Malignant Colorectal Obstruction Research Articles

Preoperative total colonic observation after self-expandable metallic stenting in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction

Preoperative total colonic observation after self-expandable metallic stenting in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction

Short-Term Outcomes of Colorectal Stenting Using a Low Axial Force Self-Expandable Metal Stent for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Japanese Multicenter Prospective Study.

(1) Background: Endoscopic colorectal stenting with high technical success and safety is essential in discussing the oncological outcomes for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction. Mechanical properties of self-expandable metal stents are usually considered to affect clinical outcomes. (2) Methods: A multicenter, prospective study was conducted in Japan. A self-expandable metal stent with low axial force was inserted endoscopically. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as the resolution of symptoms and radiological findings within 24 h. Secondary endpoints were technical success and adverse events. Short-term outcomes of 7 days were evaluated in this study. (3) Results: Two hundred and five consecutive patients were enrolled. Three patients were excluded, and the remaining 202 patients were evaluated. The technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 96.0%, respectively. Major stent-related adverse events included stent migration (1.0%), insufficient stent expansion (0.5%), and stent occlusion (0.5%). No colonic perforation was observed. There were two fatal cases (1%) which were not related to stent placement. (4) Conclusions: The placement of self-expandable metal stents with low axial force is safe with no perforation and showed high technical and clinical success rates in short-term outcomes for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction.

Transanal decompression tube is superior to self‐expandable metallic colonic stent for malignant colorectal obstruction: a retrospective study

The surgical management of left-sided malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, self-expandable metallic colonic stent (SEMS) and transanal decompression tube (TDT) used as a 'bridge to surgery' (BTS) have been widely used. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and oncological safety of SEMS and TDT as BTS to transform MLBO into elective surgery. Between February 2013 and March 2019, 62 patients with MLBO received SEMS (n=32) or TDT (n=30), and elective one-stage surgery later. We evaluated decompression efficiency and oncological safety in selective operation in TDT and SEMS groups, including preoperative preparation time, surgical approach, number of lymphatic dissection and vascular invasion, ulcer formation and histopathological findings of resected specimens. The preoperative preparation time in the SEMS group was shorter than that of the TDT group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in postoperative length of hospital stay (P > 0.05). The number of vascular invasions in the TDT group was less than that in the SEMS group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the risk of wound abscess and ulcer formation in the TDT group was significantly lower than that in the SEMS group (P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that SEMS is associated with a relatively poor oncological outcome and the placement of TDT as BTS in MLBO patients may be a better alternation.

Predictors of clinical outcomes of self-expandable metal stent treatment for malignant colorectal obstruction: A Honam Association for the Study of Intestinal Disease (HASID) multicenter study.

There has been increased use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) in treating malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO). The aim of this study was to investigate factors that are associated with the outcomes of SEMS placement for MCO.Clinical data from patients who underwent SEMS placement for MCO at 6 hospitals in Honam province of South Korea between 2009 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Eight hundred two patients were identified and their data were analyzed. Technical success, clinical success, complications, and predictors of outcome were included as main outcome measures.Technical and clinical success rates were 98.8% (792/802) and 90.1% (723/802), respectively. Complications including stent migration, stent occlusion due to tumor ingrowth and outgrowth, perforation, bacteremia/fever, and bleeding occurred in 123 (15.3%) patients. In multivariate regression analyses, procedure time was significantly associated with the technical success of SEMS placement (P = .001). Longer length of obstruction, the use of covered stent, and longer procedure time were significant independent predictive factors for the clinical success of SEMS placement (odds ratio [OR] 0.974 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.950–0.990); P = .043, OR 0.255 (95% CI 0.138–0.471); P < .001, and OR 0.957 (95% CI 0.931–0.984); P = .002, respectively). Stage IV colorectal cancer and the use of covered stent were significant independent predictive factors for the development of complications after SEMS placement (OR 2.428 (95% CI 1.407–4.188); P = .001 and OR 3.329 (95% CI 2.060–5.378); P < .001, respectively).Longer length of obstruction, the use of covered stent, and longer procedure time were associated with lower clinical success rates. Having stage IV colorectal cancer and the use of covered stents were associated with an increased risk of complications.

