharmacology and optoelectronics, the self-assembly pathways and energy landscapes of these systems are not well understood. Here, we report combined molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and surface manometry studies on a specially designed alkylated, meta-substituted azobenzene derivative to quantify the hydrogen-bonding interactions in the self-assembled monolayers of its photoisomers. The z-density profile, radial distribution function, order parameters, and hydrogen bond analyzed using MD simulations corroborated the experimental observations of changes in surface pressure, dipole moment, and thickness of the monolayers. Even a small change in the number of hydrogen bonds in the molecule-molecule and molecule-water interactions causes significant changes in the monolayer properties. These results are fundamentally important for engineering photoresponsive molecules with tailored properties for applications in targeted drug delivery and other industrial applications.

Esophageal motor disorders across ages: A retrospective multicentric analysis.

Age-related changes in the gastrointestinal system are common and may be influenced by physiological aging processes. To date, a comprehensive analysis of esophageal motor disorders in patients belonging to various age groups has not been adequately reported. We conducted a retrospective assessment of high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies in a multicenter setting. HRM parameters were evaluated according to the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Epidemiological, demographic, clinical data, and main manometric parameters, were collected at the time of the examination. Age groups were categorized as early adulthood (<35 years), early middle-age (35-49 years), late middle-age (50-64 years), and late adulthood (≥65 years). Overall, 1341 patients (632, 47.0% male) were included with a median age of 55 years. Late adulthood patients reported more frequently dysphagia (35.2%) than early adulthood patients (24.0%, p = 0.035), early middle-age patients (21.0%, p < 0.0001), and late middle-aged patients (22.7%, p < 0.0001). Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction was more prevalent in late adulthood (16.7%) than in early adulthood (6.1%, p = 0.003), and in early middle-age (8.1%, p = 0.001). Patients with normal esophageal motility were significantly younger (52.0 years) than patients with hypercontractile esophagus (61.5 years), type III achalasia (59.6 years), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (59.4 years), absent contractility (57.2 years), and distal esophageal spasm (57.0 years), in multivariate model (p < 0.0001). The rate of esophageal motor disorders is higher in older patients, in particular esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and hypercontractile esophagus. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm our results and to find tailored strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Exploring Diagnostic Priorities: The Role of Colonic Manometry in Evaluating Pediatric Patients with Intractable Idiopathic Constipation Prior to Sacral Nerve Stimulation.

Despite the limited understanding of its precise mechanism of action, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has proven to be helpful for pediatric patients with constipation, particularly those with fecal incontinence. It is unclear whether the outcome of SNS is impacted by normal or abnormal colonic motility. Our study aimed to determine whether colonic manometry results had an impact on the outcome of SNS as a treatment in pediatric patients with refractory idiopathic constipation. Electronic medical records of patients with idiopathic constipation who underwent colonic manometry and SNS placement at our center over 6 years were reviewed. A comparison of post-SNS outcomes was performed between patients with normal and abnormal colonic manometry studies. Twenty patients [12 (60%) females, median age of 10.2 years] met inclusion criteria, with fecal incontinence in 12 (60%) and abnormal colonic manometry in 6 (30%). Significantly more patients had an improvement in fecal incontinence following SNS placement (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in post-SNS constipation outcome measures between patients with normal versus abnormal colonic manometry. Colonic manometry did not help with patient selection for those being considered for SNS therapy. Our findings do not support performing colonic manometry as a screening prior to SNS placement.

Parkinson's disease is associated with low striated esophagus contractility potentially contributing to the development of dysphagia.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, and more than 80% of PD patients will develop oropharyngeal dysphagia. Despite its striated histology, proximity to airway, and potential negative impact of its dysfunction on bolus transport and airway safety, the contractile function of the striated esophagus in PD patients has not been systematically studied. Using our repository of clinical manometry and the Milwaukee ManoBank, we analyzed high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies of 20 PD patients, mean age 69.1 (range 38-87 years); 30 non-PD patients with dysphagia, mean age 64.0 (44-86 years); and 32 healthy volunteers, mean age 65.3 (39-86 years). Patients with abnormal findings based on Chicago Classification 4.0 were identified. Repeat analysis was performed in 20% of the manometric tracings by a different investigator with inter-rater concordance between 0.91 and 0.99. The striated esophageal contractile integral in PD patients was significantly lower than that in non-PD dysphagic patients and healthy controls (p = 0.03 and <0.01, respectively). This significant difference persisted after excluding patients with concurrent Chicago Classification motility disorders (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). In both analyses, the distal esophageal contractile integral did not show any significant difference between groups (p = 0.58 and 0.93, respectively). PD is associated with a significant decrease in striated esophagus contractility compared to non-PD and healthy controls. This finding may play a pathophysiologic role in development of dysphagia in this patient population.

Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad term that pertains to a computer's ability to mimic and sometimes surpass human intelligence in interpretation of large datasets. The adoption of AI in gastrointestinal motility has been slower compared to other areas such as polyp detection and interpretation of histopathology. Within esophageal physiologic testing, AI can automate interpretation of image-based tests, especially high resolution manometry (HRM) and functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) studies. Basic tasks such as identification of landmarks, determining adequacy of the HRM study and identification from achalasia from non-achalasia patterns are achieved with good accuracy. However, existing AI systems compare AI interpretation to expert analysis rather than to clinical outcome from management based on AI diagnosis. The use of AI methods is much less advanced within the field of ambulatory reflux monitoring, where challenges exist in assimilation of data from multiple impedance and pH channels. There remains potential for replication of the AI successes within esophageal physiologic testing to HRM of the anorectum, and to innovative and novel methods of evaluating gastric electrical activity and motor function. The use of AI has tremendous potential to improve detection of dysmotility within the esophagus using esophageal physiologic testing, as well as in other regions of the gastrointestinal tract. Eventually, integration of patient presentation, demographics and alternate test results to individual motility test interpretation will improve diagnostic precision and prognostication using AI tools.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction in Children with Type 1 Laryngeal Cleft after Failed Primary Cleft Repair.

Changes in pharyngeal and upper-esophageal-sphincter (UES) motor dynamics contribute to swallowing dysfunction. Children with type 1 laryngeal clefts can present with swallowing dysfunction and associated symptoms which may persist even after the initial endoscopic intervention. This study sought to characterize pharyngeal and esophageal motor function in children with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had persistent presenting symptoms after their initial therapeutic intervention. We retrospectively analyzed high-resolution esophageal manometry studies of children ≤ 18 years old with type 1 laryngeal clefts who had an esophageal manometry study performed for persistent symptoms after an initial repair. A total of 16 children were found to have significantly increased UES resting pressure, UES pre- and post-swallow maximum pressures, and duration of UES contraction during swallows in comparison to nine age-matched controls of children without pharyngeal anatomical abnormalities. There was no difference between UES residual pressures or pharyngeal dynamics between the two groups. UES resting and residual pressures did not correlate with VFFS in penetration and aspiration scores of children with type 1 laryngeal clefts status post repair. Our study is the first to identify specific changes in UES motor function in patients with type 1 laryngeal cleft post initial repair.

Esophageal Symptoms and Lumbosacral Back Pain

Background and AimsEsophageal symptoms, i.e., heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and chest pain are common in the general population. Also common are symptoms of back pain, related to pathology in the lumbosacral spine. The right crus of the diaphragm that forms the esophageal hiatus, originates from lumbar spine, may be affected by lumbar spine pathology resulting in esophageal symptoms. We studied whether there was an association between esophageal symptoms and spine symptoms. MethodsTwo patient groups of 150 each were investigated; Group 1 (ES); patients referred to the esophageal manometry study for assessment of esophageal symptoms, Group 2 (SC); patients undergoing screening colonoscopy (control group). Both groups completed standardized questionnaires assessing esophageal and spine symptoms. ResultsBack pain was reported by 74% of patients in the ES as compared to 55% of patients in SC group. 30% of patients in the SC group reported one or more esophageal symptom and these patients were regrouped with the ES group, resulting in 2 groups ES1 and SC1, with and without esophageal symptoms, respectively. ES1 group was 3.3 times more likely to experience back pain compared to the SC1 group (95% CI: 1.95-5.46). Thoracolumbar was the most common site of pain in both groups. Pain score was greater for the group with esophageal symptoms compared to controls. Narcotic intake for most patients in the ES1 group was for back pain. ConclusionA strong association between esophageal symptoms and thoracolumbar back pain raises the possibility that structural and functional changes in the esophageal hiatus muscles, related to thoracolumbar spine pathology leads to esophageal dysmotility and symptoms.

Hiatal hernia reporting: time to remove subjectivity?

