Management Of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Research Articles

Adherence to and clinical utility of "quality indicators" for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a retrospective, multicenter study.

We aimed to improve the prognosis, treatment, and management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) by evaluating the association between adherence to quality indicators (QIs) and clinical outcomes in patients with their clinical outcomes. We retrospectively collected clinical and microbiological data on hospitalized patients with SAB from 14 hospitals (three with > 600, two with 401-600, five with 201-400, and four with ≤ 200 beds) in Japan from January to December 2022. The SAB management quality was evaluated using the SAB-QI score (ranging from 0 to 13 points), which consists of 13 QIs (grouped into five categories) based on previous literature. Of the 4,448 positive blood culture episodes, 289 patients with SAB (6.5%) were enrolled. The SAB-QI scores ranged from 3 to 13, with a median score of 9 points. The SAB-QI score was highest in middle-sized hospitals with 401-600 beds. Adherence to each of the four QI categories (blood culture, echocardiography, source control, and antibiotic treatment) was significantly higher in survived cases than in fatal cases. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests demonstrated that higher adherence to SAB-QIs indicated a better prognosis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, methicillin resistance, multiple comorbidities (≥2), and low SAB-QI score were significantly associated with 30-day mortality in patients with SAB. Our study highlights that greater adherence to the SAB-QIs correlates with improved patient outcomes. Management of patients with SAB should follow these recommended indicators to maintain the quality of care, especially for patients with poor prognosticators.

Global Differences in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: No International Standard of Care.

Despite being the leading cause of mortality from bloodstream infections worldwide, little is known about regional variation in treatment practices for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). The aim of this study was to identify global variation in management, diagnostics, and definitions of SAB. During a 20-day period in 2022, physicians throughout the world were surveyed on SAB treatment practices. The survey was distributed through listservs, e-mails, and social media. In total, 2031 physicians from 71 different countries on 6 continents (North America [701, 35%], Europe [573, 28%], Asia [409, 20%], Oceania [182, 9%], South America [124, 6%], and Africa [42, 2%]) completed the survey. Management-based responses differed significantly by continent for preferred treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, use of adjunctive rifampin for prosthetic material infection, and use of oral antibiotics (P < .01 for all comparisons). The 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were most commonly used in Europe (94%) and least frequently used in Africa (13%) and North America (51%; P < .01). Although most respondents defined persistent SAB as 3-4 days of positive blood cultures, responses ranged from 2 days in 31% of European respondents to 7 days in 38% of Asian respondents (P < .01). Large practice variations for SAB exist throughout the world, reflecting the paucity of high-quality data and the absence of an international standard of care for the management of SAB.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with a high mortality rate. The clinical outcome of SAB patients highly depends on early diagnosis, adequate antibiotic therapy and source control. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the health care system faced additional organizational challenges and the question arose whether structured screening and triaging for COVID-19 and shifting resources influence the management of SAB. Patients (n = 115) with SAB were enrolled in a retrospective comparative study with historical controls (March 2019-February 2021). The quality of SAB therapy was assessed with a point score, which included correct choice of antibiotic, adequate dosage of antibiotic, sufficient duration of therapy, early start of therapy after receipt of findings, focus search and taking control blood cultures 3-4 days after starting adequate antibiotic therapy. The quality of treatment before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were compared. No significant differences in the total score points were found between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 cohort. All quality indicators, except the correct duration of antibiotic therapy, showed no significant differences in both cohorts. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the outcome between both cohorts. The treatment quality of SAB therapy was comparable before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A Fully Integrated Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Stewardship Telehealth Service Improves Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Bundle Adherence and Outcomes in 16 Small Community Hospitals.

