Management Of Proximal Humeral Fractures Research Articles

Permissive Weight Bearing in Proximal Humeral Fracture Management: A Survey-Based Inquiry in the Netherlands.

Purpose Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are common, particularly among the elderly due to low-energy trauma. Adequate rehabilitation is essential for functional recovery, whether through conservative or surgical treatment. Permissive weight bearing (PWB) is a relatively new rehabilitation concept, characterized by earlier mobilization of the affected limb/joint after trauma. Multiple studies demonstrated the value of PWB for the lower extremities, but this has not been translated to the upper extremity (i.e. PHF). Therefore, our aim was to investigate the current state and variability of rehabilitation of PHF and the role of implementing PWB principles in aftercare. Materials and methods An online survey, comprising 23 questions about the treatment of PHF, was distributed amongst an estimated 800 Dutch orthopaedic and trauma surgeons via the Dutch Orthopaedic and Dutch Trauma Society newsletter from May 2021 until July 2021. Results Among 88 respondents (n=69 orthopaedic, n=17 trauma surgeons, and n=2 other), most recommended early post-trauma mobilization (<6 weeks). Additionally, 53.4% (n=49) advised starting load bearing after six weeks for conservatively treated patients and 59.8% (n=52) for operative treatment. A wide variation of exercises used after immobilization was found in both groups. The usage of a sling after operative treatment was advised by 86% (n=74) of all 86 respondents. Conclusions The present study found limited consensus about PHF aftercare and the implementation of weight-bearing principles. The majority recommended early mobilization and advised the usage of a sling. A protocol capable of accommodating the diversity in aftercare (e.g. fracture type) is essential for maintaining structured rehabilitation, with PWB emerging as a promising example. More prospective studies are needed to form an evidence-based protocol focusing on the aftercare of PHF.

Operative management of proximal humeral fractures using combined osteosynthesis

Operative management of proximal humeral fractures using combined osteosynthesis

Trends in the surgical management of proximal humerus fractures in Ireland from 2009 to 2022: An increasing usage of reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures are a common injury accounting for a significant workload across orthopaedic departments. Though often managed non-operatively, surgical management is indicated for a proportion of patients.AimsThe aim of this study is to examine the trends in the management of proximal humeral fractures within Ireland over the past 13 years.MethodsA retrospective review of Irish Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) data was performed between January 2009 and December 2022. Information regarding demographics including age and gender, along with procedure type were collated after patients with proximal humerus fractures, were identified using relevant ICD 10 codes.ResultsDemographic details remained stable with females and those within the 55–69 year age bracket accounting for the highest proportion of patients. The mean annual number of procedures performed across the study period was 365 (273–508), with an increase from 288 cases in 2009 to 441 in 2022. Open reduction and internal fixation were the most common procedures accounting for 76.4% of cases. There has been a rising usage of total shoulder arthroplasty for fixation with an increase from < 5 cases in 2016 to 84 in 2022. A decrease in the usage of hemiarthroplasty and closed reduction internal fixation was also observed.ConclusionsThere has been an increasing volume of operatively managed proximal humeral fractures in Ireland, which sustained despite the 2015 publication of the highly publicised PROPHER trial. The increasing utilisation of total shoulder arthroplasty in acute trauma management is notable and necessitates appropriate training for trauma theatre personnel.

Proximal humerus fractures: A review of current practice

The management of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) remains controversial. Its incidence is increasing. Patients should be meticulously assessed clinically for co-morbidities and neuro-vascular injuries. Radiological investigation helps provide information on the fracture configuration and dislocations. Enhanced by 3-dimensional CT scanning, these further help in decision making and operative planning. PHF classifications have been demonstrated to have poor intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. Research has identified some radiographic predictive factors for humeral head ischaemia and likely failure of surgical fixation. The range of management options include non-operative treatment, operative fixation, intramedullary nailing and arthroplasty (hemiarthroplasty, reverse shoulder replacement).The majority of PHFs are stable injuries and non-operative management is usually successful. Some degree of malunion is readily tolerated especially by elderly patients. Surgical management of significantly displaced, unstable proximal humerus fractures should aim to stabilise the fracture adequately and provide satisfactory function for the long term. Management of the greater tuberosity is pivotal for the eventual outcome. When fixation may appear to be compromised by poor bone quality, likely poor function, age related rotator cuff degeneration or likely humeral head ischaemia clinicians may opt for arthroplasty. Successful hemiarthroplasty outcomes are dependent on sufficient healing of the tuberosity and recovery of the rotator cuff integrity. Reverse shoulder replacement can predictably deliver good functional outcomes for the shoulder in elderly patients, where rotator cuff dysfunction is suspected or as a revision procedure following failure of other surgical interventions. As opposed to hemiarthroplasty, which has shown a downward trend, there has been an increasing trend towards the use of reverse shoulder replacement in proximal humeral fractures. The management of PHFs should be patient specific, fracture specific and meet the functional demands and needs of the individual patient. The surgeon's skill set and clinical experience also plays an important role in the options of management available.

