Manometric Patterns Research Articles

355. LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER-DOR FOR ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC JUNCTION OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION: A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED TRIAL

Abstract Background The gold-standard treatment for esophago-gastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is still debated. Currently, the management of this motility disorder reflects the experience gained with esophageal achalasia, for which Laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) has been proven to be an effective long-term treatment. However, prospective data comparing long-term results of LHD for these two motility disorders are still lacking. The aim of this prospective, controlled study was to assess the 5-year follow-up of laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) in patients with EGJOO, compared with radiological stage I achalasia patients (ACH). Methods Patients with diagnosis of idiopathic EGJOO, referred for dysphagia or food regurgitation, and radiological stage I achalasia (subgrouped by manometric pattern I, II & III), treated with LHD, were enrolled to the study and then followed prospectively for 5 years. During the follow-up patients were evaluated with Eckard score (ES), Barium-swallow X-ray, High Resolution Manometry (HRM), 24 hour pH-monitoring and Upper-Gastrointestinal endoscopy. The primary outcome was therapeutic success (presence of ES ≤3 or no additional treatment) at the 5-year follow-up assessment. The secondary outcomes included the postoperative IRP and the evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Results The study involved 150 patients: 25 in the EGJOO group and 125 in the ACH group (25 pattern I, 74 pattern II, and 26 pattern III). The patients’ demographic and clinical parameters are summarized in Image. After 5 years, there was no significant difference in success rate: 92% in the EGJOO, 88% in achalasia pattern I, 91.9% in pattern II and 92.3% in pattern III (p=0.95). In the four groups, no differences were shown in the presence of postoperative esophagitis (p=0.08) and in the incidence of abnormal postoperative acid exposure (p=0.87) (Image). Conclusion This is the first long-term comparative study based on prospective data collection to assess the outcome of LHD in patients with EGJOO. After at least 5 years of follow-up, Laparoscopic Heller-Dor has a comparable success rate in both EGJOO and achalasia patients. Based on these data, we conclude that LHD can be proposed as a first-line treatment for symptomatic EGJOO, provided the diagnosis is accurate.

Electroneuromyographic examination of pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in patients with descending perineum syndrome

Aim: to assess the functional state of the pelvic floor muscles and their innervation in patients with descending perineum syndrome, manifested simultaneously by obstructive defecation and chronic neurogenic pelvic pain.Materials and methods: in 2022–2023, 51 patients (40 (78.4 %) women, 11 (21.6 %) men; age 50.9 ± 14.5 years) with pelvic organ prolapse, manifested by obstructive defecation and chronic neurogenic pelvic pain were examined at the Ryzhikh National Medical Research Centre for Coloproctology. All patients underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry and stimulation electroneuromyography according to a comprehensive neurophysiological protocol using a St. Mark’s electrode.Results: manometric patterns of functional defecation disorders were detected in 40 (78.4 %) patients, in the rest they were confirmed by defecography data and a negative evacuation test according to the Rome criteria IV. With stimulation electroneuromyography, neuropathy was detected in 68.6 % of cases by increasing the latency of the M-response of the pudendal nerve on the right or left. Complex neurophysiological diagnostics made it possible to additionally identify neuropathy in another 25.5 % of patients: according to changes in the mixed reciprocating reflex response (mixed feedback-reflex response) (efferent pathway) — in 17.7 % of cases; according to changes in the bulbocavernous reflex (efferent and afferent pathways) — in 7.8 % of cases. That is, neuropathy was determined in 94.1 % of patients in total.Conclusions:Functional diagnostic methods are an effective tool for studying the state of the pelvic floor muscle structures and their innervation and make it possible to identify pathogenetic links of disorders, the clinical manifestations of which are anal incontinence, neurogenic pelvic pain and proctogenic constipation in the form of obstructive defecation.Stimulation electroneuromyography makes it possible to detect disturbed innervation of the pelvic floor muscles and anal sphincter in the standard study of the M-response in 68.6 % of cases with perineal prolapse syndrome with a combination of proctogenic disorders and neurogenic pelvic pain. The use of a comprehensive neurophysiological protocol makes it possible to detect innervation disorders in 94.1 % of cases.