Infectious diseases (ID) and antimicrobial stewardship (AS) improve Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) outcomes. However, many small community hospitals (SCHs) lack on-site access to these services, and it is not known if ID telehealth (IDt) offers the same benefit for SAB. We evaluated the impact of an integrated IDt service on SAB outcomes in 16 SCHs. An IDt service offering IDt physician consultation plus IDt pharmacist surveillance was implemented in October 2016. Patients treated for SAB in 16 SCHs between January 2009 and August 2019 were identified for review. We compared SAB bundle adherence and outcomes between patients with and without an IDt consult (IDt group and control group, respectively). A total of 423 patients met inclusion criteria: 157 in the IDt group and 266 in the control group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Among patients completing their admission at an SCH, IDt consultation increased SAB bundle adherence (79% vs 23%; odds ratio [OR], 16.9; 95% CI, 9.2-31.0). Thirty-day mortality and 90-day SAB recurrence favored the IDt group, but the differences were not statistically significant (5% vs 9%; P = .2; and 2% vs 6%; P = .09; respectively). IDt consultation significantly decreased 30-day SAB-related readmissions (9% vs 17%; P = .045) and increased length of stay (median [IQR], 5 [5-8] days vs 5 [3-7] days; P = .04). In a subgroup of SAB patients with a controllable source, IDt appeared to have a mortality benefit (2% vs 9%; OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01-0.98). An integrated ID/AS telehealth service improved SAB management and outcomes at 16 SCHs. These findings provide important insights for other IDt programs.

Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries.

To determine clinical practice variation and identify knowledge gaps in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB). A web-based survey with questions addressing antibiotic treatment of SAB was distributed through the ESGAP network among infectious disease specialists, clinical microbiologists and internists in Croatia, France, Greece, the Netherlands and the UK between July 2021 and November 2021. A total number of 1687 respondents opened the survey link, of whom 677 (40%) answered at least one question. For MSSA and MRSA bacteraemia, 98% and 94% preferred initial monotherapy, respectively. In patients with SAB and non-removable infected prosthetic material, between 80% and 90% would use rifampicin as part of the treatment. For bone and joint infections, 65%-77% of respondents would consider oral step-down therapy, but for endovascular infections only 12%-32% would. Respondents recommended widely varying treatment durations for SAB with different foci of infection. Overall, 48% stated they used 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) to guide antibiotic treatment duration. Persistent bacteraemia was the only risk factor for complicated SAB that would prompt a majority to extend treatment from 2 to 4-6 weeks. This survey in five European countries shows considerable clinical practice variation between and within countries in the antibiotic management of SAB, in particular regarding oral step-down therapy, choice of oral antibiotic agents, treatment duration and use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Physicians use varying criteria for treatment decisions, as evidence from clinical trials is often lacking. These areas of practice variation could be used to prioritize future studies for further improvement of SAB care.

Increasing Pediatric Infectious Diseases Consultation Rates for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Introduction:Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) in children is associated with significant mortality and morbidity, including recurrent bacteremia. Infectious disease consultation (IDC) improves SAB outcomes in adult patients. However, increasing IDC and impact for pediatric patients with SAB is not well described.Methods:This quality improvement project aimed to increase IDC for SAB events at a quaternary pediatric medical center. First, we evaluated the local practices regarding pediatric SAB and engaged stakeholders (July 2018–August 2020). We added an advisory comment supporting IDC for SAB to all blood culture results in September 2020. Using statistical process control charts, we monitored the number of SAB events with IDC before a SAB event without IDC. Finally, we evaluated SAB recurrences before and after initiating the advisory comment.Results:In the baseline period, 30 of 49 (61%) SAB events received an IDC with a mean of 1.4 SAB events with IDC before a SAB event without IDC. Postintervention, 22 of 23 (96%) SAB events received IDC with a mean of 14 events with IDC before 1 event without IDC. The SAB recurrence rate was 8%, with 6 events in 4 children; none of the index cases resulting in recurrence received an IDC (P = 0.0002), and all occurred before any intervention.Conclusions:An electronic advisory comment supporting IDC for SAB significantly increased the rate of pediatric IDC with no further SAB recurrence episodes following intervention. This low-resource intervention may be considered in other pediatric centers to optimize SAB management.