The size of a hiatal hernia (HH) is a key determinant of the approach for surgical repair. However, endoscopists will often utilize subjective terms, such as "small," "medium," and "large," without any standardized objective correlations. The aim of this study was to identify HHs described using objective axial length measurements versus subjective size allocations and compare them to their corresponding manometry and barium swallow studies. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted on 93 patients diagnosed endoscopically with HHs between 2017 and 2021 at Newton-Wellesley Hospital. Information was collected regarding their HH subjective size assessment, axial length measurement (cm), manometry results, and barium swallow readings. Linear regression models were used to analyze the correlation between the objective endoscopic axial length measurements and manometry measurements. Ordered logistic regression models were used to correlate the ordinal endoscopic and barium swallow subjective size allocations with the continuous axial length measurements and manometry measurements. Of the 93 endoscopy reports, 42 included a subjective size estimate, 38 had axial length measurement, and 12 gave both. Of the 34 barium swallow reads, only one gave an objective HH size measurement. Axial length measurements were significantly correlated with the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0957, p = 0.049). The endoscopic subjective size estimates were also closely related to the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0543, p = 0.0164). Conversely, the subjective size estimates from barium swallow reads were not significantly correlated with the endoscopic axial length measurements (R2 = 0.0143, p = 0.366), endoscopic subjective size estimates (R2 = 0.0481, p = 0.0986), or the manometry measurements (R2 = 0.0418, p = 0.0738). Mesh placement was significantly correlated to pre-operative endoscopic axial length measurement (p = 0.0001), endoscopic subjective size estimate (p = 0.0301), and barium swallow read (p = 0.0211). However, mesh placement was not significantly correlated with pre-operative manometry measurements (0.2227). Endoscopic subjective size allocations and objective axial length measurements are associated with pre-operative objective measurements and intra-operative decisions, suggesting both can be used to guide clinical decision making. However, including axial length measurements in endoscopy reports can improve outcomes reporting.

HPB P08 Is Biliary Hyperkinesia a true Pathology? Should cholecystectomy be considered? A prequel towards Pilot study

Abstract Background Biliary Hyperkinesia (BH) is defined as a condition where gallbladder contracts and empties more rapidly than usual causing recurrent biliary colic with no evidence of gallstones on ultrasound or MRCP. Hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan is the investigation of choice and shows gallbladder ejection fraction (EF) of &amp;gt;80% in BH. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) could alleviate the symptoms. Similar results have been highlighted in case reports published about this relatively new gallbladder dysmotility. This study investigates the number of patients with BH on HIDA scan who might qualify for LC. Methods This was a 7-year (2015 to 2022) retrospective cohort study of adult patients with biliary pain in the absence of gallstones who underwent HIDA scan. Patient with EF &amp;gt;80% on HIDA scan were included in the study. Electronic case notes were reviewed for demographics, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, liver function tests, duration of symptoms, radiology investigations and endoscopy result including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Results 225 patients had HIDA scan of which 37 (16.4%) patients had BH. Median age was 49 years (IQR 38-62) and 32 (86.4%) were female. Median BMI 28 (IQR 23.3-32.4) and 48.3% were smokers. 5 (13.5%) were referred for pH manometry and gastric emptying studies while 25 (67.5%) have been formally discharged from surgery clinic follow-up. 7 (18.9%) are still waiting for further review. Only two patients had LC; one 3 years post HIDA when repeat ultrasound eventually showed gall stones and histopathology confirmed chronic cholecystitis. The second patient had sludge seen on EUS and histopathology confirmed chronic cholecystitis. Conclusions The hypothesis that overactive emptying of gallbladder represented by a high EF on HIDA scan leads to pain is somewhat convincing. High biliary pressure in a short circuit bounded by gallbladder/cystic duct junction and sphincter of Oddi causes gallbladder mucosal damage and cholecystitis. However, could there be missed stones or sludge is something that still needs to be considered. EUS might be of additional value before diagnosing patient with biliary hyperkinesia. Surgeons should consider LC in patients with BH once other pathologies have been ruled out. Further studies are needed to understand the outcome of cholecystectomy in BH.

OGBN P28 Accuracy of Barium Swallow and PH Manometry on Pre-operative Anti-reflux surgery

