Management Of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Research Articles

The Role of Cisternostomy in the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Triple-Center Study

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a critical public health problem worldwide, constituting a major cause of mortality and morbidity for people of all ages, but especially in the younger population. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) and cisternostomy are surgical procedures commonly used in the management of severe TBI, but their effectiveness in improving outcomes remains controversial. Methods: We conducted a prospective longitudinal study on patients who underwent surgical treatment for severe TBI between 2021 and 2022. The extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOS-E) was used to assess clinical outcome at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Results: The study included 30 patients (21 men and 9 women) who met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 24 patients (80%) underwent DC combined with cisternostomy, while 6 patients (20%) underwent cisternostomy alone. The initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission ranged from 4 to 8 points, with an average score of 5.9. The overall mortality and overall morbidity was 13.3% and 20%, respectively. The mortality rate was 12.5% and 16.7% in the DC + cisternostomy group and in the cisternostomy alone group, respectively. No statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups in terms of mortality, morbidity and favorable outcome at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Conclusions: Our preliminary multi-center study shows a good clinical outcome in patients who underwent DC + cisternostomy or cisternostomy alone in both early and long-term follow-up. Larger multi-center randomized trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of cisternostomy in the management of TBI.

Racial Disparity in Placement of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: A TQIP Analysis.

The Brain Trauma Foundation recommends intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Race is associated with worse outcomes after TBI. The reasons for racial disparities in clinical decision-making around ICP monitor placement remain unclear. We queried the TQIP database from 2017 to 2019 and included patients 16 years or older, with blunt severe TBI, defined as a head abbreviated injury score 3 or greater. Exclusion criteria were missing race, those without signs of life on admission, length of stay 1 day or less, and AIS of 6 in any body region. The primary outcome was ICP monitor placement, which was calculated using a Poisson regression model with robust SEs while adjusting for confounders. A total of 260,814 patients were included: 218,939 White, 29,873 Black, 8,322 Asian, 2,884 American Indian, and 796 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Asian and American Indian patients had the highest rates of midline shift (16.5% and 16.9%). Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders had the highest rates of neurosurgical intervention (19.3%) and ICP monitor placement (6.5%). Asian patients were found to be 19% more likely to receive ICP monitoring (adjusted incident rate ratio 1.19; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33; p = 0.003], and American Indian patients were 38% less likely (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.79; p < 0.001), compared with White patients, respectively. No differences were detected between White and Black patients. ICP monitoring use differs by race. Further work is needed to elucidate modifiable causes of this difference in the management of severe TBI.

Kidney Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: Pathophysiology and General Management.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity, and almost half of these patients are admitted to the intensive care unit. Of those, 10% develop acute kidney injury (AKI) and 2% even need kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Although clinical trials in patients with TBI who have AKI are lacking, some general principles in this population may apply. The present review is an overview on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of AKI in patients with TBI admitted to the intensive care unit who are at risk for or who have developed AKI. A cornerstone in severe TBI management is preventing secondary brain damage, in which reducing the intracranial pressure (ICP) and optimizing the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) remain important therapeutic targets. To treat episodes of elevated ICP, osmolar agents such as mannitol and hypertonic saline are frequently administered. Although we are currently awaiting the results of a prospective randomized controlled trial that compares both agents, it is important to realize that both agents have been associated with an increased risk of developing AKI which is probably higher for mannitol compared with hypertonic saline. For the brain, as well as for the kidney, targeting an adequate perfusion pressure is important. Hemodynamic management based on the combined use of intravascular fluids and vasopressors is ideally guided by hemodynamic monitoring. Hypotonic albumin or crystalloid resuscitation solutions may increase the risk of brain edema, and saline-based solutions are frequently used but have a risk of hyperchloremia, which might jeopardize kidney function. In patients at risk, frequent assessment of serum chloride might be advised. Maintenance of an adequate CPP involves the optimization of circulating blood volume, often combined with vasopressor agents. Whether individualized CPP targets based on cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring are beneficial needto be further investigated. Interestingly, such individualized perfusion targets are also under investigation in patients as a strategy to mitigate the risk for AKI in patients with chronic hypertension. In the small proportion of patients with TBI who need KRT, continuous techniques are advised based on pathophysiology and expert opinion. The need for KRT is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hypertension, especially if osmolar clearance occurs fast, which can even occur in continuous techniques. Precise ICP and CPP monitoring is mandatory, especially at the initiation of KRT.

Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatric Patients.

The optimal management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the pediatric population has not been well studied. There are a limited number of research articles studying the management of TBI in children. Given the prevalence of severe TBI in the pediatric population, it is crucial to develop a reference TBI management plan for this vulnerable population. In this review, we seek to delineate the differences between severe TBI management in adults and children. Additionally, we also discuss the known molecular pathogenesis of TBI. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of TBI will inform clinical management and development of therapeutics. Finally, we propose a clinical algorithm for the management and treatment of severe TBI in children using published data.

Beta-Blocker Therapy in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among trauma patients worldwide, poses the risk of secondary neurological insult due to significant catecholamine surge. We aim to investigate the effectiveness and outcomes of beta-blocker administration in patients with severe TBI. A search through PubMed, EMBASE, JAMA network, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for relevant peer-reviewed original studies published before February 15, 2022. A standard random-effects model was used, as justified by a high Cohen's Q test. Twelve studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Severe TBI patients who were administered beta-blockers had a significantly reduced incidence of in-hospital mortality compared to the non-beta-blocker group (14.5% vs 19.2%). However, the beta-blocker group was reported to have a significantly greater number of ventilator days (5.58 vs 2.60days). Similarly, intensive care unit (9.00 vs 6.84days) and hospital (17.30 vs 11.02days) lengths of stay (LOS) were increased in the beta-blocker group compared to those who were not administered beta-blocker therapy, but only the difference in hospital-LOS was significant. Beta-blockers have significantly decreased in-hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI despite being associated with an increase in ventilator days and hospital-LOS. The administration of beta-blocker therapy in the management of severe TBI may be warranted and should be discussed in future guidelines.

Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of mortality and disability among trauma-related injuries. Neuromonitoring plays an essential role in the management and prognosis of patients with severe TBI. Our bibliometric study aimed to identify the knowledge base, define the research front, and outline the social networks on neuromonitoring in severe TBI. We conducted an electronic search for articles related to neuromonitoring in severe TBI in Scopus. A descriptive analysis retrieved evidence on the most productive authors and countries, the most cited articles, the most frequently publishing journals, and the most common author's keywords. Through a three-step network extraction process, we performed a collaboration analysis among universities and countries, a cocitation analysis, and a word cooccurrence analysis. A total of 1884 records formed the basis of our bibliometric study. We recorded an increasing scientific interest in the use of neuromonitoring in severe TBI. Czosnyka, Hutchinson, Menon, Smielewski, and Stocchetti were the most productive authors. The most cited document was a review study by Maas et al. There was an extensive collaboration among universities. The most common keywords were "intracranial pressure," with an increasing interest in magnetic resonance imaging and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring. Neuromonitoring constitutes an area of active research. The present findings indicate that intracranial pressure monitoring plays a pivotal role in the management of severe TBI. Scientific interest shifts to magnetic resonance imaging and individualized patient care on the basis of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.

Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Single Institution Experience in a Middle-Income Country.

