Malleolar Fractures Research Articles

Study of clinical and functional outcome of malleoli fracture

Background: Ankle fractures are a common orthopedic injury, accounting for 9% of all fractures, with an increasing incidence among both young and elderly populations. These fractures often result from road traffic accidents, falls, and sports injuries. Malleolar fractures, involving the bony prominences of the ankle, are particularly prevalent and necessitate accurate reduction and stable internal fixation to prevent complications such as post-traumatic arthritis and restricted motion. This study aims to assess the functional outcomes and results of surgical treatment of malleolar fractures. Methods: The study utilized Lauge-Hansen’s classification to analyze the mechanism of injury in 32 patients with ankle fractures. Surgical techniques included the fixation of syndesmotic injuries with anatomical fibular plates, (AFP) posterior malleolus fractures with percutaneous screws or Ellis plates, and medial malleolus fractures with tension band wiring (TBW). The outcomes were measured in terms of union time, range of motion, and stability. Results: The most common injury mechanism was supination external rotation (SER) in 14 patients, followed by pronation external rotation (PER) in 7 patients, pronation abduction (PAB) in 6 patients, and supination adduction (SAD) in 5 patients. Syndesmotic injuries were found in 7 patients, all treated surgically except one. Posterior malleolus fractures were present in 3 patients and treated with screws or plates. Fixation of medial malleolus fractures with TBW showed better union rates and improved range of motion compared to screw fixation. Lateral malleolar fractures treated with AFP provided additional stability. The average union time was 6 to 8 weeks. Conclusions: Anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation are crucial for the successful treatment of malleolar fractures. TBW for medial malleolus fractures and AFP for lateral malleolar fractures provide favorable outcomes. However, a larger sample size and longer follow-up duration are required to further evaluate the outcomes of ankle injuries, particularly in older patients with osteoporosis and comorbidities.

Longitudinal weight and plantar pressure distribution while standing after tibial or malleolar fractures in patients with or without fracture union

Fracture healing is usually monitored by clinical impressions and radiographs. Objective and easy methods for assessing fracture healing without radiation would be beneficial. The aim of this study was to analyse whether weight and plantar pressure while standing can be used to monitor healing of tibial or malleolar fractures and whether these parameters can discriminate between patients with and without union. Thirteen patients were longitudinally assessed during each postoperative clinical visit, of whom two developed a nonunion. Eleven matched healthy controls were assessed once. Additionally, five patients already experiencing nonunion were assessed once at the time of their nonunion diagnosis. All participants performed a standing task for ten seconds with pressure-sensing insoles. Greatest improvements were detected throughout the first three months in patients with union. However, six months after surgery, more than half of the parameters were still significantly different from those of the controls. The weight and pressure distributions did not differ between patients with or without union six months after surgery. A standing task can be used to monitor improvements in weight and pressure distribution throughout the healing process of tibial or malleolar fractures, but lacks potential to discriminate between patients with or without fracture union.

Non-surgical treatment of lateral malleolar fractures is safe: long-term follow-up of a comprehensive treatment algorithm