57. Evaluation of the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Consensus Document in Patients with Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices Who Develop Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BackgroundCardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation has markedly increased over the past two decades. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) occurs in patients with CIED and determination of device infection among patients without clinical findings of pocket site infection is often difficult. Our study examines the characteristics, management, and outcomes of SAB in patients living with CIED using 2019 international criteria to define CIED infection. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients with CIED who were hospitalized at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, with SAB from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019. Patients who met CIED infection criteria following SAB based on the 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association International Concensus Document were identified. A time-to-event analysis was used to determine the impact, if any, of complete device extraction on outcomes. ResultsOverall, 110 patients with CIED developed SAB and 92 (83.6%) of them underwent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Eighty-eight (80%) had CIED infection with 57 (51.8%) and 31 (28.2%) patients meeeting criteria for definite and possible CIED infections, respectively. Forty-three (75.4%) patients with definite CIED infection underwent complete device extraction. For possible and rejected CIED infection, the rates of complete device extraction were 35.5% and 27.3%, respectively (p< .001 for each). The primary endpoint of a composite of one-year mortality and SAB relapse had a rate that was significantly lower in patients with CIED infection who underwent complete device extraction as compared to that of patients who did not undergo device extraction (25.9% vs. 76.5%, p< .001). No significant difference in outcomes was seen in the rejected CIED infection group (33.3% vs. 62.5%, p =.27). ConclusionThe rate of CIED infections following SAB was higher than that reported previously. Increased use of TEE and a novel case definition with broader diagnostic criteria were likely operative, in part, in accounting for the the higher rate of CIED infections complicating SAB. Complete device removal is critical in patients with either definite or possible CIED infection as defined by the 2019 consensus document to improve one-year mortality and SAB relapse rates. Disclosures Larry M. Baddour, MD, Boston Scientific (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Botanix Pharmaceuticals (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Roivant Sciences (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Muhammad R. Sohail, MD, Medtronic (Consultant)Philips (Consultant)

Mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia remains high despite adherence to quality indicators: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the association between compliance with previously published quality indicators (QIs) for the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) and 30-day mortality. MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of all adult patients with SAB who were hospitalized at a Spanish university hospital between 2013 and 2018. We evaluated the compliance with 7 QIs of SAB management (i.e., Infectious Diseases consultation, follow-up blood cultures, early source control, echocardiography, early cloxacillin or cefazolin, vancomycin monitoring, and appropriate treatment duration). The QIs compliance rate was considered good if ≥75% of the QIs recommended in each patient were performed. We studied the impact of different risk factors (including QIs compliance) on 30-day all-cause mortality adjusting by multivariable modeling and propensity-matched analysis. ResultsWe included 441 patients with SAB. The QIs compliance rate was ≥75% in 361 patients (81.9%). A total of 95 patients (21.5%) died within 30 days after the index blood culture. In the multivariable model, the variables associated with 30-day mortality were: age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0–1.1), Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1–1.4), persistent bacteraemia >72 h (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 3.2–11.5), infective endocarditis (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2–6.7), and SAB of unknown source (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5–7.1). We did not find an association between a global QIs compliance rate of ≥75% or any individual QI with 30-day mortality. ConclusionsSAB 30-day mortality remains high despite good adherence to previously published QIs for the management of SAB. Future research should focus on additional factors to further improve SAB-related mortality.

Variation Among Infectious Diseases Pharmacists for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) remains complex, in that optimal treatment for patients, including complicated or persistent infection, remains unclear. Two recent surveys have demonstrated practice variations in SAB among infectious diseases (ID) physicians. Objectives: The purpose of this survey was to examine practice variations in SAB among ID pharmacists. Methods: A thirty-five-question survey was electronically distributed to the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Infectious Diseases Practice and Research Network (IDPRN) in Fall 2019 to determine differences in SAB management. Data were analyzed utilizing Pearson’s Chi-Square or Fisher’s Exact Test. Results: A total of 106 ID pharmacists responded. Only 28% of pharmacists practiced at hospitals with mandatory ID consultation for SAB. A majority (75%) had rapid diagnostic technology (RDT) for identifying SABSI, but 32% of those facilities with RDT did not notify pharmacy with results. Anti-staphylococcal penicillins were preferred for MSSA blood stream infections (BSI) in patients with central nervous system infection and endocarditis, whereas cefazolin was favored for other MSSA BSI. For persistent MRSA BSI, 34% selected daptomycin alone while 38% elected to combine daptomycin and ceftaroline. Pharmacists at hospitals less than 500 beds were more likely to use daptomycin, while those at larger hospitals were more likely to use daptomycin and ceftaroline for persistent MRSA BSI (P < .05). Conclusions: A survey of ID pharmacists showed variation in the management of SABs, as well as the definition and treatment of persistent SAB. Mandatory ID consultation and RDT use to improve SAB management have not been optimized.