Age-Related changes in the morphological features of medial column of the proximal humerus in the Chinese population.

Age-related changes in the medial column (MC) of the proximal humerus have a major impact on fracture management; however, the changes in the morphological features remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the age-related changes in the morphological features of MC and present the morphological grading. One hundred computed tomography (CT) images of the proximal humerus of 100 individuals (19-95 years) were retrospectively obtained. The individuals were categorized into five age groups to quantify the differences among different ages; the youngest group (18-44 years) served as the baseline group. Parameters of the morphological features were measured on CT images with multiplanar reconstruction based on an explicit definition of MC, including length, thickness, width, oblique thickness (DSM), humeral head diameter (DHM), and ratio (RSM) of DSM to DHM. The morphological grading of MC was presented based on the value of RSM deviating different standard deviations (SD) from the mean value in the baseline group. Significant negative correlations were observed between age and the morphological parameters of MC (r ranged from -0.875 to -0.926; all P < 0.05), excluding DHM (r = 0.081, P = 0.422). Significant differences in the values of morphological feature parameters were detected among the five age groups (all P < 0.001). The highest mean values of morphological feature parameters were observed in the youngest group (18-44 years), which decreased gradually with increasing age until the lowest mean values were observed in the oldest group (≥90 years) (all P < 0.05). The morphological features of MC were categorized into three grades based on the value of RSM deviating 1.5 SD or 3 SD from the mean value in the baseline group. Our study shows that the parameter values of morphological features of MC decreased with increasing age. The morphological features of MC could be categorized into three grades. Our findings may provide a more comprehensive insight into age-related changes in the morphological features of MC that facilitate risk stratification and optimize the management of proximal humeral fractures.

Anatomical variation in humeri: gender and side comparison using statistical shape modelling.

The surgical management of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging. Anatomical reduction of the fracture has been reported as the keystone for a sufficient surgical fixation and successful outcome. However, mostly there is no example of its premorbid state. Literature suggests that the mirrored contralateral side can be used as a reconstruction template. But is this a correct technique to use? The purpose of this study is to define anatomical variation between humeri based on gender and side comparison. Two different statistical shape models of the humerus were created and their modes of variation were described. One model contained 110 unpaired humeri. The other model consisted of 65 left and corresponding right humeri. The compactness of the statistical shape model containing 110 humeri showed that two principal components explain more than 95% of the variation and the generalization showed that a random humerus can be described with an accuracy of 0.39mm. For only three parameters, statistically significant differences were observed between left and right. However, comparing the mean of the different metrics on the humeri of men and women, almost all were significant. Since there were only small differences between left and right humeri, using the mirrored contralateral side as a reconstruction template for fracture reduction can be defended. The variable anatomy between men and women could explain why locking plates not always fit to the bone.

Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Differences in function, pain, and reoperation rates were compared between the following treatment options: (1) operative vs. nonoperative treatment and (2) various surgical treatments including open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched through February 1, 2022. All English-language randomized trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a control group in patients 18 years or older were included. Demographic data, functional and pain scores and re-operation rates were extracted. Study quality was determined with the Cochran risk of bias tool and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Heterogeneity was determined with the I-squared statistic. Meta-analysis of included studies using mean difference and odds ratios where appropriate. Surgical treatment with either locked plates or HA results in similar functional scores and pain outcomes as nonoperative treatment, although plates were associated with higher reoperation rates in 3-part and 4-part fractures. In 3-part and 4-part fractures, RSA results in higher function and pain scores compared with HA. Further high-quality trials should focus on RSA, and further study is required to better define the role of open reduction internal fixation in the younger patient population. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fragility of randomized controlled trials on treatment of proximal humeral fracture.

