Management Of Open Fractures Research Articles

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study : epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK.

Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open2022;3(10):746-752.

Hyperbaric Oxygen for Lower Limb Trauma (HOLLT): an international multi-centre randomised clinical trial.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is sometimes used in the management of open fractures and severe soft tissue crush injury, aiming to reduce complications and improve outcomes. Patients with open tibial fractures were randomly assigned within 48 hours of injury to receive standard trauma care or standard care plus 12 sessions of HBOT. The primary outcome was the incidence of necrosis or infection or both occurring within 14 days of injury. One-hundred and twenty patients were enrolled. Intention to treat primary outcome occurred in 25/58 HBOT assigned patients and 34/59 controls (43% vs 58%, odds ratio (OR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 1.18, P = 0.12). Tissue necrosis occurred in 29% of HBOT patients and 53% of controls (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.78, P = 0.01). There were fewer late complications in patients receiving HBOT (6/53 vs 18/52, OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.64, P = 0.007) including delayed fracture union (5/53 vs 13/52, OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.95, P = 0.04). Quality of life measures at one and two years were superior in HBOT patients. The mean score difference in short form 36 was 2.90, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.77, P = 0.002, in the short musculoskeletal function assessment (SMFA) was 2.54, 95% CI 0.62 to 4.46, P = 0.01; and in SMFA daily activities was 19.51, 95% CI 0.06 to 21.08, P = 0.05. In severe lower limb trauma, early HBOT reduces tissue necrosis and the likelihood of long-term complications, and improves functional outcomes. Future research should focus on optimal dosage and whether HBOT has benefits for other injury types.

Patient reported outcomes after definitive open tibial fracture management

Aims: Open tibial fractures are often life-changing injuries and patient outcomes remain poor despite the introduction of national management guidelines. The longer-term impact to the patient can be considerable but this is often overlooked in the literature. This study aims to establish the functional, physical, and psychosocial impact of sustaining an open tibial fracture.Methods: We reviewed 69 consecutive Gustilo-Anderson grade IIIB and IIIC open tibial fractures that presented to our Major Trauma Centre (MTC) between September 2012 and April 2018. Each participant was interviewed and sent patient-reported outcome questionnaires, a minimum of 12 months following injury. Our primary outcome was the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Secondary outcomes included the Short-Form 36 Healthy Survey (SF-36), Sickness Impact Profile 128 (SIP) and return to occupation. Subgroups were analysed according to age, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and limb amputation.Results: The mean follow up was 43 months. 96% were grade IIIB and 4% grade IIIC. The response rate for our study was 72%. The mean LEFS was 42 (IQR 21.5–58.5). All total and sub-domain scores within both the SF-36 and SIP questionnaires were reduced when compared to normative population data. Only 48% of patients returned to full time employment. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly reduced LEFS, SIP and SF-36 subdomain scores for those with a presenting ISS >14 and those undergoing limb amputation.Conclusion: Patients are at significant risk of longer-term functional, physical and psychosocial harm after suffering an open tibial fracture. Those sustaining major polytrauma or amputation demonstrated to have the greatest risk of poor outcome. Early identification of these individuals likely to suffer most from their injury would help direct appropriate resources to those with greatest need at the earliest opportunity.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Unstable Spine Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Mortality.

