Management Of Actinic Keratosis Research Articles

The development and validation of a decision aid to enhance shared decision‐making for the management of actinic keratosis

AbstractActinic keratoses (AKs) are common pre‐malignant lesions. There are numerous management options including active surveillance, multiple topical therapies, cryotherapy, curettage and cautery, and photodynamic therapy, each with their own risks, benefits and efficacy. Best practice currently involves shared decision‐making between patient and clinician, particularly in the setting of multiple management options. Patient decision aids have been shown to be beneficial in the shared decision‐making process. In view of this, we have developed and validated a decision aid for the management of AKs, in concordance with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards.

Advancements in elucidating the pathogenesis of actinic keratosis: present state and future prospects.

Solar keratosis, also known as actinic keratosis (AK), is becoming increasingly prevalent. It is a benign tumor that develops in the epidermis. Individuals with AK typically exhibit irregular, red, scaly bumps or patches as a result of prolonged exposure to UV rays. These growths primarily appear on sun-exposed areas of the skin such as the face, scalp, and hands. Presently, dermatologists are actively studying AK due to its rising incidence rate in the United States. However, the underlying causes of AK remain poorly understood. Previous research has indicated that the onset of AK involves various mechanisms including UV ray-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, complex mutagenesis, resulting immunosuppression, inhibited apoptosis, dysregulated cell cycle, altered cell proliferation, tissue remodeling, and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. AK can develop in three ways: spontaneous regression, persistence, or progression into invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Multiple risk factors and diverse signaling pathways collectively contribute to its complex pathogenesis. To mitigate the risk of cancerous changes associated with long-term UV radiation exposure, prompt identification, management, and prevention of AK are crucial. The objective of this review is to elucidate the primary mechanisms underlying AK malignancy and identify potential treatment targets for dermatologists in clinical settings.

Topical Immunotherapy for Actinic Keratosis and Field Cancerization.

This comprehensive review delves into various immunotherapeutic approaches for the management of actinic keratoses (AKs), precancerous skin lesions associated with UV exposure. Although there are treatments whose main mechanism of action is immune modulation, such as imiquimod or diclofenac, other treatments, apart from their main effect on dysplastic cells, exert some immunological action, which in the end contributes to their efficacy. While treatments like 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, photodynamic therapy, and nicotinamide are promising in the management of AKs, especially in immunocompetent individuals, their efficacy is somewhat reduced in solid organ transplant recipients due to immunosuppression. The analysis extends to optimal combination, focusing on cryoimmunotherapy as the most relevant. New immunotherapies include resimiquimod, ingenol disoxate, N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), or anti-PD1 that have shown promising results, although more studies are needed in order to standardize their use.

Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of actinic keratosis

Actinic keratoses are common in the UK, especially in lighter skinned individuals and those with high lifetime UV exposure. As they are considered premalignant and can progress to squamous cell carcinoma, early identification and treatment are important. This article provides a guide to the prevention, recognition and management of actinic keratosis.

Field Cancerization Therapies for the Management of Actinic Keratosis: An Updated Review.

Field cancerization theory highlights that the skin surrounding actinic keratoses (AK) is also at increased risk for possible malignant transformation; thus, field-directed treatments may both reduce the risk of AK recurrence and potentially reduce the risk of development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with either aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methylaminolevulinate (MAL), as well as topical treatments such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), diclofenac gel, piroxicam, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate, have all shown higher efficacy than vehicle treatments. PDT is widely recognized for its high efficacy; however, concerns for associated pain have driven new studies to begin using alternative illumination and pretreatment techniques, including lasers. Among topical treatments, a combination of 5-FU and salicylic acid (5-FU-SA) has shown to be the most effective but also causes the most adverse reactions. Tirbanibulin, a new topical agent approved for use in 2020, boasts a favorable safety profile in comparison with imiquimod, 5-FU, and diclofenac. Meanwhile, ingenol mebutate is no longer recommended for the treatment of AKs due to concerns for increased risk of cSCC development. Moving forward, an increasing number of studies push for standardization of outcome measures to better predict risk of future cSCC and use of more effective measures of cost to better guide patients. Here, we present an updated and comprehensive narrative review both confirming the efficacy of previously mentioned therapies as well as highlighting new approaches to PDT and discussing the use of lasers and novel topical treatments for treatment of AK.