Abstract Background Fundoplication is one of the common surgical procedures offered to patients who have not responded to medical or conservative treatment for Gastroesophageal-Reflux-Disease.Within our trust routine-PH manometry,barium swallow and OGD are preferred pre-op investigations.According to the guidelines set forth by SAGES(Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons)-PH manometry and endoscopy are recommended as the preferred methods for pre-operative assessment.PH manometry is considered the gold standard for detecting reflux and dysmotility.Our objective is to evaluate and compare the local practice with published literature on identifying the accuracy of pre-operative barium swallow and ph manometry in diagnosing reflux and dysmotility. Methods A retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who had Nissen fundoplication at Ealing Hospital between January2017-December2022 was included in the study. Among these, patients who had both pre-operative assessments - barium swallow and Ph manometry were included in the cohort. Initial data was retrieved from the Surgical operating service list and was further analyzed with the help of EPRO ( Electronic information provider) for information on Barium swallow, Ph manometry studies, and postoperative outcome. Results In a study of 54 Nissen Fundoplication patients (mean age M&amp;F 58), 25 underwent pH manometry and barium swallow- Concordant positive results were found in 13 patients (52%), indicating reflux. Discordant results occurred in 11 patients (44%) with positive manometry but negative barium swallow, favoring pH manometry's sensitivity. Of the 25 patients analyzed, 20 (80%) had good symptom control, while 3 (12%) experienced symptom recurrence, and 2 (8%) missed follow-ups. Barium swallow missed 8 dysmotility cases, while pH manometry missed 4. Among 46 patients with detected hiatus hernia by OGD, only 26 (54%) were accurately diagnosed using barium swallow. Conclusions Our study demonstrated that Ph manometry is a reliable pre-operative assessment tool for anti-reflux surgery, achieving 100% accuracy in detecting reflux compared to only 55% accuracy with barium swallow. With dysmotility, Ph manometry showed better results of 67% whereas barium swallow identified only 33%. Barium swallow should be used as an additional investigation for failed pH studies and reflux-related dysphagia symptoms. It can also be valuable in post-operative cases to evaluate wrap position and potential complications due to tightness. These findings were presented at the local surgical audit meeting, and future cycles will focus on guideline compliance assessment.

Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.

The 4th iteration of the Chicago Classification (CC v4.0) for esophageal motility disorders offers more restrictive criteria for the diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM) compared to version 3.0 (CC v3.0). In light of the updated criteria for IEM, we aimed to characterize and compare the patients who retained their IEM diagnosis to those who were reclassified as normal motility, and to evaluate the clinical impact of the newly introduced CC v4.0. We performed a retrospective case-control study. We included all individuals who underwent a high-resolution manometry (HRM) between 2020 and 2021 at two centers. Consecutive studies reported as IEM according to the CC v3.0 were reanalyzed according to the CC v4.0. We compared demographics, clinical, manometry, and pH-monitoring parameters. Out of 452 manometry studies, 154 (34%) met criteria for IEM as per the CC v3.0 (CC v3.0 IEM group). Of those, 39 (25%) studies were reclassified as normal studies according to the CC v4.0 (CC v4.0 normal group), while the remaining 115 studies (25% of the overall cohort) retained an IEM diagnosis (CC v4.0 IEM group). The CC v4.0 normal group had more recovered contractions during solid swallows (p = 0.01), less ineffective swallows (p = 0.04), and lower acid exposure time (p = 0.02) compared to the CC4.0 IEM group. Under CC v4.0 criteria, fewer patients are diagnosed with IEM. Those diagnosed with IEM had worse esophageal function and higher acid burden. Though further studies are needed to confirm these findings, our results indicate that CC v4.0 criteria restrict the IEM diagnosis to a more clinically meaningful population.

Assessing the diagnostic yield of achalasia using provocative testing in high-resolution esophageal manometry: Serial diagnostic study.

Chicago Classification v4.0 recommends that if achalasia is demonstrated with single water swallows (SWS); provocative testing is not required. We determine whether provocative testing in patients with suspected achalasia can change manometric findings and reproduce symptoms. Between 2016 and 2022, 127 consecutive manometry studies of patients with achalasia were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent SWS, a solid meal (SM) and/or a rapid drink challenge (RDC). Demographic data, fluoroscopy, gastroscopy, and pre-and post-treatment Eckardt scores were collated. Of 127 achalasia patients (50.6 ± 16.6 years and 54.6% male), all completed a SM and 116 (91.3%) completed RDC; overall 83 were naïve (65.4%) to previous therapy. 15.4% patients with normal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on SWS demonstrated obstruction with RDC. SM gave a different achalasia phenotype in 44.9% of patients (p ⟨ 0.001). Twelve patients with normal IRP during SWS had persistent/recurrent obstruction during provocative testing; 83.3% had previous achalasia therapy. None of 13 patients with Type III (TIII) achalasia with SWS exhibited a change in manometric findings with provocative testing. Impedance bolus heights were lower in patients with TIII achalasia and those with normal IRP with SWS. During the SM, symptoms were reproduced in 56.7% of patients. Forty-six of 103 patients (44.7%) underwent therapy based upon the final achalasia subtype which was defined by the provocative test result of the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study. All treatments were effective, regardless of the achalasia subtype. Manometric findings remain unchanged when TIII achalasia is diagnosed with SWS. In patients with normal IRP, Type I, or Type II achalasia during SWS, provocative testing can alter achalasia phenotype or uncover achalasia where diagnosis is unclear. Further, it can reproduce symptoms. Such findings can personalize and guide effective therapeutic decisions.

