Mammalian Runx Genes Research Articles

RUNX transcription factors: orchestrators of development.

RUNX transcription factors orchestrate many different aspects of biology, including basic cellular and developmental processes, stem cell biology and tumorigenesis. In this Primer, we introduce the molecular hallmarks of the three mammalian RUNX genes, RUNX1, RUNX2 and RUNX3, and discuss the regulation of their activities and their mechanisms of action. We then review their crucial roles in the specification and maintenance of a wide array of tissues during embryonic development and adult homeostasis.

Addiction to RUNX in lymphoma

The three mammalian Runx genes encode transcription factors that play essential but distinct and lineage-specific roles in development. These sequence-specific DNA binding proteins share a common binding cofactor (CBFβ) that confers protein stability and high affinity for target DNA on its RUNX partners. An important link to cancer was first realised through identification of both RUNX1 and CBFB as frequent targets for chromosomal translocations in human leukaemia. Early studies suggested that RUNX1 is a tumour suppressor subject to dominant negative inhibition by its fusion oncoprotein derivatives and to loss-of-function mutations in AML (reviewed in [1]). However, it is now clear that RUNX1 is far from a typical tumour suppressor as, for example, AML cells expressing the RUNX1-ETO fusion require the activity of the unaffected allele for survival [2] while ALL cases frequently over-express RUNX1 and/or display increased copy number [1]. Moreover, early studies on mouse models of lymphoma revealed all three Runx genes as targets for transcriptional activation in MYC transgenic mice, and the ability of over-expressed MYC and Runx to synergise in lymphoma has been amply confirmed in compound transgenics [1].

Correction: RUNX1B Expression Is Highly Heterogeneous and Distinguishes Megakaryocytic and Erythroid Lineage Fate in Adult Mouse Hematopoiesis

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005814.].

RUNX1B Expression Is Highly Heterogeneous and Distinguishes Megakaryocytic and Erythroid Lineage Fate in Adult Mouse Hematopoiesis.

The Core Binding Factor (CBF) protein RUNX1 is a master regulator of definitive hematopoiesis, crucial for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) emergence during ontogeny. RUNX1 also plays vital roles in adult mice, in regulating the correct specification of numerous blood lineages. Akin to the other mammalian Runx genes, Runx1 has two promoters P1 (distal) and P2 (proximal) which generate distinct protein isoforms. The activities and specific relevance of these two promoters in adult hematopoiesis remain to be fully elucidated. Utilizing a dual reporter mouse model we demonstrate that the distal P1 promoter is broadly active in adult hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) populations. By contrast the activity of the proximal P2 promoter is more restricted and its upregulation, in both the immature Lineage- Sca1high cKithigh (LSK) and bipotential Pre-Megakaryocytic/Erythroid Progenitor (PreMegE) populations, coincides with a loss of erythroid (Ery) specification. Accordingly the PreMegE population can be prospectively separated into “pro-erythroid” and “pro-megakaryocyte” populations based on Runx1 P2 activity. Comparative gene expression analyses between Runx1 P2+ and P2- populations indicated that levels of CD34 expression could substitute for P2 activity to distinguish these two cell populations in wild type (WT) bone marrow (BM). Prospective isolation of these two populations will enable the further investigation of molecular mechanisms involved in megakaryocytic/erythroid (Mk/Ery) cell fate decisions. Having characterized the extensive activity of P1, we utilized a P1-GFP homozygous mouse model to analyze the impact of the complete absence of Runx1 P1 expression in adult mice and observed strong defects in the T cell lineage. Finally, we investigated how the leukemic fusion protein AML1-ETO9a might influence Runx1 promoter usage. Short-term AML1-ETO9a induction in BM resulted in preferential P2 upregulation, suggesting its expression may be important to establish a pre-leukemic environment.

Runx Family Genes in a Cartilaginous Fish, the Elephant Shark (Callorhinchus milii)

The Runx family genes encode transcription factors that play key roles in hematopoiesis, skeletogenesis and neurogenesis and are often implicated in diseases. We describe here the cloning and characterization of Runx1, Runx2, Runx3 and Runxb genes in the elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii), a member of Chondrichthyes, the oldest living group of jawed vertebrates. Through the use of alternative promoters and/or alternative splicing, each of the elephant shark Runx genes expresses multiple isoforms similar to their orthologs in human and other bony vertebrates. The expression profiles of elephant shark Runx genes are similar to those of mammalian Runx genes. The syntenic blocks of genes at the elephant shark Runx gene loci are highly conserved in human, but represented by shorter conserved blocks in zebrafish indicating a higher degree of rearrangements in this teleost fish. Analysis of promoter regions revealed conservation of binding sites for transcription factors, including two tandem binding sites for Runx that are totally conserved in the distal promoter regions of elephant shark Runx1-3. Several conserved noncoding elements (CNEs), which are putative cis-regulatory elements, and miRNA binding sites were identified in the elephant shark and human Runx gene loci. Some of these CNEs and miRNA binding sites are absent in teleost fishes such as zebrafish and fugu. In summary, our analysis reveals that the genomic organization and expression profiles of Runx genes were already complex in the common ancestor of jawed vertebrates.