IntroductionA study at Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SU) found significant variation in the treatment of ankle fractures, leading to the development of a structured treatment algorithm (TA). The TA aimed to standardise treatment and reduce the number of unnecessary surgical procedures. A follow-up study concluded that the number of surgeries had significantly decreased since the TA was introduced. However, the long-term effects of the TA and the reduced number of surgical procedures remain unclear. The aim of the study was to analyse the long-term effects of a structured TA for ankle fractures, focusing on complications and reoperation rates.MethodThe present study is a long-term follow-up of the same two cohorts of patients with lateral malleolar fractures of type AO/OTA44-B1, as studied in the previous studies on the TA for ankle fractures at SU. The current study compares a group of AO/OTA 44B1 fractures treated before introducing the TA, the pre-TA cohort (n = 410), with a group treated after introducing the TA, the post-TA cohort (n = 333). Both cohorts were followed for at least four years, and the outcomes were reoperation or complication. Reoperation was defined as any surgical procedure performed ≥ 30 days after the injury.ResultsThe results highlight a statistically significant reduction in the reoperation rate for lateral malleolar ankle fractures from 7.1 to 2.4% (p = 0.006) after introducing a TA that reduced the number of primary surgical procedures. Hardware-related issues were identified as the dominant cause of reoperation in both cohorts. Three major reoperations were observed in the pre-TA cohort compared to none in the post-TA cohort. The present study revealed no increase in the frequency of reoperations (late surgeries) due to non-union.ConclusionThe non-surgical treatment of stable ankle fractures does not lead to an increase in reoperations caused by non-union. A TA that reduces the need for primary surgical procedures for lateral malleolar fractures of type AO/OTA44-B1 has resulted in a significant decrease in reoperation rates and no increase in failure rates. This long-term follow-up demonstrates that a non-surgical approach to isolated lateral malleolar fractures is safe.

External validation of an artificial intelligence multi-label deep learning model capable of ankle fracture classification

BackgroundAdvances in medical imaging have made it possible to classify ankle fractures using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Recent studies have demonstrated good internal validity for machine learning algorithms using the AO/OTA 2018 classification. This study aimed to externally validate one such model for ankle fracture classification and ways to improve external validity.MethodsIn this retrospective observation study, we trained a deep-learning neural network (7,500 ankle studies) to classify traumatic malleolar fractures according to the AO/OTA classification. Our internal validation dataset (IVD) contained 409 studies collected from Danderyd Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, between 2002 and 2016. The external validation dataset (EVD) contained 399 studies collected from Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia, between 2016 and 2020. Our primary outcome measures were the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) for fracture classification of AO/OTA malleolar (44) fractures. Secondary outcomes were performance on other fractures visible on ankle radiographs and inter-observer reliability of reviewers.ResultsCompared to the weighted mean AUC (wAUC) 0.86 (95%CI 0.82–0.89) for fracture detection in the EVD, the network attained wAUC 0.95 (95%CI 0.94–0.97) for the IVD. The area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) was 0.93 vs. 0.96. The wAUC for individual outcomes (type 44A-C, group 44A1-C3, and subgroup 44A1.1-C3.3) was 0.82 for the EVD and 0.93 for the IVD. The weighted mean AUPR (wAUPR) was 0.59 vs 0.63. Throughout, the performance was superior to that of a random classifier for the EVD.ConclusionAlthough the two datasets had considerable differences, the model transferred well to the EVD and the alternative clinical scenario it represents. The direct clinical implications of this study are that algorithms developed elsewhere need local validation and that discrepancies can be rectified using targeted training. In a wider sense, we believe this opens up possibilities for building advanced treatment recommendations based on exact fracture types that are more objective than current clinical decisions, often influenced by who is present during rounds.

Preoperative CT Scans Prior to Distal Tibial Intramedullary Nailing Do not Change Treatment Decisions or Surgical Outcomes.

Distal tibia shaft fractures have a high association with posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs); hence, a preoperative ankle CT scan is commonly obtained. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a CT scan for distal third tibia shaft fractures is associated with differences in recognition of a posterior malleolus fracture (PMF), treatment of an identified PMF, outcomes, and postoperative complications. We retrospectively reviewed cases of adult patients with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with an intramedullary nail between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received a preoperative ankle CT scan. Outcomes included surgical time, the rate of missed PMFs or postoperative PMF displacement, the treatment of the PMFs, postoperative weight-bearing restrictions, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10 (PROMIS Global-10) scores, and unplanned revision surgeries. 124 patients (age 45 ± 18 years; 39.5% female) with distal third tibia shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing and with minimum 6 months of follow-up were reviewed. 26 patients received preoperative CT scans, and 98 patients did not have CT scans. The rate of detected PMF was 69.2% (N = 18) in patients with CT and 55.1% (N = 54) in patients without CT (P = 0.19). No significant differences were observed in all outcomes between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). 3 PMFs not visible on radiographs were identified on CT, and they did not require fixation and did not displace. PMFs that were greater than one-third of the joint surface were more likely to have a preoperative CT (P < 0.01). Preoperative CT scans for distal third tibia shaft fractures may be useful in characterizing large PMFs; however, this knowledge does not translate into shorter surgical time, increased fixation rates, decreased unplanned revision surgery, or improved patient-reported outcomes. Discovery of PMFs did not always lead to fixation, and PMFs without fixation did not become further displaced.

