Malignant Mesothelial Cells Research Articles

Effects of patient pleural effusion fluids on the BBSome components expression of human benign mesothelial cells.

Malignant pleural mesothelial cells are affected by the extracellular milieu while such data on benign cells are scarce. Benign cells sense the extracellular environment with the Primary Cilium (PC) and its molecular complex, the BBSome, is critical for this process. Here we aimed at assessing the changes in BBSome genes expression in ordinary 2D and spheroid 3D cell cultures after incubation with pleural effusion fluids (PF) of several etiologies. Benign human mesothelial cells MeT-5A were incubated with PF from patients with mesothelioma (Meso-PF), breast cancer (BrCa-PF), hemothorax (Hemo-PF) and congestive heart failure (CHF-PF). Gene expression of BBS1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 18 was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to monitor PF-induced gene expression changes. MeT-5A cell migration using the PC-modulating drugs ammonium sulfate (AS) and lithium chloride (LC) during PF incubation was also determined. BBSome gene expression upon influence of BrCa-PF and Hemo-PF was more pronounced in 2D compared to 3D, inducing global changes in 2D. CHF-PF and Meso-PF also induced changes in 2D but not as many, while in all cases MeT-5A grown in 3D were more resistant to the effects of the PF. Meso-PF decreased 2D cell migration, while the disturbance of PC in all PF cases resulted in decreased cell migration. These data suggest distinct BBSome molecular profile changes in benign mesothelial cells exposed to malignant and benign PF, in each case, in both 2D and 3D. Cell migration is sensitive to drug disturbance with PC modulators in PF-exposed cells.

Diagnosis of Body Fluids Using a Combined Approach of Cytomorphology in Routinely Stained Smears and Cell Blocks: A Boon for Primary Health Care in this Era of Molecular Medicine!

Accurate diagnosis of cells as reactive or malignant mesothelial cells in body fluids is a common problem. The limited sensitivity of cytodiagnosis in effusions primarily results from unclear morphological details of cells, cell overcrowding or overlapping, cell loss, and changes caused by diverse laboratory processing techniques. Numerous studies have observed that despite meticulous preparation, cytological assessments of fluid through smears often leave substantial unexplored residue, potentially harboring valuable diagnostic information. The unexplored residue can be easily and pragmatically assessed using the cell block method, where it is embedded in paraffin and examined alongside routine smears. Cell blocks prove especially beneficial when conventional cytological smear methods fall short in providing accurate diagnoses, as seen in cases such as reactive mesothelial cells, or when findings are ambiguous, as in occasional well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. The present study reviews the usefulness and benefits of cell block method in cyto-diagnosis of body fluids and highlight the importance of ancillary techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) in improving the sensitivity of diagnosis. It was observed that isolated use of conventional smear misses the diagnosis when there is cell overcrowding, low cellularity, and deranged morphology. Hence, with the application of a simple cell block technique with or without ancillary techniques such as IHC, we can provide a quality report for better patient outcome even at the level of primary health care.

Cytologie du liquide pleural

AbstractCytological analysis of pleural effusion is essential after pleural puncture. The aspect of the fluid and the analysis of nucleated elements guide the diagnosis. In the case of malignant pleural effusion, the most common cause is lung adenocarcinoma. The pleural fluid is then used to perform the diagnosis and additional testing required for the patient’s therapeutic management. Other carcinomas (ovarian, digestive, breast, etc.) can also metastasize to the pleura. Malignant mesothelial cells in the context of malignant pleural mesothelioma may be observed, although sensitivity is low and pleural biopsy is recommended for the diagnosis of this pathology. In rare cases, pleural effusion may reveal melanoma, sarcoma, neuroblastoma or haematological malignancy. This review covers the steps required for cytological analysis of pleural effusion and its interpretation.

Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of human pleura reveals stromal heterogeneity and informs in vitro models of mesothelioma.

The pleural lining of the thorax regulates local immunity, inflammation and repair. A variety of conditions, both benign and malignant, including pleural mesothelioma, can affect this tissue. A lack of knowledge concerning the mesothelial and stromal cells comprising the pleura has hampered the development of targeted therapies. Here, we present the first comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human parietal pleura and demonstrate its utility in elucidating pleural biology. We confirm the presence of known universal fibroblasts and describe novel, potentially pleural-specific, fibroblast subtypes. We also present transcriptomic characterisation of multiple in vitro models of benign and malignant mesothelial cells, and characterise these through comparison with in vivo transcriptomic data. While bulk pleural transcriptomes have been reported previously, this is the first study to provide resolution at the single-cell level. We expect our pleural cell atlas will prove invaluable to those studying pleural biology and disease. It has already enabled us to shed light on the transdifferentiation of mesothelial cells, allowing us to develop a simple method for prolonging mesothelial cell differentiation in vitro.

