Management Of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Research Articles

Management of statin intolerance in a pharmacy led cardiology innovative medicines optimisation lipid clinic

Abstract Background Statins are cornerstone in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. If a patient has experienced clinically significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs), representing an unacceptable risk or may result in adherence issues, we would consider them intolerant. The prevalence is lower in randomised trials than cohort observational studies, 5% vs. 17%. Purpose To assess how many people we reviewed in clinic were able to be re-challenged and successfully continued on a statin, free from side effects. Methods Over 6 months we reviewed all patients referred to our innovative clinic for lipid optimisation labelled as “statin intolerant”. Initially, as per our protocol, we adopted a person-centred approach and explored this label (actual vs. potential concerns, any previous issues, symptoms experienced and timings, statins tried (if any), and patient's feelings on re-challenge). A statin re-challenge was offered if not contraindicated. If agreed, based on shared-decision making, we offered patients a once weekly statin (usually rosuvastatin 5mg) with a clear self-management plan to up/down-titrate frequency and dose, until they identify a tolerated regimen. We measured LDL-C at baseline and every 3 months thereafter until satisfactory. Results Of 207 patients referred 152 (73%) were labelled as “statin intolerant”. Average age was 62 (±11), 51% females. 78% for secondary prevention and 37% had familial hypercholesterolaemia. The average baseline LDL-C was 4.4mmol/L. 108 (71%) qualified for PCSK9 inhibitors therapy (PCSK9i) as per UK NICE guidance. The top 3 reported ADRs were musculoskeletal side effects (48%), GI upsets (13%) and deranged LFTs (7%). 25 (58%) of those “intolerant” who did not qualify for PCSK9i attempted a re-challenge with statins vs. 44 (41%) among those who qualified. Of the 69 patients, who accepted a re-challenge, 43 (62%) were successfully restarted on a statin. At an average of 14 months post re-challenge, LDL-C (available for >80% of the sample) was reduced by an average of 31% in those not on PCSK9i, compared to a 62% reduction (sustained over an average of 40 months) in those on combination therapy with PCSK9i. The top 3 rosuvastatin regimens established were 5mg OD (29%), 5mg weekly (24%) and 10mg OD (15%). Approximately 80% of patients were on rosuvastatin, and the rest accepted atorvastatin, pravastatin or simvastatin. There was no attempt to re-challenge in 77 (51%) patients, mostly due to choice (45%) or statins re-challenged prior to referral (44%). We stopped statins in 6 cases due to intolerable ADRs. Conclusion(s) By using a person-centred approach, and a variety of strategies to tackle “statin intolerance” we have successfully re-established over 60% of patients with very high CVD risk on statins. While patients who qualified for PCSK9i therapy were less likely to consider re-challenge with statins (41% v 58%), combination lipid-lowering therapies produced better reduction in LDL-C. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Sustained usage of an app-based clinical-decision making aid for the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background Complexity of therapies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction represents a challenge for clinicians and may lead to poor uptake of these therapies. Purpose The goal of this project was to design an easy-to-use, point-of-care tool to risk stratify ASCVD patients and provide individualized guidance for clinicians to incorporate these agents. Methods Based on the REACH registry trial and predictive modeling (including 49,689 patients with ASCVD in 44 countries), we designed and implemented an app for secondary risk assessment. Using demographic and comorbidity profiles, this tool was used to calculate an individual's 20-month risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. It also provided graphical comparison to an age-matched control with optimized cardiovascular risk profile to illustrate the modifiable residual risk. The app then utilized the patient's risk profile to provide specific guidance for possible therapeutic interventions SGLT2-inhibitors, GLP1-agonists, PCSK9-inhibitors, Vascular-dose Rivaroxaban, and Icosapent Ethyl. Additionally, it identified individuals who qualified for cardiac rehabilitation or may benefit from smoking cessation interventions, including counselling or pharmacological therapies. We launched a pilot test of the “Residual Cardiovascular Risk: Assessment and Management Guide” app at a regional cardiac center. 240 referring physicians (including family doctors, emergency physicians, internists, and cardiologists) were invited by email or fax to utilize the app. Feedback was solicited from all users three months into the test period. Following this, no further marketing of the app was performed for all users. Usage data was recorded using Google Analytics over a 12-month period and analyzed in 4-month increments. Results From January to December 2021, our app was used to risk stratify 1576 patients. A total of 47 individual users utilized the app over this period. From January to April, the app was used on average 160 times monthly. From May to August, it was used 115 times monthly. From September to December, it was used 118 times monthly. Twenty-four physicians provided feedback; 100% affirmed the functionality, ease of use, and utility of the tool. The app was described as “useful for discussions with patients”, “helpful to optimize patients” and “similar to a mini-cardiology consult”. User suggestions resulted in further improvements to the app, including integration of reports into Electronic Medical Records. Conclusions The early success of this app demonstrates a need for simple, accessible, and individualized guidance for management of ASCVD patients to improve uptake of guideline-based medical therapies. This tool demonstrates sustained usage among clinicians, as well as subjective utility in aiding therapeutic decision making. Future clinical research will focus on the ability of this tool to impact physician prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Update in antilipidaemic management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: emerging concepts, new risk assessment, and risk-related management

