14 EFFECT OF ARTHROSCOPIC CAPSULAR RELEASE ON SHOULDER STIFFNESS CONCOMITANT WITH A ROTATOR CUFF TEAR -DIABETES AS A PREDISPOSING FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH TREATMENT OUTCOME SeokWon Chung,MD, Kyung-Soo Oh, MD, Jong Pil Yoon, MD, Jin-Young Park, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; Kyungpook University Hospital, Dae-gu, South Korea Introduction: In spite of the high prevalence,optimal management of shoulder stiffness during rotator cuff repair remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of capsular release during rotator cuff repair on the outcomes of patients with both shoulder stiffness and a rotator cuff tear using subgroup analyses. Methods: Forty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 61.568.3 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of a small-to-large sized full-thickness rotator cuff tear and manipulation for concomitant shoulder stiffness (FF#120 and ER at side#45 ) were enrolled. The first 21 consecutive patients underwent manipulation alone to treat stiffness, and the second 28 consecutive patients underwent capsular release with manipulation. Among the 49 patients, 25 showed severe stiffness (FF#100 and ER at side#30 : 11 in the first series and 14 in the second series) and 15 (30.6%: 6 in the first series and 9 in the second series) had diabetes mellitus (DM). The postoperative ROM was measured 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and at final follow-up visit. Simultaneously, functional outcome was evaluated from pain VAS, ASES score, Constant score, and muscle strength ratio (involved/uninvolved), and cuff integrity was assessed ultrasonographically at least 1 year postoperatively. Results: All ROM, functional scores, and muscle strength ratios significantly improved postoperatively in all patients (all p<0.01). No outcome measure differed significantly between patients who did and did not undergo capsular release. However, among patients with severe stiffness, those who underwent capsular release showed greater improvement in ER at side 3 months postoperatively (p1⁄40.036) despite the lack of significant difference in the final outcome. Moreover, among patients with DM, those who underwent capsular release showed greater improvement in FF after 3 months and 1 year and in ER atside at all timepoints, except 6 weeks postoperatively (all p<0.05) and also a significantly higher final ASES score (p1⁄40.030). Two of 21 patients who underwent manipulation alone and 1 of 28 who underwent capsular release and manipulation developed retears. Conclusions: Both manipulation and capsular release with manipulation significantly improved ROM and produced satisfactory functional outcomes. However, in patients with severe stiffness, capsular release at the time of rotator cuff repair increased ER in early postoperative period. Capsular release was also beneficial in patients with diabetes, especially for ER and final postoperative function.