Successful Use of Telemedicine Infectious Diseases Consultation With an Antimicrobial Stewardship-Led Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Care Bundle.

BackgroundTelemedicine (TM) programs can be implemented to deliver specialty care through virtual platforms and overcome geographic/resource constraints. Few data exist to describe outcomes associated with TM-based infectious diseases (ID) management. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes associated with TM and onsite standard-of-care (SOC) ID consultation after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)-led Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) bundle.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on the effects of a SAB bundle comparing ID consult delivery (SOC or TM) at 10 US hospitals within Atrium Health in adult patients admitted from September 2016 through December 2017. The type of ID consult provided was based on the admitting hospital; no hospital had both modalities. Bundle components included the following: (1) ID consult, (2) appropriate antibiotics, (3) repeat blood cultures until clearance, (4) echocardiogram obtainment, and (5) appropriate antibiotic duration. The AMS facilitated bundle initiation and compliance. The primary outcome was bundle adherence between groups. Differences in clinical outcomes were also assessed.ResultsWe evaluated 738 patients with SAB (576 with SOC, 162 with TM ID). No differences were observed in overall bundle adherence (SOC 86% vs TM 89%, P = .33). In addition, no significant differences resulted between groups for hospital mortality, 30-day SAB-related readmission, persistent bacteremia, and culture clearance. Groups did not differ in 30-day mortality when controlling for demographics, bacteremia source, and physiological measures with multivariable logistic regression.ConclusionsOur findings provide evidence to support effective use of TM ID consultation and AMS-led care bundles for SAB management in resource-limited settings.

Forgoing transesophageal echocardiogram in selected patients with complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Infective endocarditis (IE) has been increasingly recognized as an important complication of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), leading to a low threshold for echocardiography and extended treatment with anti-staphylococcal agents. However, outside of IE, many indications for prolonged anti-staphylococcal therapy courses are present. We sought to determine the frequency in which findings from a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) changed clinical SAB management in a large Canadian health region. Residents (> 18years) with SAB from 2012 to 2014 who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and TEE were assessed. Patients potentially benefiting from an extended course of anti-staphylococcal agents were defined a priori. Patient demographics, treatment (including surgical), and clinical outcomes were extracted and evaluated. Of the 705 episodes of SAB that underwent a screening echocardiogram, 203 episodes underwent both a TTE and TEE, of which 92.1% (187/203) contained an a priori indication for extended anti-staphylococcal therapy. Regardless of TEE results, actual duration of therapy did not differ in SAB episodes that had ≥ 1 extended anti-staphylococcal therapy criteria (36.7days, IQR 23.4-48.6 vs. 43.8days, IQR 33.3-49.5, p = 0.17). Additionally, there were no cases in which TEE was utilized as the sole reason to shorten duration of therapy or proceed to surgery for those with SAB. Routine performance of TEE may be unnecessary in all SAB as many patients have pre-existing indications for extended anti-staphylococcal therapy independent of TEE findings. An algorithm to selectively identify cases of SAB that would benefit from TEE can reduce resource and equipment expenditure and patient risks associated with TEE.

67. Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Collaborative Initiative on Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Management

BackgroundInfectious diseases (ID) consultation has been associated with improved outcomes for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) largely by providing guidance to follow widely accepted standards. However, ID consultation may be delayed due to numerous factors. ID pharmacists may be able to facilitate timely and optimal management of SAB in collaboration with ID providers and microbiology. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-driven collaborative initiative for SAB.MethodsThis was a single-center, quasi-experimental study of patients with SAB before (8/1/16–7/31/17) and after (8/1/18-7/31/19) implementation of pharmacist-driven collaborative initiative for SAB management. After direct notification of SAB and penicillin-binding protein assay results from microbiology personnel, the ID pharmacist promptly contacted the primary team to facilitate ID consultation and identified opportunities to optimize treatment or diagnosis prior to consult. Recommendations were also collaboratively discussed with the ID consult service. Included patients were ≥18 years old with SAB. Excluded patients were < 18 years old, under palliative care or expired prior to S. aureus speciation, refused care against medical advice, pregnant, incarcerated, or had polymicrobial bacteremia.ResultsNinety and 111 patients were included in the pre- and post-intervention cohort, respectively. Demographic data were similar between cohorts. Most SAB cases were community-acquired (72% vs 81%, p=0.137), complicated (83% vs 71%, p=0.059), and methicillin-susceptible (57% vs 65%, p=0.236). The most common sources were catheter (23%) and skin and soft tissue (30%) in pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. Table 1 displays compliance with evidence-based SAB measures and clinical outcomes. Compliance with the SAB bundle was significantly higher in the post-intervention cohort (91% vs 50%, p< 0.001).Table 1. Compliance with Evidence-Based Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Management Bundle Elements and Clinical Outcomes ConclusionIncreased compliance with evidence-based SAB recommendations decreased SAB duration, time to targeted antibiotics, and infection-related hospital length of stay after implementation of a pharmacist-driven collaborative initiative for SAB.Disclosures Wesley D. Kufel, PharmD, Melinta (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Research Grant or Support)Theratechnologies, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Jeffrey Steele, PharMD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship and rapid diagnostics in children with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