Lateral malleolar fractures : when to operate ?

Ankle fractures account for 10 % of all fractures in adults. The incidence of ankle fractures is rising, particularly as the population ages. Two thirds are isolated malleolar fractures. The most used classifications are anatomical, Weber's and Lauge-Hansen's classifications. The treatment of lateral malleolar fractures may be conservative or surgical, depending on the ankle stability. To test this, a weight-bearing X-ray is required. If this is not possible on the day of trauma, it can be done 7 days later. Conservative treatment consists of a six-week immobilization in a splint or plaster cast, with weight-bearing as tolerated. Surgical treatment is mandatory for unstable fractures.

Posterior-anterior versus anterior-posterior screws for posterior malleolar fractures: A meta-analysis.

The incidence of posterior malleolus fractures in ankle fractures ranges from 7% to 44%. Studies have indicated a poorer prognosis for ankle joint function when a posterior malleolar fracture is present, underscoring the significance of active intervention for optimal postoperative ankle function recovery. Hence, the selection of treatment for such fractures holds particular importance. Screw fixation is a key treatment for posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) or Haraguchi Type 1 fractures involving less than 25% of the distal tibia's articular surface. However, the optimal screw placement direction - anteroposterior (AP) or posterior-anterior (PA) - remains debated. This meta-analysis aims to compare these two approaches for treating posterior ankle fractures, focusing on the efficacy of PA fixation. We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, SinoMed, and Web of Science databases from their inception to October 20, 2022. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing bias risk in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Stata MP17 software was used to compare the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, full weight-bearing time, and fracture healing time at the last follow-up between the two fixation methods. A total of 403 patients with posterior malleolar fractures from six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a higher AOFAS score at the last follow-up for PA placement compared to AP placement [SMD = 0.512, 95% CI (0.244 to 0.780), z= 3.74, P< 0.001]. Postoperative full weight-bearing time and fracture healing time did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. PA fixation demonstrated a superior AOFAS score compared to AP fixation for posterior malleolar fractures. PA screw placement offers advantages in restoring ankle joint stability and enhancing joint function recovery post-surgery.

Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLag screw fixation (LSF) or locking plate fixation (LPF) are both recommended for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures (MMFs). However, no standard has been established for attaining optimal surgical treatment or functional recovery. We hypothesized that LPF for MMFs would result in superior outcomes compared to LSF. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of LSF and LPF in the treatment of MMF. Patients and methodsWe searched for studies published prior to November 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Standardization of individual effect sizes was conducted; subsequently, pooled effect sizes were derived by employing random-effects models. ResultsFive retrospective studies involving 394 patients were reviewed. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were significantly higher among patients who received LPF (mean difference [MD]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37–4.04; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. Pain scores were significantly lower among patients who received LPF (MD: −0.35; 95% CI: −0.64 to −0.05; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. No significant differences in delayed union was observed between the groups (Relative risk [RR]: 1.43; 95% CI, 0.37–4.04; p = 0.42). Fixation failure was slightly higher in patients who received LSF than in those who received LPF (RR: 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88–11.01; p = 0.08). DiscussionCompared with LSF, LPF yields superior functional outcomes, superior patient comfort, and comparative complication rates. LPF is also better able to prevent rotation and apply compressive forces across fracture sites, which can facilitate the management of different types of MMF. Additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted. Level of evidenceIII.

