Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction Research Articles

Management of malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction (mGOO) due to pancreatic cancer in the era of EUS-Gastrojejunostomy: an international practice survey and case vignette study by Pancreas 2000 from the European Pancreatic Club.

Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction (mGOO) has been standardly treated by surgical Gastrojejunostomy (S-GJ) or Endoscopic Stenting (ES). Recently, EUS-Gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) has emerged as an alternative, despite its worldwide diffusion is heterogeneous. The aim of this survey was to assess clinical decision-making around mGOO and to explore current opinions regarding EUS-GJ. An online survey, spread through social networks and EPC newsletter, was created exploring opinions regarding indications, contraindications, benefits/risks, availability of mGOO treatments; 2 case vignettes explored clinical decision-making in different scenarios. Overall, 290 pancreatologists from 44 countries responded, of whom 35% surgeons and 65% gastroenterologists. The most common treatment for mGOO was ES (86%), followed by laparoscopic GJ (76%). EUS-GJ was accessible to 59% of respondents, with 10% proficient in this technique. Gold-standard treatment for mGOO varied by specialty; 45% of gastroenterologists preferred ES, 20% EUS-GJ, and 10% surgical GJ, while among surgeons, these were 24%, 8%, and 25%, respectively. A higher annual volume of mGOO treated correlated with increased EUS-GJ adoption and reduced surgical advice. For 51%, EUS-GJ will become the primary treatment for mGOO, notably higher among gastroenterologists and high-volume centers. For 14%, EUS-GJ spread will be limited in the future, or used only when ES fails (19%). Life expectancy, disease stage and patient's frailty are the main decision driver in therapeutic choice, whereas future surgical resectability does not contraindicate any treatment for 75%. EUS-GJ's main advantages were its minimally invasive nature and clinical efficacy, offset by its steep learning curve. This survey revealed significant differences in the management of mGOO, depending on specialties, local expertise and treatment volume, suggesting the lack of standardized algorithms. Life expectancy and patients' frailty are the main decision drivers. Regarding EUS-GJ, its availability remains suboptimal, with learning curve as the main perceived barrier.

Palliative procedures for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A network meta-analysis.

The optimal treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to comprehensively investigate the efficacy and safety of four palliative treatments for malignant GOO: gastrojejunostomy (GJ), endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EGE), stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy (PGJ), and endoscopic stenting (ES). We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases; ClinicalTrials.gov; and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing the aforementioned treatments for malignant GOO. We included studies that reported at least one of the following clinical outcomes: clinical success, 30-day mortality, reintervention rate, or length of hospital stay. Evidence from RCTs and non-RCTs was naïve combined to perform network meta-analysis through the frequentist approach using an inverse variance model. Treatments were ranked by P-score. This network meta-analysis included 3417 patients from 4 RCTs, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 32 retrospective cohort studies. PGJ was the optimal approach in terms of clinical success and reintervention (P-scores: 0.95 and 0.90, respectively). EGE had the highest probability of being the optimal treatment in terms of 30-day mortality and complications (P-scores: 0.82 and 0.99, respectively). Cluster ranking to combine the P-scores for 30-day mortality and reintervention indicated the benefits of PGJ and EGE (cophenetic correlation coefficient: 0.94; PGJ and EGE were in the same cluster). PGJ and EGE are recommended for malignant GOO. PGJ could be the alternative choice in centers with limited resources or cases unsuitable for EGE.

Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review on the Old, the Classic and the Innovative Approaches.

Gastrojejunostomy is the principal method of palliation for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstructions (GOO). Gastrojejunostomy was traditionally performed as a surgical procedure with an open approach butrecently, notable progress in the development of minimally invasive procedures such as laparoscopic gastrojejunostomies have emerged. Additionally, advancements in endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic stenting (ES) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), are becoming more prominent. ES involves the placement of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) to restore luminal patency. ES is commonly the first choice for patients deemed unfit for surgery or at high surgical risk. However, although ES leads to rapid improvement of symptoms, it carries limitations like higher stent dysfunction rates and the need for frequent re-interventions. Recently, EUS-GE has emerged as a potential alternative, combining the minimally invasive nature of the endoscopic approach with the long-lasting effects of a gastrojejunostomy. Having reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of these different techniques, this article aims to provide a comprehensive review regarding the management of unresectable malignant GOO.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gastroenterostomy Using Lumen-apposing Metal Stent in the Treatment of Malignant and Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Case Series