Introduction: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem usually resulting in mortality or severe disabling morbidities of the victims. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is recently recognized as an imperative modality in the management of severe TBI, whereas growing evidence, based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs), suggests that ICP monitoring does not affect the outcome when compared with clinical and radiological data-based management. Also, ICP monitoring carries a considerable risk of intracranial infection that cannot be overlooked. The aim of this study is to assess the different aspects of our current local institutional management of severe TBI using non-invasive ICP monitoring for a potential need to change our management strategy.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our data of TBI from June 2019 through January 2020. Patients with severe TBI were identified. Their demographics, Glasgow coma score (GCS) at presentation, treatments received, and imaging data were extracted from the charts. Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOS-E) at 6 months was also assessed for the patients.Results: Twenty patients with severe TBI were identified on chart review. Ten patients received only medical treatment measures to lower the ICP, whereas the other 10 patients had additional surgical interventions. In one patient, a ventriculostomy tube was inserted to monitor ICP and to drain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This was complicated by ventriculostomy-associated infection (VAI) and the tube was removed. In our cohort, the total mortality rate was 40%. The average GOS-E for the survivor patients managed without ICP monitoring based on the clinical and radiological data was 6.2 at 6 months follow-up. The 6-month overall good outcome, based on GOS-E, was 33.3%.Conclusion: Although recent guidelines advocate for the use of ICP monitoring in the management of severe TBI, they remain underutilized in our practice due to many factors. External ventricular drains were mainly used to drain CSF; however, the higher rates of VAIs in our institution compared with the literature-reported rates are not in favor of the use of ICP monitoring. We recommend doing a comparative study between our current practice using clinical-and radiological-based management and subdural or intraparenchymal bolts. More structured RCTs are needed to validate these findings in our setting.

Multidisciplinary management of a traumatic posterior meningeal artery pseudoaneurysm: A case report and review of the literature.

BackgroundMeningeal arterial injuries represent <1% of all blunt traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Middle meningeal artery (MMA) lesions comprise the majority. However, there is little clinical data on posterior meningeal artery (PMA) injuries.Case reportA 69-year-old man was brought to our trauma center after sustaining a fall inside a warehouse. He was GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) 3 on arrival. Non-contrast CT (computed tomography) brain showed subarachnoid hemorrhage with diffuse cerebral edema and a basilar skull fracture. The patient subsequently underwent emergency ventriculostomy. Immediately after the procedure, further imaging with CTA (computed tomography angiography) head identified a hyperintense posterior cranial fossa lesion, prompting cerebral angiography with identification and embolization of a traumatic PMA pseudoaneurysm. The patient improved and was discharged to a long-term acute care facility. At 3 months post-discharge, the patient was eating, talking with family, and working aggressively with physical therapy.DiscussionThis case represents a functional neurologic outcome from a rare subset of TBI. Early CTA head imaging is not supported by limited literature, but allowed for expedient identification and definitive management of this PMA pseudoaneurysm. In the critical care setting, hyperosmolar therapy, CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) drainage, prompt enteral nutritional support, and early tracheostomy all represent evolving evidence-based strategies to optimize care for severe TBI.ConclusionsThe initial evaluation and management of severe TBI can be nuanced. Future research may refine indications for CTA head to the diagnostic evaluation of patients with both severe TBI and skull fractures.

Severe traumatic brain injury management in Tanzania: analysis of a prospective cohort.

Given the high burden of neurotrauma in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), in this observational study, the authors evaluated the treatment and outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) accessing care at the national neurosurgical institute in Tanzania. A neurotrauma registry was established at Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute, Dar-es-Salaam, and patients with severe TBI admitted within 24 hours of injury were included. Detailed emergency department and subsequent medical and surgical management of patients was recorded. Two-week mortality was measured and compared with estimates of predicted mortality computed with admission clinical variables using the Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) core model. In total, 462 patients (mean age 33.9 years) with severe TBI were enrolled over 4.5 years; 89% of patients were male. The mean time to arrival to the hospital after injury was 8 hours; 48.7% of patients had advanced airway management in the emergency department, 55% underwent cranial CT scanning, and 19.9% underwent surgical intervention. Tiered medical therapies for intracranial hypertension were used in less than 50% of patients. The observed 2-week mortality was 67%, which was 24% higher than expected based on the CRASH core model. The 2-week mortality from severe TBI at a tertiary referral center in Tanzania was 67%, which was significantly higher than the predicted estimates. The higher mortality was related to gaps in the continuum of care of patients with severe TBI, including cardiorespiratory monitoring, resuscitation, neuroimaging, and surgical rates, along with lower rates of utilization of available medical therapies. In ongoing work, the authors are attempting to identify reasons associated with the gaps in care to implement programmatic improvements. Capacity building by twinning provides an avenue for acquiring data to accurately estimate local needs and direct programmatic education and interventions to reduce excess in-hospital mortality from TBI.

