Mammographic Follow-up Research Articles

The Use of Stereotaxic Core Biopsy and Stereotaxic Aspiration Biopsy as Diagnostic Tools in the Evaluation of Mammary Calcification.

We compared stereotaxic fine needle aspiration biopsy (SFNA) with stereotaxic core needle biopsy (SCB) in the evaluation of radiographically clustered mammary microcalcification, a common finding at screening mammography. Over a 4-year period, 181 specimens were obtained from 175 patients who underwent both SFNA and SCB of clustered microcalcification. Aspiration and core biopsies were performed by radiologists at a community-based diagnostic radiology facility. All aspiration smears were air dried, stained on site, and assessed for adequacy by the radiologists, then sent to the cytopathologists at New York University for interpretation. Core biopsy specimens were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, hematoxylin and eosin stained, and interpreted by surgical pathologists at a community hospital. Of 181 SFNA specimens, 133 (74%) were benign, 18 (10%) were atypical, 13 (7%) were suspicious, and 16 (9%) were malignant. One (0.5%) aspiration biopsy was nondiagnostic. Excisional biopsies were performed after 12 benign SFNAs and in 46 of the 47 cases with an atypical, suspicious, or malignant diagnosis on SFNA. Mammographic follow-up in 111 of the 133 cases (92%) diagnosed as benign showed no radiologic change (mean 29.2 months, range 6-60 months). The false-negative rate for cancer was 4% (6 cases) for SFNA alone. There were no false-positive diagnoses for SFNA. There was one false-positive diagnosis on core biopsy [focal cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)], which at excisional biopsy and correlation with the core biopsy was diagnosed as ductal hyperplasia; the false-negative rate for cancer was 8% (13 cases) for SCB alone. Aspiration biopsy identified calcification in 180 procedures, core needle biopsy revealed calcification in 170. SFNA was superior to SCB for the confirmation of clustered mammary microcalcification (99% versus 94%) and in the identification of cancer associated with microcalcification (false negative rate of 4% versus 8%). Patients with benign findings on stereotaxic aspiration and core biopsy can reasonably be followed mammographically.

Apport des macrobiopsies stéréotaxiques par aspiration dans la stratégie de prise en charge des microcalcifications mammaires : première série prospective de 115 cas

The objective of this prospective study of a 115-case series cases was to delineate the specific usefulness of this technique for the diagnosis and management of patients with microcalcifications. Materials and methods – Patients with probably benign ACRII and III ( n = 87) or suspicious ACRIV ( n = 14) and high suspicious lesion ACRV ( n = 7) lesions. The microcalcification sites were biopsied with a dedicated table and a vacuum-assisted aspiration system (Mammotome®). The results were correlated either with the results of any surgery or, for the lesions with benign histology findings, with the results of the six-month follow-up mammography. Results – These results concern a series with a follow-up longer than one year. The patients’mean age was 53 years. The procedure was possible in 108 of 115 cases (feasibility). There were two failures. We studied 87 patients with ACRII or III findings; the mean size of the microcalcification cluster was 8.3 ± 6 mm. For 67, it was less than or equal to 10 mm. The mean size for the 21 patients initially staged as ACRIV or V was 18 ± 9 mm, and for 15 of them, it was less than or equal to 10 mm. Microcalcifications were found on the radiographs of 96 % of the biopsies specimens. Excision was complete in 59 of 73 cases for the clusters less than or equal to 10 mm and in only 12 of 35 cases for the larger clusters. The correlation between the ACR staging and the histology results was excellent. Conclusion – Vacuum-aspirated biopsies are indicated especially among patients with an ACRIII finding and a cluster smaller than 10 mm. Surgery was avoided in more than 60 % of these cases. When surgery was performed, it most often resulted in the discovery of malignant lesions. This procedure was also useful for the very small ACRIV clusters, which were totally benign and completely excised. Finally it can be useful for obtaining a preoperative diagnosis in the case of extensive ACRIV or ACRV lesions (strategic biopsies).

Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.