Pleural Fluid-to-Blood BNP Ratio May Contribute to Prognosis in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) seems to be produced from malignant mesothelial cells other than cardiomyocytes. We aimed to evaluate whether an increased pleural fluid-to-blood BNP ratio in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) could facilitate prognosis beyond diagnosis. Patients with MPM were included (observational study). One- and two-year survival and factors affecting it were tested. To evaluate the prognostic significance of the natriuretic peptide precursor B (NPPB) gene expression in MPM, we constructed a survival curve from data derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Nineteen consecutive patients with MPM were included (age: 67 (61, 80), male 78.9%). One- and two-year survival were 52.6% and 31.6%, respectively. Age, performance status, and the other variables tested did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Non-survivors presented higher pleural fluid BNP in two years (699 (210, 5000) vs. 379.5 (5, 567), p = 0.036) and BNP ratios than survivors (1-year: 28.75 (4.05, 150.24) vs. 3.49 (0.3, 26) p = 0.001, 2-years: 22.8 (2.42, 150.24) vs. 3.49 (0.3, 7.76), p = 0.001). One- and two-year survival rates in patients with BNP ratios above/equal to the median value (8.82) were 20% and 0%, and 88.9% and 66.7%, respectively, in patients with BNP ratios below 8.82 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002, respectively). MPM patients with low NPPB expression presented significantly higher survival rates compared to patients with higher expressions (p = 0.032). A high pleural fluid/blood BNP ratio, an easily performed in everyday practice, costless biomarker seems to predict poorer survival better than the commonly reported prognostic factors in MPM.

Characteristics of transcription profile, adhesion and migration of SETD2-loss Met-5A mesothelial cells exposed with crocidolite.

Asbestos is a fibrous silicate mineral exhibiting biopersistence and carcinogenic properties and contributes to mesothelioma. Despite the concept of gene-environmental interaction in pathogenesis of mesothelioma, the possible pathophysiological changes of mesothelial cells simultaneously with SET domain containing 2 (SETD2) loss and asbestos exposure remains obscure. Herein, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SETD2 knockout Met-5A mesothelial cells (Met-5ASETD2-KO ) were established and exposed with crocidolite, an amphibole asbestos. Cell viability of Met-5ASETD2-KO appeared to dramatically decrease with ≥2.5μg/cm2 crocidolite exposure as compared with Met-5A, although no cytotoxicity and apoptosis changes of Met-5ASETD2-KO and Met-5A was evident with 1.25 μg/cm2 crocidolite exposure for 48 h. RNA sequencing uncovered top 50 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 1.25 μg/cm2 crocidolite exposed Met-5ASETD2-KO (Cro-Met-5ASETD2-KO ) and 1.25 μg/cm2 crocidolite exposed Met-5A (Cro-Met-5A), and ITGA4, THBS2, MYL7, RAC2, CADM1, and CLDN11 appeared to be the primary DEGs involved with adhesion in gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis. Cro-Met-5ASETD2-KO had strong migration but mild adhesion behavior as compared with Cro-Met-5A. Additionally, crocidolite tended to increase migration of Met-5ASETD2-KO but inhibited migration of Met-5A when compared with their corresponding cells without crocidolite exposure, although no further adhesion property changes was evident for both cells in response to crocidolite. Therefore, crocidolite may affect adhesion-related gene expression and modify adhesion and migration behavior for SETD2-depleted Met-5A, which could provide preliminary insight regarding the potential role of SETD2 in the cell behavior of asbestos-related malignant mesothelial cell.

Usefulness of malignant pleural effusion for early cytological diagnosis of mesothelioma in situ: A case report.