Update in antilipidaemic management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: emerging concepts, new risk assessment, and risk-related management

Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis.

Atherosclerosis remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide characterized by the deposition of lipids and fibrous elements in the form of atheroma plaques in vascular areas which are hemodynamically overloaded. The global burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is steadily increasing and is considered the largest known non-infectious pandemic. The management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is increasing the cost of health care worldwide, which is a concern for researchers and physicians and has caused them to strive to find effective long-term strategies to improve the efficiency of treatments by managing conventional risk factors. Primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the preferred method to reduce cardiovascular risk. Fasting, a Mediterranean diet, and caloric restriction can be considered useful clinical tools. The protective impact of physical exercise over the cardiovascular system has been studied in recent years with the intention of explaining the mechanisms involved; the increase in heat shock proteins, antioxidant enzymes and regulators of cardiac myocyte proliferation concentration seem to be the molecular and biochemical shifts that are involved. Developing new therapeutic strategies such as vagus nerve stimulation, either to prevent or slow the disease’s onset and progression, will surely have a profound effect on the lives of millions of people.

DOACs and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Management: Can We Find the Right Balance Between Efficacy and Harm.

The balance between efficacy and harm remains a challenge in the adoption of non-vitamin K antagonist direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for secondary atherosclerotic disease prevention. We provide a comprehensive review of the evidence for and against the addition of DOACs to the current management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including stable coronary artery disease (CAD), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), peripheral artery disease (PAD), and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The DOAC class exerts pleiotropic effects on atherosclerotic progression through coagulation and inflammatory pathways. In ACS, low-dose DOAC provides no added efficacy in the setting of dual antiplatelet therapy; however, full-dose DOAC increases bleeding. Efficacy-safety profile favor use of low-dose rivaroxaban in select stable CAD or PAD patients. Atrial fibrillation patients undergoing PCI resort to dual therapy with DOAC due to prohibitory bleeding with triple anti-thrombotic therapy. Evidence favors DOAC use in CAD and PAD; however, careful individual considerations must be undertaken.

Cerebrovascular Disease and Statins.

Elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a causal factor for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD); accordingly, LDL-C lowering is associated with a decreased risk of progression of atherosclerotic plaques and development of complications. Currently, statins play a central role in any ASCVD management and prevention strategies, in relation to their lipid-lowering action and potentially to pleiotropic effects. After coronary artery disease, stroke is the most frequent cause of ASCVD mortality and the leading cause of acquired disability, a major public health problem. There is often a tendency to aggregate all types of stroke (atherothrombotic, cardioembolic, and haemorrhagic), which have, however, different causes and pathophysiology, what may lead to bias when interpreting the results of the studies. Survivors of a first atherothrombotic ischemic stroke are at high risk for coronary events, recurrent stroke, and vascular death. Although epidemiological studies show a weak relationship between cholesterol levels and cerebrovascular disease as a whole compared with other ASCVD types, statin intervention studies have demonstrated a decrease in the risk of stroke in patients with atherosclerosis of other territories and a decrease in all cardiovascular events in patients who have had a stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial demonstrated the benefit of high doses of atorvastatin in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke. In this review, we discuss the evidence, use and recommendations of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, and their role in other scenarios such as the acute phase of ischemic stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, cardioembolic stroke, small vessel disease, and cognitive impairment.