To evaluate the reliability of stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy (SCNB) performed by surgeons to detect histologically benign tissue. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy is widely used to obtain tissue for definitive pathologic diagnosis of mammographically suspicious breast lesions. It has an incidence of malignancy detection similar to that of open biopsy. The potential for sampling error is a concern. Minimal data regarding follow-up and failure rate are available, especially from series performed exclusively by surgeons. Pertinent medical records of all patients who underwent SCNB between April 1995 and October 1997 were reviewed. Breast lesions were classified by mammographic Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) categories before SCNB. Benign biopsy specimens were classified as nonproliferative or proliferative. Malignant lesions and those with atypical histopathology by SCNB were excluded from this analysis. All lesions initially reported as benign were followed up mammographically for at least 2 years for any suspicious change requiring repeat biopsy. During the 31-month period, SCNB was performed on 694 lesions in 619 patients. Histologic evidence of malignancy was found in 112 lesions (16%). The initial histologic diagnosis for the remaining 582 lesions was benign. Four hundred lesions were available for follow-up; of these, 373 (93%) were mammographically categorized as BI-RADS 3 (probably benign) or 4 (suspicious). Three hundred forty-three lesions were categorized as nonproliferative and 151 as proliferative (94 had combined nonproliferative and proliferative histology). Follow-up ranged from 24 to 48 months (mean 33 months). During the follow-up period, 87 lesions (21.8%) underwent either image-guided or open biopsy. At the time of follow-up rebiopsy, ductal carcinoma in situ was found in four lesions and infiltrating ductal carcinoma was found in one, for an overall false-negative rate of 4.3% (5/117) and a negative predictive value of 98.8% (395/400). For the five false-negative cases, the interval from initial SCNB to definitive diagnosis ranged from 7 to 36 months. No correlation was found between the type of initial histopathology and development of malignancy. These results support SCNB as an alternative to open biopsy and show the reliability of SCNB when benign pathology is obtained. However, given the possibility of sampling error and the nature of breast disease, close mammographic and clinical follow-up is necessary. The false-negative rate and negative predictive value in this series compare favorably with those in other reports, supporting the fact that surgeons can confidently use SCNB in the evaluation and treatment of breast disease.

Imaging Guided Biopsy: An Alternative to Surgical Biopsy.

Imaging guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of the breast is an accurate and cost-effective method for the diagnosis of indeterminate breast lesions. It is also useful for the preoperative confirmation of suspected carcinoma. Depending on the location of the lesion in the breast, its imaging characteristics, and the configuration of the breast, biopsy using sonographic or stereotactic guidance may be preferable. However, for many lesions either technique can be used. A variety of biopsy probes are available. For many lesions the ability to make a diagnosis does not appear to depend on the probe size or configuration. However, when calcifications undergo biopsy, the retrieval of larger volumes of tissue may improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and other rare lesions. Major complications are rare with these techniques. With benign histologies, most patients can avoid surgery and return to 6-month follow-up or routine screening mammography. When benign histologies are not concordant with the imaging pattern, when certain high-risk lesions are found at core biopsy, and when the pathologist is unable to make a definitive diagnosis based on the small volume of tissue removed, surgical biopsy is necessary. However, the vast majority of patients with benign diagnoses can avoid surgery with these biopsy techniques. It should be remembered that these techniques are not appropriate for the treatment of breast carcinoma at the present time.

Uncommon high-risk lesions of the breast diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy: clinical importance.

To assess the outcome of papillary lesions, radial scars, or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) diagnosed at stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB). Retrospective review of 1,236 lesions sampled with SCNB yielded 22 papillary lesions, nine radial scars, and five LCIS lesions. Diffuse lesions such as papillomatosis, papillary ductal hyperplasia, papillary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and atypical lobular hyperplasia were not included. The mammographic findings, associated histologic features, and outcome were assessed for each case. Sixteen papillary lesions were diagnosed as benign at SCNB. Of these, five were benign at excision, and 10 were unremarkable at mammographic follow-up. At excision of an unusual lesion containing a microscopic papillary lesion, DCIS was found. Three of four papillary lesions suspicious at SCNB proved to be papillary carcinomas; the fourth had no residual carcinoma at excision. Eight of nine radial scars were excised, which revealed atypical hyperplasia in four scars but no malignancies. One LCIS lesion was found at excision to contain DCIS. Benign or malignant papillary lesions were accurately diagnosed with SCNB in the majority of cases. Cases diagnosed as suspicious for malignancy or with atypia or unusual associated histologic findings should be excised. No malignancies were found at excision of radial scars diagnosed at SCNB. Surgical removal of these lesions following SCNB may not be routinely necessary. DCIS was found in one lesion diagnosed as LCIS at SCNB, which suggests that removal of these lesions may be prudent.