Objective: To study the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumenapposing metal stent (LAMS) in patients with benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Materials and Methods: This single-center study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of benign and malignant GOO patients who underwent EUS-GE between May 2019 and September 2023. We evaluated the technical success, adverse events related to the techniques used, clinical success, and recurrence and reintervention rates. Results: A total of twelve patients who underwent three different EUS-GE techniques were included in this study. The first method was the direct over-the-guidewire technique, the second was the wireless-freehand method, and the third was modified endoscopic ultrasound-guided double-balloon occluded gastroenterostomy bypass (M-EPASS). All 3 techniques used preloaded oroenteral catheters in combination. Technical success was achieved in 83.3% (10/12) of patients, and there were 16.6% (2/12) failures due to misdeployment. One (8.3%) severe adverse event occurred resulting in peritonitis during the direct over-the-guidewire method. The second failure, which ensued after use of the wireless-freehand technique, achieved successful stent deployment at the second attempt without any complications. Clinical success was 100% (11/11), and mean follow up was 6.2 months. There was one (9.1 %) incidence of recurrence at 12-month follow up. Conclusion: EUS-GE is effective in the management of GOO, and the wireless-freehand and M-EPASS techniques in combination with oroenteral catheters should be the technique of choice in term of safety and efficacy.

Propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy and enteral stenting for malignant gastric outlet.

Symptomatic malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) significantly reduce patients' quality of life. Endoscopic treatment involves enteral stenting or endoscopic ultrasonography to perform gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). Aim was to compare enteral stenting with EUS-GE for endoscopic treatment of malignant GOO. We retrospectively compared enteral stenting with EUS-GE for the treatment of malignant GOO. Patients treated at our institution were identified and a propensity score matching analysis was performed. Treatment failure was the primary outcome, while the secondary endpoints were time until treatment failure, technical and clinical success rates, and adverse event rates. Eighty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. Of whom, 44 were included in each of the two treatment groups. Treatment failure occurred significantly more frequently in the enteral stenting group (13/44) compared with the EUS-GE group (4/44; hazard ratio: 4,9; 95% CI 1.6-15.1). A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median time until treatment failure of 22.0weeks (95% CI 4.6-39.4) in the enteral stenting group compared with 76.0weeks (95% CI 55.9-96.1) in the EUS-GE group (P = .002). No difference in technical success and clinical success was detected. Technical success was achieved in 43/44 patients (97.7%) in the enteral stenting group compared with 41/44 patients (93.2%) in the EUS-GE group, while clinical success was achieved in 32/44 (72.7%) and 35/44 (79.5%) patients, respectively. Nine adverse events were observed (9/44, 10.2%). There were no differences in 30-day adverse event rate and 30-day mortality rate. EUS-GE was superior to enteral stenting in the treatment of malignant GOO in terms of treatment failure and time until treatment failure in a propensity score-matched cohort.

Incidence and factors associated with stent dysfunction and pancreatitis after gastroduodenal stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Background and study aims Endoscopic gastroduodenal stent (GDS) deployment is currently a standard treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) in patients with limited life expectancy; however, stent dysfunction (SD) and complicated pancreatitis often occur after GDS deployment. We investigated incidence and contributing factors of SD and complicated pancreatitis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed 203 patients who underwent initial GDS deployment for palliation of mGOO symptoms between October 2017 and July 2022, including 109 who underwent GDS deployment across the duodenal papilla (sub-cohort). Results SDs, including tumor ingrowth (n = 26), kinking (n = 14), and migration (n = 13), occurred in 68 patients (33.5%). Cumulative SD incidence was 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 32.6-49.4%). SD incidence increased to 0.4%, 0.16%, and 0.06% per day at < 8, 8-16, and>16 weeks, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Niti-S pyloric/duodenal stent deployment (sub-distribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.26, P = 0.01) and survival length ≥ 90 days (sHR 2.5, P = 0.01) were respectively identified as favorable and risk factors significantly associated with SD. Pancreatitis developed in 14 patients (12.8%) in the sub-cohort, which had significantly higher parenchymal diameter ( P < 0.01) and lower main pancreatic duct (MPD) caliber ( P < 0.01) than the non-pancreatitis cohort. On multivariate analysis, MPD caliber < 3 mm independently predicted pancreatitis (odds ratio 6.8, P = 0.03). Conclusions Deployment of the Niti-S pyloric/duodenal stent, with conformability even for angulated strictures, significantly reduced the incidence of SD. Stent selection, life expectancy, and MPD caliber should be taken into consideration during decision-making for GDS deployment for mGOO.

Endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: focusing on comparison of endoscopic stenting and surgical gastrojejunostomy.

Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a condition characterized by blockage or narrowing where the stomach empties its contents into the small intestine due to primary malignant tumors or metastatic diseases. This condition leads to various symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and weight loss. To manage malignant GOO, different treatment options have been employed, including surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ), gastroduodenal stenting (GDS) using self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ). This review focuses on comparing the clinical outcomes of endoscopic stenting (GDS and EUS-GJ) with SGJ for malignant GOO. Studies have shown that GDS with SEMS provides comparable clinical outcomes and safety for the palliation of obstructive symptoms. The choice between covered and uncovered SEMS remains controversial, as different studies have reported varying results. EUS-GJ, performed via endoscopic ultrasound guidance, has shown promising efficacy and safety in managing malignant GOO, but further studies are needed to establish it as the primary treatment option. Comparative analyses suggest that GDS has higher recurrence and reintervention rates compared to EUS-GJ and SGJ, with similar overall procedural complications. However, bleeding rates were lower with GDS than with SGJ. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine the optimal treatment approach for malignant GOO.

A102 EUS-GUIDED GASTROENTEROSTOMY IS COST-EFFECTIVE COMPARED TO SURGICAL GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY AND ENTERAL STENTING FOR PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT GASTRIC OUTLET OBSTRUCTION

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an emerging modality for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), which combines the benefits of the traditional treatments by providing a robust bypass using a minimally invasive, endoscopic approach. The health economic aspects of this new treatment compared to the traditional treatment approaches are not known. Aims To conduct a cost-consequence analysis to compare the costs and benefits of using EUS-GE, surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) and enteral stenting (ES) for the management of malignant GOO. Methods A decision analytical model, comprising a decision tree and a time-dependent state-transition model with three health states (no recurrent GOO, recurrent GOO, and death), was designed. The costs and benefits of the first month are included in the decision tree, after which, simulated patients enter the time-dependent state-transition model and the costs and consequences of each intervention are estimated for each monthly cycle until the end of a twelve-month time horizon. To address uncertainty around parameters, the expected values of costs and other outcomes were obtained through probabilistic analysis. The model parameters were assigned probability distributions and 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using randomly sampled values drawn from these distributions. The outcomes were the estimated total cost and the probability of recurrent GOO in the follow-up time. We compared the incremental cost of avoiding recurrent GOO between these three strategies. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 to avoid recurrent GOO was established a priori. Results The total estimated costs for EUS-GE, SGJ, and ES, were $82,575 (SD, $16,240), $149,731 (SD, $27,254), and $77,324 (SD, $14,529), respectively. SGJ (6.84% [SD, 1.34]) had a lower GOO recurrence rate compared to EUS-GE (8.70% [SD, 1.64] and ES (23.37% [SD, 3.82]; however, when comparing SGJ with EUS-GE and ES, the incremental cost to avoid GOO recurrence was $ 3,611,345 and $37,854, respectively. The cost of avoiding GOO recurrence using EUS-GE compared to ES was $35,774. Conclusions EUS-GE has emerged as a cost-effective option in treating patients with malignant GOO. It is associated with a much lower cost per avoided recurrent GOO when compared to SGJ, and it is more effective in preventing recurrent GOO than ES at a cost that is well below the pre-set willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000. Cumulative rate of GOO recurrence for EUS-GE, SGJ and ES Funding Agencies None

A156 INCIDENCE OF MALIGNANT GASTRIC OUTLET OBSTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC CANCER UNDERGOING FOLFIRINOX THERAPY