Combination of vitamin D and photodynamic therapy enhances immune responses in murine models of squamous cell skin cancer

Improved treatment outcomes for non-melanoma skin cancers can be achieved if Vitamin D (Vit D) is used as a neoadjuvant prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT). However, the mechanisms for this effect are unclear. Vit D elevates protoporphyrin (PpIX) levels within tumor cells, but also exerts immune-modulatory effects. Here, two murine models, UVB-induced actinic keratoses (AK) and human squamous cell carcinoma (A431) xenografts, were used to analyze the time course of local and systemic immune responses after PDT ± Vit D. Fluorescence immunohistochemistry of tissues and flow analysis (FACS) of blood were employed. In tissue, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) were increased, and infiltration of neutrophils (Ly6G+), macrophages (F4/80+), and dendritic cells (CD11c+) were observed. In most cases, Vit D alone or PDT alone increased cell recruitment, but Vit D + PDT showed even greater recruitment effects. Similarly for T cells, increased infiltration of total (CD3+), cytotoxic (CD8+) and regulatory (FoxP3+) T-cells was observed after Vit D or PDT, but the increase was even greater with the combination. FACS analysis revealed a variety of interesting changes in circulating immune cell levels. In particular, neutrophils decreased in the blood after Vit D, consistent with migration of neutrophils into AK lesions. Levels of cells expressing the PD-1+ checkpoint receptor were reduced in AKs following Vit D, potentially counteracting PD-1+ elevations seen after PDT alone. In summary, Vit D and ALA-PDT, two treatments with individual immunogenic effects, may be advantageous in combination to improve treatment efficacy and management of AK in the dermatology clinic.

Needs and challenges among general practitioners in the management of actinic keratosis: a qualitative study

BackgroundBecause of the increasing incidence of actinic keratosis (AK), optimal use of limited healthcare resources is essential. Although most patients can be managed in primary care, dermatology referrals are common. More profound knowledge of general practitioners’ (GPs) considerations might assist in enhancing AK care.MethodsThe aim of the current study was to gain insight into AK management in primary care by exploring the needs and challenges among GPs in the Netherlands. A qualitative study was conducted based on semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 conveniently sampled Dutch GPs, focusing on the needs and challenges in AK management. A literature-informed, predefined topic list guided the interviews, which were recorded, transcribed ad verbatim, and thematically analysed using the Framework Method.ResultsAll GPs reported AK to be a clinical diagnosis and most GPs indicated that most AK patients could be managed in primary care. Cryotherapy was preferred and experience with 5-FU therapy was limited. Most GPs applied cryotherapy without discussing other treatment options with patients. Reasons for dermatology referrals included an incomplete treatment response, extensive lesions, difficult-to-treat areas, and serious doubts about the diagnosis. GPs reported a need for more education, especially on 5-FU therapy. Their main challenges were dealing with diagnostic uncertainty, treating extensive lesions, managing treatment-related skin reactions, and reconciling patient misconceptions.ConclusionsThis study shows various AK management approaches among Dutch GPs with suboptimal guideline compliance due to diverse underlying barriers. It suggests that more education might contribute to a more standardised and uniform AK management and supports further transition of AK care from hospital to primary care.

Expert Recommendations on Facilitating Personalized Approaches to Long-term Management of Actinic Keratosis: The Personalizing Actinic Keratosis Treatment (PAKT) Project.

Actinic keratoses are pre-malignant skin lesions that require personalized care, a lack of which may result in poor treatment adherence and suboptimal outcomes. Current guidance on personalizing care is limited, notably in terms of tailoring treatment to individual patient priorities and goals and supporting shared decision-making between healthcare professionals and patients. The aim of the Personalizing Actinic Keratosis Treatment panel, comprised of 12 dermatologists, was to identify current unmet needs in care and, using a modified Delphi approach, develop recommendations to support personalized, long-term management of actinic keratoses lesions. Panellists generated recommendations by voting on consensus statements. Voting was blinded and consensus was defined as ≥ 75% voting 'agree' or 'strongly agree'. Statements that reached consensus were used to develop a clinical tool, of which, the goal was to improve understanding of disease chronicity, and the need for long-term, repeated treatment cycles. The tool highlights key decision stages across the patient journey and captures the panellist's ratings of treatment options for attributes prioritized by patients. The expert recommendations and the clinical tool can be used to facilitate patient-centric management of actinic keratoses in daily practice, encompassing patient priorities and goals to set realistic treatment expectations and improve care outcomes.

