Postoperative Pain Management Research Articles

Innovations in Pain Management for Abdominoplasty Patients: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: Abdominoplasties are prevalent surgical procedures for improving lower abdominal contours, necessitating effective pain management. Insufficient management can increase opioid usage, dependency risks, and adverse effects. This review investigates various strategies in abdominoplasty pain management, aiming to reduce opioid dependence and improve patient care. Methods: A comprehensive systematic literature search (MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE) was conducted, spanning from their inception to January 2024, using keywords such as ‘abdominoplasty’ and ‘postoperative pain management’. Included studies focused on nonopioid interventions in adults, encompassing various study designs. Non-English publications and those not meeting outcome criteria were excluded. Bias in studies was assessed using specific tools for randomized and non-randomized trials. Results: Thirty-five studies, published between 2005 and 2024, were included, involving 3636 patients with an average age of 41.8. Key findings highlighted the effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane blocks in reducing opioid use and pain. Pain pump catheters also showed promise in improving pain management and reducing opioid dependency. Local anesthetics demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy, while other alternatives like ketamine and NSAIDs successfully reduced postoperative pain and opioid requirements. The bias assessment of the RCTs revealed “low” and “some concerns” ratings, indicating a need for more detailed methodology reporting and management of missing data. The cohort studies generally attained “moderate” risks of bias, primarily due to confounding variables and outcome data reporting. Conclusions: Nonopioid analgesics show potential in postoperative pain management for abdominoplasties, but further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness and optimize patient care.

Comparative efficacy of erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks in managing postoperative pain for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Effective postoperative pain management after total abdominal hysterectomy is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction. This study compared the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in reducing postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients with total abdominal hysterectomy. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, 90 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were divided into 3 groups: ESPB, QLB, and control. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included pain scores assessed by the visual analog scale at predetermined times and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The ESPB and QLB groups showed a significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption compared with the control group (P < .001 for both comparisons). Pain scores were significantly lower in the ESPB and QLB groups than in the control group at 2, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively (P < .001 at each time point). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower in the ESPB and QLB groups than that in the control group; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .029). No significant differences were observed in opioid consumption or pain scores between the 2 groups. Both the erector spinae plane and quadratus lumborum blocks effectively reduced postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients with total abdominal hysterectomy. These techniques offer a promising approach for postoperative pain management, potentially reducing the need for opioids.

The analgesic benefit of rectus sheath block in robotic gynecologic surgery: A retrospective study.

With the growing adoption of robotic techniques in gynecologic surgery, the advantages of minimally invasive procedures over traditional open surgery, such as reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery, are clear. Yet, establishing an effective multimodal analgesic regimen remains a challenge. This retrospective study from a tertiary care center aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of the rectus sheath block (RSB) on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after robotic gynecologic surgery. Between June 2022 and March 2023, 20 patients who underwent robotic gynecologic surgery were evaluated. Key parameters included postoperative visual analog scale scores, opioid consumption, and postoperative nausea/vomiting instances. Anesthesia protocols were standardized, with postsurgical pain management involving RSB and a patient-controlled analgesia device filled with morphine. Patients showed an average morphine intake of 8.2 ± 5.09 mg over the initial 24 hours postsurgery. During mobilization, average pain scores were consistently low, with no correlation identified between opioid consumption and age or body mass index. 40% of patients reported postoperative nausea on the first day, and no complications linked to the RSB were observed. The study underlines the potential of integrating RSB in a multimodal analgesic regimen after robotic gynecologic surgery. Its application may lead to reduced opioid consumption and more efficient postoperative pain management. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to validate these findings.

Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for treatment of post refractive surgery pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

For ophthalmic patients, eye discomfort is a major problem that requires efficient pain treatment techniques. Pregabalin and gabapentin have surfaced as viable treatments for post-refractive surgery pain. To manage pain after refractive surgery, gabapentin and pregabalin were evaluated in this systematic review and meta-analysis. A thorough search of databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL was performed until March 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials assessing pregabalin and/or gabapentin's effectiveness in treating pain post-PRK, LASIK, and LASEK surgeries. Six studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 391 patients undergoing various corneal surgeries. The meta-analysis revealed that pregabalin was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain on the first and second postoperative days (SMD day 1: -0.32, 95% CI -0.54, -0.09; SMD day 2: -0.55, 95% CI -0.85, -0.25), while gabapentin showed significant pain reduction on the second day only (SMD day 2: -0.42, 95% CI -0.71, -0.13). Combined analysis for both medications showed significant pain reduction on the first- and second-days post-surgery. No significant increase in adverse events was associated with either medication. Publication bias was minimal except for a slight asymmetry noted on day 1 effectiveness. Pregabalin and gabapentin are effective in reducing postoperative pain following refractive surgeries, with pregabalin showing a greater effect. Both medications are safe, with no significant increase in adverse events. Further research with standardized methodologies and long-term follow-up is recommended to optimize postoperative pain management in ocular surgeries.

Comparative evaluation of analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine transdermal patch and fentanyl transdermal patch in the management of postoperative pain after lower limb surgery

Background: Postoperative pain represents a significant medical issue that needs immediate attention. Despite advancements in pain management, managing postoperative pain remains challenging. Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) offers a straightforward, reliable, non-invasive, and patient-friendly approach for alleviating post-surgical pain. Hence, this study was planned to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine and fentanyl transdermal patch in the management of post-operative pain after lower limb surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomised study, 82 adult patients of either sex undergoing elective lower limb surgery were randomly allocated into two groups- Group A (Transdermal Buprenorphine 20 mg patch) and Group B (Transdermal Fentanyl 50 mcg patch). Postoperative pain was assessed by 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) every 6 hours following surgery on the first day and then daily for next 4 days. All patients were also monitored for total rescue analgesic requirement, drug-related adverse effect and haemodynamic status. Statistical analysis was carried out using student t-test and Chi-square test. A p-value &lt;0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean pain intensity scores were found to be significantly different (p&lt;0.0001) between the two groups, with VAS scores consistently lower in Buprenorphine group as compared to Fentanyl group. Also, Buprenorphine group had the lowest demand for rescue analgesic, with 58.5% of patients requiring two administrations and 36.6% needing only one. Patients belonging to Fentanyl group exhibited higher occurrence of nausea (46.3%), vomiting (46.3%) and pruritus (31.7%). Conclusions: Our study concludes that transdermal patch of buprenorphine demonstrates superior efficacy and safety profile as compared to fentanyl patch for post-operative pain management in lower limb surgeries.

Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Supraglottic Laryngectomy and Bilateral Neck Dissection: A Case Series

Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Supraglottic Laryngectomy and Bilateral Neck Dissection: A Case Series

Comparison of Bromelain and Diclofenac in the Management of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life Following Root Canal Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Bromelain and Diclofenac in the Management of Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life Following Root Canal Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative Ultrasound-Guided Caudal Block Analgesia for Lower Limb Surgeries in Pediatrics: A Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Evaluating pain after surgery is particularly important in children due to their limited ability to communicate effectively. The intensity, duration, and threshold of pain make it challenging to assess in this age group. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided caudal block at different timings on children's pain and drug consumption during unilateral knee osteotomy surgery. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, fifty patients were randomly included in the study. The patients were children aged 2 - 6 years, candidates for unilateral osteotomy surgery under general anesthesia with total IV anesthesia (TIVA). The patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of the caudal block: The first group received the block after induction, and the second group received it after surgery and before extubation. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the average amount of Propofol and narcotic consumption during recovery at different time points (P &gt; 0.05). However, significant differences in pain levels were observed during the operation at 60 minutes (P-value &lt; 0.001) and 120 minutes (P-value = 0.006) between the two groups. Pain scores at the start of recovery and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the second group than in the first group. Additionally, the mean difference in Bispectral Index (BIS) at 60 minutes between the two groups was significant (P-value = 0.003), but there was no significant difference at 120 minutes (P-value = 0.896). The second group consistently had significantly lower pain levels than the first group at all times. Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, patients who received a caudal block had lower pain scores, and performing the block before extubation had more beneficial effects on postoperative pain management in children undergoing osteotomy surgery than performing it after induction.