Mesothelioma in situ (MIS) is defined as a preinvasive mesothelioma that forms a single layer of mild atypical mesothelial cells lining on the serosa surface of pleura. The atypical mesothelial cells present loss of BRCA-1 associated protein-1 (BAP-1) and/or methylthioadenosine phosphorylase as examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or homozygous deletion of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/p16 as examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. It is difficult to diagnose because of the unremarkable clinical findings except for pleural effusion. The present report describes a case in which MIS was diagnosed at the time of sampling due to the presence of clearly malignant mesothelial cells in the pleural fluid. In 2016, a 74-year-old man with a history of past exposure to asbestos was admitted to Ibaraki Higashi National Hospital (Tokai-mura, Japan) with dyspnea. Chest CT indicated only right pleural effusion. Malignant mesothelial cells were suspected in a cell block made using pleural effusion; therefore, right pleural biopsy was performed. Pathologically, there was proliferation of mesothelial cells with mild atypia that formed a single-flat layer on the pleural surface; however, there was no invasion. Furthermore, IHC revealed loss of BAP-1 in cells from the biopsied pleura and pleural effusion. MIS was suspected at the time; however, the patient arbitrarily quit his medical check-ups. After 44 months, the patient was readmitted to our hospital complaining of dyspnea. CT indicated a large right pleural mass. A specimen of the mass obtained via CT-guided needle biopsy revealed malignant mesothelioma. The patient continued to deteriorate and eventually died. This case indicated that pleural effusion could be used to demonstrate overtly malignant mesothelial cells and diagnose MIS at the time of sampling. To the best of our knowledge, this is first report of MIS with overtly malignant mesothelial cells in pleural effusion. Pleural effusion may serve an important role in MIS diagnosis.

Suspected malignant mesothelial cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a dog with respiratory distress

Suspected malignant mesothelial cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a dog with respiratory distress

A human multi-cellular model shows how platelets drive production of diseased extracellular matrix and tissue invasion

SummaryGuided by a multi-level “deconstruction” of omental metastases, we developed a tetra (four cell)-culture model of primary human mesothelial cells, fibroblasts, adipocytes, and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cell lines. This multi-cellular model replicated key elements of human metastases and allowed malignant cell invasion into the artificial omental structure. Prompted by findings in patient biopsies, we used the model to investigate the role of platelets in malignant cell invasion and extracellular matrix, ECM, production. RNA (sequencing and quantitative polymerase-chain reaction), protein (proteomics and immunohistochemistry) and image analysis revealed that platelets stimulated malignant cell invasion and production of ECM molecules associated with poor prognosis. Moreover, we found that platelet activation of mesothelial cells was critical in stimulating malignant cell invasion. Whilst platelets likely activate both malignant cells and mesothelial cells, the tetra-culture model allowed us to dissect the role of both cell types and model the early stages of HGSOC metastases.

The Use of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence in situ Hybridization, and Emerging Epigenetic Markers in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): A Review.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos related disease that is generally considered to be difficult to diagnose, stage and treat. The diagnostic process is continuing to evolve and requires highly skilled pathology input, and generally an extensive list of biomarkers for definitive diagnosis. Diagnosis of MPM requires histological evidence of invasion by malignant mesothelial cells often confirmed by various immunohistochemical biomarkers in order to separate it from pleural metastatic carcinoma. Often when invasion of neoplastic mesothelial cells into adjacent tissue is not apparent, further immunohistochemical testing - namely BAP1 and MTAP, as well as FISH testing for loss of p16 (CDKN2A) are used to separate reactive mesothelial proliferation due to benign processes, from MPM. Various combinations of these markers, such as BAP1 and/or MTAP immunohistochemistry alongside FISH testing for loss of p16, have shown excellent sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of MPM. Additionally, over the recent years, research into epigenetic marker use in the diagnosis of MPM has gained momentum. Although still in their research stages, various markers in DNA methylation, long non-coding RNA, micro RNA, circular RNA, and histone modifications have all been found to support diagnosis of MPM with generally good sensitivity and specificity. Many of these studies are however, limited by small sample sizes or other study limitations and further research into the area would be beneficial. Epigenetic markers show promise for use in the future to facilitate the diagnosis of MPM.

Lamellar Inclusions within Hyperplastic Endoplasmic Reticulum in Benign Mesothelial Cells

Introduction: In effusion cytology, mesothelial cells can occasionally present with striking intracytoplasmic accumulation of rod- and crystal-like cytoplasmic lamellar inclusions (LIs). Their nature and function are poorly understood, and their diagnostic relevance is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the nature of LIs in mesothelial cells and determine their prevalence and diagnostic utility in routine practice. Material and Method: We reviewed a consecutive series of cytological specimens of reactive (n = 102) and malignant effusions (n = 90), respectively. Malignant effusions included malignant mesotheliomas (n = 63) and carcinomas (n = 27). LIs of one effusion were analyzed by electron microscopy (EM). Results: LIs were found exclusively in benign mesothelial cells in 14% (14/102) of reactive and in 4% (1/27) of malignant effusions with carcinomatosis. They were absent in effusions of malignant mesothelioma. EM revealed mainly straight lamellar, less tubular, structures in cisternae of the hyperplasic rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER). Conclusion: Cytoplasmic LIs located within hyperplastic rER can be found in up to 14% of effusions restricted to benign mesothelial cells. They can be used as an indirect morphological clue favoring the diagnosis of benign effusion and helping the cytologist to differentiate between reactive and malignant mesothelial cells in daily practice.