Ineffective esophageal motility: Characterization and outcomes across pediatric neurogastroenterology and motility centers in the United States.

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) on high-resolution manometry (HRM) is not consistently associated with specific clinical syndromes or outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence, clinical features, management, and outcomes of pediatric IEM patients across the United States. Clinical and manometric characteristics of children undergoing esophageal HRM during 2021-2022 were collected from 12 pediatric motility centers. Clinical presentation, test results, management strategies, and outcomes were compared between children with IEM and normal HRM. Of 236 children (median age 15 years, 63.6% female, 79.2% Caucasian), 62 (23.6%) patients had IEM, and 174 (73.7%) patients had normal HRM, with similar demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, and median symptom duration. Reflux monitoring was performed more often for IEM patients (25.8% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.002), but other adjunctive testing was similar. Among 101 patients with follow-up, symptomatic cohorts declined in both groups in relation to the initial presentation (p > 0.107 for each comparison) with management targeting symptoms, particularly acid suppression. Though prokinetics were used more often and behavioral therapy less often in IEM (p ≤ 0.015 for each comparison), symptom outcomes were similar between IEM and normal HRM. Despite a higher proportion with residual dysphagia on follow-up in IEM (64.0% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.043), an alternate mechanism for dysphagia was identified more often in IEM (68.8%) compared to normal HRM (27.8%, p = 0.017). IEM is a descriptive manometric pattern rather than a clinical diagnosis requiring specific intervention in children. Management based on clinical presentation provides consistent symptom outcomes.

Quality Indicator Development for the Approach to Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Modified Delphi Study.

Develop quality indicators for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). IEM is identified in up to 20% of patients undergoing esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) based on the Chicago Classification. The clinical significance of this pattern is not established and management remains challenging. Using RAND/University of California, Los Angeles Appropriateness Methods, we employed a modified-Delphi approach for quality indicator statement development. Quality indicators were proposed based on prior literature. Experts independently and blindly scored proposed quality statements on importance, scientific acceptability, usability, and feasibility in a 3-round iterative process. All 10 of the invited esophageal experts in the management of esophageal diseases invited to participate rated 12 proposed quality indicator statements. In round 1, 7 quality indicators were rated with mixed agreement, on the majority of categories. Statements were modified based on panel suggestion, modified further following round 2's virtual discussion, and in round 3 voting identified 2 quality indicators with comprehensive agreement, 4 with partial agreement, and 1 without any agreement. The panel agreed on the concept of determining if IEM is clinically relevant to the patient's presentation and managing gastroesophageal reflux disease rather than the IEM pattern; they disagreed in all 4 domains on the use of promotility agents in IEM; and had mixed agreement on the value of a finding of IEM during anti-reflux surgical planning. Using a robust methodology, 2 IEM quality indicators were identified. These quality indicators can track performance when physicians identify this manometric pattern on HRM. This study further highlights the challenges met with IEM and the need for additional research to better understand the clinical importance of this manometric pattern.

Sacral Neuromodulation for defecation disorders after non oncologic pelvic surgery

PurposeDefecation disorders (DD) can sometimes affect the outcomes of pelvic or colorectal surgery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the role of sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of constipation and other evacuation disorders after surgery.MethodsA retrospective analysis in all the consecutive patients that underwent sacral nerve modulation (SNM) for DD arisen or worsened after pelvic or colorectal surgery was performed from January 2010 to December 2020. DD were defined starting from Rome IV Criteria, and according to manometric results, all patients were further divided into the two subgroups: inadequate defecatory propulsion and dyssynergic defecation. Cleveland Clinic Constipations Score (CCCS) and SF-36 have been evaluated in the time.ResultsThirty-seven patients have been included in the study. Twenty-seven out of thirty-seven (73.3%) patients had experienced sufficient benefits to implant the definitive device, and 22 patients (59.4% of tested and 81.5% of permanently implanted) still had the device functioning after a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. The most represented manometric pattern was inadequate propulsive function (59% of patients). CCCS at preoperative assessment for all patients was 17.5 with a reduction to 10.4 at the first year of follow-up (p < 0.001).ConclusionSNM appears to be a feasible, safe, and well-tolerated procedure with durable benefit in the long-term treatment of defecatory dysfunction after pelvic or colorectal surgery for benign diseases.