Retrospective cohort study. To assess outcomes and mortality in elderly patients following unstable spine fractures depending on treatment modality. Operative management of unstable spine fractures in the elderly remains controversial due to increased risk of perioperative complications. Mortality rates after operative versus nonoperative treatment of these injuries have not been well-characterized. Patients aged above 65 with unstable spine fractures without neurologic injury from 2015 to 2021 were identified from the Clinformatics ® Data Mart (CDM) Database. Demographics, complications, and mortality were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for the effect of baseline characteristics on mortality following unstable fracture diagnosis. Of the 3688 patients included, 1330 (36.1%) underwent operative management and 2358 (63.9%) nonoperative. At baseline, nonoperative patients were older, female, had higher Elixhauser comorbidity scores, and were more likely to have a cervical fracture. Operative patients had a longer length of stay in the hospital compared with nonoperative patients (9.7 vs. 7.7 days; P <0.001). Although patients in the operative group had higher rates of readmission at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days after diagnosis ( P <0.01), they had lower mortality rates up to five years after injury. After adjusting for covariates, nonoperative patients had a 60% greater risk of mortality compared with operative patients (hazard ratio: 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-1.78, P <0.001). After propensity score matching, operative patients age 65 to 85 had greater survivorship compared with their nonoperative counterparts. Elderly patients with an unstable spine fracture who undergo surgery experience lower mortality rates up to five years postdiagnosis compared with patients who received nonoperative management, despite higher hospital readmission rates and an overall perioperative complication rate of 37.3%. Operating on elderly patients with unstable spine fractures may outweigh the risks and should be considered as a viable treatment option in appropriately selected patients.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Extremity Open Wound Management: A Review of the Literature.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with reticulated open cell foam is used commonly in orthopaedic trauma, particularly in the management of complex open fracture wounds. This article reviews the literature to date regarding this adjunctive treatment, particularly in regard to removal of infectious material, temporary management of wounds pending soft tissue reconstruction, combat wounds, and over split-thickness skin grafts. Mechanism of action is also reviewed, including stabilization of the wound environment, edema control, macrodeformation, and microdeformation effects. Use of NPWT as an adjunct in management of open fractures along with operative debridement, systemic antibiotics, and early soft tissue reconstruction are the highest yield interventions for managing open fracture wounds with infection. NPWT as an adjunct therapy in the protocol for open fractures seems to add additional clinical benefit for patients with severe open fracture wounds not amenable to primary, immediate closure.

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: the management of open fracture care in the UK.

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study was performed to provide clarity in open fracture management previously skewed by small, specialist centre studies and large, unfocused registry investigations. We report the current management metrics of open fractures across the UK. Patients admitted to hospital with an open fracture (excluding phalanges or isolated hand injuries) between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 were included. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture software. All domains of the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Open Fracture Management were recorded. Across 51 centres, 1,175 patients were analyzed. Antibiotics were given to 754 (69.0%) in the emergency department, 240 (22.0%) pre-hospital, and 99 (9.1%) as inpatients. Wounds were photographed in 848 (72.7%) cases. Median time to first surgery was 16 hrs 14 mins (interquartile range (IQR) 8 hrs 29 mins to 23 hrs 19 mins). Complex injuries were operated on sooner (median 12 hrs 51 mins (IQR 4 hrs 36 mins to 21 hrs 14 mins)). Of initial procedures, 1,053 (90.3%) occurred between 8am and 8pm. A consultant orthopaedic surgeon was present at 1,039 (89.2%) first procedures. In orthoplastic centres, a consultant plastic surgeon was present at 465 (45.1%) first procedures. Overall, 706 (60.8%) patients required a single operation. At primary debridement, 798 (65.0%) fractures were definitively fixed, while 734 (59.8%) fractures had fixation and coverage in one operation through direct closure or soft-tissue coverage. Negative pressure wound therapy was used in 235 (67.7%) staged procedures. Following wound closure or soft-tissue cover, 509 (47.0%) patients received antibiotics for a median of three days (IQR 1 to 7). OPEN provides an insight into care across the UK and different levels of hospital for open fractures. Patients are predominantly operated on promptly, in working hours, and at specialist centres. Areas for improvement include combined patient review and follow-up, scheduled operating, earlier definitive soft-tissue cover, and more robust antibiotic husbandry.Cite this article: Bone Joint J2022;104-B(9):1073-1080.

Incisional and Surrounding Periarticular Soft Tissue Management With Negative Pressure Therapy.

Periarticular injuries of the lower extremity are known for wound healing and infection complications. The role for incisional negative pressure wound therapy for lower extremity periarticular fractures has expanded over the last 10 years in hopes of minimizing complications. To date, there is no standardized published protocol of how negative pressure wound therapy is best used in lower extremity periarticular fractures. A review of strategies to decrease complications associated with the operative management of lower extremity periarticular fractures to include the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy is presented.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Acetabular Fractures Treated Operatively without a C-Arm in Ethiopia.