AbstractIntroductionRapid diagnostic testing (RDT) in combination with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has been associated with improved outcomes in adults with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB); however, pediatric data are limited.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact of concomitant implementation of an ASP and RDT in children with SAB.MethodsThis pre‐post quasi‐experimental study compared time to optimal antibiotic in children with SAB in 2015/2016 (pre‐intervention [PRE]) and 2017/2018 (post‐intervention [POST]). During the PRE period there was no RDT or ASP available. However, in the POST period, RDT was performed on all positive blood cultures, followed by feedback from an ASP. Secondary outcomes included time to effective antibiotic, antibiotic exposure, duration of bacteremia, hospital length of stay (LOS), transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), SAB recurrence, and inpatient mortality.ResultsSixty‐eight patients were included in the study (PRE: n = 32, POST: n = 36). Median time to optimal antibiotic therapy decreased by 23 hours (PRE: 44.3 hours vs POST: 21.3 hours; P = .008). Duration of bacteremia (PRE: 65 hours vs POST: 40.9 hours; P = .03) and inpatient mortality (PRE: 12.5% vs POST: 0%; P = .04) were also reduced. However, further review revealed that only one death was related to SAB. Differences in time to effective therapy, antibiotic exposure, and hospital LOS were not significantly different between the groups. There were similar rates of infectious disease (ID) consultation (PRE: 78% vs POST: 89%, P = .23), but a shorter time to central line removal in the POST group (PRE: 68.2 hours vs POST: 19.8 hours; P = .04). Throughout the study period, recurrence of SAB only occurred in one patient (PRE).ConclusionASP interventions, facilitated by RDT, resulted in a shorter time to optimal antibiotic therapy in children with SAB. Although these interventions may have led to improved overall SAB management, further studies are needed to confirm clinical benefits.

Early differentiation between uncomplicated and complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: Potential value and limitations of a clinical risk score.

ObjectiveA cornerstone in the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is the differentiation between a complicated and an uncomplicated SAB course. The ability to early and accurately identify patients with ‐ and without ‐ complicated bacteraemia may optimise the utility of diagnostics and prevent unnecessary prolonged antibiotic therapy.MethodsDevelopment and validation of a prediction score in SAB using demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from two independent Dutch cohorts; estimating the risk of complicated disease at the time of the first positive blood culture. Models were developed using logistic regression and evaluated by c‐statistics, ie area under the ROC‐curve, and negative predictive values (NPV).ResultsThe development‐ and validation cohorts included 150 and 183 patients, respectively. The most optimal prediction model included: mean arterial pressure, signs of metastatic infection on physical examination, leucocyte count, urea level and time to positivity of blood cultures (c‐statistic 0.82, 95% CI 0.74‐0.89). In the validation cohort, the c‐statistic of the prediction score was 0,77 (95% CI 0.69‐0.84). The NPV for complicated disease for patients with a score of ≤2 was 0.83 (95% CI 0.68‐0.92), with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.14 (95% CI 0.06‐0.31).ConclusionThe early SAB risk score helps to identify patients with high probability of uncomplicated SAB. However, the risk score's lacked absolute discriminative power to guide decisions on the management of all patients with SAB on its own. The heterogenicity of the disease and inconsistency in definitions of complicated SAB are important challenges in the development of clinical rules to guide the management of SAB.

A case study on Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: available treatment options, antibiotic R&D and responsible antibiotic-use strategies.