Intrapyloric Botulinum Toxin Injection for Refractory Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients.

Chronic nausea and vomiting may be associated with gastroparesis or other conditions. Poor mechanistic understanding of symptoms often precludes targeted therapy. Numerous case series suggest that intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection (IPBI) may be beneficial in treating gastroparesis and dyspepsia in children. We hypothesized that nausea, vomiting, and other symptoms, independent of gastroparesis, may improve with IPBI. We sought to identify gastric emptying (GE) and manometric patterns in IPBI responders versus nonresponders. Electronic records of 25 pediatric patients who received IPBI for refractory nausea, vomiting, or both were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed symptom improvement post-IPBI and compared symptoms, GE, and antroduodenal manometry (ADM) findings between IPBI responders and nonresponders. At least one major symptom improved in 19 patients (76%) after IPBI. Of 22 patients completing a GE study, 14 had delayed GE with no significant difference between IPBI responders and nonresponders. Of 22 patients who underwent ADM, 18 had normal fasting peristalsis, 5 had postprandial antral hypomotility, 4 had neuropathic findings, and 19 had pylorospasm. IPBI responders, compared to nonresponders, demonstrated higher antral pressures with feeding ( P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of pylorospasm ( P = 0.0036). Antral pressures did not differ significantly with fasting or following motilin agonists. Our findings suggest that IPBI may have therapeutic benefit in pediatric patients with chronic nausea and/or vomiting, independent of gastroparesis. ADM findings of intact antral peristalsis and elevated antral pressures, in conjunction with efficacy of IPBI, support pyloric non-relaxation as a potential contributor to nausea and/or vomiting in pediatric patients.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia and Achalasia-Like Syndromes: Insights From HRM and FLIP.

High-resolution manometry, Chicago Classification v4.0, the functional lumen imaging probe, Panometry, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are all now integral parts of the landscape for managing achalasia or, more precisely, achalasia-like syndromes. This narrative review examines the impact of these innovations on the management of achalasia-like syndromes. High-resolution manometry was the disruptive technology that prompted the paradigm shift to thinking of motility disorders as patterns of obstructive physiology involving the esophagogastric junction and/or the distal esophagus rather than as siloed entities. An early observation was that the cardinal feature of achalasia-impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation-can occur in several subtypes: without peristalsis, with pan-esophageal pressurization, with premature (spastic) distal esophageal contractions, or even with preserved peristalsis (esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction). Furthermore, there being no biomarker for achalasia, no manometric pattern is perfectly sensitive or specific for 'achalasia' and there is also no 'gold standard' for the diagnosis. Consequently, complimentary physiological testing with a timed barium esophagram or functional lumen imaging probe are employed both to improve the detection of patients likely to respond to treatments for 'achalasia' and to characterize other syndromes also likely to benefit from achalasia therapies. These findings have become particularly relevant with the development of a minimally invasive technique for performing a tailored esophageal myotomy, POEM. Now and in the future, optimal achalasia management is to render treatment in a phenotype-specific manner, that is, POEM calibrated in a patient-specific manner for obstructive physiology including the distal esophagus and more conservative strategies such as a short POEM or pneumatic dilation for obstructive physiology limited to the lower esophageal sphincter.