There is little evidence describing the open treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in low-resource environments. We endeavored to determine the results of the operative management of acetabular fractures without intraoperative C-arm use in a developing nation, through the assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. This was a prospective, single-surgeon, consecutive case series conducted in a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia, a high-population, low-income country. The primary author performed fixation without the use of a C-arm in 108 patients from among a total of 202 patients presenting with acetabular fracture. The modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and Short-Form Health Survey (SF)-36 at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were used to assess the outcome. Of the 108 patients potentially available for analysis, 92 (85%) were available for 2-year follow-up (mean age of 35 years; range, 15 to 70 years). The mean duration from injury to surgery was 16 days (range, 1 to 204 days). Seventy-three (78.5%; n = 93) of the patients had associated fracture patterns. The most common fractures were associated both-column type (22%) and transverse-plus-posterior-wall type (22%). The mean mHHS was 91; 88% of the patients had a score of ≥80, and 12% had a score of ≤79. SF-36 scores were in alignment with the mHHS. The majority (approximately 90%) of our cohort returned to work. We did not find a significant difference in the mean mHHS between patients with or without anatomic reduction (p = 0.31). However, 2-year radiographic outcomes were strongly associated with the mean mHHS (p < 0.001). Predictors of a lower mHHS included older age, cartilage damage, and lack of secondary congruence. Good functional outcomes were achieved at 2 years among patients with acetabular fractures surgically treated without the use of a C-arm in a limited-resource setting. Surgical congruence of the femoral head under the acetabular roof, rather than the absolute residual gap, seems essential in determining clinical outcomes. This information can help in planning increased access to care for individuals who experience traumatic injuries in low- and middle-income countries. Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Assessing the Variability of Antibiotic Management in Patients With Open Hand Fractures Presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Open hand fractures may be difficult to recognize and treat. There is variability in management and administration of antibiotics for these types of injuries. Unlike open long bone fractures, there is no standardized protocol for antibiotic administration for open hand fractures in children. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of antibiotic management of open hand fractures in children. We performed a retrospective chart review at a tertiary hospital in New York of patients with hand injuries between ages 0 and 18 years presenting to the emergency department during January 2019 and December 2020. Patient encounters were reviewed for open fractures of the hand. Descriptive statistics were included for demographic and physical characteristics. There were 80 encounters with open hand fractures, of which the most common being tuft fractures (77.5%). The mean age was 7.6 years (SD, 4.7 years) with male predominance (58.8%). Crush injuries were the most common mechanism of injury (78.8%). Bedside repair was performed on 62 encounters (77.5%), of which 45 (72.5%) required nail bed repair, 56 (90.3%) required suturing, and 24 (38.7%) required reduction. Antibiotics were given to 62 (77.5%) encounters, most commonly oral cefalexin (45.2%), oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (27.4%), and intravenous cefazolin (14.5%). Median time to antibiotics from emergency department registration to administration was 150 minutes (interquartile range, 92-216 minutes). Antibiotic prescriptions were sent for 71 encounters (88.8%). Seventy seven (96.3%) of the encounters were discharged home. Pediatric open hand fractures have a variability of type and timing to antibiotics. Future initiatives should attempt to create standardized guidelines for management of open hand fractures.

Synchronous circular frame stabilisation and microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction for open lower limb fractures–A cost analysis and description of the surgical technique

IntroductionCurrent surgical paradigms for ortho-plastic management of IIIB open tibial fractures make compromises. Often, definitive circular frame stabilisation is delayed until the soft tissue envelope is secure to allow access for further soft tissue reconstruction if required. This delay has potential clinical and cost implications. A previous study showed acute circular frame stabilisation performed concurrently or before soft tissue reconstruction was feasible without additional soft tissue reconstruction problems. This study examines potential resource savings using this approach. MethodsAll open tibial fractures managed by circular fixator and microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction between April 2015 and June 2019 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Those receiving circular frame stabilisation with synchronous microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction were considered cases; those in whom the frame stabilisation was delayed were controls. Cost data were derived from the Patient Level Information and Costing System. Salvage cases and those with incomplete treatment were excluded. ResultsNine cases and 25 controls were evaluated. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups in terms of age, sex, injury severity score, time to debridement, time to coverage, length of follow up, or time to union. Median length of stay was 13.3 and 19.7 days for cases and controls respectively (p<0.01). Cases required fewer procedures (2.3) compared to controls (4.5) (p<0.001). The cost of care was less for cases (£25,527) than controls (£32,952) (p <0.05). No cases returned to theatre with flap failure or flap compromise. Complications were similar between groups. ConclusionIn suitable patients, synchronous circular frame stabilisation and microsurgical soft tissue reconstruction is a safe, clinically effective, and cost-saving option.