Self-expanding metal stent insertion by colorectal surgeons using a two-person approach colonoscopy without fluoroscopic monitoring in the management of acute colorectal obstruction: a 14-year experience

BackgroundPlacement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) in patients presenting with an acute colorectal obstruction (ACO) may obviate emergency surgery (ES), potentially effectively palliating incurable tumors, acting as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with operable or potentially operable tumors and achieving effective decompression of other ACO. We present our experience with SEMS insertion by colorectal surgeons without fluoroscopic monitoring for ACO especially for acute malignant colorectal obstruction (AMCO) for nearly a 14-year period (2007–2020).AimTo explore the safety and effectiveness of SEMS insertion in the management of ACO by colorectal surgeons using a two-person approach colonoscopy without fluoroscopic monitoring.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients retrospectively to identify all patients presenting to our unit with ACO especially with AMCO who had stenting carried out to achieve colonic decompression. All 434 procedures were performed by colorectal surgeons using a two-person approach colonoscopy without fluoroscopic monitoring.ResultsThe overall technique success rate and clinic success rate by SEMS insertion were 428/434 (98.6%) and 412/434 (94.9%). The overall incidence of complications by SEMS insertion was 19/434 (4.4%). The complications included clinical perforation (6/434, 1.4%); stent migration (2/434, 0.5%), 1 of which re-stent; stent detachment (fell off) (3/434, 0.7%), none of them with re-stent; stool impaction (6/434, 1.4%), 1 of which re-stent; and abdominal or anal pain (2/434, 0.5%). There was no hemorrhage in any of the 434 patients.ConclusionsSEMS insertion is a relatively safe and effective technique for colonic decompression in dealing with ACO as either a BTS or as a palliative measure. It is also a solution to other causes of ACO such as recurrent tumor, benign diseases, or extra-luminal compression. Therefore, ES was largely avoided.

Comparison of the efficacy of self-expandable metallic stents in colorectal obstructions caused by extracolonic malignancy and colorectal cancer.

The current study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of self-expandable metallic stent placement among patients with extracolonic malignancy and those with colorectal cancer. Patient information, technical and clinical success rates and complication rates were compared between patients with colorectal cancer and extracolonic malignancy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the time elapsed before the onset of complications. Risk factors for re-obstruction in patients with self-expandable metallic stents were evaluated by multivariate analysis. A total of 68 patients who underwent self-expandable metallic stent placement at Saiseikai Niigata Hospital between January 2012 and September 2019 were included. The clinical success rate was significantly different between the colorectal cancer (96.6%) and extracolonic malignancy (66.7%) groups (P=0.01). The incidence of complications was significantly higher in the extracolonic malignancy group (66.7%) than in the colorectal cancer group (25.4%; P=0.02). Additionally, the time elapsed before the onset of complications was shorter in the extracolonic malignancy group than in the colorectal cancer group (P=0.0008). Risk factors for re-obstruction were higher in the extracolonic malignancy group [odds ratio, 7.76 (1.02-57.2)] than in the palliative stent placement group [odds ratio, 5.45 (1.01-29.5); P=0.04]. In extracolonic malignancy, self-expandable metallic stent placement was associated with lower clinical success rates and increased risk of complications. The time elapsed before the onset of complications was short, and extracolonic malignancy was a risk factor for re-obstruction, suggesting that the placement of self-expandable metallic stents for malignant colorectal obstruction in extracolonic malignancy is not optimal.

Current Status of the Self-Expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery Versus Emergency Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: Results from an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Background: The current use of endoscopic stenting as a bridge to surgery is not always accepted in standard clinical practice to treat neoplastic colonic obstructions. Objectives: The role of colonic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) positioning as a bridge to resective surgery versus emergency surgery (ES) for malignant obstruction, using all new data and available variables, was studied and we focused on short- and long-term results. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases were included. The search comprised only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the interventions that included SEMS positioning versus ES. The primary outcomes were the rates of overall postoperative mortality, clinical and technical success. The secondary outcomes were the short- and long-term results. Results: A total of 12 studies were eligible for further analyses. A laparoscopic colectomy was the most common operation performed in the SEMS group, whereas the traditional open approach was commonly used in the ES group. Intraoperative colonic lavage was seldomly performed during ES. There were no differences in mortality rates between the two groups (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.04; I2 = 0%). In the SEMS group, the rate of successful primary anastomosis was significantly higher in of SEMS (69.75%) than in the ES (55.07%) (RR 1.26, 95% 245 CI 1.01 to 1.57; I2 = 86%). Conversely, the upfront Hartmann procedure was performed more frequently in the ES (39.1%) as compared to the SEMS group (23.4%) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85; I2 = 23%). The overall postoperative complications rate was significantly lower in the SEMS group (32.74%) than in the ES group (48.25%) (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I2 = 65%). Conclusions: In the presence of malignant colorectal obstruction, SEMS is safe and associated with the same mortality and significantly lower morbidity than the ES group. The rate of successful primary anastomosis was significantly higher than the ES group. Nevertheless, recurrence and survival outcomes are not significantly different between the two groups. The analysis of short- and long-term results can suggest the use of SEMS as a bridge to resective surgery when it is performed by an endoscopist with adequate expertise in both colonoscopy and fluoroscopic techniques and who performed commonly colonic stenting.