Artificial Intelligence and Anorectal Manometry: Automatic Detection and Differentiation of Anorectal Motility Patterns-A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is the gold standard for the evaluation of anorectal functional disorders, prevalent in the population. Nevertheless, the accessibility to this examination is limited, and the complexity of data analysis and report is a significant drawback. This pilot study aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence model to automatically differentiate motility patterns of fecal incontinence (FI) from obstructed defecation (OD) using ARM data. We developed and tested multiple machine learning algorithms for the automatic interpretation of ARM data. Four models were tested: k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, random forests, and gradient boosting (xGB). These models were trained using a stratified 5-fold strategy. Their performance was assessed after fine-tuning of each model's hyperparameters, using 90% of data for training and 10% of data for testing. A total of 827 ARM examinations were used in this study. After fine-tuning, the xGB model presented an overall accuracy (84.6% ± 2.9%), similar to that of random forests (82.7% ± 4.8%) and support vector machines (81.0% ± 8.0%) and higher that of k-nearest neighbors (74.4% ± 3.8%). The xGB models showed the highest discriminating performance between OD and FI, with an area under the curve of 0.939. The tested machine learning algorithms, particularly the xGB model, accurately differentiated between FI and OD manometric patterns. Subsequent development of these tools may optimize the access to ARM studies, which may have a significant impact on the management of patients with anorectal functional diseases.

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN OPIOID USE AND OUTPATIENT VISITS FOR DYSPHAGIA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL AMBULATORY MEDICAL CARE SURVEY IN 2008-2018.

Opioids-induced esophageal dysfunction has been described with characteristic manometric patterns, but the population burden of dysphagia attributable to opioid use remains unclear. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2008-2018 was used to assess the relationship between opioid use and outpatient visits for dysphagia. After controlling for potential confounders there were no significant difference in ambulatory visits for dysphagia between opioid users and non-users (adjusted odds ratio=0.98, confidence interval: 0.59-1.65). No correlation between opioid use and ambulatory visits for dysphagia was found in a nationwide sample. Opioid-related manometric changes may be clinically relevant only in a small proportion of patients.

Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement of High Resolution Antroduodenal Manometry in Pediatric Patients Among Single Center Experts.

Studies in adults have suggested that high-resolution technology increases the diagnostic yield of antroduodenal manometry (ADM). However, there is no study comparing high-resolution with low-resolution ADM recordings as well as comparing the 2 types of high-resolution display [conventional line plot (CLP) and pressure topographic plots (PTP)]. We hypothesized that high-resolution ADM is a superior diagnostic modality with higher inter-observer and intra-observer agreement compared with low-resolution recordings. Twenty-four anonymized ADM studies were blindly analyzed by 3 experienced pediatric neurogastroenterologists. All studies had been performed using a low-compliance water-perfused system with a 20-channels catheter. Data were displayed as CLP, as both high-resolution and low-resolution, and PTP in different sessions with at least 6-week interval. Accuracy was evaluated using previous established diagnosis and specific pre-prandial and post-prandial manometric patterns. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were calculated. Analysis with high-resolution CLP revealed a substantial inter-observer agreement among the 3 observers regarding the diagnosis (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.832; average pairwise percentage agreement: 88.9%). Conversely, PTP and low-resolution CLP showed poor agreement for diagnoses (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.600; average pairwise percentage agreement: 75.3%; Krippendorff's alpha: 0.390; average pairwise percentage agreement: 60.2%, respectively). For the intra-observer agreement, Krippendorff's alpha ranges were 0.891-1 for CLP and 0.19393-0.34621 for PTP. Our study demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for high-resolution ADM compared to the low-resolution recordings. However, although it is well established for other motility investigations, PTP is not yet reliable in assessing foregut motor patterns. Advanced and more sophisticated software are clearly required for analyzing PTP display.

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in named manometric patterns of dysmotility according to the Chicago Classification 4.0.

Esophageal motility disorders (EMD) may be considered primary disorders only in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). If GERD is present, treatment should be directed toward correction of the abnormal reflux. The actual prevalence of GERD in manometric dysmotility patterns according to the new Chicago Classification 4.0 (CC4) is still elusive. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of GERD in patients with esophageal motility disorders according to the CC4. We reviewed 400 consecutive patients that underwent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Esophageal motility was classified according to the CC4 and GERD + was defined by a DeMeester score > 14.7. Normal motility or unclassified dysmotility was present in 290 (73%) patients, with GERD+ in 184 of them (63%). There were a total of 110 patients (27%) with named esophageal motility disorders, with GERD+ in 67 (61%). The incidence of ineffective esophageal motility was 59% (n = 65) with 69% GERD +, diffuse esophageal spasm was 40% (n = 44) with 48% GERD +, and hypercontractile esophagus was 0.01% (n = 1) with 100% GERD +. There was no correlation between the presence of GERD and the number of non-peristaltic swallows. Our results show that: (i) manometry only is not enough to select patients' treatment as >60% of patients with named esophageal motility disorders have GERD; (ii) there was no correlation between the presence of GERD and the number of non-peristaltic swallows.