Synergistic actions between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins in atherosclerosis

AimsHypertension and hypercholesterolemia are independent risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) by acting directly on the endothelium and activating the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) and mevalonate pathways. This review examines how the severity and duration of these risk factors may influence the cardiovascular risk through a reciprocal interplay leading to oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory response. Data synthesisThe review highlights the clinical evidence supporting the benefits of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for hypertension, lipid disorders and ASCVD management, both individually and combined, at all stages of the cardiovascular continuum. ConclusionDrug strategies incorporating an ACE-inhibitor and a statin, and in particular perindopril and atorvastatin, have consistently demonstrated reductions in the rate of ASCVD events in patients with hypertension and lipid disorders, cementing their position as first-line therapies for the management of atherosclerosis complications.

Shared decision making and patient reported outcomes among adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, medical expenditure panel survey 2006–2015

ImportanceShared decision-making (SDM), one of the pillars of patient centered care is strongly encouraged and has been incorporated into the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) but the expansion of its use has been limited ObjectiveTo determine the association of SDM on patient-reported health status, measures of quality of care, healthcare resource utilization, and healthcare spending among US adults with ASCVD MethodThis is a retrospective cohort study in an ambulatory setting, utilizing the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2006–2015. Analysis completed in December 2020. Participants included were adults 18 years and over with a diagnosis of ASCVD. We used the average weighted response to self-administered questionnaire evaluating shared-decision-making process as the exposure variable in the regression model. Outcome measures included inpatient hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) visits, statin and aspirin use, self-perception of health, and healthcare expenditure ResultsWhen compared with individuals reporting poor SDM, those with optimal SDM were more likely to report statin and aspirin use [statin use, Odds Ratio (OR) 1.26 (95% CI, 1.09–1.46)], [aspirin use, 1.25 (1.07–1.45)], more likely to have a positive perception of their health and healthcare related quality of life, and were less likely to visit the ED [OR for ≥ 2 ED visits: 0.81 (0.67–0.99)]. There was no difference between groups in annual total or out of pocket healthcare expenditure ConclusionThis study suggests that effective SDM is associated with better utilization of healthcare resources and patient reported health outcomes. We hope these results could provide useful evidence for expanding the use of SDM in patient-centered care among individuals with ASCVD

Assessment and management of the heightened risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients with lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis.

For patients with lupus erythematosus (LE) or dermatomyositis (DM), there is an urgent need to address a heightened risk of clinical events, chiefly heart attacks and strokes, caused by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Patients with LE or DM frequently exhibit high levels of conventional risk factors for ASCVD events, particularly dyslipoproteinemia and hypertension; an amplified burden of atherosclerotic plaques; and increased age- and sex-adjusted rates of ASCVD events compared with the general population. The rate of ASCVD events exceeds what would be expected from conventional risk factors, suggesting that disease-specific autoimmune processes exacerbate specific, known pathogenic steps in atherosclerosis. Importantly, despite their heightened risk, patients with LE or DM are often undertreated for known causative agents and exacerbators of ASCVD. Herein, we propose an approach to assess and manage the heightened risk of ASCVD events in patients with LE or DM. Our approach is modeled in large part on established approaches to patients with diabetes mellitus or stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease, which are well-studied conditions that also show heightened risk for ASCVD events and have been explicitly incorporated into standard clinical guidelines for ASCVD. Based on the available evidence, we conclude that patients with LE or DM require earlier and more aggressive screening and management of ASCVD. We suggest that physicians consider implementing multipliers of conventional risk calculators to trigger earlier initiation of lifestyle modifications and medical therapies in primary prevention of ASCVD events, employ vascular imaging to quantify the burden of subclinical plaques, and treat to lower lipid targets using statins and newer therapies, such as PCSK9 inhibitors, that decrease ASCVD events in nonautoimmune cohorts. More clinical vigilance is needed regarding surveillance, prevention, risk modification, and treatment of dyslipidemias, hypertension, and smoking in patients with LE or DM. All of these goals are achievable.