Are positional screws superior to lag screws in fixation of medial malleolar fractures? A randomized controlled trial.

There is no consensus about the best fixation method for medial malleolar fractures. This study was conducted to compare the clinical and radiological results of positional (fully threaded) screws and lag (partially threaded) screws when used to fix medial malleolar fractures. This prospective, randomized clinical trial included 68 patients with closed isolated medial malleolar fractures. Each study arm included 34 patients who were randomly treated with either fully threaded screws (FT group) or partially threaded screws (PT group). Patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot score. After a 12-month follow-up, the mean AOFAS ankle hindfoot score was 92.1 ± 3.5 in the FT group and 91.8 ± 5.4 in the PT group. Union was achieved in the FT group after a mean of 6.2 ± 1.3 weeks and after a mean of 6.5 ± 1.5 weeks in the PT group. Both fully threaded and partially threaded screws yielded good comparable clinical and radiological outcomes when used to fix isolated medial malleolar fractures.

Treatment of Syndesmotic Instability: The Importance of Malleolar Fixation

A significant proportion of syndesmotic injuries often occur simultaneously with malleolar fractures. The existing literature emphasizes that even slight misalignments in the malleolar structures can lead to altered talar motion, ultimately resulting in post-traumatic ankle arthritis. Rotational ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury can manifest with isolated or a combination of lateral, medial, and/or posterior malleolar fractures, and an accurate anatomic restoration of malleolar fractures has been emphasized. One such reason for anatomic reduction is that the fracture fragment may have an important attachment site for ligaments that contributes to the stability of the ankle and syndesmotic joints. While the biomechanical impact of malreduction of the lateral and medial malleolus osteoligamentous complex has been well documented and understood, controversy persists regarding the optimal surgical treatment of posterior malleolar fractures in the context of syndesmosis instability. Advanced imaging and biomechanical studies have shed new light on the role of the posterior malleolus in syndesmosis stability, suggesting that anatomic reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment could decrease the necessity of transfixation of the syndesmosis, lowering the risk of malreduction. As a result, there is growing advocacy for anatomically reducing and fixing the posterior malleolus in ankle fractures with syndesmotic injuries. This review focuses on the critical role of malleolar fixation in the management of syndesmotic injuries. Level of Evidence : Diagnostic Level V—expert opinion. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Radiological characteristics and injury mechanism of Logsplitter injury: a descriptive and retrospective study

BackgroundLogsplitter Injury is a type of high-energy ankle fracture dislocation. The mechanism of injury has not been described in detail. A detailed understanding of the radiological features and pathological changes can further guide treatment.MethodsBetween April 2009 and December 2018, a retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with Logsplitter injury. The study analysed the characteristics of fibular injury, tibial injury, syndesmosis injury, medial injury and lateral ligament injury on preoperative X-ray and CT scans. The incidence of the different injury types was summarised. The correlation between Logsplitter injuries and the mechanisms causing them were analysed using the Lauge-Hansen classification of ankle fractures.ResultsThe study provides data on the types of fractures observed. Of the total fractures, 98.4% were open fractures. The fibula injuries were classified as no fracture (1.6%), transverse or short oblique fractures (61.3%), butterfly fragments (25.8%), and comminuted fractures (11.3%). The tibial injuries included compression of lateral articular surfaces (38.7%) and posterior compressions (6.5%). Medial injuries, including medial malleolar fractures, accounted for 87.1%, and deltoid ligament rupture accounted for 12.9%. The study found that injuries to the syndesmosis consisted of simple ligament ruptures (11.3%), Tillaux fractures (8.1%), Volkmann fractures (43.5%), and Tillaux and Volkmann fractures (37.1%). In 12.9% of cases, there was a complete rupture of the lateral collateral ligament. Based on the Lauge-Hansen classification, 87.1% of injuries were pronation-abduction injuries, while 8.1% were pronation and external rotation injuries, and 1.6% were supination external rotation injuries. Furthermore, 3.2% of cases could not be classified.ConclusionThe pathoanatomic characteristics of Logsplitter injury are diverse, with some cases accompanied by collateral ligament injury. It is important to note that these evaluations are objective and based on current results. The most common injury mechanism is vertical violence combined with abduction, although in some cases, it may be a vertical combined external-rotation injury.Level of evidence(4) case series.Trial registrationThis study has been approved by the ethical research committee of the Honghui Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, under the code: 202,003,002.

Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation for implant positioning in custom-made total ankle arthroplasty.

This retrospective radiological analysis aimed to assess the accuracy of implant positioning in patients with ankle arthritis undergoing custom-made total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) compared with preoperative planning. Patients who underwent custom-made TAA with PSI from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on the tibial anterior surface (TAS) angle, tibial lateral surface (TLS) angleand tibiotalar ratio (TTR). Additionally, data regarding the time from the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to surgery, associated proceduresand complications were recorded. No associated procedures were performed, and only one intraoperative complication, an iatrogenic lateral malleolar fracture, was recorded. In the coronal plane, custom-made TAA with PSI consistently achieved precise positioning of prosthetic components, even in cases with significant preoperative deformities or bone deficits. However, a statistically significant deviation from the planned values was observed in the sagittal plane (p = 0.007). A notable correlation was identified between the time elapsed from the preoperative CT scan to surgery and the deviation from the planned to the actual postoperative TAS angle (p < 0.001). This study underscores the efficacy of PSI systems in achieving precise positioning in the coronal plane, in accordance with preoperative planning. In contrast, sagittal plane positioning did not demonstrate the same level of accuracy, as evidenced by a statistically significant difference between the planned and postoperative TLS values. Nevertheless, all measurements remained within the recommended range according to the existing literature. Level IV.

Atypical lesional association (Talus Fracture + Pilon Fracture): A case report

Background: Talus fractures represent 3% to 6% of all foot and ankle fractures and are frequently associated with significant morbidity and poor outcomes. They typically result from high-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle accidents or falls from heights. The combination of talar body and tibial plafond fractures is particularly rare, with few cases reported in the literature. Case Report: We present the case of a 20-year-old female who sustained a closed injury to her right ankle after a 6-meter fall. Clinical examination revealed swelling, pain, and bruising without skin opening or neurovascular disturbances. Radiographs and a CT scan identified a non-displaced fracture of the tibial plafond, a medial malleolus fracture, and a posterior process talus fracture. The patient underwent closed reduction and internal fixation with percutaneous screws. At six months post-surgery, she exhibited a good functional outcome with minimal residual pain and slight limitations in ankle movement. Discussion: Talar body fractures commonly result from falls that exert axial compression or shearing forces. Severe cases involve comminution of the ankle and subtalar joints, often accompanied by malleoli fractures. The concomitant fracture of the tibial plafond and talus, as seen in this case, is rare. Managing such injuries is challenging due to high risks of avascular necrosis, subtalar arthritis, and restricted ankle motion. Thorough radiographic and clinical assessments are crucial for effective management, emphasizing the need for careful preoperative planning, precise anatomical reduction, and stable fixation. Conclusion: This rare case of combined talus body and tibial plafond fractures highlights the importance of comprehensive evaluation and appropriate management to minimize serious complications.

Postoperative Medial Malleolar Fractures in Total Ankle Replacement Are Associated With Decreased Medial Malleolar Width and Varus Malalignment: A Case-Control Study.