2 A Retrospective Analysis of the Definitive Management of Open Talus Fractures at a Major Trauma Centre and an Audit of BOAST 4 Guidelines

Abstract Currently, the management of open talus fractures is based upon BOAST 4 guidelines although there is no suggested definitive management, thus definitive management is based upon surgeon preference. This retrospective analysis aims to clarify the debate between ORIF and tibiocalcaneal fusion (FUSION). A review of open talus fractures from 2014–2021 returned foureen patients with fifteen open talus fractures. Seven cases were initially managed with ORIF, five cases were definitively managed with FUSION. We collected patient's age, gender, surgical complications, surgical risk factors and post-treatment functional ability and pain and compliance with BOAST guidelines. Comparison between FUSION and ORIF groups showed no statistically significant difference in EQ-5D-5L score (P = 0.13), FAAM-ADL (P = 0.20), FAAM-Sport (P = 0.34), infection rate (P = 0.55), surgical times (P = 0.91) and time to weight bearing (P = 0.39), despite a higher proportion of polytrauma and Hawkins III and IV fractures in the FUSION group. FUSION is typically used as second line to ORIF or failed ORIF. However, there are a lack of studies that directly compared outcome in open talus fracture patients definitively managed with FUSION or ORIF. Our results demonstrate for the first time, that FUSION may not be inferior to ORIF in terms of patient functional outcome, infection rate, and quality-of-life, in the management of patients with open talus fracture patients. Of note, as open talus fractures have increased risks of complications such as osteonecrosis and non-union, FUSION should be considered as a viable option to mitigate these potential complications in these patients.

Racial Disparities in the Operative Management of Orthopedic Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this study was to investigate if race is associated with the likelihood of operative management of acute fractures. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to identify studies associated with social disparities and acute orthopedic trauma. Peer-reviewed studies commenting on social disparities and the decision to pursue operative or non-operative management of acute fractures were identified for detailed review. Study characteristics and odds ratios were extracted from each article. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. A quality analysis of the data was also performed. In total, 13 studies were identified and 8 were included in the meta-analysis totaling 743,846 fractures. Hip, distal radius, pelvic, tibial plateau, clavicle, femoral neck, and femoral shaft fractures were represented in this patient population. The meta-analysis demonstrated that White race is associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention compared to all other races pooled together (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.47; p < .0001) as well as Black race (odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.72; p = .0025). Non-White race and Black race are associated with a lower likelihood of receiving surgical management of acute orthopedic trauma. Surgeons and health systems should be aware of these inequities and consider strategies to mitigate bias and ensure all patients receive appropriate and timely care regardless of race.

Rates of readmission and reoperation after operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents.

The present letter to the editor is a commentary on the study titled “Rates of readmission and reoperation after operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents”. There is a debate over whether surgical treatment of clavicle shaft fractures improves clinical outcomes in adolescents. The readmission and reoperation rates following surgery should be identified.

Functional and radiological outcomes of primary ring fixator versus antibiotic nail in open tibial diaphyseal fractures: A prospective study

Management of open fractures of tibia is still a matter of debate due to high incidence of infections. Traditionally external fixators have been advocated in managing open tibial fractures. Due to limited efficacy of systemic antibiotics, recently antibiotic coated intramedullary interlocking nails have been developed for the management of open tibia fractures. Therefore, we conducted this prospective randomized study to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of primary ring fixator versus antibiotic coated nail in open diaphyseal tibial fractures. The study included 32 patients with Gustilo-Anderson type II and type IIIA fractures of tibial diaphysis. Out of them 16 patients were managed with Ring External Fixator (Group I) and 16 were managed with OssiproÒ gentamicin intramedullary interlocking tibial nail (Group II). The radiological and functional outcomes were assessed at final follow-up according to and SMFA criteria. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using IBM SPSS statistics 2.0 software. Chi square test and independent student t-test were used and a P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant RESULTS: Union was achieved in 15 patients (93.8%) in group I and 13 patients (81.2%) in group II. Pin tract infection was seen in 6 patients (37.5%) in group I, whereas infection was present in 2 patients (12.5%) in group II. Bone results were excellent in 13 patients (81.3%), good in 2 patients (12.5%), poor in one patient (6.3%). In group II, bone results were excellent in 12 patients (75%), good in one patient (6.2%), poor in 3 patients (18.8%). At 1 year of final follow up, mean SMFA score was 24.41±5.87 in group I, whereas mean SMFA score was 23.703±8.02 in group II. Ring fixator as well as antibiotic coated tibial interlocking nail achieved comparable rates of union in the present study. Complication rates were similar in both the groups and the functional and radiological outcomes were comparable in both groups. Results of this study indicate that although ring fixation is an established option for management of open tibial fractures, antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail is also a reliable option in open Grade II and grade IIIA injuries. Level II.