The Effects of Statin Dose, Lipophilicity, and Combination of Statins plus Ezetimibe on Circulating Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background Elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the main risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Statins are the drugs of choice for decreasing LDL-C and are used for the prevention and management of ASCVD. Guidelines recommend that subjects with high and very high ASCVD risk should be treated with high-intensity statins or a combination of high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. The lipophilicity or hydrophilicity (solubility) of statins is considered to be important for at least some of their LDL-C lowering independent pleiotropic effects. Oxidative modification of LDL (ox-LDL) is considered to be the most important atherogenic modification of LDL and is supposed to play a crucial role in atherogenesis and ASCVD outcomes. Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to find out what are the effects of statin intensity, lipophilicity, and combination of statins plus ezetimibe on ox-LDL. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 5, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent and blinded authors evaluated eligibility by screening the titles and abstracts of the studies. Risk of bias in the studies included in this meta-analysis was evaluated according to the Cochrane instructions. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) V2 software. Evaluation of funnel plot, Begg's rank correlation, and Egger's weighted regression tests were used to assess the presence of publication bias. Results Among the 1427 published studies identified by a systematic databases search, 20 RCTs were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. A total of 1874 patients are included in this meta-analysis. This meta-analysis suggests that high-intensity statin treatment is associated with a significant decrease in circulating concentrations of ox-LDL when compared with low-to-moderate treatment (SMD: -0.675, 95% CI: -0.994, -0.357, p < 0.001; I2: 55.93%). There was no difference concerning ox-LDL concentration between treatments with hydrophilic and lipophilic statins (SMD: -0.129, 95% CI: -0.330, -0.071, p = 0.206; I2: 45.3%), but there was a significant reduction in circulating concentrations of ox-LDL associated with statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy when compared with statin monotherapy (SMD: -0.220, 95% CI: -0.369, -0.071, p = 0.004; I2: 0%). Conclusion High-dose statin or combination of statins with ezetmibe reduces plasma ox-LDL in comparison low-to-moderate intensity statin therapy alone. Statin lipophilicity is not associated with reduction in ox-LDL plasma concentrations.

Use of antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Insights from the COordinated National Network to Engage Cardiologists in the antithrombotic Treatment of patients with CardioVascular Disease (CONNECT‐CVD) study

Although acetylsalicylic acid is the most commonly used antithrombotic agent for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events, residual atherothrombotic risk has prompted a guideline recommendation for the addition of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or dual pathway inhibition (DPI) in high vascular risk patients. Accordingly, the CONNECT CVD quality enhancement initiative provides a contemporary "snapshot" of the clinical features and antithrombotic management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients in Canada. Canadian cardiologists (49 cardiologists from six provinces) undertook a retrospective chart audit of 10 ASCVD patients in their outpatient practice who met the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategy-like criteria from May 2018 to April 2019. Of the 492 (two cardiologists provided 11 patients) enroled, average age was 70years, 25% were female, 39% had diabetes and 20% had atrial fibrillation. Prior revascularisation was common (percutaneous coronary artery intervention 61%, coronary artery bypass graft 39%), with 31% having multivessel disease. A total of 47% of patients had a Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health bleeding score of ≥11 (~2.8% risk of serious bleeding at 2years). Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) alone was most commonly used (62%), while 22% were on DAPT alone. In total, 22% were on oral anticoagulation (OAC), with 16% being on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant alone, 5% on DPI and 1% received triple therapy. In contemporary Canadian clinical practice of stable ASCVD patients, a large number of patients receive antithrombotic therapy other than SAPT. Further efforts are required to guide the appropriate selection of patients in whom more potent antithrombotic therapies may safely reduce residual risk.

Clinical Implications of Genetic Profiling, Polygenic Risk Scores, LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) – What is New?

Clinical Implications of Genetic Profiling, Polygenic Risk Scores, LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) – What is New?

Optimizing Cardiovascular Health Worldwide: The Global Cardiovascular Nursing Leadership Forum.

Optimizing Cardiovascular Health Worldwide: The Global Cardiovascular Nursing Leadership Forum.

Lipid control and its associated factors among patients with dyslipidaemia in Jordan.

Lipid control represents a cornerstone in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nevertheless, little research has explored the factors associated with poor lipid control in patients with dyslipidaemia. The study aim was to investigate the variables associated with poor lipid control among patients with dyslipidaemia in Jordan. In addition to socio-demographics, disease and medication-related variables, lipid profile including total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C and triglyceride and other biomedical variables were collected for patients diagnosed with dyslipidaemia using hospital medical charts at three major outpatient clinics in Jordan. The validated 4-item medication adherence scale and the beliefs about medications questionnaire were used to evaluate medication adherence and medication beliefs among the study participants. The participants were classified to have controlled and uncontrolled dyslipidaemia using recent AHA guidelines. A stepwise forward conditional binary regression was conducted to explore the variables significantly and independently associated with dyslipidaemia control. A P-value of<.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 228 patients participated in the study. Most of the study participants (61%) were classified to have uncontrolled lipid profile and 60.1% of them were found to have ASCVD. Regression analysis revealed that increased necessity for dyslipidaemia medications increased the odds of dyslipidaemia control (OR=1.14), whereas active smoking (OR=0.42), low medication adherence (OR=0.0.8) and the presence of ASCVD (odd ratio=0.24) were significantly associated with poor dyslipidaemia control. Lipid profile has considerable scope for improvement in patients with dyslipidaemia in Jordan. Improving medication adherence by emphasising on medication necessity and simplifying the prescribed dosage regimen, particularly in smoking patients and those who have ASCVD, should be particularly considered in future clinical pharmacy service programmes aim at improving lipid control and health outcomes in patients with dyslipidaemia.