The Importance of Medication Adherence in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: An Expert Consensus Panel

Background: Actinic keratosis (AK) is one of the most common dermatologic diagnoses. While there are several treatment options, many topical therapies have poor adherence due to duration of treatment and local skin reactions (LSRs).
 Objective: To review the available literature on the most commonly used patient-administered field-directed therapies for AK and create consensus statements on the role of medication adherence in improving AK outcomes.
 Methods: A literature search of PubMed was completed for English-language original research articles reporting efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for 5-FU, diclofenac gel, imiquimod cream, and tirbanibulin. Once the articles were selected, they were distributed to a panel consisting of seven dermatologists with extensive expertise in managing AKs. Each panelist reviewed the articles and assigned them a level of evidence based on Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) criteria. The panelists then met to review and discuss the studies and created consensus statements on the management of AKs and the importance of medication compliance. A modified Delphi process was used to approve the adoption of each statement.
 Results: The literature search produced 1,326 articles that met search criteria. After screening these articles for relevance and applying the inclusion criteria, 17 articles were chosen to be reviewed by the panel and assigned a level of evidence based on SORT criteria. The panel then created six consensus statements that received a unanimous vote for adoption.
 Conclusion: While there are several options for the treatment of AK, there is little consensus on a standard of care. Clearance rates for the most common topical field therapies vary significantly but are also difficult to directly compare due to differences in methodology for measuring and assessing outcomes. Overall, it is clear that an efficacious, tolerable, and convenient treatment for AKs is critical to optimal adherence and management and, given the results of recent studies, tirbanibulin may be the best topical option for meeting these criteria.

Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Tirbanibulin 1% Treatment for Actinic Keratosis in Routine Clinical Practice Across the U.S. (PROAK Study)

Background: Patients' experiences regarding topical actinic keratosis (AK) treatments may optimize clinical outcomes. PROAK study aimed to evaluate patient- and clinician-reported outcomes among adult patients with AK on face or scalp who were prescribed tirbanibulin in real-world clinical practice in the United States.
 Methods: Key primary endpoint was quality of life (QoL) assessed by Skindex-16. Additional endpoints were tirbanibulin treatment effectiveness and satisfaction (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and Expert Panel Questionnaire).
 Results: 290 patients were included in this analysis. At week 8, Skindex-16 scores improved in all domains (mean change from baseline [standard deviation, SD]: -14.3 [27.8] in symptoms, -24.9 [33.0] in emotions, and -9.8 [23.7] in functioning domain). Clinicians and patients reported high global satisfaction with tirbanibulin (mean [SD] scores of 78.8 [20.1] and of 74.5 [23.5]). Overall skin appearance improved from baseline to week 8 (91.0% clinicians; 84.1% patients). In comparison with previous treatments, tirbanibulin had shorter skin reactions duration (89.2% clinicians; 73.9% patients); milder skin reaction severity (91.0% clinicians; 76.6% patients); better daily activities impact (87.4% clinicians; 64.0% patients); and was easier to use (88.3% clinicians; 71.2% patients). Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) success (0-1) was achieved by 73.8% of the patients. Skin photodamage severity reduction from baseline to week 8 was significant (77.4% vs. 39.6%; p<0.0001).
 Conclusions: Tirbanibulin treatment demonstrated effectiveness in AK management. Moreover, tirbanibulin improved QoL, as early as week 8, and both clinicians and patients reported tirbanibulin treatment convenience, and high levels of treatment satisfaction, compared to patient’s previous treatments.

Clinical Management of Actinic Keratosis: Review and Update

Actinic keratosis is commonly seen in dermatology clinics. Age and chronic sun exposure are the essential risk factors for its pathogenesis. It is regarded as a premalignant lesion; hence, aggressive treatment is warranted. Abundant research has been published about overall management, however, extensive knowledge about actinic keratosis prevention, the cost, safety profile, and mechanism of the existing therapeutics are pivotal in optimal clinical care. In this review article, we hereby present several commonly used approaches in office settings and the current guidelines. Finally, we will discuss the limitations of the available clinical evidence.

Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: The Best Choice through an Observational Study.

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a precancerous lesion that can progress to invasive squamous cell carcinoma if untreated. However, no gold standard treatment has been established. We aimed to investigate the management of AK by comparing the effectiveness and treatment duration of treatment modalities, including cryotherapy, imiquimod (IMQ), and photodynamic therapy (PDT). We reviewed the medical records of 316 patients diagnosed with AK at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital from February 2015 to May 2020, and a total of 195 patients were included. The clearance rate was the highest in PDT, followed by cryotherapy and IMQ (82.4%, 71.2%, and 68.0%, respectively). The recurrence rate was the lowest in cryotherapy, followed by PDT and IMQ (3.5%, 6.7%, and 10.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). The average treatment duration was shortest with PDT, followed by IMQ and cryotherapy (5.5 weeks, 6.8 weeks, and 9.1 weeks, respectively, p < 0.05). The number of hospital visits was lowest for PDT, followed by cryotherapy and IMQ (1.8, 2.8, and 3.6, respectively, p < 0.05). PDT showed the highest clearance rate, a moderate recurrence rate, the shortest treatment duration, and the least number of visits, suggesting that PDT could be the first choice for treatment of AK. Considering the advantages as a topical agent, IMQ could also be a treatment option.