Open tibial shaft fracture management in Argentina: an evaluation of treatment standards in diverse resource settings.

Argentina is a country with varying access to orthopedic surgical care. The Argentine Association of Trauma and Orthopedics (AATO) "Interior Committee" was developed to address potential regional differences and promote standardization of orthopedic trauma care. The paper assesses the level of national standardization of the management of open tibia fractures across 9 provinces in Argentina. Utilizing a matched-comparison group design, management of these injuries were assessed and compared between 3 groups: an "AATO Exterior Committee" consisting of surgeons that practice in Buenos Aires, and 2 "Interior Committees," comprising surgeons that practice in outlying provinces, 1 of which is affiliated with the AATO, and 1 that is not affiliated with the AATO. The study was conducted in 2 phases: phase 1 assessed open tibia fracture management characteristics, and phase 2 evaluated the management of soft-tissue wound coverage following open fractures. Soft-tissue coverage procedures for Gustilo Anderson Type IIIB fractures were more commonly performed by orthopedic surgeons in Interior Committees than the AATO Exterior Committee. Greater rates of definitive wound coverage within 7 days post-injury were reported in both Interior Committees compared to the Exterior Committee. Plastic surgeons were reported as more available to those in the AATO Exterior Committee group than in the AATO Interior Committees. While treatment patterns were evident among groups, differences were identified in the management and timing of soft-tissue coverage in Gustilo Anderson Type IIIB fractures between the Exterior Committee and both Interior Committees. Future targeted educational and surgical hands-on training opportunities that emphasize challenges faced in resource-limited settings may improve the management of open tibia fractures in Argentina.

Efficacy of Cefazolin versus Ceftriaxone for Extremity Open Fracture Management at a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Background: Antibiotic agents have been shown to improve outcomes in open extremity fractures. The first-generation cephalosporins, which are used most often, are often under-dosed based on weight and recommended frequency. Ceftriaxone offers a broader coverage and a decreased frequency of administration. Our institution began utilizing ceftriaxone for open fracture management in 2017 to address those concerns. Objective: To examine the efficacy of cefazolin versus ceftriaxone for open fracture management of extremity trauma. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study from 2015-2019 of patients who sustained open extremity fractures. Patients were stratified by antibiotic administered and Gustilo-Anderson grade. Outcomes included non-union/malunion, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, osteomyelitis, re-operation after index hospital visit, re-admission due to prior injury, limb loss, and death. Subgroup analysis stratified each antibiotic group by Gustilo-Anderson grade 1 or 2 and grade 3. Results: Data was collected from 2015 to 2019. Of the 1,149 patients, 619 patients met inclusion criteria. Three hundred fifty-five patients received cefazolin and 264 patients received ceftriaxone. There were no statistically significant differences between groups on specified outcomes. No statistically significant differences existed during subgroup analysis for the specified outcomes. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased Gustilo-Anderson grade increased risk of infectious outcome. Conclusions: Ceftriaxone is a safe and effective alternative for open fracture extremity management that offers the advantage of 24-hour dosing and single antibiotic coverage for grade 3 open fractures. It does not increase infectious complications and offers benefits of resource efficiency.

Factors associated with delays in medical and surgical open facial fracture management

ObjectivesOpen fractures are at risk of infection because of exposure of bone and tissue to the environment. Facial fractures are often accompanied by other severe injuries, and therefore fracture management...