ObjectivesThis case study addresses: (i) antibiotic treatment options for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), for both empirical and targeted therapy; (ii) the current status of and priorities for the antibiotic pipeline to ensure access of effective antibiotics for SAB; and (iii) strategies for responsible antibiotic use relevant to the clinical management of SAB.MethodsEvidence to address the aims was extracted from the following information sources: (i) EUCAST and CLSI recommendations, summaries of product characteristics (SPCs), antibiotic treatment guidelines and the textbook Kucers’ The Use of Antibiotics; (ii) the www.clinicaltrial.gov database; and (iii) quality indicators for responsible antibiotic use.ResultsCurrent monotherapy treatment options for SAB include only three drug classes (β-lactams, glycopeptides and lipopeptides), of which two also cover MRSA bacteraemia (glycopeptides and lipopeptides). The analysis of the antibiotic pipeline and ongoing clinical trials revealed that several new antibiotics with S. aureus (including MRSA) coverage were developed in the past decade (2009–19). However, none belonged to a new antibiotic class or had superior effectiveness and their added clinical value for SAB remains to be proven. Responsible antibiotic use for the treatment of SAB was illustrated using 11 quality indicators.ConclusionsAwareness of the problem of a limited antibiotic arsenal, together with incentives (e.g. push incentives), is needed to steer the R&D landscape towards the development of novel and effective antibiotics for treating SAB. In the meantime, responsible antibiotic use guided by quality indicators should preserve the effectiveness of currently available antibiotics for treating SAB.

Management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) in the oncology patient: Further evidence supports prompt removal of central venous catheters and shorter duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy

SummaryBackgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is associated with relatively high risk of complications and high levels of mortality. Internationally, SAB management guidelines lack consensus and especially so regarding oncology patients. This is likely a reflection of insufficient randomised control trials (RCT) and the diversity of SAB patient populations. However, there are 2011 guidelines recommending a minimum of 14 days of appropriate IV antibiotic therapy for SAB.ObjectiveWe wished to determine whether our practice of shortened duration of intravenous antimicrobial therapy in favour of oral administration proved as effective as recommended guidelines in a mixed oncology patient cohort.MethodsRetrospective review of patient records that included any SAB episode among oncology patients from January 2002 to December 2015. Medical chart reviews were undertaken to determine patient demographics, clinical management & antimicrobial therapy, duration of stay, presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) and outcome.ResultsOur CVC removal rate was just 73% in SAB where CVC was the identified source of infection, with an attributable mortality rate (<4%) far lower than would be expected. Antimicrobial therapy durations were considerably lower (10 days) than current recommendations of 14 days IV therapy. The recurrence rate of 15% was also significantly lower than has been reported previously.ConclusionsOur observations contribute new insights concerning the management of SAB in oncology patients. Our findings suggest that therapeutic approaches should perhaps remain individualised and reflective of patient characteristics taking into consideration the complex nature of oncology patients.

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia management in a busy London DGH; is early switch to ceftriaxone safe?

Background: Standard of care for management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is 2-4 weeks intravenous (IV) flucloxacillin or glycopeptide. Ceftriaxone (CRO) is used to facilitate management of SAB under out-patient antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services once patients are medically stable, however published data on this approach are limited. Methods: Retrospective review of SAB cases at Homerton Hospital: 1st August 2015 to 31st July 2018. Cases were identified from the microbiology database and clinical data retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. Results: 83 cases of SAB were included. Median age was 56 years (IQR 45-74); 53 (63.9%) were male. 70 (84.3%) had complicated SAB, 4 (4.8%) had MRSA bacteraemia and 11/80 (13.8%) were PVL positive. After excluding patients who died or were transferred whilst on IV therapy; 8/11 (72.7%) uncomplicated SAB patients and 29/55 (52.7%) complicated SAB patients received the standard duration of IV anti-staphylococcal therapy. Median length of stay (LOS) was 32 days (IQR 16-52.5). 30-day mortality was 9.6%; in hospital mortality was 14.5%. Eight (8/83, 9.6%) patients switched to CRO prior to completion of standard IV flucloxacillin therapy to facilitate OPAT. Median length of IV flucloxacillin in this group was 12 days (IQR 7-16). Ceftriaxone MIC was performed on 1/8 isolates (3mg/L). 7/8 had complicated SAB. Median LOS was 13 days (IQR 9-17). There were no deaths or relapsed infections. 1 patient developed C. difficileinfection on CRO. Conclusion: In this cohort ceftriaxone was a safe and effective follow-on therapy from flucloxacillin for management of SAB and allowed reduced LOS.