Effects of Multimodal Analgesia Combined with Comfort Management on Pain and Stress Indexes in Patients with Orthopedic Trauma after Intervention: A Retrospective Study.

This study aims to assess the impact of combining multimodal analgesia with comfort care on pain levels, stress, negative emotions, and quality of life in individuals recovering from traumatic fractures. This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from traumatic fracture patients who underwent emergency operations at our hospital between June 2022 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative pain management: the control group, which received standard measures, and the exposure group, which received a combination of multimodal analgesia and comfort-based care. We compared these groups for pain intensity (baseline and activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores), serum stress biomarkers (norepinephrine, adrenaline, cortisol), emotional distress (self-rating depression scale (SDS), and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)), and overall quality of life (Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) score). Overall, this study evaluated differences in postoperative complications between the two pain management approaches. In this study, we included 101 participants, 41 in the exposed group and 60 in the control group. Before the intervention, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, one week after the intervention, the resting and active VAS scores were significantly reduced in the exposed group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, one week after the intervention, the exposed group had lower levels of serum sodium, epinephrine, cortisol, stress, and anxiety, as well as higher physical and mental health scores on the GQOLI-74 scale. During the intervention period, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). Combining multi-mode analgesia with comfort management for patients with traumatic fractures significantly reduces postoperative pain and stress levels. Additionally, this approach can effectively enhance patients' negative emotions and improve their quality of life. This approach holds significant promise for practical use in clinical settings.

Sensory assessment of intramuscular quadratus lumborum block at the L2 level in open inguinal hernia repair patients

BackgroundThe effectiveness of the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for postoperative pain management depends on the injection pathway used. There is limited research on the block area produced by intramuscular injection of local anesthesia in the quadratus lumborum muscle. This study aimed to determine the cutaneous sensory blockade area produced by an intramuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLBi) at the L2 level.MethodsTwenty patients aged 18–60 years with ASA grade I-II and a BMI of 18–30 kg/m2 who were scheduled for open inguinal hernia repair with mesh underwent ultrasound-guided QLBi injection of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The cutaneous sensory blockade area was measured by applying a cold stimulus 1 h after the block and then measured every hour after surgery until the sensation returned to normal. The duration of a blockade is defined as the time it takes for all affected areas to fully regain normal sensation following a blockade. Pain scores (numeric rating scale, NRS) were recorded at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Adverse reactions to QLBi were recorded 24 h after surgery.ResultsAll 20 patients had reduced or lost cold sensation areas. The greatest extent of cold sensation reduction occurred at T7 (10%), and the least amount of cold sensation reduction occurred at L3 (10%). The block level covered T8 (20%), T9 (30%), T10 (45%), T11 (90%), T12 (95%), L1 (100%), and L2 (15%). Eighteen patients experienced areas of sensory loss, with the highest range at T11 and the lowest at L2. The duration of the blockade was 8.9 ± 3.8 h, with a maximum of 24 h and a minimum of 5 h. One patient experienced quadriceps weakness after surgery.ConclusionQuadratus lumborum block of intramuscular pathway can produce effective cutaneous sensory blockade, which can be used for postoperative analgesia of indirect inguinal hernia operation, and may also be beneficial to analgesia of other lower abdominal operations. However, the best method needs further confirmation to determine specific anesthesia methods for various operations.Chinese clinical trial registryJune 2, 2018; ChiCTR1800016457.

Anterior quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative pain treatment following intra-abdominal surgery: A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.