Malignant mesothelioma cells secrete natriuretic peptides: Data and diagnostic clinical implications.

Mesothelial cells and cardiomyocytes have shared embryonic mesodermal origin. Cardiomyocytes release BNP under stretch. We searched whether malignant mesothelioma cells also secrete BNP and if so, this has a meaningful impact. Part I: Prospectively, patients with pleural lesions on CT having malignant mesothelioma effusions (MME, n = 13) were compared to patients with malignant effusions with pleural lesions (MEa, n = 14). Age-matched patients with ME without pleural lesions (MEb, n = 16) and non-malignant effusions (NME, n = 25) were analysed. Part II: Retrospectively, samples from patients with mesothelioma (n = 14), lung cancer (n = 8) or heart failure (n = 9) were used. BNP was measured in pleural fluid and blood/plasma. Part III: BNP was assessed in the culture supernatants of benign (MeT-5A) and malignant mesothelioma cell lines (M14K-epithelioid, MSTO-biphasic and ZL34-sarcomatoid) (n = 10 per cell line in three different biological replicates). In vitro, BNP concentration was significantly higher in the supernatant of all malignant cell lines than benign ones (P < 0.01), denoting BNP's production from the former. The pleural fluid to blood BNP ratio in MME was extremely high in Part I and Part II subjects (28.3 ± 12.1 and 25.9 ± 8.6, respectively) versus 1.1 ± 0.3 and 0.4 ± 0.1 in Part I ME and NME, respectively (P < 0.0001), and 0.8 ± 0.1 and 0.4 ± 0.1 in Part II ME and NME, respectively (P < 0.0001). BNP ratio ≥2.11 in Part I had 92% sensitivity and 94.5% specificity for MME (P < 0.0001). BNP is secreted from malignant mesothelial cells. In clinical practice, the pleural fluid to blood BNP ratio can help in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

Immunohistochemical Differentiation between Reactive and Malignant Mesothelial Proliferations in Pleural Effusion

AbstractBackground: The differentiation between benign and malignant mesothelial cells in pleural effusion in some cases can be a challenge. In the current study, we investigated the value of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in making that differ-entiation.Aim of Study: This study aims to examine the value of IHC expression of desmin, EMA, GLUT-1, p53, Ki67, and BAP1 in discrimination between benign and malignant mes-othelial proliferation in pleural effusions and compare their results regarding sensitivity and specificity.Material and Methods: Pleural fluids from 30 cases diagnosed as malignant meothelioma (MM) epitheloid type and 20 cases diagnosed as reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) were selected, and stained with immunohistochemical stains included BAP-1, desmin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), glucose-transport protein 1 (GLUTA]1), Ki67, and p53.Results: BAP-1 was negative in 5% (1 of 20) cases of reactive MH and in 63.3% (19 of 30) of MM cases (p 40% of mesothelial cells in 10% (2 of 20) of benign and 16.7% (5 of 30) of malignant cases (p=0.40). EMA negativity and desmin positivity were found in 75% (15 of 20) of reactive MH cases and 3.3% (one of 30) of MM cases. EMA positivity and desmin negativity were found in 5% (1 of 20) of reactive MH cases and 90% (27 of 30) of MM cases (p<.001). Positivity for both of Desmin and BAP-1 was detected in 80% (16 of 20) of RMH cases. The combination of Desmin and BAP-1 negativity was detected in 60% (16 of 30) of MM cases (p-value p<.001).Conclusions: Cases showed positivity for EMA and neg-ativity for desmin strongly favors malignant mesothelioma. On the contrary, cases showed negative EMA and positive desmin strongly favors Reactive mesothelial hyperplasia. also the combination of Desmin and Bap-1 postivity favors diagnosis of RMH, and the combination of Desmin and BAP-1 negativity favors the diagnosis of MM. Similarly, cases showed strong membranous expression of GLUT-1 and/or strong nuclear expression of p53 strongly favors diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Proliferative index showed detected by Ki67 showed no significant difference between reactive and malignant cases.