Classifying Actinic Keratosis: What the Reality of Everyday Clinical Practice Shows Us.

Difficulties faced by clinicians in routine clinical practice when selecting the appropriate treatment for patients with actinic keratosis (AK) include: the independent evaluation of AK lesions, the absence of a standardized definition of field cancerization (FC), and the lack of a reproducible classification to grade the entire AK-affected area. Moreover, to assess the severity of AK, most guidelines rely on lesion count, which is often not reproducible among specialists. The present work has 2 main objectives: first, to review and highlight some of the issues clinicians tackle when classifying and monitoring AK lesions and the status of FC, looking in more detail at some of the most commonly used clinical scales for classifying AK lesions. Second, we pose questions that we encounter in daily clinical practice, and whose answers or comments help to deal with cases of AK, facilitating the work of clinicians: How should we approach AK diagnosis? How do the challenges of clinical studies on the evaluation of treatment efficacy translate into clinical practice? We review the literature on the clinical classifications and management of AK, and propose how to guide the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of patients with AK. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):845-849. doi:10.36849/JDD.6704.

Focused update: Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis

Actinic keratoses (AKs) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically UV-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. In 2021, the American Academy of Dermatology published guidelines to assist in clinical decision-making for the management of AK. The purpose of this focused guideline update is to incorporate recently available evidence on the use of topical tirbanibulin to treat AK. A multidisciplinary work group conducted a systematic review to evaluate data on the use of tirbanibulin for AK and applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading a clinical recommendation. The graded recommendation was voted on to achieve consensus. Two trials were identified, and analysis of the evidence resulted in 1 recommendation. This analysis is based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. Long-term efficacy and safety data are not currently available. A strong recommendation for the use of topical tirbanibulin to join the currently recommended list of topical therapies for AK was made on the basis of the available evidence.

2020 IDEOM Annual Meeting: Actinic Keratosis Stakeholders Survey Identifies Gaps in Research and Care.

This is a report of the survey results from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) actinic keratosis (AK) workgroup. The purpose of the survey was to compile a list of gaps within AK care and management that require refinement. The results were discussed at the IDEOM annual meeting held virtually on October 23&ndash;24, 2020. This built a framework with which the AK workgroup, which consisted of physicians, patients, and pharmaceutical scientists, discussed at length in their breakout session at the meeting. The electronic survey was distributed to patients, pharmaceutical scientists, and leading physician experts in the field via email on September 22, 2020, with a deadline of October 2, 2020. The survey consisted of three open-ended prompts concerning key gaps and/or unmet needs in (1) the care of AKs, (2) outcome measurement of AKs in clinical trials and, (3) the measurement of AKs in clinical practice. The results were qualitative, with a response rate of 47%. Responses included reform of outcome measures for clinical trials, a methodology for evaluating the efficacy of preventative measures, and a comparison of treatments to establish a treatment protocol, among other efforts. This paper will also provide a brief overview of the current state of the AK outcome measures, emphasizing the heterogeneity of the measures and detailing the AK workgroup's future efforts to create a reliable and applicable core outcome measure set. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(2):128-134. doi:10.36849/JDD.6360.

28521 Frequency of procedural and medical treatments for actinic keratosis

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common dermatologic diagnosis with the potential of malignant transformation. Treatment options include destructive therapies, such as cryotherapy, and topical medications, such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate. Historically, destructive procedures have remained the standard of care. There have been limited updates on AK management practices; we determined the frequency of procedural and medical treatments of AK. We assessed visits from the 2009 to 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to quantify the use of cryotherapy, topical 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, ingenol and topical aminolevulonic acid (as a proxy for photodynamic therapy). There were an estimated 11.5 (10.6, 12.4) million visits with a primary diagnosis of AK. One or more of the studied treatments were identified at 47.1% (42.5, 51.6) of visits. Of visits with some kind of AK treatment, cryotherapy was used in 90.6% (81.5, 99.7) of visits, while 5-fluorouracil, imiquimod, and ingenol were prescribed at 4.06% (2.20, 5.92), 5.00% (1.65, 8.36) and 0.16% (0, 0.33) of all visits (respectively). Photodynamic therapy was used at 0.90% (0.25, 1.55) of all visits with treatment. Despite the expansion of treatment options, cryotherapy remains the standard of care. Future development of therapies with improved tolerability and patient compliance as well as alternate payment models have the potential to change the standard of practice.