There are limited data regarding risk factors associated with periprosthetic medial malleolar fractures in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). This case-control study aimed to identify the risk factors and analyze the effect of prophylactic screw fixation in preventing a medial malleolar fracture after TAA. A case-control study was conducted on 149 patients who underwent primary TAA. Twenty patients with postoperative medial malleolar fractures >4 weeks postoperatively (cases) were identified. An additional 129 patients (controls) were randomly selected from the TAA database. Radiographic evaluation included tibial component coronal alignment and postoperative medial malleolar width. Demographics and radiographic variables were compared between cohorts. Logistic regression was used to investigate the association between medial malleolar fracture and postoperative coronal alignment, medial malleolar width, and prophylactic fixation of the medial malleolus. Mean (SD) medial malleolar width was significantly smaller in the fracture cohort (8.52 mm [1.6]) than in the control group (11.78 mm [1.74]) (P < .001). Mean (SD) tibial component coronal alignment was 92.17 degrees (2.77) in the fracture cohort and 90.21 degrees (1.66) in the control group (P = .002). Regression analysis identified a significant negative association between postoperative medial malleolar width and the probability of fracture (OR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.01, 0.26, P < .001). Varus malalignment of the tibial component was positively associated with the probability of fracture (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.27, 2.86, P = .002). Prophylactic screw fixation resulted in more than 90% reduction in the odds of a fracture (OR = 0.04, 95% CI 0.01, 0.45, P = .01). ROC curve analysis determined a medial malleolar width of 10.3 mm as a potential threshold for predicting fracture. Decreased medial malleolar width and postoperative varus malalignment were associated with an increased risk of postoperative medial malleolar fracture. Therefore, surgeons should consider prophylactic screw fixation in patients with a medial malleolar width <10.3 mm or at risk of postoperative varus deformity.

A MORPHOLOGICAL REVIEW OF MEDIAL MALLEOLAR FRACTURES: ARE THERE ANY FACTORS WHICH MAY PREDISPOSE TO NONUNION AND MALUNION?

BackgroundMany approaches to management of medial malleolar fractures are described in the literature however, their morphology is under investigated. The aim of this study was to analyse the morphology of medial malleolar fractures to identify any association with medial malleolar fracture non-union or malunion.MethodsPatients who had undergone surgical fixation of their MMF were identified from 2012 to 2022, using electronic patient records in a single centre. Analysis of their preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative radiographs was performed to determine their morphology and prevalence of non-union and malunion. Lauge-Hansen classification was used to characterise ankle fracture morphology and Herscovici classification to characterise MMF morphology.ResultsA total of 650 patients were identified across a 10-year period which could be included in the study. The overall non-union rate for our cohort was 18.77% (122/650). The overall malunion rate was 6.92% (45/650). There was no significant difference in union rates across the Herscovici classification groups. Herscovici type A fractures were significantly more frequently malreduced at time of surgery as compared to other fracture types (p=.003). Medial wall blowout combined with Hercovici type B fractures showed a significant increase in malunion rate. There is a higher rate of bone union in patients who have been anatomically reduced.ConclusionThe morphology of medial malleolar fractures does have an impact of the radiological outcome following surgical management. Medial wall blowout fractures were most prevalent in adduction-type injuries; however, it should not be ruled out in rotational injuries with medial wall blowouts combined with and Herscovici type B fractures showing a significant increase in malunions. Herscovici type A fractures had significantly higher malreductions however the clinical implications of mal reducing small avulsions is unknown.

MEDIAL MALLEOLUS: OPERATIVE OR NONOPERATIVE (MOON). A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL OF OPERATIVE VERSUS NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ASSOCIATED MEDIAL MALLEOLUS FRACTURES IN UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURE DISLOCATIONS