How Updates in Chicago Classification Impact Clinical Practice.

Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0), published in 2021, presents several modifications largely aimed at minimizing over-diagnosis of inconclusive patterns on high-resolution manometry (HRM). These include: 1) introduction of a standardized HRM protocol for consistency among centers, 2) emphasis on the need for supportive data in instances of inconclusive manometric patterns, 3) required presence of relevant symptoms in certain instances to reduce over-diagnosis and inappropriate interventions, and 4) classification as disorders of EGJ outflow or disorders of peristalsis. These updates aim to improve the clinical application of HRM and patient outcomes.

Comparison of Treatment Response in Different Types of Achalasia: A Long-Term Study.

BACKGROUND Three manometric patterns are seen in high-resolution manometry (HRM). Response to treatment has been reported to be different in these subtypes. We aimed to investigate the frequency and response to treatment in subtypes of achalasia. METHODS 306 patients between 15 to 60 years old, naïve to treatment with idiopathic achalasia (IA) were evaluated prospectively in a cohort study for 8 years. The patients were treated with pneumatic balloon dilation (PBD), and evaluated before and one month after PBD with Achalasia Symptom Score (ASS) and timed barium esophagogram (TBE) and then every 6 months with ASS. The primary study outcome was defined as a reduction in ASS (equal to or less than 4) and a reduction greater than 80% in the volume of barium in TBE at 1 month after PBD compared with baseline values. RESULTS According to HRM, 57 were classified as type I (18.62%), 223 as type II (72.9%), and 26 as type III (8.5%). The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) residual pressures before treatment were 34.05 ± 31.55, 32.99 ± 17.90, and 37.47 ± 14.07 mmHg in types I, II, and III, respectively (p = 0.18). The mean ASS values before treatment were 12.23, 11.50, and 11.50, for types I, II, and III, respectively (p = 0.29). The ASS dropped to 2.50 in type I, 2.40 in type II, and 2.12 in type III at 1 month after treatment (p = 0.83). Eventually, at the end of follow-up, 24 patients with type I (83%), 82 patients with type II (67%), and five patients with type III (83%) showed sustained good responses (p = 0.528). CONCLUSION Manometric subtypes of achalasia did not have an important role in clinical success in the long term. Achalasia has no definite cure, but with current treatment modalities, palliation of symptoms is possible in over 90% of patients.

Novedades acerca de los trastornos motores del esófago tras la reciente clasificación de chicago 4.0

The Chicago Classification includes esophageal motor disorders diagnosed by high-resolution manometry. Of the manometric patterns, some are always clinically relevant and require treatment (eg, the achalasia), while others may be incidental findings requiring no intervention in which aggressive management would be counterproductive. One of the goals of the new version of the recently published Chicago Classification (CCv4.0) was to distinguish between clinically relevant and non-clinically relevant disorders. With this in mind, the study protocol was modified to include liquid swallows in the supine and sitting positions and provocation tests were standardized. Diagnostic criteria were modified, incorporating the presence of symptoms and the support of complementary studies other than manometry. In this review, we will comment the diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric junction outlet obstruction and hypomotility disorders based on CCv4.0.

Correlation Between Skin and Affected Organs in 52 Sclerodermic Patients Followed in a Diseases Management Team: Development of a Risk Prediction Model of Organ-Specific Complications.