Simultaneous Colonic Pressure Waves in Children and Young Adults with Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders: Artefact or Colonic Physiology?

Simultaneous pressure waves (SPW) spanning all recording sites in colonic manometry studies have been described as a potential biomarker of normal gas transit and extrinsic neural reflexes. In pediatric studies utilizing combined antroduodenal and colonic manometry, it was noted that most colonic SPWs appeared to also span all sensors in the gastric and small bowel regions. This suggests that a proportion of colonic SPWs may represent an artefact caused by forces extrinsic to the colon. Our aim was to characterize colonic SPWs and determine how many of these spanned most of the digestive tract. In 39 combined high-resolution antroduodenal and colonic manometry traces from 27 pediatric patients, we used our purpose-built software to identify all SPWs that spanned either (i) all recording sites in the digestive tract or (ii) those restricted to the colon. A total of 14,565 SPWs were identified (364 ± 316 SPWs/study), with 14,550 (99.9%) spanning the entire antroduodenal and colonic recording sites. Only 15 SPWs (0.1% of the total) were restricted to the colon (all in one recording). Based on these findings, we suggest that, in pediatric studies, SPWs should not form part of any diagnostic criteria, as these events appear to be an artefact caused by factors outside the colon (abdominal strain, body motion).

1020 Pre-Operative Investigation of Symptomatic GORD Patients and Hiatus Hernia: Are We Doing Too Many?

Abstract Aim To evaluate the clinical utility of diagnostic tests such as upper endoscopy, barium swallow, oesophageal manometry and pH studies that are commonly performed in patients prior to undergoing a hiatus hernia repair and determine whether one or more of these investigations can be omitted in our practice. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on 215 patients from September 2012 to August 2022 with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) undergoing hiatus hernia repair. Endoscopy was used as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of oesophageal manometry and barium swallow findings in diagnosing hiatus hernia (HH). Results Endoscopy had the highest detection rate of HH (76.9%), followed by barium swallow which had a higher detection rate of HH (51.8%), specificity and positive predictive value compared to manometry studies (42.1%), however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was no significant difference between endoscopy and barium swallow (p&amp;lt;0.05) and oesophageal manometry and endoscopy (p&amp;lt;0.00001) in the detection of HH. Conclusions All three investigations appear to be useful for the detection of GORD and hiatus hernia prior to treatment. However, the routine use of manometry pH studies may not be crucial and therefore could be performed selectively in patients. Further prospective analysis comparing preoperative and intraoperative findings could be carried out for each diagnostic test to assess whether the significance of our results is applicable to all populations and to determine whether one of these tests can be safely omitted or performed more selectively.

Diagnostic Utility of Mucosal Biopsies Taken During Colonoscopy-Guided Colonic Manometry Catheter Placement.

The diagnostic utility of mucosal biopsies taken during colonoscopy-guided colonic manometry catheter placement is unknown. The aims of our study were to determine the frequency and histopathology results of mucosal biopsies during these procedures and to assess whether there were any associations between the histology or gross findings with manometry results. We performed a retrospective chart review of children who had a colonic manometry study completed between 2008 and 2020 at a quaternary children's hospital. We captured patient demographics, biopsy locations, histopathology results, gross endoscopy findings, and manometry results. The chi-squared test and when appropriate Fisher exact test was used to evaluate categorical associations. One hundred forty-eight patients were included. One hundred eighteen (80%) had colonic biopsy and 63 (43%) had ileal biopsy. Colonic histology findings, which patients could have multiple, included lymphonodular hyperplasia (34%), normal (27%), chronic inflammation (24%), melanosis coli (21%), colonic eosinophilia (10%), and acute inflammation (8%). Ileal histology findings included increased Peyer patches (44%), normal (44%), acute inflammation (11%), chronic inflammation (3%), eosinophilia (5%), and eosinophilic ileitis (3%). The majority of acute and chronic inflammation was graded as mild. There were no statistically significant associations of histology to gross endoscopy or manometry findings. Colonic biopsies are obtained in the majority of patients presenting for colonic manometry evaluation with ileal biopsies obtained less frequently. Histopathology findings are noted frequently, but the majority are the result of or did not impact clinical care. There were no associations between abnormal histopathology or abnormal gross endoscopy findings with colonic manometry results.