CDNA cloning of Runx family genes from the pufferfish ( Fugu rubripes)

The Runx family genes are involved in hematopoiesis, osteogenesis and neuropoiesis, and mutations in these genes have been frequently associated with human hereditary diseases and cancers. Here we report the cDNA cloning of the full Runx gene family of the pufferfish ( Fugu rubripes), which comprises frRunx1, frRunx2, frRunx3, frRunt and frCbfb. Fugu is evolutionarily distant from mammals, thus the annotation of the frRunx family genes greatly facilitates comparative genomics approaches. Protein sequence comparison revealed that the fugu genes show high conservation in the Runt domain and PY and VWRPY motifs. frRunx1 had an extra stretch of eight histidine residues, while frRunx2 lacked the poly-glutamine/-alanine stretch that is a hallmark of the mammalian Runx2 genes. Analysis of the promoter regions revealed high conservation of the binding sites for transcription factors, including Runx sites in the P1 promoters. Abundant CpG dinucleotides in the P2 promoter regions were also detected. The expression patterns of the frRunx family genes in various tissues showed high similarity to those of the mammalian Runx genes. The genomic structures of the fugu and mammalian Runx genes are largely conserved except for a split exon 2 in frRunx1 and an extra exon in the C-terminal region of frRunx3 that is missing in mammalian Runx3 genes. The similarities and differences between the Runx family genes of fugu and mammals will improve our understanding of the functions of these proteins.

Control of RUNX2 isoform expression: The role of promoters and enhancers

The three mammalian RUNX genes constitute the family of runt domain transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of a number of developmental processes such as haematopoiesis, osteogenesis and neuronal differentiation. All three genes show a complex temporo-spatial pattern of expression. Since the three proteins are probably mutually interchangeable with regard to function, most of the specificity of each family member seems to be based on a tightly controlled regulation of expression. While RUNX gene expression is driven by two promoters for each gene, the promoter sequence alone does not seem to suffice for a proper expressional control. This review focuses on the available evidence for the existence of such control mechanisms and studies aiming at discovering cis-acting regulatory sequences of the RUNX2 gene.

RNT-1, the C. elegans homologue of mammalian RUNX transcription factors, regulates body size and male tail development

The rnt-1 gene is the only Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of the mammalian RUNX genes. Several lines of molecular biological evidence have demonstrated that the RUNX proteins interact and cooperate with Smads, which are transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signal mediators. However, the involvement of RUNX in TGF-β signaling has not yet been supported by any genetic evidence. The Sma/Mab TGF-β signaling pathway in C. elegans is known to regulate body length and male tail development. The rnt-1(ok351) mutants show the characteristic phenotypes observed in mutants of the Sma/Mab pathway, namely, they have a small body size and ray defects. Moreover, RNT-1 can physically interact with SMA-4 which is one of the Smads in C. elegans, and double mutant animals containing both the rnt-1(ok351) mutation and a mutation in a known Sma/Mab pathway gene displayed synergism in the aberrant phenotypes. In addition, lon-1(e185) mutants was epistatic to rnt-1(ok351) mutants in terms of long phenotype, suggesting that lon-1 is indeed downstream target of rnt-1. Our data reveal that RNT-1 functionally cooperates with the SMA-4 proteins to regulate body size and male tail development in C. elegans.

Conservation and expression of an alternative 3′ exon of Runx2 encoding a novel proline-rich C-terminal domain

The Runx2 ( Cbfa1, Aml3, PEBP2αA) gene plays an essential role in bone development and is one of a three-member family of closely related genes that encode the α-chain DNA binding components of the heterodimeric core binding factor complex. While all three mammalian Runx genes share a complex dual promoter structure (P1, P2) and display alternative splicing, a distinctive feature of Runx2 is the potential to encode larger isoforms in which the C-terminal domain encoded by the standard 3′ terminal exon (exon 6) is replaced by an extended 200–201 amino acid C-terminal sequence including an extensive proline-rich domain and a C-terminal amphipathic helix. We report that the novel exon that gives rise to these variants (exon 6.1) is located over 100 kb downstream of exon 6 in the mouse, rat and human genomes. Exon 6.1 spans a CpG-rich island, and human/rodent conservation is evident through the coding sequence and the 3′ untranslated region (UTR). Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and blot hybridisation analyses reveal that exon 6.1 is utilised at low levels in all mouse tissues and cell lines that express Runx2, regardless of which promoter is active, giving Runx2 the potential to encode more than 12 distinct isoforms. RT-PCR analysis of human RUNX2 exon 6.1 expression shows that utilisation of this exon is also conserved. In vitro transcription/translation of cDNAs encoding several exon 6.1 isoforms reveals that the novel Runx proteins are able to bind specifically to canonical Runx DNA target sequences. Antibodies raised to the unique C-terminal domain were shown to be reactive by immunoprecipitation and immunoblot assay, and were used in confocal immunofluorescence microscopy to reveal low level cytoplasmic staining in osteosarcoma and lymphoma cells that express high levels of Runx2 mRNA. However, reactive protein could not be detected in immunoblots of extracts from either cell type, suggesting that these proteins are unstable in lymphoid and osteosarcoma cells. In conclusion, the conservation and widespread utilisation of Runx2 exon 6.1 suggest that its encoded isoforms play an as yet undetermined role in mammalian development.