The anterior quadratus lumborum (QL) block may be used for postoperative pain management for intra-abdominal surgeries, but the evidence is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the benefit and harm of the anterior QL block compared to placebo/no block for intra-abdominal surgery. We searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials investigating anterior QL block for postoperative pain management for adult patients undergoing any intra-abdominal surgery. The two co-primary outcomes were cumulative 24-h opioid consumption and serious adverse events. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), assessed the risk of bias, and present the certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Thirty-five trials randomizing 2418 patients were included in the meta-analyses. Anterior QL block may reduce cumulative 24-h intravenous opioid consumption compared to placebo/no block (MD -10.42 mg, 96.7% CI -14.83 to -6.01, TSA-adjusted CI -17.03 to -3.82, p < .01). Two trials reported on SAEs. Anterior QL block may have little to no effect on the number of serious adverse events compared to placebo (RR 1.49, 96.7% CI 0.19 to 11.47, p = .68), but the evidence is very uncertain. All trial results were assessed as being high risk of bias. The anterior QL block may reduce cumulative 24-h opioid consumption. Reported serious adverse events were few and the anterior QL block may have little to no effect on the number of SAEs, but the evidence was very uncertain.

Post-operative pain management in a surgical unit in a tertiary hospital in Spain: a best practice implementation project.

More than 80% of patients experience post-surgical pain. Poor pain control decreases patients' quality of life; increases associated comorbidity, hospital length of stay and hospital costs; and delays functional recovery. Implementing evidence-based recommendations improves these negative factors as well as the patient's quality of life. This evidence implementation project aimed to improve post-operative pain management by implementing best practice recommendations. This project used the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process. The project was conducted in the surgical unit of a tertiary hospital in Ciudad Real, Spain. We performed a baseline audit and two follow-up audits to measure audit criteria derived from a JBI evidence summary on pain management. A total of 30 surgical patients took part. We assessed the results of the baseline audit, identified the barriers to best practice, and implemented strategies to improve post-operative pain management. The first follow-up audit revealed an improvement in practice; however, these results worsened due to the delay in protocol approval and subsequent lack of staff motivation. The second follow-up audit showed greater compliance with best practices, although considerable room for improvement remains. Implementing evidence-based practices in health care improved nurses' clinical practice. The health care staff complied with the recommendations more readily since they associated the best practices with a clear benefit for the patient. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A276.

Prevalence and associated factors of acute postoperative pain in adult surgical patients: A prospective study

BackgroundPain, as defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain, is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling, that is associated with actual or potential tissue damage. In Ethiopia, where healthcare facilities and offerings are expanding to handle countless patients requiring surgical intervention, managing acute postoperative pain is a serious concern. ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence of acute postoperative pain and associated factors after elective surgery among adult patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 MethodologyThis is an institution-based cross-sectional study. A structured data collection format was used to collect data from 219 participants. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses described the association between independent and dependent variables. ResultsOf 219 patients, 180 (82.2 %) had acute postoperative pain. The prevalence of moderate to severe pain was 34.24 %. Preoperative anxiety, the use of intraoperative analgesics, and duration of surgery were the main factors associated with the prevalence of acute postoperative pain. ConclusionOur study revealed that the overall prevalence of postoperative pain was relatively low in the study area. This suggests that the attention given to postoperative pain recognition and management is better than that in other areas. However, the finding of a significant gap in managing postoperative pain underscores the need for further improvements in pain management practices. This should motivate us to commit to change, particularly in the identified areas of concern, such as preoperative anxiety, use of intraoperative analgesics, and duration of surgery.

The effect of an open-heart surgery patient care protocol on post-sternotomy pain, anxiety and quality of care: A randomized controlled trial.