Intermittent Negative Blood Cultures in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia; a Retrospective Study of 1071 Episodes.

BackgroundRecommended management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) includes follow-up blood culture sets (BCs) to determine the duration of bacteremia. Duration of bacteremia is an important prognostic factor in SAB, and follow-up BCs have a critical role in differentiation of uncomplicated and complicated SAB. However, intermittent negative BCs occur in SAB. Clinical guidelines for SAB management do not specify an approach to follow-up BCs’ collection or define the number of negative BCs required to demonstrate resolution of bacteremia. This study assessed the frequency of intermittent negative BCs in SAB and used these findings to formulate a recommendation for collection of follow-up BCs.MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed 1071 episodes of SAB. Clinical and microbiological data including the duration of bacteremia and the occurrence of intermittent negative BCs (those preceded and followed by positive cultures) were considered.ResultsIntermittent bacteremia occurred in 13% (140/1071) of episodes. A single negative BC on days 1–3 had a predictive value of 87%–93% for resolution of bacteremia, although this was improved if all BCs collected within the same day were considered.ConclusionsIntermittent negative BCs are common in SAB. Given this, we would not recommend accepting a single negative BC as demonstrating resolution of the bacteremia. This is particularly important if a patient is to be classified as having uncomplicated SAB.

854. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship and Rapid Diagnostics in Children with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BackgroundRapid diagnostic testing (RDT) in combination with antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has been associated with improved outcomes in adults with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). Data in children are lacking. In January 2017, Atrium Health implemented a pediatric ASP with blood culture RDT. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of those interventions.MethodsThis was a retrospective, multicenter, quasi-experimental study of children ≤18 years with monomicrobial SAB from March 2015 to August 2016 (pre-intervention; PRE) and March 2017 to August 2018 (post-intervention; POST). The primary outcome was time to an optimal antibiotic. Secondary outcomes included time to effective antibiotic, total antibiotic exposure in the first 5 days, duration of bacteremia, infectious diseases (ID) consultation, time to central line removal, hospital and pediatric ICU length of stay (LOS), need for vasopressors or intubation, recurrence of SAB within 90 days, and inpatient mortality.ResultsOf 101 patients with SAB, 32 and 36 met inclusion criteria for the PRE and POST groups, respectively. The median time to optimal antimicrobial therapy decreased by 23 hours (PRE 44.3 hours vs. POST 21.3 hours; P = 0.008). Duration of bacteremia (65h vs. 40.9 hours; P = 0.028) and mortality (12.5% vs. 0%; P = 0.044) was also significantly reduced. Differences in median time to effective therapy (7 hours vs. 5.1 hours; P = 0.74), total antibiotic exposure in the first 5 days (160.4 hours vs. 152 hours; P = 0.4), hospital LOS (9.9 vs. 8.5 days; P = 0.25), and pediatric ICU LOS (7 vs. 4 days; P = 0.11) did not meet statistical significance, but trended downward. The POST group had more patients with ID consultation (78% vs. 89%, P = 0.23) and shorter time to central line removal (68 hours vs. 20 hours; P = 0.037). There was no difference in the need for vasopressors (3 vs. 3 patients; P = 0.99) or intubation (2 vs. 4 patients; P = 0.68). Throughout the study period, recurrence of SAB only occurred in one patient (PRE).ConclusionConcurrent implementation of RDT and an ASP in pediatric patients with SAB decreased time to optimal antimicrobial therapy, duration of bacteremia, and mortality. RDT coupled with timely feedback from an ASP contributed to improved SAB management and clinical outcomes in children.Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

Disparity in Quality of Infectious Disease vs Addiction Care Among Patients With Injection Drug Use-Associated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Evidence-based interventions for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) are well known, but it is unclear how they are implemented among patients with injection drug use–associated (IDU) SAB. Of 46 patients with IDU-SAB identified, all received high-quality SAB management; however, few received appropriate recognition or treatment of their underlying substance use disorder.