Structure and regulated expression of mammalian RUNX genes.

The RUNX are key regulators of lineage-specific gene expression in major developmental pathways. The expression of RUNX genes is tightly regulated, leading to a highly specific spatio/temporal expression pattern and to distinct phenotypes of gene knockouts. This review highlights the extensive structural similarities between the three mammalian RUNX genes and delineates how regulation of their expression at the levels of transcription and translation are orchestrated into the unique RUNX expression pattern.

The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors.

The Runx genes present a challenge to the simple binary classification of cancer genes as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. There is evidence that loss of function of two of the three mammalian Runx genes promotes cancer, but in a highly lineage-restricted manner. In human leukemias, the RUNX1 gene is involved in various chromosomal translocation events that create oncogenic fusion proteins, at least some of which appear to function as dominant-negative inhibitors of the normal gene product. Paradoxically, evidence is mounting that structurally intact Runx genes are also oncogenic when overexpressed. All the three murine genes act as targets for transcriptional activation by retroviral insertional mutagenesis, and the oncogenic potential of Runx2 has been confirmed in transgenic mice. Moreover, the RUNX1 gene is often amplified or overexpressed in cases of acute leukemia. The state of progress in elucidating the oncogenic roles of the Runx genes is the subject of this review, and we draw together recent observations in a tentative model for the effects of Runx deregulation on hematopoietic cell differentiation. We suggest that lineage-specific factors determine the sensitivity to the oncogenic effects of loss or overexpression of Runx factors.

Phylogenesis and regulated expression of the RUNT domain transcription factors RUNX1 and RUNX3

The RUNX transcription factors are key regulators of lineage specific gene expression in developmental pathways. The mammalian RUNX genes arose early in evolution and maintained extensive structural similarities. Sequence analysis suggested that RUNX3 is the most ancient of the three mammalian genes, consistent with its role in neurogenesis of the monosynaptic reflex arc, the simplest neuronal response circuit, found in Cnidarians, the most primitive animals. All RUNX proteins bind to the same DNA motif and act as activators or repressors of transcription through recruitment of common transcriptional modulators. Nevertheless, analysis of Runx1 and Runx3 expression during embryogenesis revealed that their function is not redundant. In adults both Runx1 and Runx3 are highly expressed in the hematopoietic system. At early embryonic stages we found strong Runx3 expression in dorsal root ganglia neurons, confined to TrkC sensory neurons. In the absence of Runx3, knockout mice develop severe ataxia due to the early death of the TrkC neurons. Other phenotypic defects of Runx3 KO mice including abnormalities in thymopoiesis are also being investigated.

The expression of SpRunt during sea urchin embryogenesis

The runt box (runx) is a highly conserved DNA binding and protein–protein interaction domain that defines a family of heterodimeric transcription factors that regulate development in metazoans. The three mammalian runx genes are oncogenes with essential functions in normal development: Runx1 is required for hematopoiesis and is frequently mutated in human and murine leukemias; Runx2 is required for bone development and is associated with human cleidocranial dysplasia and murine leukemias; and Runx3 (the evolutionarily basal member of the mammalian family) regulates growth of the gut and functions as a tumor suppressor in the gastric epithelium ( Westendorf and Hiebert, 1999; Li et al., 2002). The sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus contains a single runx gene, SpRunt. We present here the initial structural characterization of SpRunt, and its pattern of expression during embryogenesis. SpRunt contains two introns, the locations of which are identical to those of the second and third introns from promoter P2 of the mammalian runx genes. A ∼6 kb transcript begins to accumulate during cleavage. At mesenchyme blastula stage, SpRunt transcripts are found throughout the embryo, but specifically enriched in the vegetal plate, skeletogenic mesenchyme, and part of the ectoderm. By late gastrula stage expression is localized to the endomesoderm and oral ectoderm. In the pluteus larva SpRunt transcripts remain confined to the endomesoderm and oral ectoderm, with highest levels of accumulation in the foregut and in the ciliary band. These data suggest that SpRunt expression is enhanced in proliferating cells.