Open-heart surgery patients face many problems because of post-sternotomy pain. Care protocols can eliminate pain and pain-related problems by providing holistic care. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of an open-heart surgery patient care protocol developed in the study on post-sternotomy pain, anxiety and quality of care. The study was carried out as a double-blind randomized controlled trial. The sample size was calculated. Considering some attrition, the sample size was increased by 10% for each group, and a total of 68 participants, including 34 in each group, were included in the sample. Data were collected using a 'Patient Information Form', a 'Post-Sternotomy Pain Follow-up Form', the 'Numeric Rating Scale', the 'State Anxiety Inventory' and the 'Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management Questionnaire'. The patients in the experimental group were given care in accordance with the protocol, which was developed in the study, on postoperative days 0, 1 and 2. The statistical evaluation showed a significant difference between the mean scores of the experimental (F = 7.28; p < .001) and control groups (F = 2.42; p < .05) on the pain assessment scale. It was determined that the number of analgesics used in the experimental group was statistically significantly lower than in the control group. Intra-group comparisons showed that there was a difference between the mean pre-test and post-test state anxiety scale scores of the groups (p < .001). The experimental group had higher mean scores on the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management Questionnaire than that of the control group (p < .001). The protocol developed in the study was found to be effective in reducing pain, the use of NSAIDs and opioids, and anxiety levels and increasing the level of quality of care. The protocol was original and feasible in that it included independent nursing interventions to improve the quality of care by reducing pain and anxiety. Particularly, the use of protocols in intensive care units was nurses' strongest resource in patient care management. Thus, the protocol, which was prepared for intensive care patients who most frequently experience pain and anxiety, was promising for nurses in improving the quality of care by reducing pain and anxiety. However, it is necessary to conduct further studies involving longitudinal follow-up in samples and institutions with similar conditions.

Erector Spinae Plane Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Patient Controlled Analgesia Needed.

Retrospective Controlled Cohort. To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) via Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) on postoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with and without patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Pain control after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for AIS includes opioids and other modalities. The goal of these modalities is to reduce pain and opioid consumption. Two new modalities for pain control include LB and ESPB. There are scant studies on these modalities tested in concert on patients undergoing PSF for AIS. 72 consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF separated into patients who had a PCA (Group A) as part of their postoperative pain management and those who did not (Group B). Opioid consumption was measured via Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). Pain scores were measured via the Visual Acuity Score (VAS). Patient mobility was measured by steps taken. These were measured by function of postoperative day from surgery (POD). Group B had significant lower MME at every point after surgery, most notably throughout the entire hospital stay (99.8 vs. 200.7). Postoperative pain scores in Group B were the same if not better than Group A. There was no difference in mobility between the cohorts. The Group B had lower LOS (3.7 s 4.1). In postoperative PSF for AIS patients receiving LB via ESPB, those who did not receive a PCA had lower opioid consumption without worse pain scores or mobility and had a lower LOS. Adding LB via ESPB to postoperative pain regimens effectively replaces a PCA by providing the same pain control and reducing overall opioid consumption and LOS.

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries

ObjectiveThis study compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were divided into two groups: ESPB (n = 40) and WI (n = 40). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS) at multiple time points within 24 h. Additionally, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.ResultsBoth ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, with no significant differences in VAS scores. However, the ESPB group demonstrated a significantly longer duration of analgesia, a shorter time to first rescue analgesia, and lower total tramadol consumption (50 ± 60 mg vs. 100 ± 75 mg; p = 0.010) than did the WI group. Furthermore, a trend toward reduced PONV incidence was observed in the ESPB group, likely due to its opioid-sparing effect.ConclusionWhile both ESPB and WI provided effective postoperative pain management, ESPB demonstrated a distinct advantage by offering a longer duration of analgesia and significantly reducing opioid consumption. These findings suggest that ESPB is more effective than WI for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeries, providing prolonged pain relief and improving patient outcomes. Further studies are warranted to explore its long-term benefits and cost-effectiveness.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.govPRS: NCT06567964 Date: 08/21/2024 Retrospectively registered.

Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a rapid-acting meloxicam formulation, for analgesia after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Postoperative pain management is one of the most challenging treatments after orthopaedic surgery, and improved medical treatment options are urgently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide (QP001) for moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery. This randomized clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery in 20 hospitals in China. We allocated randomly 132 participants to receive 30mg QP001 and 66 participants to receive 0.9% saline pre-surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the total morphine consumption within 24h. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was significantly lower over the following 24h [12.53 (10.51) vs. 26.13 (13.98), P < 0.001]. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48h (P < 0.001). The QP001 group, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump, morphine relief analgesia ratio over the 24h and 48h periods and the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant prolonged in the time of first pressing the analgesic pump and the time of first morphine rescue analgesia (P < 0.001). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant difference in adverse events, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions decreased (59.4% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.023). QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopaedic surgery, with a favorable safety profile.