Association between vasopressor use and mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan.

AimVasopressors are frequently incorporated into severe traumatic brain injury management algorithms. However, evidence regarding their clinical effectiveness is lacking. We undertook a nationwide retrospective cohort study to determine the association between vasopressor use and mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.MethodsData were collected between January 2004 and December 2018 from the Japanese Trauma Data Bank, which includes data from 272 emergency hospitals in Japan. Adults aged 16 years and over with severe traumatic brain injury but without major extracranial injuries were examined. A severe traumatic brain injury was defined based on a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3–8 on admission. Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were carried out. Statistical significance was assessed using 95% confidence intervals.ResultsIn total, 10,295 patients were eligible for analysis, with 654 included in the vasopressor group and 9,641 included in the nonvasopressor group. The proportion of deaths at hospital discharge was higher in the vasopressor group than in the nonvasopressor group (81.80% [535/654] versus 40.24% [3,880/9,641]). This finding was confirmed in a multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 5.37; 95% confidence interval, 4.23–6.81). Among propensity score‐matched patients adjusted for severity, the proportion of deaths at hospital discharge remained higher in the vasopressor group than in the nonvasopressor group (81.87% [533/651] versus 56.22% [366/651]) (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% confidence interval, 2.73–4.53).ConclusionThe study results suggest that vasopressor use in patients with severe isolated traumatic brain injury is associated with a higher mortality at hospital discharge.

Quality improvement in neurocritical care: current state and looking to the future.

Neurocritical care has matured as a field and there is now a growing body of literature on the subject of quality improvement in neurocritically ill patients. This review will highlight major recent contributions in this field and discuss future directions. Articles published in the past 18 months have evaluated neurocritical care unit staffing, structure, and disease-specific protocols including subarachnoid hemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury management. An assessment of current quality improvement practices in neurocritical care was also conducted. A neurocritical care-specific metric bundle is being proposed. The quality improvement movement is gaining momentum in neurocritical care with evaluation of general medical and surgical critical care quality improvement approaches in this specific patient population. Future work should focus on improving systems of neurocritical care delivery through iterative evaluation of structure, staffing, minimizing unnecessary variation, and evaluation of neurocritical care-specific metrics.

Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol

IntroductionIndividualising therapy is an important challenge for intensive care of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Targeting a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) tailored to optimise cerebrovascular autoregulation has been...

Book Review: Controversies in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Management

Book Review: Controversies in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Management

Variation in Guideline Implementation and Adherence Regarding Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Treatment: A CENTER-TBI Survey Study in Europe

Guidelines may reduce practice variation and optimize patient care. We aimed to study differences in guideline use in the management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and analyze reasons for guideline non-adherence. As part of a prospective, observational, multicenter European cohort study, participants from 68 centers in 20 countries were asked to complete 72-item questionnaires regarding their management of severe TBI. Six questions with multiple sub-questions focused on guideline use and implementation. Questionnaires were completed by 65 centers. Of these, 49 (75%) reported use of the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for the medical management of TBI or related institutional protocols, 11 (17%) used no guidelines, and 5 used other guidelines (8%). Of 54 centers reporting use of any guidelines, 41 (75%) relied on written guidelines. Four centers of the 54 (7%) reported no formal implementation efforts. Structural attention to the guidelines during daily clinical rounds was reported by 21 centers (38%). The most often reported reasons for non-adherence were "every patient is unique" and the presence of extracranial injuries, both for centers that did and did not report the use of guidelines. There is substantial variability in the use and implementation of guidelines in neurotrauma centers in Europe. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence underlying guidelines and to overcome implementation barriers.

