Malpositioned Chest Tube Research Articles

Successful removal of malpositioned chest tube within the lung in a patient with chronic obstructive lung disease

Successful removal of malpositioned chest tube within the lung in a patient with chronic obstructive lung disease

Successful Balloon-Assisted Hepatic Tract Embolization Using the Pull-Through Technique to Remove a Malpositioned Chest Tube Penetrating the Liver and into the Right Ventricle.

Intra-abdominal injury is an uncommon complication of chest tube insertion. A 66-year-old man had empyema and underwent chest tube insertion for drainage. Massive hemorrhage occurred; the postprocedural radiograph showed the malpositioned chest tube in the mediastinum. Computed tomography scan showed that the tube's tip penetrated through the liver capsule and passed through the hepatic vein to the right ventricle. Hepatic tract embolization with coiling was performed during chest tube removal under a controlled condition with the hepatic tract occluded by a balloon catheter. The balloon catheter was placed from the right jugular vein using the pull-through technique, establishing a through-and-through guidewire. This is the first report of successful removal of a chest tube malpositioned in the hepatic vein by balloon-assisted hepatic tract embolization without complication.

Bedside pleural procedures by pulmonologists and non‐pulmonologists: a 3‐year safety audit

Pleural procedures such as tube thoracostomy and chest aspirations are commonly performed and carry potential risks of visceral organ injury, pneumothorax and bleeding. In this context limited information exists on the complication rates when non-pulmonologists perform ultrasound-guided bedside pleural procedures. Bedside pleural procedures in our university hospital were audited to compare complication rates between pulmonologists and non-pulmonologists. A combined safety approach using standardized training, pleural safety checklists and ultrasound-guidance was initially implemented in a ∼1000-bed academic medical centre. A prospective audit, over approximately 3.5 years, of all bedside pleural procedures excluding procedures done in operating theatres and radiological suites was then performed. Overall, 529 procedures (295 by pulmonologists; 234 by non-pulmonologists) for 443 patients were assessed. There were 16 (3.0%) procedure-related complications, all in separate patients. These included five iatrogenic pneumothoraces, four dry taps, four malpositioned chest tubes, two significant chest wall bleeds and one iatrogenic hemothorax. There were no differences in complication rates between pulmonologists and non-pulmonologists. Presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) independently increased the risk of complications by nearly sevenfold. Results from this study support pleural procedural practice by both pulmonologists and non-pulmonologists in an academic medical centre setting. This is possible with a standard training program, pleural safety checklists and relatively high utilization rates of ultrasound guidance for pleural effusions. Nonetheless, additional vigilance is needed when patients with COPD undergo pleural procedures.

Malpositioning of the chest tube across the anterior mediastinum is risky in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with pneumothorax

Malpositioning is one of the most common complications of chest tube insertion and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We present two cases of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) in whom malpositioned chest tubes penetrated through the anterior mediastinum to the contralateral pleural cavity, and were later removed without complications. Both patients had a relatively wide retrosternal airspace and received blunt dissection with a trocar for percutaneous chest tube insertion, which may have increased the risk of chest tube penetration through the anterior mediastinum during tube thoracostomy. Further, the precise location of the malpositioned chest tubes could not be confirmed by single-view anteroposterior portable chest radiography, and computed tomography (CT)-scan was more helpful in the diagnosis and management of the cases reported herein.

Emergency chest tube placement in trauma care—Which approach is preferable?