Proximal humeral fracture represents an increasingly common pathology with evaluation and treatment often guided by evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), but the strength of an RCT must be considered in this process. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strength of outcomes in RCTs on the management of proximal humeral fractures using the fragility index (FI), a method used with statistically significant dichotomous outcomes to assess the number of patients that would change an outcome measure from significant (P ≤ .05) to nonsignificant if the patient outcome changed. We also aimed to correlate the FI with other measures of study strength. A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate RCTs on the management of proximal humeral fractures. The PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from database inception to May 2021. RCTs with at least 1 statistically significant (P ≤ .05) dichotomous outcome were included. The FI was calculated for each included trial using the Fisher exact test. The FI was correlated with the study sample size and journal impact factor. Ten RCTs reporting on 656 patients and published between 2011 and 2020 were included. The median patient sample size was 67 (mean, 65.6; range, 40-86). Complications were the most commonly reported dichotomous statistically significant outcome. The median FI was 1 (mean, 2.6; range, 0-18), with 4 studies having an FI of 0. A median FI of 1 indicates that 1 patient experiencing an alternative outcome or having not been lost to follow-up could have changed the pertinent conclusions of the trial for a given outcome. The median number of patients lost to follow-up was 3 (mean, 4.9; range, 0-16) and exceeded the FI in 50% of studies. There was no correlation between the FI and sample size (Spearman coefficient = 0.0592, P = .865) or between the FI and journal impact factor (Spearman coefficient = -0.0229, P = .522). In most studies of proximal humeral fractures, only 1 or 2 patients experiencing an alternative outcome or lost to follow-up would change the conclusions for the dichotomous outcome studied. Although the FI cannot be used to assess continuous variables, which are often the primary outcome variables of RCTs, it does offer an additional unique measure of study strength that surgeons should consider when evaluating RCTs.

Surgical Fixation of Three- and Four-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures Using the Proximal Humeral Interlocking System Plate.

IntroductionThe management of proximal humeral fractures ranges greatly from conservative management to surgical treatment. For those fractures requiring surgical treatment, internal fixation is the primary method. The aim of internal fixation is to achieve rigid fracture fixation until union occurs, return of shoulder range of motion, and minimise intra-and postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the Proximal Humeral Interlocking System Plate (PHILOS) used for the treatment of three-and four-part proximal humeral fractures.Materials and methodsThis study included 30 patients with a mean age of 54 years (range 20-80 years). Results were checked post-operatively with standard radiographs and clinical evaluation according to the Constant-Murley shoulder score. All patients were followed up for 12 months.ResultsUnion was achieved in all patients with a mean neck/shaft angle of 130° (range 108°-150°). The mean Constant-Murley score at the final follow-up was 82.28 (range 67-96) correlating with good results. No patients developed an intraoperative or postoperative vascular injury, wound complications, or avascular necrosis of the humeral head.ConclusionOur study has shown that the surgical treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures with the use of the PHILOS plate leads to a good functional outcome. It has also demonstrated the PHILOS plate and is an effective system for fracture stabilisation provided the correct surgical technique is used with awareness of potential hardware complications.

Specific Radiologic Risk Factors for Implant Failure and Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head after Interlocking Nailing with the Targon PH+ of Proximal Humeral Fractures in a Middle to Old Population.

Background: Operative management of proximal humeral fractures is still challenging. While antegrade nailing has become a valid option in fracture fixation, risk factors for adverse events, and failure have not been sufficiently clarified. Methods: All patients of a single trauma center undergoing surgery for proximal humeral fractures with the Targon PH+ nail between 2014 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. This included complications, revisions, and failures. Pre- and postoperative radiographic imaging were assessed regarding fracture’s complexity, anatomic reduction, reconstruction of the medial hinge, metaphyseal head extension, and fixation of the implant in the calcar region. Follow-up was at a minimum of 12 months. Results: A total number of 130 patients with a mean age of 74.5 years (range 63–94, SD ± 8.2) are included in this study. Two- and three-part fractures were found in 58 patients, while 14 patients showed four-part fractures. Overall, a complication rate of 34.2% and an implant failure rate of 15.4% was found. Four-part fractures showed a significantly higher complication rate than two- and three-part fractures. Four-part fractures also showed significantly higher revisions (p = 0.005) and implant failures (p = 0.008). The nonsufficient anatomical reduction was found to be a risk factor for complications (p < 0.0001), implant failures (p < 0.0001), and later humeral head osteonecrosis (p < 0.0001). Insufficiently reconstructed medial hinges (p = 0.002) and a metaphyseal head extension of over 8 mm (p = 0.005) were also demonstrated as risk factors for osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Conclusions: Four-part fractures in an elderly population show high complication, revision, and implant-failure rates. Therefore, demonstrated radiologic risk factors should be evaluated for improvements. Anatomical reduction and fixation near the calcar proved to be vital for successful antegrade nailing of complex fractures. To prevent osteonecrosis of the humeral head, reconstruction of the medial hinge and metaphyseal head extension should be evaluated.