The Evolving Concept of Damage Control in Neurotrauma: Application of Military Protocols in Civilian Settings with Limited Resources

The aim of the present review was to describe the evolution of the damage control concept in neurotrauma, including the surgical technique and medical postoperative care, from the lessons learned from civilian and military neurosurgeons who have applied the concept regularly in practice at military hospitals and civilian institutions in areas with limited resources. The present narrative review was based on the experience of a group of neurosurgeons who participated in the development of the concept from their practice working in military theaters and low-resources settings with an important burden of blunt and penetrating cranial neurotrauma. Damage control surgery in neurotrauma has been described as a sequential therapeutic strategy that supports physiological restoration before anatomical repair in patients with critical injuries. The application of the concept has evolved since the early definitions in 1998. Current strategies have been supported by military neurosurgery experience, and the concept has been applied in civilian settings with limited resources. Damage control in neurotrauma is a therapeutic option for severe traumatic brain injury management in austere environments. To apply the concept while using an appropriate approach, lessons must be learned from experienced neurosurgeons who use this technique regularly.

Standard of care, controversies, and innovations in the medical treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.

Severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) is characterized by a primary injury which cannot be reversed and a secondary injury that can be prevented or reversed. Management of STBI patients in intensive care mainly aims at preventing the secondary injury. Treatment aims to: reducing ICP pressure (that can result in an ischemic insult); avoiding hypotension, hyperthermia, or hypoxemia; maintaining a normal electrolytes homeostasis; treating the autonomic dysfunction syndrome, coagulopathies, acute kidney injury and maintaining an adequate nutrition. Many treatment protocols are already well established, while many others are still debated. Moreover, new frontiers in STBI management are represented by the neurovascular regeneration and neurorestoration which are showing very promising results even if most of them still need a clinical validation. In this paper we review standard of care, controversies and innovations in the medical treatment of STBI.

Implementation on clinical practice of current guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis is a leading cause of death and disability around the world. Sepsis-linked morbidity rate constantly grows, and this tendency, as expected, will be observed in the future.In this article the clinical case of critically ill patient 41 yrs. old R. is described in details and discussed. He suffered of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), complicated by sepsis in postoperative period. The analysis of diagnostics and treatment was conducted in relation to correspondence to current guidelines on severe TBI and sepsis. Treatment efficiency is appraised and contradictions are outlined that arise up during management of severe TBI, complicated by sepsis and multiorgan failure.It is set that efficiency of sepsis management is determined by its’early appeared diagnostic signs and appropriate prognostic conclusions. A choice of optimal treatment strategy for critical patients with TBI-induced systemic inflammatory responce syndrome is the crucial problem of intensive care. The main goal of management is a rescue of cerebrum. Application of elaborated and approved localprotocol for early diagnostics of sepsis will make possible the prevention of sepsis and septic shock at patients with severe TBI.

Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injuries: a closer look at level 1 trauma centers in the United States