The risk and added values of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk enhancers on prediction of cardiovascular events: Tehran lipid and glucose study

BackgroundIn 2013 American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association released a guideline on the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) including a composite of death from CVD, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke (hard CVD). This guideline recommended a risk score that was calculated using pooled cohort equations (ASCVD-PCE). The guideline was updated in 2018/2019 and further risk discussion was suggested for deciding whether to continue or initiate statin therapy among non-diabetic individuals with ASCVD-PCE score ranged 5–20%. They recommended a risk discussion with considering risk enhancing factors (ASCVD-REFs) including family history of premature CVD, chronic kidney disease, triglycerides ≥ 175 mg/dl, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 160 mg/dl, metabolic syndrome (Mets), and for women premature menopause, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). In the current study, we aimed to examine the predictability of recommended ASCVD-REFs on incident hard CVD in non-diabetic individuals with LDL-C 70-189 mg/dl, with ASCVD-PCE risk 5–20% during 10 and 15-year follow-up.MethodsAmong a total of 3546 non-diabetic individuals aged 40-75 years, after excluding those with ASCVD-PCE score < 5% and ≥ 20% (n = 2342), 1204 individuals (women = 332) were included. The univariable and multivariable (further adjusted for ASCVD-PCE) Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the association of each potential ASCVD-REFs with hard CVD. Additionnaly, the role of different components of Mets and a history of gestational diabetes (GDM)/macrosomia was also examined. The predictive ability of each significant ASCVD-REFs, then was evaluated by the discrimination accuracy and risk reclassification index.ResultsDuring the 10-year follow-up, 73 hard CVD events occurred. Although in univariable analysis, high blood pressure (BP) component of Mets, GDM/macrosomia, and HDP remained as significant ASCVD-REFs, in the multivariable analysis, only the history of HDP (5.35 (1.22–23.38)) and GDM/macrosomia (3.18 (1.05–9.65)) showed independent risks. During the 15-year follow-up, Mets (1.47 (1.05–2.06)) and its components of high waist circumference (1.40 (1.0–1.95)) and high BP (1.52 (1.07–2.15)) significantly increased the risk. These ASCVD-REFs did not improve discrimination or predictive ability.ConclusionsIn a decade follow-up, only conditions specific for women and in longer follow-up, the presence of Mets perse, and its components of high WC and high BP were shown as significant ASCVD-REFs.

Glucose-lowering pharmacotherapies in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. An expert consensus reported by the Chinese Diabetes Society and the Chinese Society of Endocrinology.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which are important causes of disabling and death in patients with T2DM. For the prevention and management of ASCVD or CKD, cardiovascular risk factors should be systematically evaluated, and ASCVD and CKD should be screened in patients with T2DM. In this consensus, we recommended that metformin should be used as the first-line therapy for patients with T2DM and ASCVD or very high cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF) or CKD, and should be retained in the treatment regimen unless contraindicated or not tolerated. In patients with T2DM and established ASCVD or very high cardiovascular risk, addition of a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor with proven cardiovascular benefits should be considered independent of individualised glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C ) targets. In patients with T2DM and HF, an SGLT2 inhibitor should be preferably added regardless of HbA1C levels. In patients with T2DM and CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors should be preferred for the combination therapy independent of individualised HbA1C targets, and GLP-1RAs with proven renal benefits would be alternative if SGLT2 inhibitors are contraindicated. Moreover, the prevention of hypoglycaemia and management of multiple risk factors by comprehensive regimen, including lifestyle intervention, antihypertensive therapies, lipid-lowering treatment and antiplatelet therapies, should be kept in mind in treating patients with T2DM and ASCVD, HF or CKD.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in inflammatory bowel disease: The role of chronic inflammation.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) causes systemic vascular inflammation. The increased risk of venous as well as arterial thromboembolic phenomena in IBD is well established. More recently, a relationship between IBD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has been postulated. Systemic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, have well characterized cardiac pathologies and treatments that focus on prevention of disease associated ASCVD. The impact of chronic inflammation on ASCVD in IBD remains poorly characterized. This manuscript aims to review and summarize the current literature pertaining to IBD and ASCVD with respect to its pathophysiology and impact of medications in order to encourage further research that can improve understanding and help develop clinical recommendations for prevention and management of ASCVD in patients with IBD.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease screening and management protocols among adult HIV clinics in Asia