Evaluation of Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System in Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures

Evaluation of Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System in Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures

Proximal humeral fractures treated with an intramedullary cage and plate: clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively

Proximal humeral fractures are common injuries. Although certain fracture types may benefit from surgery including open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF), the optimal method for fixation is unclear. Newer implant designs that improve healing by minimizing hardware failure and recurrent fracture displacement may optimize clinical outcomes. Over a 27-month period, 37 consecutive patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated by a single surgeon with a lateral humeral plate through which an intramedullary nitinol cage was inserted. Additional screws were placed through the tuberosities and cage as required. Fractures were classified by both the Neer classification and angulation or displacement in the coronal plane. At most recent follow-up, radiographic results, patient-reported outcome measurements, range of motion, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Thirty-one patients had a minimum of 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The average follow-up period was 91 weeks. By use of the Neer classification, there were 4 two-part, 21 three-part, and 6 four-part fractures. Twenty-one fractures were displaced in valgus and 10 in varus. Outcome measurements at most recent follow-up demonstrated an average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 68; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score of 70; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 27; Veterans RAND-12 Physical Component Score of 37 and Mental Component Score of 51; Constant score of 55; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score of 29; and Oxford Shoulder Score of 23. Average active range of motion showed forward elevation of 134°, abduction of 91°, external rotation with the arm at the side of 30° (range, -10° to 60°), and internal rotation with the arm at the side to L1 (range, T6-S4). There were 11 complications (35%), including 2 cases of axillary nerve neurapraxia that resolved and 4 cases of avascular necrosis (13%). Unplanned reoperations were performed in 6 patients (19%). One patient underwent revision for loose hardware removal, 1 patient underwent revision ORIF after a fall, and 4 patients required component removal and revision to shoulder arthroplasty. No screw cutout or varus head collapse occurred. The management of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging. Our results demonstrate similar fracture healing, clinical improvement, and complication rates compared with conventional ORIF with screws and a side plate. At 1 year of follow-up, there were low rates of recurrent fracture displacement and screw cutout. There was a higher-than-expected rate of avascular necrosis as compared with other studies using a similar fixation construct. Larger studies and longer follow-up may demonstrate decreased rates of revision surgery and superior outcomes. Additional studies may determine whether this fixation method is superior to others for proximal humeral fractures.

Outcomes of Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Patient-Specific, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms.

Previous studies have identified risk factors for different types of treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) and allowed the development of a patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithm with the potential of improving overall outcomes and reducing complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of treating PHF using this algorithmic approach. All patients with isolated PHF between 2014 and 2017 were included and prospectively followed. The initial treatment algorithm (Version 1 [V1]) based on patients' functional needs, bone quality, and type of fracture was refined after 2 years (Version 2 [V2]). Adherence to protocol, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed at a 1-year follow-up. The study included 334 patients (mean age, 66 years; 68% female): 226 were treated nonoperatively; 65, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); 39, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); and 4, with hemiarthroplasty. At 1 year, the preinjury EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) values were regained (0.88 and 0.89, respectively) and the mean relative Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (and standard deviation [SD]) were 96% ± 21% and 85% ± 16%. Overall complications and revision rates were 19% and 13%. Treatment conforming to the algorithm outperformed non-conforming treatment with respect to relative CS (97% versus 88%, p = 0.016), complication rates (16.3% versus 30.8%, p = 0.014), and revision rates (10.6% versus 26.9%, p < 0.001). Treating PHF using a patient-specific, evidence-based algorithm restored preinjury quality of life as measured with the EQ-5D and approximately 90% normal shoulders as measured with the relative CS and the SSV. Adherence to the treatment algorithm was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes and substantially reduced complication and revision rates. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Analyzing outcomes after proximal humerus fractures in patients