Short‑ and long‑term outcomes of self‑expanding metallic stent placement vs. emergency surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy does not recommend self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge to surgery (BTS) for malignant colorectal obstruction (MCRO). However, no universally accepted consensus has been determined. The present study aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of SEMS placement vs. emergency surgery (ES) for MCRO. Surgical resection of colorectal cancer was performed in 3,840 patients between April 2001 and June 2016. Of these, 93 patients had MCRO requiring emergency decompression. Only patients in whom the colorectal lesion was ultimately resected were included; thus, the present study included 62 patients treated with MCRO via SEMS placement as a BTS (n=25) or via ES (n=37). The rates of laparoscopic surgery, primary anastomosis, stoma formation, lymph node dissection, adverse events, 30-day mortality and disease-free survival were evaluated. The clinical success rate of SEMS placement was 92.0% (23/25). Compared with the ES group, the SEMS group had higher rates of laparoscopic surgery (68.0 vs. 2.7%; P<0.001) and primary anastomosis (88.0 vs. 51.4%; P=0.003), a greater number of dissected lymph nodes (30 vs. 18; P=0.001), and lower incidences of stoma formation (24.0 vs. 67.6%; P=0.002) and overall adverse events (24.0 vs. 62.2%; P=0.004). The 30-day mortality and disease-free survival of the SEMS group were not significantly different to that of the ES group (0 vs. 2.7%; P=1.000; log-rank test; P=0.10). In conclusion, as long as adverse events such as perforation are minimized, SEMS placement as a BTS could be a first treatment option for MCRO. The present study is registered in the University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN R000034868).

Stenting for colorectal cancer obstruction in Icelandic patients

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are a known treatment option for obstruction due to colorectal cancer. The objective of this project was to estimate the usage of such stents in Iceland between 2000-2018. We evaluated the number of patients who received the stent as a bridge to surgery (BtoS) or as a palliative therapy (PT) and evaluated complication rate and the technical and clinical success rate. Retrospective review of patients in Landspitali University Hospital who received SEMS for malignant colorectal obstruction. Search was conducted using diagnostic and theraputic codes in the Icelandic electronic medical record system. A total of 43 patients with colorectal cancer received in total 53 SEMS for obstruction, the first patient in 2005. More patient received SEMS as PT (n=27) than as BtoS (n=16). Colon perforation occurred in 5 patients (12%). A resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 69% of the BtoS patients. The majority of the PT patients did not receive an operation (63%). Permanent stoma ratio was 27% for BtoS patients and 22% for PT patients. SEMS served as BtoS with resection and primary anastomosis for the majority of patients in the BtoS group. For a majority of patients in the PT group, SEMS could be used to avoid surgery. The perforation rate was relatively high. Information on techincal and clinical success was poorly recorded. Because of the retrospective nature of the study and the small population size all results should be interpreted with caution.

Self-expandable metallic stenting as a bridge to elective surgery versus emergency surgery for acute malignant right-sided colorectal obstruction

BackgroundThe use of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery has increased for patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. However, relatively few reports have compared SEMS as a bridge to elective surgery for acute malignant obstruction of the right-sided colon (MORC) vs. emergency surgery (ES). This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of elective surgery after SEMS placement vs. ES for patients (including stage IV cases) with acute MORC.MethodsPatients with acute MORC who underwent radical resection for a primary tumour from July 2008 to November 2016 at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were retrospectively enrolled. Postoperative short-term outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the SEMS and ES groups.ResultsIn total, 107 patients with acute MORC (35 in the SEMS group and 72 in the ES group) were included for analysis. The Intensive Care Unit admission rate was lower (11.4% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.011), the incidence of complications was reduced (11.4% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.042), and the postoperative length of hospitalisation was significantly shorter (8.23 ± 6.50 vs. 11.18 ± 6.71 days, P = 0.033) for the SEMS group. Survival curves showed no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.506) or OS (P = 0.989) between groups. Also, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS rates between patients with stage II and III colon cancer. After colectomy for synchronous liver metastases among stage IV patients, the hepatectomy rates for the SEMS and ES groups were 85.7% and 14.3%, respectively (P = 0.029). The hazard ratio for colectomy alone vs. combined resection was 3.258 (95% CI 0.858–12.370; P = 0.041).ConclusionStent placement offers significant advantages in terms of short-term outcomes and comparable prognoses for acute MORC patients. For synchronous liver metastases, SEMS placement better prepares the patient for resection of the primary tumour and liver metastasis, which contribute to improved survival.

Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement or emergency surgery as palliative treatment for obstructive colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous meta-analyses on palliative treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction with Self-Expandable Metal Stent (SEMS) or emergency surgery reported contradictory results for morbidity, and frequently included extracolonic obstruction. Therefore, the current meta-analysis aimed to exclusively analyze palliative treatment for primary obstructive colorectal cancer, with early complication rate as a primary outcome. A systematic literature search was performed on studies comparing palliative SEMS and emergency surgery. Corresponding authors were contacted for additional data. Eighteen studies were selected (1518 patients). Early complication rate was 13.6 % for SEMS and 25.5 % for emergency surgery (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.46, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.74). Mortality was 3.9 % and 9.4 % (OR 0.44, 0.28-0.69). Stomas were present in 14.3 % and 51.4 % of patients (OR 0.17, 0.09-0.31). More late complications occurred after SEMS (23.2 % versus 9.8 %, OR 2.55, 1.70-3.83), mostly due to SEMS obstruction. In conclusion, SEMS placement seems the preferred treatment of obstructing colorectal cancer in the palliative setting.

Efficacy of uncovered self-expandable metallic stent for colorectal obstruction by extracolonic malignancy.

BACKGROUNDSelf-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used for malignant colorectal obstruction. Recently, SEMS has been used for palliative option for colorectal obstruction caused by extracolonic malignancy (ECM).AIMTo evaluate the efficacy of SEMS for colorectal obstruction caused by ECM, and to identify the factors associated with stent occlusion.METHODSSeventy-two patients who were treated with uncovered SEMS insertion for malignant colorectal obstructions caused by colorectal metastasis or peritoneal seeding of ECM at Samsung Medical Center between April 2012 to March 2016 were enrolled. We analyzed technical and clinical outcomes of stent insertion, the factors associated with stent occlusion and long term outcomes after stent insertion.RESULTSTechnical success rate was determined as 90.3% with a clinical success rate of 87.7%. Stent occlusion developed in 28.1%, with a median duration of 51 d. Further, 81.3% with stent occlusion could be treated with secondary stent insertion. Clinical failure was observed to be related to the male sex (P = 0.020) and right colon obstruction (P = 0.017). Stent length ≤ 10 cm was found to be associated with stent occlusion (P = 0.003). Median survival time after stent insertion was 4.7 mo and 40.4% were able to receive their oncological treatments after stent insertion without surgery.CONCLUSIONUncovered SEMS is effective for the treatment of colorectal obstruction caused by ECM, considering life expectancy of patients with ECM.

Comparison of different types of covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant colorectal obstruction.

Stent migration is one of the main drawbacks of covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMSs), occurring in up to 40% of malignant colorectal obstruction management cases. Various types of covered SEMSs have been developed to reduce this risk. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and complication rates of the flare-type covered SEMS (Flare) with those of the double-layered covered SEMS (ComVi). We performed a prospective, randomized study in four tertiary referral centers between July 2016 and April 2018. Patients with malignant colorectal obstruction were eligible for the study. The primary outcome was migration rate as observed within the first month. Rates of technical success, clinical success, and complications within the first month were also assessed. A total of 60 patients were included (mean age, 70.5 ± 12.5years; male, 31 [51.7%]). Flare and ComVi stents were applied in 30 patients each. The Flare and ComVi groups showed comparable technical success rates (90% [27/30] vs. 96.7% [29/30], p = 0.605) and clinical success rates (85.2% [23/27] vs. 75.9% [22/29], p = 0.589). Migration occurred in three (11.1%) and four (13.8%) cases in the Flare and ComVi groups, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.99), and the risk of other complications, including perforation and re-obstruction, did not differ between the two groups. Our study indicates that both flare-shape and double-layered covered SEMSs are equally effective options for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction with low migration rates when compared with previously reported migration risk of covered SEMS.