Advances and Considerations in the Management of Actinic Keratosis: An Expert Consensus Panel Report.

Actinic Keratosis (AK) is a potentially pre-malignant tumor with a poorly defined risk of progression to invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Because of the typical need for recurrent cycles of AK treatment, outcomes can be limited by both therapeutic efficacy and patient adherence. To synthesize the available and most current literature into overarching principles to provide guidance on the management of AKs, improving patient experiences and treatment outcomes. A systematic review querying epidemiology, natural history, prognosis, management of AKs as well as the mechanism of action of and adherence to current AK therapy was conducted. After reviewing the literature, an expert consensus panel consisting of 10 expert dermatologists and dermatopathologists used a modified Delphi process to develop statements regarding the pathogenesis and management of AKs. Final statements were only adopted with a supermajority vote (&ge;7/10). The panel developed 7 consensus statements regarding AKs pathogenesis and management. The poorly defined risk for AK progression into invasive SCC without universally accepted clinical-histopathological factors highlights the importance of long-term efficacious treatment. To effectively counsel and treat patients with actinic keratoses, dermatologists must understand how newer therapeutic approaches with mechanisms of action that have more rapid onset of action, shorter treatment courses, and less intense local skin reaction (LSRs) may promote adherence and improve long-term outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):888-893. doi:10.36849/JDD.6078 THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL fTEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Vitamin D and Vitamin D Analogs as Adjuncts to Field Therapy Treatments for Actinic Keratoses: Current Research and Future Approaches.

Actinic keratoses (AK), also known as solar keratoses, are precancerous hyperkeratotic papules caused by long-term exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Management of AK prior to progression to cutaneous malignancy represents an important window of intervention. This is important on a population level, given the high incidence, morbidity, financial costs, and the low but measurable risk of mortality from cutaneous neoplasia. Treatments for AK have been refined for many years with significant progress over the past decade. Those recent advancements lead to questions about current treatment paradigms and the role of harnessing the immune system in field therapies. Recent studies suggest a key interplay between vitamin D and cancer immunity; in particular, the systemic and/or topical vitamin D analogs can augment field therapies used for severe actinic damage. In this review, we will examine the literature supporting the use of vitamin D-directed therapies to improve field therapy approaches. An enhanced understanding of these recent concepts with a focus on mechanisms is important in the optimized management of AK. These mechanisms will be critical in guiding whether selected populations, including those with immunosuppression, heritable cancer syndromes, and other risk factors for skin cancer, can benefit from these new concepts with vitamin D analogs and whether the approaches will be as effective in these populations as in immunocompetent patients.

Guidelines of care for the management of actinic keratosis: Executive summary

Actinic keratoses (AK) are rough scaly patches that arise on chronically ultraviolet-exposed skin and can progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. Treatment options for AK include topical medications, photodynamic therapy, cryosurgery, and laser ablation. This executive summary provides a synopsis of the 18 evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of AK detailed in the Guidelines of Care for the Management of Actinic Keratosis. A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review to address 5 clinical questions on the management of AKs and applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence and formulating and grading clinical recommendations. Graded recommendations were voted on to achieve consensus. Analysis of the evidence resulted in 18 recommendations, suggesting there are several effective treatments available for AK. The analysis informing the recommendations was based on the best available evidence at the time it was conducted. The results of future studies may necessitate a revision of current recommendations. Strong recommendations are presented for using ultraviolet protection, topical imiquimod, topical 5-fluorouracil, and cryosurgery. Conditional recommendations are presented for the use of photodynamic therapy and diclofenac for the treatment of AK, both individually and as part of combination therapy regimens.

Optimizing management of actinic keratosis concerning for underlying carcinoma in anatomically sensitive locations: Application of complete circumferential peripheral and deep margin assessment

To the Editor: We define “special actinic keratoses (AKs)” by 2 criteria: (1) location on anatomically sensitive sites that are cosmetically important (face) or tight skin (scalp, hands, feet, or lower legs) and (2) partial biopsy showing a complex AK extending to the base of the biopsy specimen without exclusion of carcinoma. Destructive treatments do not allow evaluation of underlying carcinoma. For AKs in esthetically sensitive locations, a vertically sectioned deeper biopsy/excision may generate a defect that requires a complex repair to avoid distortion of a free margin.