ObjectiveTo identify the existence of a correlation among the various organs affected, focusing primarily on immuno-dermatological aspects, and to create a risk prediction model of organ-specific complications.Material and MethodsFifty-two patients with stable scleroderma, followed between 2015 and 2019, were investigated through an extensive multidisciplinary evaluation in the last year.ResultsPatients with lung involvement presented a worse degree of skin fibrosis than patients without it (p <0.001). No relationship was observed for the heart, kidney, and esophagus. Patients with pulmonary involvement had a lower pressure of the low esophagus sphincter and a higher Warrick score than patients without it (p <0.05). Age was significantly higher in patients with kidney involvement. Diffuse scleroderma patients had a worse pulmonary impairment than limited scleroderma patients (p <0.05). The manometric “sclerodermic” pattern was observed to be the most frequent (55.6%, p <0.05) in dcSSc patients while the sclerodermic and normal pattern were equally represented (41.2 and 32.4% respectively, p <0.05) in lcSSc patients. When compared to the negative serological groups, anti-Scl-70 positive patients presented a worse lung involvement while anti-centromere patients presented a better lung outcome (p <0.05). PM-Scl 100/75 positive patients presented mostly a pulmonary fibrotic pattern (p <0.05) and, also, heart complications were more likely associated with anti PM-Scl 100/75 positivity (p <0.05). The risk prediction model for organ-specific complications had an accuracy of 84.4% (95%CI 78, 89) in complication-site prediction, AUC of 0.871, 86% of sensitivity, and 83% of specificity, Cohen’s Kappa (k) of 0.68.ConclusionsOut of all the organs studied, the skin is the one that correlates with the lung. Patients with a diffuse form of disease presented more frequently the anti Scl-70 antibody and had a worse lung and esophageal involvement (scleroderma pattern) than the negative group. Conversely, patients with limited disease presented all positive for the anti-centromere antibody with a better lung involvement than the negative group, without any difference among the esophageal manometric pattern. Anti PM-Scl 100/75 antibody patients were associated with pulmonary fibrosis and presented cardiac involvement. The model created has demonstrated excellent values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, but further studies are needed for validation.

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor Is an Effective Treatment for Esophageal-Gastric Junction Outflow Obstruction

BackgroundThe treatment of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) currently mirrors that of achalasia, but this is based on only a few studies on small case series. The aim of this prospective, controlled study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD) in patients with EGJOO, as compared with patients with esophageal achalasia. Materials and MethodsBetween 2016 and 2019, patients with manometric diagnosis of idiopathic EGJOO and patients with radiological stage I achalasia, both treated with LHD, were compared. The achalasia group was further analyzed by subgrouping the patients based on the manometric pattern. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence or reoccurrence of an Eckardt score > 3 or the need for retreatment. ResultsDuring the study period, 150 patients were enrolled: 25 patients had EGJOO and 125 had radiological stage I achalasia (25 pattern I, 74 pattern II, and 26 pattern III). The median follow-up was 24 months (IQR: 34–16). Treatment was successful in 96% of patients in the EGJOO group and in 96% of achalasia patients with pattern I, 98.7% in those with pattern II, and 96.2% of those with pattern III (p=0.50). High-resolution manometry showed a reduction in the LES resting pressure and integrated relaxation pressure for all patients in all 4 groups (p<0.001). ConclusionThis is the first comparative study based on prospective data collection to assess the outcome of LHD in patients with EGJOO. LHD emerged as an effective treatment for EGJOO, with an excellent success rate, comparable with the procedure’s efficacy in treating early-stage achalasia.

Manometric pattern progression in esophageal achalasia in the era of high-resolution manometry.

Esophageal manometry represents the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of esophageal achalasia because it can detect both the lack of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation and abnormal peristalsis. From the manometric standpoint, cases of achalasia can be segregated on the grounds of three clinically relevant patterns according to the Chicago Classification v3.0. It is currently unclear whether they represent distinct entities or are part of a disease continuum with the possibility of transition from a pattern to another one. The four cases described in the present report could provide further insights on this topic because the manometric pattern changed from type III to type II in all patients—without any invasive treatment. The cases described here support the hypothesis that the different manometric patterns of achalasia represent different stages in the evolution of the same disease, type III being the early stage, type II an intermediate stage, and type I probably the end stage of achalasia.