Diagnostic Value of the EZH2 Immunomarker in Malignant Effusion Cytology

Background: Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic carcinoma in effusion cytology is a challenging task. The application of at least 4 monoclonal antibodies including 2 epithelial markers (Ber-EP4, MOC-31, CEA, or B72.3) and 2 mesothelial markers (calretinin, WT-1, CK5/6, or HBME-1) are often useful in this distinction; however, it is not readily available in many resource-limited developing countries. Aberrant immunoexpression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a transcriptional repressor involved in cancer progression, is observed widely in various malignancy. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic value of EZH2 as a single reliable immunomarker for malignancy in effusion samples. Methods: A total of 108 pleural, peritoneal, and pericardial effusions/washings diagnosed as unequivocally reactive (n = 41) and metastatic carcinoma (n = 67) by cytomorphology over 18 months were reviewed. Among the metastatic carcinoma cases, 54 were adenocarcinoma and others were squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1), carcinosarcoma (n = 1), and carcinoma of undefined histological subtypes (n = 11). Cell block sections were immunostained by EZH2 (Cell Marque, USA). The percentages of EZH2-immunolabeled cells over the total cells of interest were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off score to define EZH2 immunopositivity. Results: A threshold of 8% EZH2-immunolabeled cells allows distinction between malignant and reactive mesothelial cells, with 95.5% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 93.2% negative predictive value (p < 0.0001). The area under the curve was 0.988. Conclusion: EZH2 is a promising diagnostic biomarker for malignancy in effusion cytology which is inexpensive yet trustworthy and could potentially be used routinely in countries under considerable economic constraints.

The role of BRCA1-associated protein 1 in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion and fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a diagnostically challenging entity in cytology specimens due to the lack of architectural context and a cytomorphologic overlap between malignant and reactive mesothelial cells (RMCs). A diagnostic marker with excellent specificity is not currently available in clinical practice. The newly appreciated BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) antibody may help distinguish MM from RMC based on its immunohistochemical (IHC) staining pattern but its role in cytopathology is controversial. Immunohistochemistry with BAP1 antibody was performed on cell blocks from 39 cytology specimens including 13 cases of RMC and 26 cases of effusion and fine-needle aspiration specimens (FNAC) with tissue-specimen-proven MM. Cases were dichotomised into positive and negative cohorts. Positivity was defined as >50% loss of nuclear BAP1 IHC staining. Of the 26 MM cases, a slight majority (14/26, 54%) showed loss of BAP1 nuclear IHC staining, while all 13 RMC controls showed strong nuclear BAP1 IHC staining. MM was more likely to show loss of BAP1 than RMC (P < .001); and peritoneal MM was more likely to demonstrate loss of BAP1 than pleural MM (P = .04). There was perfect specificity at 1.0 and positive predictive value of 1.0 for loss of nuclear BAP1 IHC staining. However, only modest sensitivity at 0.52 and negative predictive value of 0.50 was seen. These data confirm that absence of BAP1 nuclear staining identifies malignant mesothelial cells. On the other hand, positive BAP1 nuclear staining can occur in both benign and malignant pleural effusions.

Molecular analysis of an asbestos-exposed Belgian family with a high prevalence of mesothelioma.

Familial clustering of malignant mesothelioma (MM) has been linked to the presence of germline mutations in BAP1. However, families with multiple MM patients, without segregating BAP1 mutation were described, suggesting the existence of other predisposing genetic factors. In this study, we report a previously undescribed Belgian family, in which BAP1 was found to be absent in the epithelial malignant mesothelial cells of the index patient. Whole exome analysis did not reveal a germline or somatic BAP1 variant. Also, no germline or somatic copy number changes in the BAP1 region could be identified. However, germline variants, predicted to be damaging, were detected in 11 other 'Cancer census genes' (i.e. MPL, RBM15, TET2, FAT1, HLA-A, EGFR, KMT2C, BRD3, NOTCH1, RB1 and MYO5A). Of these, the one in RBM15 seems to be the most interesting given its low minor allele frequency and absence in the germline DNA of the index patient's mother. The importance of this 'Cancer census gene' in familial MM clustering needs to be evaluated further. Nevertheless, this study strengthens the suspicion that, next to germline BAP1 alterations, other genetic factors might predispose families to the development of MM.