Pneumothorax is present in about 20% of blunt major trauma cases. Insertion of an intercostal tube drainage is one effective treatment, however it is unclear whether the thoracostomy has more advantages if placed in the ventral (2.-3. intercostal space) or lateral (4.-6. intercostal space) approach. The aim of this study was to determine, whether there are any differences between the two approaches in respect of malposition and complications. The data from 851 consecutive patients, admitted to our trauma centre from January 2000 to June 2004, was collected and analysed prospectively. The inclusion criteria were: ISS > or = 16, insertion of an intercostal tube and subsequent thoracic computed tomography. Epidemiological and physiological data were analysed together with the location of the tube (ventral or lateral). The attending physician was free to choose the location of insertion. Chest tubes placed both on-scene and in-hospital chest tubes were investigated. Malpositions, defined as extrathoracic, abdominal, parenchymal or interlobal positions, were analysed by reviewing the computed tomography of the thorax (CT). Complications, like injuries to vessels or organs, infection or empyaema were analysed using our standardised prospective trauma protocol. Furthermore, the rate of clinically relevant malfunctions due to malposition was investigated as well as the number of chest tubes that had to be replaced. One hundred and one chest tubes were inserted in 68 patients with multiple trauma (mean age 40.7, ISS=38.1, AIS thorax=3.9). In 21 cases a ventral approach was chosen (20.8%) and in 80 a lateral approach (79.2%). CT revealed malposition in two of the ventrally placed tubes (9.5%) and in 20 of the laterally placed tubes (25%) (p=0.15, Fisher's exact test). One tube was identified in a subcutaneous location 17 chest tubes, after ventral approach all of them as a result of lateral approaches, were placed in the interlobe. No interlobal positions were observed in the ventral group. The interlobal position was found to be significantly higher in the lateral approach (p=0.013, Fisher's exact test). Clinically relevant malfunction was diagnosed in 6 of the 22 malpositioned chest tubes (5.9%). These tubes had to be repositioned, one was placed ventrally, the other five were placed laterally. In our setting physicians preferred the lateral approach on-scene as well as in-hospital. In every fifth patient malpositioning of the tube was observed, mostly interlobal after lateral chest tube, however only few were associated with relevant clinical malfunctions. The probability of interlobal malpositioning is significantly higher when using the lateral approach as opposed to the ventral approach. Correction of malpositioned and ineffective chest tubes was necessary in every 17th case. No statistically significant difference between the two approaches for functional malposition was observed. Hence both approaches for emergency chest tube insertion seem to be equally justified.

Diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes after emergency tube thoracostomy: Is computed tomography more accurate than chest radiograph?

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy between computed tomography (CT) and frontal chest radiography in the diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes (MCT). Materials and methods CT scans positive for MCT between March 2000 and March 2004 were reviewed. Two radiologists assessed for intra- and extrathoracic locations of MCT in CT studies. Two physicians who were blinded to the results of CT scans assessed the frontal chest radiographs for location of chest tubes, within the pleural space or outside pleural space. The results of CT were then compared with the results of frontal chest radiographs. Medical records were also reviewed for function of the chest tubes and any complications induced by MCT. Results CT revealed 28 MCT among the 76 chest tubes that were placed in 54 patients. Among the 28 MCT detected by CT, 23 tubes were in the intrathoracic location (20 intraparenchymal; 3 intrafissural) and 5 tubes were in the extrathoracic location (4 in mediastinum; 1 in chest wall). Frontal chest radiographs only revealed six MCT. Among 28 MCT, 16 sufficient, 8 insufficient, and 4 indeterminate functions of the chest tubes were noted from medical charts. One patient complicated with lung abscess, four patients had suffered pleural empyema, and one patient suffered active lung parenchymal bleeding, resulting from MCT. Conclusions CT is more accurate than chest radiograph for the diagnosis of MCT. For selected patients with inadequacy drainage of the tubes and when chest radiograph is noncontributory, CT scan is recommended to clarify the exact location of chest tubes.

CT scan assessment of malpositioned chest tube in intensive care patients

Réanimation Chirurgicale “Pierre Viars”, Dépar, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France

CT diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes.

Insertion of a chest tube into the pleural space is standard management for various pleural disorders. Malpositioning of chest tubes in extrathoracic, intraparenchymal and mediastinal locations and in the fissures is common. Malpositioning results not only in inadequate drainage of air and fluid but may also result in increased morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis of a malpositioned tube is sometimes difficult to establish on a chest radiograph. CT, however, has proven to be extremely accurate in evaluating the position of a chest tube and has often provided additional valuable information with significant therapeutic impact.