Manometric changes of the esophagus in morbidly obese patients.

This prospective study aimed to determine the manometric pattern and the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in 79 morbidly obese patients selected for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. After clinical evaluation and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry was performed. The esophageal peristalsis, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure, and LES relaxation were evaluated. Demographic data showed a predominance of females (55.70%) and both females and males were in the 5th decade of life. In addition, approximately 3/4 of the patients (78.48%) were from the urban zone. The mean body mass index of the patients was 46.40±6.0069 kg/m2, with a maximum of 61 kg/m2. The LES basal pressure was normal in 59.49% of the patients, with a mean value of 31.40±18.43 mmHg. LES basal hypertonia was observed in 26.58%, and LES hypotonia in 13.93% of patients; 46.84% (37 patients) had abnormal manometric findings: 24.05% (19 patients) had EGJ outflow obstruction, 12.66% (10 patients) ineffective esophageal motility, 3.8% (3 patients) distal esophageal spasm, 3.8% (3 patients) Jackhammer esophagus, 2 cases were suggestive for type 2 achalasia but in asymptomatic patients. Ineffective esophageal motility was not associated with diabetes mellitus type 2 or erosive esophagitis according to our data. Hiatal hernia (HH) was manometrically diagnosed in 23 patients (29.11%). Preoperative high-resolution esophageal manometry in obese patients demonstrated a high prevalence of motility disorders, but in asymptomatic patients, thus in the future, we require more studies and larger cohorts to better appreciate the clinical impact.

Chicago Classification Update (v4.0): Technical review on diagnostic criteria for distal esophageal spasm.

Distal esophageal spasm (DES) is defined as a manometric pattern of at least 20% of premature contractions in a context of normal esophago-gastric junction relaxation in a patient with dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain. The definition of premature contraction requires the measurement of the distal latency and identification of the contractile deceleration point (CDP). The CDP can be difficult to localize, and alternative methods are proposed. Further, it is important to differentiate contractile activity and intrabolus pressure. Multiple rapid swallows are a useful adjunctive test to perform during high-resolution manometry to search for a lack of inhibition that is encountered in DES. The clinical relevance of the DES-manometric pattern was raised as it can be secondary to treatment with opioids or observed in patients referred for esophageal manometry before antireflux surgery in absence of dysphagia and non-cardiac chest pain. Further idiopathic DES is rare, and one can argue that when encountered, it could be part of type III achalasia spectrum. Medical treatment of DES can be challenging. Recently, endoscopic treatments with botulinum toxin and peroral endoscopic myotomy have been evaluated, with conflicting results while rigorously controlled studies are lacking. Future research is required to determine the role of contractile vigor and lower esophageal sphincter hypercontractility in the occurrence of symptoms in patients with DES. The role of impedance-combined high-resolution manometry also needs to be evaluated.

What is new in Chicago Classification version 4.0?

Since publication of Chicago Classification version 3.0 in 2015, the clinical and research applications of high-resolution manometry (HRM) have expanded. In order to update the Chicago Classification, an International HRM Working Group consisting of 52 diverse experts worked for two years and utilized formally validated methodologies. Compared with the prior iteration, there are four key modifications in Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0). First, further manometric and non-manometric evaluation is required to arrive at a conclusive, actionable diagnosis of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction (EGJOO). Second, EGJOO, distal esophageal spasm, and hypercontractile esophagus are three manometric patterns that must be accompanied by obstructive esophageal symptoms of dysphagia and/or non-cardiac chest pain to be considered clinically relevant. Third, the standardized manometric protocol should ideally include supine and upright positions as well as additional manometric maneuvers such as the multiple rapid swallows and rapid drink challenge. Solid test swallows, postprandial testing, and pharmacologic provocation can also be considered for particular conditions. Finally, the definition of ineffective esophageal motility is more stringent and now encompasses fragmented peristalsis. Hence, CCv4.0 no longer distinguishes between major versus minor motility disorders but simply separates disorders of EGJ outflow from disorders of peristalsis.