LOCAL BREAST CANCER RECURRENCE CAUSED BY MAMMOGRAPHICALLY GUIDED PUNCTURES

Purpose: To evaluate the risk of needle track seeding or tumor cell implantation as the cause of locally recurrent breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Material and Methods: We reviewed recurrences from a consecutive series of 303 clinically nonpalpable breast cancers treated with breast conserving surgery after pre-operative localization. The median mammographic follow-up was 5.4 years. The suspicion of seeding or implantation was based on the location of the recurrent lesion in comparison with the needle path in two orthogonal mammographic projections. Pre-operative percutaneous biopsies had been done in 71% (214/303) of the cases. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to 82% (194/238) of the invasive cancers and to 28% (18/65) of the ductal cancers in situ (DCIS). Results: Locally recurrent cancer occurred in 11% (33/303) of the cases. Radiotherapy demonstrated a protective effect from relapse among invasive cancers but not for DCIS. Seeding or implantation was suspected in 3 recurrent invasive cancers which had not been subject to radiotherapy. The histopathological diagnosis of the primary cancer and the recurrent cancer were the same in these cases: adenoid cystic, mucinous and tubuloductal cancer. Conclusion: Seeding or implantation was suspected as the cause of local recurrence in 7% (3/44) of the invasive cancers which did not receive radiotherapy.

Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging.

When multiple bilateral partially circumscribed masses having a similar appearance are detected on screening mammography, some radiologists recommend recall examination to identify imaging features suggestive of malignancy that are not evident on standard screening views. This study assesses the need for such recall imaging. Cases of multiple masses were identified by reviewing the mammographic reports of 84,615 consecutive screening examinations. Each case of multiple masses was prospectively interpreted as benign, with recommendations for follow-up mammography in 1 year and for aspiration of any palpable masses if clinically indicated. Subsequently diagnosed cancers were identified through data linkage with our regional tumor registry and through our institution's computer-based outcomes tracking system. Among 84,615 consecutive screening examinations, we identified 1440 (1.7%) cases of multiple masses. Among the multiple-masses cohort, two interval cancers were found. Both were early-stage (T1bN0M0; T1cN0M0) and low-grade (histologic grade 1) cancers. The interval cancer rate among the multiple-masses cohort was 0.14%, which is somewhat lower than the age-matched United States incident cancer rate of 0.24%. The frequency of cancer development and the stage at cancer diagnosis among nonrecalled cases of multiple masses are similar to those observed in the general screening mammography population. Therefore, recall imaging for women with multiple masses does not appear to be justified.

Mastectomy follow-up by biennial mammograms: is it worthwhile?

The value of follow-up after mastectomy for breast cancer is controversial. One reason is to detect metachronous tumour in the contralateral breast, but the optimum method for achieving this is undecided. The long-term follow-up policy of our unit is annual clinical review combined with biennial mammography. We have assessed the benefit of this policy in the detection of tumours of the contralateral breast. The case notes of 216 patients undergoing mastectomy between 1978 and 1985, under the care of one consultant surgeon (DJTW) were reviewed. Follow-up was complete to December 1997, thus allowing a minimum follow-up of 12 years. The development of a metachronous tumour was recorded as was its method of detection : either clinically, by the patient or the clinician, or by routine mammography. Two-hundred and five patients were available for follow-up of the contralateral breast. Seventeen (8.3%) developed metachronous tumours. Eight were detected by the patient, 4 by the clinician and 5 by routine follow-up mammography. Biennial mammography does not appear to be beneficial in breast cancer follow-up. More work is required to determine the benefits of more frequent mammography, with or without breast self-examination and clinical review within the hospital environment or within primary care.

Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.

Step-oblique mammography is a technique used to determine with confidence whether a mammographic finding visible on multiple images on only one projection (but not elucidated using standard additional mammographic projections such as the roll view) represents a summation artifact or a true mass, and to precisely localize the true mass for further evaluation (if applicable). This paper describes the step-oblique technique and evaluates its efficacy. Between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1998, 69 consecutive women underwent step-oblique mammography for the evaluation of densities seen on multiple images in only one standard projection. Additional images were obtained at 15 degrees stepped increments in obliquity. If a one-projection-only finding was not seen on step-oblique images, the density was judged to represent a summation artifact, completing the examination. If a density was visualized and could be triangulated concordantly on step-oblique images ranging from the craniocaudal to the 90 degrees lateral projection, then it was judged to represent a real lesion. Such a lesion was further characterized (mass, neodensity, architectural distortion, focal asymmetric density) and was localized precisely in three dimensions, permitting imaging-guided tissue diagnosis, if appropriate. For all study patients, we also recorded BI-RADS (American College of Radiology Breast Imaging and Data Reporting System) assessment categories; pathology results for biopsied lesions; and mammographic follow-up, clinical follow-up, and linkage to regional tumor registry for nonbiopsied lesions for which at least 2 years had elapsed since step-oblique mammography. Step-oblique mammography differentiated 50 real lesions from 19 summation artifacts. All 50 real lesions, although initially visible on only one standard projection, were successfully localized in three dimensions. Subsequent management resulted in the prompt detection and diagnosis of seven breast cancers and 21 benign lesions. None of the remaining findings managed by follow-up rather than biopsy have subsequently been found to be malignant. Step-oblique mammography is an effective means of evaluating the mammographic finding visible on multiple images on only one standard projection.

Mammography Pain in Women Treated Conservatively for Breast Cancer

Abstract: In this study, pain during mammography in women treated conservatively for breast cancer was examined. It studied pain intensity and its relation to a variety of demographic, medical, and pain coping variables as well as to objective measures of breast compression. Ninety-nine women, treated with lumpectomy (with or without radiation) and undergoing follow-up screening mammography, were asked about strategies they use to cope with everyday pain and then were asked to report pain experienced during the mammogram. Treated and untreated breasts were rated separately and compared with a sample of 125 control women with no history of breast cancer. Women reported significantly greater pain in the treated breast (41% greater than the untreated breast and 32% greater than the control group). There was no consistent relationship between mammography pain and pain coping. Average intensity of pain at last mammogram was the best predictor of pain in both breasts. Women treated conservatively for breast cancer experience significantly greater pain during mammography of their treated breast. Radiologists and technologists can identify women at risk for a painful mammogram by asking about the pain at last mammogram. By applying pain-reducing interventions, they might be able to make the mammography experience more tolerable for these women.

Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram.

This study was undertaken to determine the usefulness of MR imaging of the breast as an adjunct to mammography in problematic cases in which the significance, presence, or location of an abnormality could not be determined. From January 1993 through February 1998, 86 lesions for which histologic or mammographic follow-up was available were evaluated by breast MR imaging because of equivocal findings on mammography. MR studies were performed with a dedicated breast multicoil on a 1.5-T scanner. Early studies were done using a T1-weighted two-dimensional spin-echo sequence before and after the administration of contrast material. Later studies were performed using a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient sequence with fat suppression. Studies were considered to be positive for an abnormality if a focal area of enhancement was seen after contrast administration. MR imaging had positive findings in 38 sites. Twenty-six of these sites corresponded in location to the mammographic abnormality that had prompted the recommendation for MR imaging. The remaining 12 sites occurred in areas not suspected mammographically. At biopsy, 10 (26%) of the 38 positive sites were malignant. MR imaging had negative findings at 60 other sites that had been suspected mammographically. Of these 60 sites, six were treated with excision, all with benign results; the remaining 54 sites showed mammographic stability on follow-up that ranged from 5 to 66 months (mean, 19 months). MR imaging of the breast can be a valuable adjunct to mammography for selected problematic cases.