IMAGE-GUIDED MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATED PLEURAL FLUID COLLECTIONS

Percutaneous image-guided catheter drainage with adjunctive ICFT has become the mainstay in the treatment of complicated pleural fluid collections. There are six basic principles of image-guided drainage and ICFT that must be understood to maximize the efficacy and safety of the procedure. 1. There must be a basic understanding of why traditional nonguided thoracostomy drainage fails in a significant percentage of patients. Tube malposition relative to fluid loculations, fluid debris and viscosity, and the presence of a stage 3 pleural peel are the primary reasons for failure. Image-guided placement of drains addresses the issue of tube malposition and ICFT greatly facilitates drainage of fibrinous fluid. 2. Proper use of cross-sectional imaging is one of the keys to ultimate success. CT and ultrasound allow very accurate assessment of the underlying pathologic process and are crucial in planning the drainage procedure, guiding the actual placement of drains, and following the course and outcome of treatment. The added costs of cross-sectional imaging are more than compensated by the increase in success of the drainage procedure. 3. Aggressive catheter management is the single most important factor in success. Multiple loculations require multiple catheters for adequate drainage. Pleural adhesions may form quickly as drainage progresses leading to the formation of undrained loculations. Frequent cross-sectional imaging is needed to detect undrained loculations so that additional drainage catheters may be placed if needed. It is crucial that the drainage catheter always be properly positioned in relation to fluid loculations. 4. Intracavitary fibrinolytic therapy is a very powerful adjunctive therapy to aid in complete evacuation of fluid collections that contain fibrin nets and debris. It can also partially débride the pleural surfaces of fibrinous debris and facilitate complete re-expansion of the underlying lung. Intracavitary fibrinolytic therapy should not be used in an attempt to salvage success by a malpositioned chest tube. 5. The ultimate success of closed drainage for complicated pleural fluid collections is closely related to the age of the effusion at the time of drainage. A very high rate of clinical success may be expected when these techniques are used in the treatment of stage 2 fibrinopurulent effusions. If drainage is delayed until the third stage (fibrous pleural peel formation) then closed drainage likely will fail and a formal thoracotomy and decortication will be necessary. Experience in the literature suggests that effusions up to 4 to 6 weeks in duration may be drained successfully but those older than 6 weeks likely will have an associated pleural peel. Effective pleural drainage must be instituted early in the course of the disease process. 6. There may be significant residual pleural and parenchymal inflammatory changes after complete drainage of a stage 2 effusion. If the fluid in the pleural space has been adequately drained and the visceral and parietal pleural surfaces apposed, then the residual inflammatory pleural thickening and associated lung consolidation resolve over 2 to 4 months and pulmonary function returns to baseline. Imaging studies immediately after complete pleural drainage are not normal. These residual abnormalities should not be interpreted as evidence that open surgical drainage should have been performed. Effective closed drainage carries lower morbidity, mortality, and cost than does open surgical drainage. For radiologists and clinicians alike it does not suffice simply to place one or more thoracostomy tubes, round daily, and hope that the occasional use of fibrinolytic agents does the rest. Without a more aggressive approach to catheter position and management the efficacy is no greater than that historically seen with nonguided closed drainage and surgeons will continue to plead for earlier effective open drainage.

CT of blunt chest trauma in children.

While trauma is still the leading cause of death in the pediatric age range, it is surprising how little the CT appearances of pediatric chest injury have been investigated in the literature. We have reviewed the CT findings of blunt chest trauma in 44 children for whom chest CT examinations were requested to investigate the extent of intrathoracic injury. We noted a propensity for pulmonary contusions to be located posteriorly or posteromedially, and for them to be anatomically nonsegmental and crescentic in shape. This is possibly attributable to the relatively compliant anterior chest wall in children. The CT appearances of other major thoracic injuries are described, including pulmonary lacerations, pneumothoraces, malpositioned chest tubes, mediastinal hematomas, aortic injury, tracheobronchial injury, hemopericardium, and spinal injuries with paraspinal fluid collections. Children demonstrating findings incidental to the actual injury yet important to the subsequent therapy are also presented. We conclude that, in the event of clinically significant blunt chest trauma, the single supine chest examination in the trauma room is insufficient to adequately identify the extent of intrathoracic injury. With the exception of concern for aortic injury for which aortography is indicated, a dynamically enhanced CT scan of the thorax should be performed as clinically significant findings may result in altered therapy.

Brachial Plexus Compression from a Malpositioned Chest Tube after Thoracotomy

Brachial Plexus Compression from a Malpositioned Chest Tube after Thoracotomy