There has been an increasing amount of interest and research examining best practices for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHF). Recent, high-level randomized control trials and many retrospective cohort studies have failed to demonstrate clear benefit of surgical management for these injuries especially in the elderly (generally defined as ≥65 years old). There is a paucity of research available on outcomes after surgical and nonsurgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in adults younger than 65 years, and comparative data are almost nonexistent. The purpose of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the available data to determine if the literature supports surgical management over conservative treatment for PHFs in adults younger than 65 years. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of proximal humerus fractures was performed using MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases. Studies were included if they reported useable data such as outcome measures for adult patients younger than 65 years. Quality of nonrandomized studies was assessed utilizing the MINORs criteria. Extracted data were analyzed using statistical software with P-value set at 0.05. Six studies were included in the study for data extraction and statistical analysis. When comparing Constant Scores (CS) and Oxford Shoulder Scores (OSS) of operatively and nonoperatively treated adult patients aged less than 65 years, no statistical differences were found. Furthermore, no statistical differences in CS or OSS were found comparing elderly patients (defined as ≥65 years) and adult patients (defined as 18 to <65 years). Analysis of DASH outcome data did show statistical differences of the three cohorts (nonoperative <65, operative <65, and operative ≥65). Thus, only the limb-specific (not joint specific) outcome score (DASH) was found to be significantly different upon data analysis. Differences in shoulder-specific outcome scores (OSS and CS) failed to meet significance. The available literature does not demonstrate a clear clinical benefit of operative treatment over nonoperative management of proximal humeral fractures in adult patients younger than 65 years. These results challenge the widely accepted practice of choosing surgical treatment in adult patients younger than 65 years with PHFs.

Management of proximal humeral fractures: a review

Proximal humeral fractures are a common orthopaedic injury. Although many proximal humeral fractures are managed nonoperatively, operative management can result in improved functional outcome when appropriately indicated. Commonly utilized surgical treatment options include open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), arthroplasty, percutaneous fixation, and intramedullary fixation. The most commonly used classification remains the Neer fracture classification. The authors present a comprehensive review of the epidemiology, relevant anatomy, biomechanics, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of proximal humeral fractures.

Assessment of the efficacy of the far cortical locking technique in proximal humeral fractures: a comparison with the conventional bi-cortical locking technique

BackgroundLocking plate fixation is one of the treatment strategies for the management of proximal humeral fractures. However, stiffness after locking plate fixation is a clinical concern. The mechanical stiffness of the standard locking plate system may suppress the interfragmentary motion necessary to promote secondary bone healing by callus formation. The far cortical locking (FCL) technique was developed to address this limitation in 2005. FCL increases construct flexibility and promotes callus formation. Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of the FCL technique when implemented in proximal humeral fracture management. Furthermore, we compared the surgical outcomes of FCL with those of the conventional bicortical locking (BCL) screw fixation technique.MethodsForty-five consecutive patients who had undergone locking fixation for proximal humeral fractures were included in this study. A proximal humeral locking plate (PHILOS) system with BCL screw fixation was used in the first 27 cases, and the periarticular proximal humeral locking plate with FCL screw fixation was used in the final 18 consecutive cases. Functional capacity was assessed using the constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated using the Paavolainen method of measuring the neck-shaft angle (NSA).ResultsNo significant differences in clinical outcomes (ASES score, constant score, and range of motion) were found between the two groups. The union rate at 12 weeks was significantly higher in the FCL group (94.4%) than in the BCL group (66.7%, p = 0.006). No significant differences in NSA were found between the two treatment strategies. The complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsWhen implemented in proximal humeral fractures, the FCL technique showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes as compared with the conventional BCL technique. The bone union rate at 12 weeks after surgery was significantly higher in the FCL group than in the BCL group. However, no significant difference in the final bone union rate was found between the two groups.