PetSavers research

Abstract Immunohistochemical differentiation of reactive from malignant mesothelial cells as a diagnostic aid in canine pericardial disease.

Soluble CD157 in pleural effusions: a complementary tool for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma.

BackgroundCD157/Bst1 glycoprotein is expressed in >85% of malignant pleural mesotheliomas and is a marker of enhanced tumor aggressiveness.ResultsIn vitro, mesothelial cells (malignant and non-malignant) released CD157 in soluble form or as an exosomal protein. In vivo, sCD157 is released and can be measured in pleural effusions by ELISA. Significantly higher levels of effusion sCD157 were detected in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma than in patients with non-mesothelioma tumors or with non-malignant conditions. In our patient cohort, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for sCD157 that discriminated malignant pleural mesothelioma from all other causes of pleural effusion was 0.685, cut-off (determined by the Youden Index) = 23.66 ng/ml (62.3% sensitivity; 73.93% specificity). Using a cut-off that yielded 95.58% specificity, measurement of sCD157 in cytology-negative effusions increased sensitivity of malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis from 34.42% to 49.18%.ConclusionsEvaluation of soluble CD157 in pleural effusions provides a diagnostic aid in malignant mesothelioma.MethodsSoluble CD157 (sCD157) was detected biochemically in culture supernatants of malignant and non-malignant mesothelial cells, and in pleural effusions from various pathological conditions. An ELISA system was established to measure the concentration of sCD157 in fluids, and extended to analyze sCD157 in pleural effusions from a cohort of 295 patients.

A panel of markers for identification of malignant and non-malignant cells in culture from effusions

The aim of the present study was to identify cell types in primary culture from malignant and non-malignant effusions. Effusion samples were subjected to cytology and culture. Immunocytochemistry was performed in cytological slides to evaluate malignancy (positivity for malignancy markers) and in culture slides for identification of cell types in growth. A total of 143 effusion samples (pleural n=76; peritoneal n=37; pericardial n=4; and peritoneal lavage n=26) were analyzed. Cell growth was observed in 34.9% of all samples and immunocytochemistry for identification of cell types in culture slides was conclusive in 90% of them. In non-malignant samples (n=28), growth of mesothelial cells, macrophages and of both cell types was identified in 82.14, 10.71 and 7.14%, respectively. In malignant samples (n=17, all carcinomas), growth of malignant epithelial cells and of both malignant epithelial and mesothelial cells was identified in 41.17 and 23.52%, respectively. In the remaining 35.29% of malignant samples, the only cells in growth were mesothelial and/or macrophages instead of malignant epithelial cells. In conclusion, in culture of malignant effusions, mesothelial cells may be simultaneously identified with malignant epithelial cells. Besides, mesothelial cells and macrophages may be the only cells identified in malignant effusion culture. Therefore, a broad panel of cell markers should be used for unmistakable identification of cells in studies of effusion primary culture. The ideal malignant effusion sample to obtain culture of neoplastic cells should be that without the presence of mesothelial cells and macrophages.

Diagnostic Utility of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Calretinin (CAL) in Effusion Cytology.

Fluid cytology and subsequent utilization of immunocytology on cell block is being used commonly for increasing the diagnostic accuracy in effusion cytology. To do cytological analysis of fluids and evaluate the role of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and Calretinin (CAL) to differentiate between reactive and malignant cell in pleural and peritoneal fluids. This was a prospective study carried out in Department of Pathology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institue of Medical and Health Science, for a period of 18 months from January 2014 to June 2015. A total of 253 samples of pleural and peritoneal fluid were studied by May-Gruenwald-Giemsa (MGG) stain and Papanicolaou (Pap) staining. In 73 cases which were suspicious for malignancy, cell blocks were prepared and IHC was done using two immunomarkers- EMA and CAL. A total of 253 cases of effusion cytology were studied out of which 73 were found positive for malignant cells. Maximum cases of malignant cells or atypical cells were seen in peritoneal fluid. A total of 34 cases were histologically positive for malignancy. All these cases showed strong membranous and cytoplasmic positivity for EMA. Most of cases also showed 2%-5% positivity for CAL. There were 38 cases categorized as atypical or reactive mesothelial cell hyperplasia. These cases showed nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for calretinin and none of these were positive for EMA, although 5 cases showed score 2-3, which was considered as negative. The distinction between reactive and malignant mesothelial cells in cytological specimens can be problematic. A combination of CAL and EMA may help in accurate diagnosis.