IntroductionUnstable ankle fractures are routinely managed operatively. Due to soft-tissue and implant related complications, there has been recent literature reporting on the non-operative management of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures following fibular stabilisation, but with limited evidence supporting routine application. This trial assessed the superiority of internal fixation of well-reduced (displacement ≤2mm) medial malleolus fractures compared with non-fixation following fibular stabilisation.Methods and participantsSuperiority, pragmatic, parallel, prospective randomised clinical trial conducted over a four year period. A total of 154 adult patients with a bi- or trimalleolar fractures were recruited from a single centre. Open injuries and vertical medial malleolar fractures were excluded. Following fibular stabilisation, patients were randomised intra-operatively on a 1:1 basis to fixation or non-fixation after satisfactory fluoroscopic fracture reduction was confirmed. The primary outcome was the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at one-year post-randomisation. Complications and radiographic outcomes were documented over the follow-up period.ResultsAmong 154 participants (mean age, 56.5 years; 119 women [77%]), 144 [94%] completed the trial. At one-year the median OMAS was 80 (IQR, 60–90) in the fixation group compared with 72.5 (IQR, 55–90) in the non-fixation group (p=0.17). Complication rates were comparable. Significantly more patients in the non-fixation group developed a radiographic non-union (20% vs 0%; p&lt;0.001), with the majority (n=8/13) clinically asymptomatic and one patient required surgical re-intervention for this. Fracture type and reduction quality appeared to influence fracture union and patient outcome.ConclusionsIn this randomised clinical trial comparing internal fixation of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures with non-fixation, following fibular stabilisation, fixation was not superior according to the primary outcome. However, 1 in 5 patients following non-fixation developed a radiographic non-union and whilst the re-intervention rate to manage this was low, the future implications require surveillance. These results may support selective non-fixation of anatomically reduced medial malleolus fractures.

DELTOID LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION IN ANKLE FRACTURES: DOES IT PREVENT PES PLANUS?

IntroductionDeltoid ligament reconstruction (DLR) is an important factor in the consideration of pes planus deformity. There is little evidence in the literature determining whether DLR could mitigate the risk of patients acquiring flat foot postoperatively following deltoid ligament injury.AimOur objective was to establish if there was a difference in pes planus deformity in patients who underwent DLR during their ankle fracture fixation compared to those who did not.MethodsA retrospective analysis of post-operative weight bearing radiographs was performed of patients who underwent ankle fracture fixation. Inclusion criteria were confirmed deltoid instability presurgery without medial malleolar fracture and post operative weightbearing radiographs at least 6 weeks post-fixation. Patients were categorised into no deltoid ligament reconstruction (nDLR) and having DLR. Radiographic pes planus parameters involved Meary's Angle assessment. Other fracture morphology was classified.ResultsA total 723 ankle fractures were screened. 122 patients were included for further analysis. There were 94 patients in the nDLR group and 28 patients in DLR group. The mean Meary's Angle was 15.81 (95% CI 14.06, 17.56) degrees in the nDLR group and −.2 (95% CI −3.86, 3.82) in the DLR group. This was statistically significant (p&lt;.001). There was no significant difference in medial clear space measurements (2.90mm v 3.19mm, p = 0.145). There were significantly more pes planus patients in the nDLR than the DLR group (p&lt;.001, 90.5% vs 25%).ConclusionIn this study there was significantly greater pes planus parameters in patients not undergoing DLR. Patients undergoing DLR had on average normal parameters, whilst those not undergoing DLR had on average severe pes planus. The benefits of DLR are not only maintaining ankle stability but maintaining medial arch integrity, and this should be taken into account in a future study on DLR.

Utility of CT Scans for Detecting Operative Malleolar Fractures Associated With Tibial Shaft Fractures.