Analysis of surgical management of proximal humeral fractures

Analysis of surgical management of proximal humeral fractures

Locking Plates versus Locking Intramedullary Nails Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures Involving the Humeral Shaft: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundFor proximal humeral fractures (PHFs), locking intramedullary nails and locking plates have been widely used. However, few reports have been published on the therapy of complex PHFs accompanying humeral shaft fractures. Therefore, we performed this research to analyze the effectiveness of locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the management of proximal humeral fractures involving the humeral shaft.Material/MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 40 cases diagnosed with proximal humeral fractures involving the humeral shaft fixed with either locking intramedullary nails or locking plates with at least of 2 years’ follow-up. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records. Follow-up data included the Constant-Murley score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), visual analog scale score (VAS), and the relative strength of the supraspinatus and deltoid muscles.ResultsIn total, 19 locking plate patients and 21 locking intramedullary nail patients were analyzed. The average follow-up period was 35 months in the locking plate group and 34 months in the locking intramedullary nail group. There were obvious differences in the intraoperative blood loss, time of operation, and the length of operative incision between the 2 groups (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in Constant-Murley score, ASES, VAS, or the relative strength of supraspinatus and deltoid muscles.ConclusionsFor PHFs involving the humeral shaft, both locking plates and locking intramedullary nails can achieve satisfactory functional results in the long-term follow-up assessment. The locking intramedullary nail group was superior with regards to intraoperative blood loss, time of operation, and length of incision.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty compared to stemmed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: a registry analysis of 5946 patients

There is an increasing trend towardthe use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) over stemmed hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the management of proximal humeral fractures. There are limited data available comparing the revision rates for RTSA and HA in the setting of a fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the revision rates for RTSA and HA when used for the treatment of a fracture and to analyze the effect of demographics and prosthesis fixation on these revision rates. Data obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registryfrom April 16, 2004, to December 31, 2017, included all procedures for primary diagnosis proximal humeral fracture. The analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship and hazard ratiosfrom Cox proportional hazards models. Over the study period, there were 3049 (51%) RTSA and 2897 (49%) HA procedures. The cumulative percent revisionrate at 9 years was lower for the RTSA than for the HA: 7.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-10.1) compared with 11.7% (95% CI, 10.3-13.2). Between 0 and 6 months, the HA had a significantly lower revision rate than the RTSA (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.72; P < .001). Between 6 month and 3 years, the HA had a significantly higher revision rate. For the RTSA, males have a significantly higher rate of revision compared with females. There is a higher rate of early revision due to instability in younger persons (55-64) and males. For both RTSA and HA, cemented prostheses have lower revision rates compared with cementless prostheses. RTSA has a significantly lower revision rate compared with HA for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in females. Younger patients (<65) and males are at risk of early revision secondary to instability. In these patient groups, either alternatives to RTSAor further attention to fixation of tuberosities and shoulder rehabilitationmay be indicated.

Complications after surgical management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of event terms and definitions

BackgroundThe most frequently used surgical procedures for treating a proximal humeral fracture (PHF) are plate osteosynthesis, nail osteosynthesis and arthroplasty. Evidence-based recommendations for an appropriate surgical procedure after PHF requires transparent and valid safety data. We performed a systematic review to examine reported terms and definitions of complications after surgically-treated PHFs.MethodsA literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus and WorldCat to identify clinical articles and book chapters on complications of PHF published from 2010 to 2017. Complication terms and definitions were extracted from each selected article independently by two reviewers and grouped according to a predefined scheme.ResultsFrom 1376 initial references, we selected 470 articles, of which 103 were reviewed in reverse chronological order until no further information was gained. Twelve book chapters were reviewed. We found 667 local event terms associated with complications after surgical treatment of PHFs. The most frequently used event terms were infection (52 references), nonunion (n = 42), malunion (n = 35), avascular necrosis (n = 27) and pain (n = 25). Overall, 345, 177, 257 and 102 local event terms were related to plating, nailing, arthroplasty and other surgical techniques, respectively. Radiological assessment was the basis for the majority of event terms and complication definitions. Thirty-six event definitions were extracted, mostly defining the terms “secondary fracture displacement”, “screw perforation/cutout”, “malunion”, “delayed healing” and “notching”.ConclusionScientific literature on surgically-managed PHF uses different terms to describe complications and without approved definitions, which highlights a lack of agreement on adverse event terminology for PHFs. Defined event terms are mostly based on radiological observations. Consensus among shoulder surgeons on a core event set is indispensable to support the standardization of safety reporting for surgically-treated PHFs.