Abstract Background Malignant gastric outlet obstruction is a morbid complication of pancreatic cancer. There is currently a lack of epidemiology data characterizing its incidence and outcomes in patients with unresectable pancreatic head cancer undergoing chemotherapy with leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX). Determining the incidence of MGOO in this context is crucial for developing effective management strategies. Aims We aim to ascertain the incidence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX. Secondary objectives include evaluating the clinical outcomes of MGOO. The primary endpoint was the rate of malignant gastric outlet obstruction, defined as clinical evidence of MGOO confirmed with axial imaging and/or endoscopy. Secondary endpoints included the length of hospitalization for MGOO and the rate of successful endoscopic or surgical management. Methods This was a retrospective, single-center study including patients with pancreatic head cancer treated with FOLFIRINOX between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, who did not undergo surgical resection. Patients were excluded if they had pancreatic cancer located in the neck, body, and/or tail of the pancreas, had predominantly cystic cancer, had an oncological resection, had a prophylactic surgical gastrojejunostomy, or had metastatic cancer to the pancreas. Results Overall, 44 patients with pancreatic head cancer (40.90% female, mean age 59.3 ± 8.5 years) were included. There was no statistically significant difference in tumor staging between MGOO and No-MGOO patients: overall, 6.8% borderline, 40.9% metastatic, and 52.3% locally advanced. The incidence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic head cancer was 36.36%. Patients who never developed MGOO experienced significantly shorter unplanned hospitalizations (mean ± SD: 20.8 ± 18.30 days) compared to those with MGOO (mean ± SD: 50.33 ± 41.22 days; p = 0.0175). The mean number of FOLFIRINOX cycles received was 7.2 (±5.43) for patients without MGOO and 8.1 (±5.81) for patients with MGOO (p = 0.6152). Among patients with MGOO (n=12), management strategies included EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (43.75%), duodenal stent placement (31.25%), and medical management (25%). Conclusions Our contemporary data suggest a high rate of MGOO (36%) in patients with advanced pancreatic head cancer undergoing FOLFIRINOX treatment. The development of MGOO was associated with longer total hospitalization when compared to patients who never developed MGOO. Our study underscores the significant negative impact of MGOO with further research needed to elucidate better management strategies including better endoscopic or surgical prophylactic measures. Funding Agencies CIHR

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy versus Enteral Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) using lumen apposing metal stent has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). We aimed to compare EUS-GE with enteral stenting (ES) for the treatment of mGOO. Patients who underwent EUS-GE or ES for mGOO between June 2017 and June 2023 at two Italian centers were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome was stent dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical failure, safety, and hospital length of stay. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using multiple covariates. Overall, 198 patients were included (66 EUS-GE and 132 ES). The stent dysfunction rate was 3.1% and 16.9% following EUS-GE and ES, respectively (p = 0.004). Using propensity score-matching, 45 patients were allocated to each group. The technical success rate was 100% for both groups. Stent dysfunction was higher in the ES group compared with the EUS-GE group (20% versus 4.4%, respectively; p = 0.022) without differences in clinical efficacy (p = 0.266) and safety (p = 0.085). A significantly shorter hospital stay was associated with EUS-GE compared with ES (7.5 ± 4.9 days vs. 12.5 ± 13.0 days, respectively; p = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier analyses confirmed a higher stent dysfunction-free survival rate after EUS-GE compared with ES (log-rank test; p = 0.05). EUS-GE offers lower rates of stent dysfunction, longer stent patency, and shorter hospital stay compared with ES.

Complicated gastric cancer and modern treatment approaches

Among all patients with gastric cancer, 40% admit to the hospitals due to cancer-related complications. The most common complications of gastric cancer are bleeding (22-80%), malignant gastric outlet obstruction (26-60%), and perforation (less than 5%). The main treatment methods for gastric cancer complicated by bleeding are various forms of endoscopic hemostasis, transarterial embolization and external beam radiotherapy. Surgical treatment is possible in case of ineffective management. However, surgical algorithm is not standardized. Malignant gastric outlet stenosis requires decompression: endoscopic stenting, palliative gastroenterostomy. Surgical treatment is also possible (gastrectomy, proximal or distal resection of the stomach). The main problem for patients with complicated gastric cancer is the lack of standardized algorithms and abundance of potential surgical techniques. The aim of our review is to systematize available data on the treatment of complicated gastric cancer and to standardize existing methods.