IntroductionThe Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) recently updated recommendations for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The effect of ICP monitoring on outcomes is controversial, and compliance with BTF guidelines is variable. The purpose of this study was to assess both compliance and outcomes at level I trauma centers. Materials and methodsThe American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients admitted to level I trauma centers with isolated blunt severe TBI (AIS>3, GCS<9) who met criteria for ICP monitoring. Patients who had severe extracranial injuries, craniectomy, or death in the first 24h were excluded. Comparison between groups with and without ICP monitoring was made, analyzing demographics, comorbidities, mechanism of injury, head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), vital signs on admission, head CT scan findings. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation days, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, systemic complications, and functional independence at discharge. Multivariable analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for each of the outcomes. ResultsOverall, 4880 patients were included. ICP monitoring was used in 529 patients (10.8%). Stepwise logistic regression analysis identified ICP monitor placement as an independent risk factor for mortality (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.28–2.07; p<0.001), mechanical ventilation (OR 5.74 95% CI 4.42–7.46; p<0.001), ICU length of stay (OR 4.03; 95% CI 2.94–5.52; p<0.001), systemic complications (OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.29–3.37; p<0.001), and decreased functional independence at discharge (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.29–2.26; p<0.001). Subgroup analysis of patients with head AIS 3, 4, and 5 confirmed that ICP monitors remained an independent risk factor for mortality in both head AIS 4 and 5. ConclusionsCompliance with BTF guidelines for ICP monitoring is low, even at level I trauma centers. In this study, ICP monitoring was associated with poor outcomes, and was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal role of ICP monitoring in the management of severe TBI.

Predicting secondary insults after severe traumatic brain injury.

Secondary insults such as hypotension, hypoxia, cerebral hypoperfusion, and intracranial hypertension are associated with poor outcome following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Preventing and minimizing the effect of secondary insults are essential in the management of severe TBI. At present, clinicians have no way to predict the development of these events, limiting their ability to plan appropriate timing of interventions. We hypothesized that processing continuous vital signs (VS) data using machine learning methods could predict the development of future intracranial hypertension. Continuous VS including intracranial pressure (ICP), heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure data were collected from adult patients admitted to a single Level I trauma center requiring an ICP monitor. We tested the ability of Nearest Neighbor Regression (NNR) to predict changes in ICP by algorithmically learning from the patients' past physiology. Continuous VS were collected on 132 adult patients over a minimum of 3 hours per patient (5,466 hours total; 65,600 data points). Bland-Altman plots show that NNR provides good agreement in predicting actual ICP with a bias of 0.02 (±2 SD = 4 mm Hg) for the subsequent 5 minutes and -0.02 (±2 SD = 10 mm Hg) for the subsequent 2 hours. We have demonstrated that with the use of physiologic data, it is possible to predict with reasonable accuracy future ICP levels following severe TBI. NNR predicts ICP changes in clinically useful time frames. This ability to predict events may allow clinicians to make better decisions about the timing of necessary interventions, and this method could support the future development of minimally invasive ICP monitoring systems, which may lead to better overall clinical outcomes after severe TBI. Prognostic study, level III.

Evidence-based Prehospital Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparative Analysis of Current Clinical Practice Guidelines

Objective. This study appraised the completeness and level of evidence behind prehospital recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Differences and similarities in key recommendations for prehospital emergency care were assessed between current CPGs. Methods. A systematic search identified current evidence-based CPGs for the management of severe TBI. The identified CPGs were screened for prehospital recommendations. Finally, an evaluation of the completeness and level of evidence for each of the identified recommendations was carried out. A review of the literature identified additional evidence. Designs of the retrieved publications were considered and classified according to the GRADE levels of evidence. Results. This study identified 12 current CPGs for the management of patients after traumatic brain injury. Of these, twenty-one prehospital recommendations were selected. Only a few CPGs made recommendations on temperature management and ventilation patterns. Statements on prehospital transport and advanced airway management were common to all of the guidelines. Statements on initial treatment demonstrated the greatest variability. The literature review identified several relevant publications not included in the CPGs even after we controlled for the indicated time-intervals of their literature search. In addition, evidence from more recent trials published outside the search-interval of the clinical practice guidelines was found. Conclusions. The use of current guidelines on traumatic brain injury will not always facilitate decisions about best or most appropriate practice for prehospital practitioners. The amount of recommended prehospital interventions varied considerably, and there was large content variation in prehospital recommendations in these guidelines. Not all evidence was taken into account and not all CPGs were up-to-date.