Treatment of Syndesmotic Instability: The Importance of Malleolar Fixation

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

A significant proportion of syndesmotic injuries often occur simultaneously with malleolar fractures. The existing literature emphasizes that even slight misalignments in the malleolar structures can lead to altered talar motion, ultimately resulting in post-traumatic ankle arthritis. Rotational ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury can manifest with isolated or a combination of lateral, medial, and/or posterior malleolar fractures, and an accurate anatomic restoration of malleolar fractures has been emphasized. One such reason for anatomic reduction is that the fracture fragment may have an important attachment site for ligaments that contributes to the stability of the ankle and syndesmotic joints. While the biomechanical impact of malreduction of the lateral and medial malleolus osteoligamentous complex has been well documented and understood, controversy persists regarding the optimal surgical treatment of posterior malleolar fractures in the context of syndesmosis instability. Advanced imaging and biomechanical studies have shed new light on the role of the posterior malleolus in syndesmosis stability, suggesting that anatomic reduction of the posterior malleolar fragment could decrease the necessity of transfixation of the syndesmosis, lowering the risk of malreduction. As a result, there is growing advocacy for anatomically reducing and fixing the posterior malleolus in ankle fractures with syndesmotic injuries. This review focuses on the critical role of malleolar fixation in the management of syndesmotic injuries. Level of Evidence : Diagnostic Level V—expert opinion. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.