ObjectivesIntegration of HIV and non-communicable disease services improves the quality and efficiency of care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to describe current practices for the screening and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) among adult HIV clinics in Asia. MethodsSixteen LMIC sites included in the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS – Asia-Pacific network were surveyed. ResultsSites were mostly (81%) based in urban public referral hospitals. Half had protocols to assess tobacco and alcohol use. Protocols for assessing physical inactivity and obesity were in place at 31% and 38% of sites, respectively. Most sites provided educational material on ASCVD risk factors (between 56% and 75% depending on risk factors). A total of 94% reported performing routine screening for hypertension, 100% for hyperlipidaemia and 88% for diabetes. Routine ASCVD risk assessment was reported by 94% of sites. Protocols for the management of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, high ASCVD risk and chronic ischaemic stroke were in place at 50%, 69%, 56%, 19% and 38% of sites, respectively. Blood pressure monitoring was free for patients at 69% of sites; however, most required patients to pay some or all the costs for other ASCVD-related procedures. Medications available in the clinic or within the same facility included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (81%), statins (94%) and sulphonylureas (94%). ConclusionThe consistent availability of clinical screening, diagnostic testing and procedures and the availability of ASCVD medications in the Asian LMIC clinics surveyed are strengths that should be leveraged to improve the implementation of cardiovascular care protocols.

A Look Beyond Statins and Ezetimibe: a Review of Other Lipid-Lowering Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in High-Risk Patients

There has been significant progress made during the last few decades in the management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite this, residual risk remains an unmet need for secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention patients. First onset and recurrent cardiovascular events remain a major issue despite recommendations for a healthy lifestyle and current optimal medical therapy, which includes the use of maximally tolerated statin therapy plus or minus add-on ezetimibe therapy. These findings have led to the development of new treatments that modulate lipid targets in order to improve prognosis of these patients at highest ASCVD risk. These include inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (evolocumab and alirocumab), an inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (bempedoic acid), and a high-dose omega-3 formulation (icosapent ethyl), which have been evaluated in large phase III randomized clinical trials and/or currently undergoing continued study. The clinical efficacy of these drugs and their application in cardiovascular prevention are discussed in this review article. Of note, there are other novel lipid-lowering therapeutics with potential cardiovascular benefit, not discussed in this review, that include inhibitors of lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein CIII, and angiopoietin-like 3. These drugs may also play a future role in reducing residual lipid-mediated ASCVD risk, if efficacy and safety confirmed in cardiovascular outcome trials. In this review, we provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding treatment with several new lipid strategies for high-risk patients, along with suggestions on their use in ASCVD prevention management.

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Enhancing Risk Stratification and Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease in Women.

There are numerous gender- and sex-based differences that contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality related to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in women. Early detection of risk and targeted management of atherosclerotic disease is fundamental to reduce ASCVD risk and improve outcomes in women. In this review, we examine the utility of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and coronary CT angiography (CTA) in three ASCVD scenarios including coronary artery calcium scoring for risk stratification in asymptomatic women, and coronary CTA for diagnosis and prognosis of stable ischemic heart disease and acute chest pain. The risks of radiation exposure and the potential applications of novel technologies in women are explored. CTA provides the capabilities of early recognition and management of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent advancements in plaque composition and morphology further enhance the prognostic yield from coronary CTA. Innovations in stress perfusion and computational fluid dynamics allow for evaluation of physiological measures of ischemia. In addition, developments in artificial intelligence (AI) may also help unlock a deeper understanding of atherosclerosis and risk in women. Coronary CTA is an accurate and useful modality for early detection and management of ASCVD in women. Novel technologies hold great promise for furthering our understanding of sex-specific pathophysiology and potential improvement in clinical management and outcomes.