Stereotactic biopsy of noncalcified breast lesions: Utility of vacuum-assisted technique compared to multipass automated gun technique

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stereotactic 14-gauge, vacuum-assisted biopsy technique in diagnosing noncalcified breast lesions. Stereotactic biopsy of 116 noncalcified breast lesions was performed with either 14-gauge, vacuum-assisted technique or multipass, automated large-core technique. The number of core samples and time required for each biopsy were compared. Outcome for each technique was compared based on recommendations after the mammographic-histologic review process. Results from surgical excision and mammographic follow-up were reviewed. The vacuum-assisted technique obtained more tissue cores mean = 15.8 per lesion than the automated gun technique mean = 5.8 , showed marginal decrease in number of repeat biopsies for discordant results, and required fewer short-term follow-up mammograms, although the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The vacuum-assisted technique can be used successfully to sample noncalcified breast masses, with marginal improvement over the automated gun technique.

Significance of follow-up mammography in estimating the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who have undergone surgery.

We evaluated mammographic changes to assess the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who had undergone surgery. We reviewed the mammograms of 102 breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen (20 mg per day); these patients were subgrouped into tamoxifen-only patients and patients treated with tamoxifen in combination with another therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both). The control group was made up of 50 breast cancer patients who did not undergo tamoxifen therapy and 20 healthy women who had an age distribution and menstruation status similar to those of the breast cancer patients. Two radiologists evaluated parenchymal patterns on mammograms of the contralateral breast in the breast cancer patients and of the left breast in the healthy women. Parenchymal changes before and after surgery were also analyzed. Follow-up mammography showed decreased breast parenchyma in 59.8% of the tamoxifen group, 87.0% of the premenopausal tamoxifen-treated women, 36.0% of the nontamoxifen patients, and 10.0% of the healthy women. On follow-up mammography of breast cancer patients, breast parenchyma was shown to be decreased after tamoxifen therapy. Mammography can be a useful method for evaluating breast parenchymal changes after tamoxifen treatment.

Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?

Probably benign breast lesions: when should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?

Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.

To determine how often lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy (SCNB) change at follow-up mammography and to determine the optimal follow-up strategy and the delayed false-negative rate. From July 1992 through December 1995, 355 of 540 cases (66%) in which SCNB yielded benign results were managed with follow-up mammography. Mammographic follow-up was available for 298 of these cases (84%). Follow-up mammography reports were reviewed. When a change was reported, pre- and postbiopsy mammograms, pathology reports, and results of subsequent mammographic follow-up were reviewed. Mammographic change occurred in 21 of 298 cases (7%) at intervals of 6-55 months (mean, 20 months). Change occurred after initial mammographic stability in 10 of 21 cases. Repeat biopsy was performed in 18 of 21 cases. Malignancy was diagnosed in two cases: one mass that changed at 6 months and one case of microcalcifications that changed at 24 months. This represented a delayed false-negative rate of 2% (two of 105 malignancies among 540 biopsies). A small percentage of cases diagnosed as benign with SCNB will change on follow-up mammograms, which may necessitate repeat biopsy. These results suggest that 6-month follow-up for cases that yield nonspecific benign results at SCNB and yearly screening mammography for cases with specific benign results is a reasonable management strategy.

Bilateral breast carcinomas: Do they have similar mammographic features?