Small Bowel Obstruction Caused by Migration of Fractured Metal Stent in Patients with Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.

Gastroduodenal stenting (GDS) is a less invasive alternative to gastrojejunostomy for the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). GDS is a minimally invasive treatment with good technical and clinical success, and severe complications that require surgical intervention are rare. Stent fracture is an uncommon complication associated with GDS; however, migration of the fractured distal segment can result in small bowel obstruction. Adverse effects of stent fractures in patients with mGOO have rarely been reported. We herein report two surgical cases of small bowel obstruction caused by the migration of fractured metal stent in patients with mGOO.

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus uncovered duodenal metal stenting for unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction (DRA-GOO): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel endoscopic method to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. We aimed to assess whether the use of EUS-GE with a double balloon occluder for malignant gastric outlet obstruction could reduce the need for reintervention within 6 months compared with conventional duodenal stenting. The was an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial conducted at seven sites in Hong Kong, Belgium, Brazil, India, Italy, and Spain. Consecutive patients (aged ≥18 years) with malignant gastric outlet obstruction due to unresectable primary gastroduodenal or pancreatobiliary malignancies, a gastric outlet obstruction score (GOOS) of 0 (indicating an inability in intake food or liquids orally), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3 or lower were included and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either EUS-GE or duodenal stenting. The primary outcome was the 6-month reintervention rate, defined as the percentage of patients requiring additional endoscopic intervention due to stent dysfunction (ie, restenosis of the stent due to tumour ingrowth, tumour overgrowth, or food residue; stent migration; or stent fracture) within 6 months, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified secondary outcomes were technical success (successful placement of a stent), clinical success (1-point improvement in gastric outlet obstruction score [GOOS] within 3 days), adverse events within 30 days, death within 30 days, duration of stent patency, GOOS at 1 month, and quality-of-life scores. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03823690) and is completed. Between Dec 1, 2020, and Feb 28, 2022, 185 patients were screened and 97 (46 men and 51 women) were recruited and randomly allocated (48 to the EUS-GE group and 49 to the duodenal stent group). Mean age was 69·5 years (SD 12·6) in the EUS-GE group and 64·8 years (13·0) in the duodenal stent group. All randomly allocated patients completed follow-up and were analysed. Reintervention within 6 months was required in two (4%) patients in the EUS-GE group and 14 (29%) in the duodenal stent group [p=0·0020; risk ratio 0·15 [95% CI 0·04-0·61]). Stent patency was longer in the EUS-GE group (median not reached in either group; HR 0·13 [95% CI 0·08-0·22], log-rank p<0·0001). 1-month GOOS was significantly better in the EUS-GE group (mean 2·41 [SD 0·7]) than the duodenal stent group (1·91 [0·9], p=0·012). There were no statistically significant differences between the EUS-GE and duodenal stent groups in death within 30 days (ten [21%] vs six [12%] patients, respectively, p=0·286), technical success, clinical success, or quality-of-life scores at 1 month. Adverse events occurred 11 (23%) patients in the EUS-GE group and 12 (24%) in the duodenal stent group within 30 days (p=1·00); three cases of pneumonia (two in the EUS-GE group and one in the duodenal stent group) were considered to be procedure related. In patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction, EUS-GE can reduce the frequency of reintervention, improve stent patency, and result in better patient-reported eating habits compared with duodenal stenting, and the procedure should be used preferentially over duodenal stenting when expertise and required devices are available. Research Grants Council (Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China) and Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva.

Technical success of endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction

Technical success of endoscopic stenting for malignant gastric outlet obstruction

The Role of Luminal Apposing Metal Stents on the Treatment of Malignant and Benign Gastric Outlet Obstruction.