The purpose of this study was to define the utility of CT scans for detecting articular extension in tibial shaft fractures and determine whether radiographic parameters can predict the presence of operative distal tibial articular fractures (DTAFs). Retrospective cohort study. Single level I trauma center. Patients age 18 years and older who were treated operatively for tibial shaft fractures occurring at or below the tibial isthmus were included. Patients were excluded for extension of the main tibial shaft fracture into the tibial plafond (AO/OTA 43 B/C), ballistic injuries, and absence of a preoperative CT scan. The primary outcome was CT utility, defined as the presence of a DTAF or DTAF displacement on CT that was not recognized on plain radiographs on secondary analysis at the time of the study by a senior-level resident. Secondary outcome was the association between radiographic parameters and operative DTAFs. Variables with P ≤ 0.2 on univariate testing were included in a multiple binary logistic regression model to determine independent predictors of operative DTAFs. One hundred forty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 52 years. Seventy-six patients (53%) were men. CT utility was 41% for the identification of unrecognized DTAFs. CT utility was 79% for isolated pDTAF, 57% for medial DTAF, 83% for isolated anterolateral DTAF, and 100% for multiple DTAFs. Operative DTAFs were independently associated with spiral tibial shaft fracture type (P < 0.001) and low fibular fracture (P = 0.04). In patients who had both spiral tibial shaft fracture type and low fibula fracture, the rate of operative DTAF was 46% (22/48). CT scans identified DTAFs that were unrecognized on plain radiographs in 41% of cases. CT scans were most useful in identifying nonposterior DTAFs. CT scans may be considered for all distal third tibial fractures, but especially those with spiral tibial shaft patterns and low fibular fractures, to avoid missing operative articular injury. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Differences in Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Ankle Fracture Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Between Orthopaedic Surgery and Podiatry.

Surgical ankle fractures pose a unique situation because both podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons manage these injuries. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is routinely used; however, excessive radiation can be harmful to both the patient and the surgical team. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in the amount of intraoperative radiation exposure during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) when performed by orthopaedic surgeons versus podiatrists. This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent ankle fracture ORIF at an urban level I trauma center between January 1st, 2018, and April 1st, 2023. The electronic health record was queried using International Classification of Diseases nine and 10 codes associated with ankle fractures. Patients aged older than 18 years with an ankle fracture managed surgically were included. Subjects were then stratified by procedure. The mean total radiation dose (mRad) and mean total fluoroscopic time (seconds) were then compared between those performed by orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. Of the 333 included procedures, 186 were done by orthopaedic surgeons and 147 were done by podiatrists. Using multiple linear regression analysis to control for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index, patients undergoing isolated malleolus ORIF with syndesmosis repair performed by orthopaedic surgery were found to have a significantly lower mean fluoroscopic time compared with those performed by podiatry (68.4 s versus 104.8 s; P = 0.028). In addition, trimalleolar ORIF with syndesmotic repair performed by orthopaedic surgery had a significantly lower mean total radiation dose compared with those performed by podiatry (244.6 mRad v 565.6 mRad; P = 0.009). Patients and surgical teams are exposed to markedly less radiation in isolated malleolar and trimalleolar fracture ORIF with syndesmosis repair when performed by an orthopaedic surgeon as compared with those performed by a podiatrist.

Bosworth ankle fracture-dislocation: current concept review.

Bosworth fracture (BF) is a special type of locked ankle fracture-dislocation, characterized by displacement of a fragment of the fractured fibula from the fibular notch behind the posterior surface of the distal tibia. BF is a complex injury affecting multiple structures of the ankle joint, which is still frequently misjudged even today, potentially leading to severe complications. CT examination, including 3D reconstructions, should be the diagnostic standard in BF, as it provides a complete picture of the fracture pathoanatomy, most prominently the morphology of the frequently associated posterior malleolar fracture. BF requires early reduction of the displaced fibular fragment without repeated attempts on closed reduction. Non-operative treatment of BF almost always fails. The standard treatment procedure is early open reduction internal fixation. Due to the relative severity and paucity of the injury, BF seems to be particularly prone to soft tissue complications, including compartment syndrome. The results of operative treatment are mixed. Many studies report persistent pain even after a short time interval, with limitations of the range of motion or even stiffness of the ankle joint, and development of degenerative changes. Larger studies with long-term results are still missing.