AIMS: This study compared the mammographic appearance, site and histological features of synchronous and metachronous bilateral breast carcinomas. METHODS: Site, type of abnormality and background pattern seen on the diagnostic mammograms of 63 women with bilateral breast carcinoma were compared. The histological type and grade of all the carcinomas were verified by histological review. RESULTS: There was a tendency for the contralateral tumour to have similar mammographic features to those of the initial tumour. In patients in whom the first carcinoma was visible purely as a mass, the contralateral carcinoma had a similar appearance in 82% ( P<0.001). When the original tumour showed mammographic calcification the contralateral tumour did so in 65% ( P<0.001). Normal mammography or calcification alone were seen almost exclusively in women with a dense background pattern (100% and 92% respectively) while masses and calcification with masses were seen in women with dense and fatty patterns (58% and 35% dense respectively). When the mammographic site of the contralateral tumour was compared with that of the first tumour no significant correlation could be demonstrated. There was a significant trend for contralateral carcinomas to be of the same histological grade ( P<0.005) but not histological type. CONCLUSIONS: Contralateral carcinomas often have a similar mammographic appearance to the first tumours. Two factors may be responsible: (i) the tendency for contralateral carcinomas to be of the same histological grade and (ii) the influence of mammographic background pattern on the radiological appearance of breast carcinoma. This knowledge may assist in the interpretation of follow-up mammography in patients with a previous breast carcinoma.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the breast: report of a case with giant vacuolated cells

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) or inflammatory pseudo-tumours are uncommon lesions of unknown aetiology. The majority of the cases are reported in the lungs of young patients. Extra-pulmonary anatomic locations include the abdomen and pelvis, but rare cases have been described in the breast. We describe an IMT in an 86-year-old female, presenting as a well-circumscribed palpable mass in the left breast. Histologically the remarkable feature was the presence of giant vacuolated cells intermixed with spindle cells and a prominent plasma cell infiltrate immersed in a fibrous hyalinized stroma. Immunohistochemical and electron microscopy studies demonstrated the myofibroblastic nature of the giant vacuolated cells and the spindle cells, and the polyclonal nature of the plasma cells. The morphologic and immunohistochemical findings supported the diagnosis of IMT. The biological behaviour of IMT in this age group is unknown and surgical excision with close mammographic follow-up is considered to be appropriate treatment for this lesion in the breast.

A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine‐needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities

BACKGROUND Confidence in a negative stereotaxic breast biopsy result allows for safe clinical and mammographic follow-up, whereas a positive or equivocal diagnosis leads to excision. Direct comparison of stereotaxic core needle biopsy (SCBX) and fine-needle aspiration (SFNA) is needed, and should be based on the use of appropriate current methods of practice, and address the indication of each for different types of mammographic lesions. METHODS The diagnostic accuracy of SFNA, SCBX, and combined SFNA with SCBX performed at a community radiology practice were assessed for different mammographic lesions and levels of radiologic suspicion. Negative predictive values (NPVs) measured the confidence that a negative diagnosis (failure to identify atypia or malignancy) was benign and therefore suitable for follow-up. A benign outcome was accepted only after surgical excision or ≥24 months' follow-up of the lesion. Positive predictive values (PPVs) [final diagnoses at least atypical (A) or carcinoma (CA)] also were calculated. RESULTS SFNA was performed for 495 lesions and was combined with SCBX for 252 of these. Nondiagnostic (SFNA, 2%; SCBX, 8%) and atypical (SFNA, 7%; SCBX, 3%) rates were low. The authors obtained 94% follow-up (81% ≥ 24 months). NPVs were all SFNAs, 99%; SCBXs, 95% (corresponding SFNAs, 98%); and SFNA with SCBX, 99%. NPVs were 100% for masses, ill-defined densities, and architectural distortions. NPVs for microcalcifications (for low, moderate, and high suspicion) were all SFNAs, 97% (100, 95, and 75); SCBXs, 93% (94, 93, and 67), corresponding SFNAs, 96% (100, 94, 75); and SFNA with SCBX, 98% (100, 97, 75). All false-negative lesions were microcalcifications. Calcium was recognized in 98% of SFNA specimens and in 89% of SCBX specimens from microcalcifications. No calcium was identified in the histologic sections in 63% (5 of 8) SCBX false-negative specimens. PPVs(A) were atypical (SFNA, 46%; SCBX, 88%) and suspicious (SFNA, 93%). PPVs(CA) were SFNA carcinoma, 100%; SCBX in situ, 89%; and SCBX invasive, 100%. CONCLUSIONS SFNA identified benign lesions more reliably for follow-up, particularly microcalcifications. Based on these results, the authors suggest 1) added SCBX if on-site SFNA assessment is nondiagnostic, atypical, or positive (and needs preoperative confirmation of invasion); 2) either SCBX or SFNA for masses, architectural distortions, and ill-defined densities; 3) SFNA for microcalcifications, with SCBX added for moderately and highly suspicious lesions; and 4) surgical excision for all highly suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer 1999;85:1119–32. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities

Confidence in a negative stereotaxic breast biopsy result allows for safe clinical and mammographic follow-up, whereas a positive or equivocal diagnosis leads to excision. Direct comparison of stereotaxic core needle biopsy (SCBX) and fine-needle aspiration (SFNA) is needed, and should be based on the use of appropriate current methods of practice, and address the indication of each for different types of mammographic lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of SFNA, SCBX, and combined SFNA with SCBX performed at a community radiology practice were assessed for different mammographic lesions and levels of radiologic suspicion. Negative predictive values (NPVs) measured the confidence that a negative diagnosis (failure to identify atypia or malignancy) was benign and therefore suitable for follow-up. A benign outcome was accepted only after surgical excision or > or =24 months' follow-up of the lesion. Positive predictive values (PPVs) [final diagnoses at least atypical (A) or carcinoma (CA)] also were calculated. SFNA was performed for 495 lesions and was combined with SCBX for 252 of these. Nondiagnostic (SFNA, 2%; SCBX, 8%) and atypical (SFNA, 7%; SCBX, 3%) rates were low. The authors obtained 94% follow-up (81% > or = 24 months). NPVs were all SFNAs, 99%; SCBXs, 95% (corresponding SFNAs, 98%); and SFNA with SCBX, 99%. NPVs were 100% for masses, ill-defined densities, and architectural distortions. NPVs for microcalcifications (for low, moderate, and high suspicion) were all SFNAs, 97% (100, 95, and 75); SCBXs, 93% (94, 93, and 67), corresponding SFNAs, 96% (100, 94, 75); and SFNA with SCBX, 98% (100, 97, 75). All false-negative lesions were microcalcifications. Calcium was recognized in 98% of SFNA specimens and in 89% of SCBX specimens from microcalcifications. No calcium was identified in the histologic sections in 63% (5 of 8) SCBX false-negative specimens. PPVs(A) were atypical (SFNA, 46%; SCBX, 88%) and suspicious (SFNA, 93%). PPVs(CA) were SFNA carcinoma, 100%; SCBX in situ, 89%; and SCBX invasive, 100%. SFNA identified benign lesions more reliably for follow-up, particularly microcalcifications. Based on these results, the authors suggest 1) added SCBX if on-site SFNA assessment is nondiagnostic, atypical, or positive (and needs preoperative confirmation of invasion); 2) either SCBX or SFNA for masses, architectural distortions, and ill-defined densities; 3) SFNA for microcalcifications, with SCBX added for moderately and highly suspicious lesions; and 4) surgical excision for all highly suspicious microcalcifications.

Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up.

To determine the rate and causes of false-negative findings and histologic underestimates at stereotactic biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Stereotactic, 14-gauge, automated, large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) was performed in 483 consecutive nonpalpable breast lesions. Excision was advised for the 143 carcinomas, 25 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) lesions, and five radial scars. Mammographic follow-up was advised for the benign lesions without a repeat biopsy. Of the 310 benign lesions, 259 underwent mammographic follow-up at 6-85 months (median, 55 months) without repeat biopsy, 48 underwent repeat biopsy and three were lost to follow-up. On the basis of the histologic diagnosis of carcinoma at surgical biopsy, diagnosis with LCNB was not correct (i.e., disease was underestimated at histologic examination) in 14 (58%) of 24 ADH lesions and two (40%) of five radial scars. Two (1.2%) of 161 lesions with a final diagnosis of carcinoma were benign at LCNB but malignant at repeat biopsy (i.e., false-negative findings at LCNB). Repeat biopsy was prompted by mammographic progression at 6 and 18 months after LCNB. The false-negative rate with LCNB was 1.2% in this study and 4.0% in the literature. The presence of carcinoma in ADH and radial scar lesions was often underestimated.