Effect of incision location and type of fistula on postoperative urinary retention after radical surgery for anal fistula: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundPostoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication characterized by fullness of the bladder without the ability to urinate. Its etiology in proctology surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for POUR after radical surgery for anal fistula.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 511 patients who underwent radical surgery for anal fistula at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from August 2022 to December 2023. Risk factors for POUR were analyzed by means of binary logistic regression analyses.ResultsPOUR occurred in 57 patients (11.2%) within 48 h post-surgery, and males were predominantly affected (84.4%). Independent risk factors included a history of urological disease (OR = 6.048; p < 0.001), incisions at position 1 (OR = 2.228; p = 0.046), high anal fistula (OR = 4.768; p < 0.001), VAS score ≥ 7 (OR = 2.805; p = 0.010), and GAD-7 score ≥ 5 (OR = 2.405; P = 0.024).ConclusionPOUR is a significant complication post-radical surgery for anal fistula, particularly among patients with urological disease, high anal fistula, and incisions at position 1. Surgeons should pay more attention to surgical methods for high anal fistulas and fistulas in the anterior rectum, and monitor postoperative bladder volume in high-risk patients. Enhanced postoperative pain and anxiety management can reduce the incidence of POUR and prevent long-term bladder damage.

Predictors of Persistent Pain after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an orthopedic procedure performed on patients with severe knee pain and advanced knee conditions, such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis, in order to restore joint function. Despite the procedure’s high success rates, persistent postoperative pain (PPP) remains a significant complication, affecting a substantial proportion of patients. Identifying predictors of PPP is crucial for improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective analytic study was conducted, reviewing the medical records of patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral TKA at King Abdulaziz Medical City. The data collection focused on demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentations, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. Data were analyzed using JMP software. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: This study included 838 patients, predominantly female (71.5%), with an average age of 65.4 years. Osteoarthritis was the primary reason for surgery (98.3%). The mean preoperative pain score was 3.4, and the average pain duration prior to surgery was 6.2 years. We identified dyslipidemia as a significant predictor of PPP (OR 1.40, p = 0.042), while we found younger age to be a significant predictor (OR 0.979, 95% CI 0.967–0.991, p = 0.001). Other factors such as gender, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, anxiety disorder, mood disorder, tobacco use, chronic kidney disease, chronic lung disease, and BMI were not significant predictors of PPP. Conclusion: This study identifies younger age and dyslipidemia as significant predictors of persistent postoperative pain and improved outcomes following total knee arthroplasty Further research is needed to validate these results in diverse populations and settings, with the objective should be to refine preoperative counseling and postoperative pain management protocols.

Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block for midline abdominal surgery in a low- and middle-income country: a randomised controlled trial.

The use of erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in midline abdominal procedures is becoming more common. However, the most effective and appropriate method remains unclear. We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effecacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane blocks with rectus sheath blocks for midline abdominal surgery in a low- and middle-income country. We allocated randomly 72 patients aged 18-65 y undergoing midline abdominal surgery to an erector spinae plane block (n = 36) or a rectus sheath block (n = 36) utilising a prospective, parallel study design. Patients, care providers and outcome assessors were blinded to the interventions. The primary outcome measures were total postoperative analgesia consumption, postoperative pain severity and time to first rescue analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative complications and adverse events. Of 78 patients assessed for eligibility, six were excluded, leaving 72 for analysis. Patients allocated to erector spinae plane block had a lower mean (SD) postoperative opioid consumption compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (3.5 (8.7) morphine milligram equivalents vs. 8.2 (2.8) morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; p = 0.003). Time to first analgesic request was greater in patients allocated to erector spinae plane block compared with those allocated to rectus sheath block (mean (95%CI) 16 (13-17) h vs. 12 (11-13) h, respectively; p < 0.001). There were no block-related complications in either group. Erector spinae plane blocks are more effective than rectus sheath blocks for the management of postoperative pain following midline abdominal surgery. Integration of erector spinae plane blocks into multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic strategies after midline abdominal surgeries may promote enhanced patient recovery in low-and middle-income countries.