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a clinical syndrome traditionally managed by surgical gastrojejunostomy or enteral stenting. The surgical approach is burdened with a high rate of adverse events (AEs), while enteral stenting has a limited long-term clinical effectiveness, with the need for repeat procedures. The availability of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) has resulted a shift in the treatment paradigm of GOO. Indeed, endoscopists are now able to create a stable anastomosis between the stomach and small bowel under endosonographic guidance. EUS-guided gastro-enteroanastomosis (EUS-GE) has the theoretical advantage of a durable luminal patency resulting from stent placement away from the site of obstruction, free from surgical-related AEs. This approach could be especially valuable in terminally ill patients with a limited life expectancy. The present paper reviews procedural techniques and clinical outcomes of EUS-GE in the context of both malignant and benign GOOs.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for frailer patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a matched prospective comparison

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stenting for frailer patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a matched prospective comparison

Management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) due to pancreatic cancer in the era of EUS-gastroenterostomy: an international practice survey and case vignette study

Management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) due to pancreatic cancer in the era of EUS-gastroenterostomy: an international practice survey and case vignette study

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a prospective series from the PROTECT registry

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a prospective series from the PROTECT registry

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (ENDURO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundMalignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a debilitating condition that frequently occurs in patients with malignancies of the distal stomach and (peri)ampullary region. The standard palliative treatment for patients with a reasonable life expectancy and adequate performance status is a laparoscopic surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) emerged as a promising alternative to the surgical approach. The present study aims to compare these treatment modalities in terms of efficacy, safety, and costs.MethodsThe ENDURO-study is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. In total, ninety-six patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by an irresectable or metastasized malignancy will be 1:1 randomized to either SGJ or EUS-GE. The primary endpoint is time to tolerate at least soft solids. The co-primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with persisting or recurring symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction for which a reintervention is required. Secondary endpoints are technical and clinical success, quality of life, gastroenterostomy dysfunction, reinterventions, time to reintervention, adverse events, quality of life, time to start chemotherapy, length of hospital stay, readmissions, weight, survival, and costs.DiscussionThe ENDURO-study assesses whether EUS-GE, as compared to SGJ, results in a faster resumption of solid oral intake and is non-inferior regarding reinterventions for persistent or recurrent obstructive symptoms in patients with malignant GOO. This trial aims to guide future treatment strategies and to improve quality of life in a palliative setting.Trial registrationInternational Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): NL9592. Registered on 07 July 2021.

Benefits of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy over surgical gastrojejunostomy in the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a large multicenter experience.

Palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) allows resumption of peroral intake. Although surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) provides durable relief, it may be associated with a higher morbidity, interfere with chemotherapy, and require an optimum nutritional status. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. We aimed to conduct the largest comparative series to date between EUS-GE and SGJ for mGOO. This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing SGJ or EUS-GE at 6 centers. Primary outcomes included time to resumption of oral intake, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical and clinical success, reintervention rates, adverse events (AEs), and resumption of chemotherapy. A total of 310 patients were included (EUS-GE, n= 187; SGJ, n= 123). EUS-GE exhibited significantly lower time to resumption of oral intake (1.40 vs 4.06 days, P< .001), at lower albumin levels (2.95 vs 3.33 g/dL, P< .001), and a shorter LOS (5.31 vs 8.54 days, P< .001) compared with SGJ; there was no difference in mortality (48.1% vs 50.4%, P= .78). Technical (97.9% and 100%) and clinical (94.1% vs 94.3%) success was similar in the EUS-GE and SGJ groups, respectively. EUS-GE had lower rates of AEs (13.4% vs 33.3%, P< .001) but higher reintervention rates (15.5% vs 1.63%, P< .001). EUS-GE patients exhibited significantly lower interval time to resumption of chemotherapy (16.6 vs 37.8 days, P< .001). Outcomes between the EUS-GE and laparoscopic (n= 46) surgical approach showed that EUS-GE had shorter interval time to initiation/resumption of oral intake (3.49 vs 1.46 days, P< .001), decreased LOS (9 vs 5.31 days, P< .001), and a lower rate of AEs (11.9% vs 17.9%, P= .003). This is the largest study to date showing that EUS-GE can be performed among nutritionally deficient patients without affecting the technical and clinical success compared with SGJ. EUS-GE is associated with fewer AEs while allowing earlier resumption of diet and chemotherapy.