Decreasing Rate of Operative Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adolescents: A National Database Study

Background: There is no consensus on the operative treatment of adolescent proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in treatment of proximal humerus fractures in adolescents and identify predictors of operative management. Methods: The Pediatric Health Information System database was used to identify patients ages 10 to 18 diagnosed with proximal humerus fractures between 2004 to 2019. Open fractures were excluded from the analysis. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were used to determine trends and predictors of operative management. Results: A total of 17,515 proximal humerus fracture admissions were identified and 2081 (11.9%) were treated operatively. The mean age was 12.5 years and 37.5% of patients were female. The rate of operative management decreased from 15.1% to 8.9 during the study period (p&lt;0.01). There was a higher rate of operative management in boys (13.4% vs. 9.4%, p&lt; 0.01). The operative cohort was older (13.4 years vs. 12.4 years, p&lt;0.01), and patients who lived in rural areas had twice the rate of operative management (20.7% vs. 10.8%, p&lt;0.01). Operative patients had higher billed charges and longer hospital stay (p &lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference in mean estimated household income between operative and nonoperative groups (p &gt; 0.05). A multivariate analysis showed increased odds of operative management with older age (OR 1.32, 1.29-1.36), and residence in the South (OR 1.19, 1.05-1.34). The odds of operative management were lower in more recent years (OR 0.94, 0.93-0.95) and in urban settings (OR 0.41, 0.35-0.47). Conclusion: From 2004 to 2019, there has been a significant decrease in the rate of operative management of adolescent proximal humerus fractures at children’s hospitals. Patients who are older, male, or reside in rural areas or the South are more likely to be treated operatively.

Coronally Oriented Intra - Articular Distal Femur Hoffa Fracture - How We Deal with It

BACKGROUND&#x0D; Hoffa fractures are intra-articular femoral condyle fractures in the coronal plane. These are very uncommon injuries. The purpose of this study was radiologic and functional outcome assessment of surgically managed Hoffa fractures with headless compression screws.&#x0D; METHODS&#x0D; We prospectively studied 11 patients with isolated Hoffa fractures who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using two or more headless compression screws. Antiglide plate was used only in one case. We used the midline parapatellar approach for all cases. All patients had gone through aggressive physiotherapy after the operation. All patients were evaluated radiologically and functionally on a regular interval. The functional outcome was recorded in terms of Lysholm score, Knee society score (KSS), Range of motion (ROM) and VAS score.&#x0D; RESULTS&#x0D; All fractures united radiologically with an average time of 3.3 months with no evidence of subsequent fixation failure. The mean Lysholm score and KSS at final follow-up were 88.6±7.1 and 86±7.6 respectively. The mean knee range of motion was from 0˚ to 120.5˚ ± 9.3˚. At the final follow-up, the mean VAS score dropped significantly to 0.63±0.8.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS&#x0D; Operative management of Hoffa fractures with at least two headless compression screws can yield satisfactory functional and radiologic outcomes. Stable fixation and timely physiotherapy are the keys to success.

Outcomes after primary intramedullary nail fixation of open tibial and femoral fractures in low resource settings.

Open fractures are unique in the urgency they impart to the injury and the therapeutic challenge they pose. Non-union and infection are among the major concerns. Open tibial and femoral shaft fractures are among the commonest orthopaedic urgencies. Primary intramedullary (IM) nailing requires a skillset and knowledge of the principles of open fracture management and also a well-equipped operating room with the necessary implants and instruments. In a low resource setting, one or more of these prerequisites may not be met, and the outcome may thus be affected similarly. The objective of this study was to study these outcomes. We prospectively studied primary IM nailing of open 1, 2 and 3A tibial and femoral fractures done in our hospital, in a simple non-modular operating room without an image intensifier. There were 106 fractures in 104 patients: 93 tibial and 13 femoral. The mean time from injury to surgical debridement was 19.6h. Mean duration of antibiotics therapy was 4.3days, and the mean duration of hospital stay was 4.1days. All patients were followed up to union. Mean time to radiographic union was 6.1months for the tibia and 5.7months for the femur. Non-union was seen in 4 tibial and 1 femoral fractures. There were 3 superficial infections but no deep infection. The outcomes were comparable to, and in some cases better than, those found in existing literature. We conclude that primary IM nailing in open long bone fractures can be performed in austere environments with good success, in expert hands if the principles are adhered to.