Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Health and Medical Research Council Synergy Grant Background Receipt of guideline-indicated comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improves patient outcomes. Optimum service delivery and meeting quality standards necessitates accurate standardised data collection and reporting. The methods, processes and systems used for data capture and reporting in cardiac rehabilitation are under-documented, limiting identification of areas needing change and creation of a platform for quality improvement (QI) at national levels. Purpose To describe data capture, management, and reporting and the awareness and use of quality indicators in contemporary Australian CR programs. Methods CR programs (n=396) were identified through professional and national directories, jurisdictional networks, webinars, and direct provider contact. Program coordinators completed an online survey on individual service characteristics, data capture and management systems (paper, electronic, database, integrated platform) including awareness, use and usefulness of the published National Cardiac Rehabilitation Quality toolkit components. Results Respondents totalled 319 (80.5%), from all eight states and territories. Coverage of Metropolitan, rural and remote towns, and regional centres was 46.3%, 45.9% and 7.8%, respectively. Indicative annual patient enrolments were >200 (31.0%), 51-200 (46.4%) and ≤50 (22.6%). Most programs used ≥2 data management systems: paper and electronic 62.6% or multiple e-systems 19.1%, or one system, either paper 20.9% or electronic 16.3%. Use of multiple systems and combinations of systems did not differ by number of patients enrolled. QI systems were infrequently used: QI Platforms 17.2%, QI Databases 10.0%. Supplementary to patient care, data gained was used for reports for management (57.0%), QI (56.1%), funding support (43.2%), required jurisdictional reporting (41.1%) and research (30.7%). Higher volume programs were more likely to be using the data capture for multiple purposes. Independent covariates of services using data for QI were enrolments of >200 (OR 3.83 95% CI 1.76, 8.34) and the state/territory location, such that use of QI was less likely in the states of Victoria (OR 0.24 95% CI 0.08, 0.77), New South Wales (OR 0.25 95% CI 0.08, 0.76) and Western Australia (OR 0.16 95% CI 0.05, 0.57). Conclusions Management of cardiac rehabilitation patient data is highly variable across Australian programs and jurisdictions, often including multiple different systems, with limited use of the data for QI. A national user-friendly, low burden approach to CR data collection incorporated into daily work-flow that is capable of benchmarking and informs QI is essential.
Read full abstract