Improved results for left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction with a proper selection for self expandable metal stent placement, surgical resection or diverting stoma

AimsEndoscopic placement of Self Expandable Metal Stents to relieve malignant colorectal obstruction has become a common therapeutic advancement in clinical practice. MethodsIn a 16 year period 145 patients had endoscopic placement of a Self-Expandable Metal Stent for acute/subacute left sided malignant colorectal obstruction in a center where gastroenterologists and surgeons cooperate in a daily basis, discussing indications. ResultsThere was no operative mortality and no major complication in placement of the stent. Technical and clinical success was respectively 94.5% and 91.8%. Consultation among specialists changed the preoperative indication in 60 patients. ConclusionsSelf-Expandable Metal Stents placement represents an important tool to treat patients with obstructing colorectal cancer. Surgical resection, diverting stoma or endoscopic stent placement should be chosen according to the clinical characteristics of each single patient. In this scenario, a close collaboration among specialists in selecting the most appropriate operative procedure is essential and brings to better results.

Efficacy of transanal drainage tube and self-expanding metallic stent in acute left malignant colorectal obstruction.

The self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) or transanal drainage tube (TDT) methods can be used as a palliative treatment before tumor resection surgery. Studies systematically comparing the efficacy and characteristics between SEMS with TDT are limited, especially in a large-scale Chinese population. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of these treatment approaches. This was a retrospective comparative study of patients with an acute malignant left colorectal obstruction who underwent a preoperative decompressive procedure with SEMS or TDT intervention between December 2014 and October 2017. The indicators after endoscopic treatment and tumor resection surgery between the SEMS and TDT groups were compared. 206 patients underwent endoscopic intervention to relieve obstruction, including 139 patients treated with SEMS and 67 patients treated with TDT. The technical success rates of the SEMS group and TDT group were 97.1% and 95.6%, respectively, and the rates of obstruction relief were 92.8% and 86.6%, respectively. TDT was more easily translocated than SEMS (P=0.02), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications. However, SEMS had a lower complication rate than TDT (P=0.02), and could alleviate the obstruction faster (P<0.01). There were 72 patients and 44 patients who took resection surgery in the SEMS group and TDT group, respectively. The direct anastomosis rates were 73.6% and 63.6% (P=0.26), respectively, and only 1 case in the TDT group had anastomotic leakage. The surgery time of the SEMS group was significantly shorter than that of the TDT group (P=0.01). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative hospital stay (P=1.00) or total treatment costs for patients undergoing surgery (P=0.26). Both TDT and SEMS could effectively relieve acute left malignant colorectal obstruction with safe and reliable results, and they could both reduce the stomas rate compared with traditional surgery. SEMS could alleviate obstruction faster than TDT and had fewer complications.

Performance Status Is a Predictive Factor of Improvement after Colonic Stenting in Patients with Malignant Stenosis due to Extraparenteral Malignant Tumors.

Endoscopic stenting with self-expandable metallic stents is widely accepted for the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Generally, stenting is performed as a bridge-to-surgery for primary colorectal cancer (CRC). Furthermore, palliative colonic stenting is performed for extraparenteral malignant tumors (EPMTs). However, predictive factors for improving clinical outcomes after colonic stenting for EPMTs remain unclear. This study is aimed at evaluating patients with EPMTs who underwent colonic stenting and investigating factors influencing clinical improvement after the stenting procedure. Twenty-one patients with colorectal obstruction by EPMTs were treated using self-expandable metallic stents over a period of 8 years. We divided the enrolled patients into the clinically improved and nonimproved groups after colonic stenting. Variables, including age; sex; type of primary cancer; serum albumin level; location of the obstruction; stent type, length, and diameter; prior chemotherapy treatment; ascites; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS); technical and clinical success rates; stent-related adverse events; and mortality rates, were evaluated. Technical failure was not observed in all cases. Clinical success, defined as the passage of stool and improvement in the colorectal obstruction scoring system (CROSS) without adverse events, was observed in the 14 patients. Univariate analyses revealed no significant differences in factors other than PS before stenting (P = 0.04) between the improved and nonimproved groups. Colonic stenting for EPMTs was effective. PS may be an independent risk factor of clinical outcomes after stenting.

Novel Predictive Nomogram for Identifying Difficult Guidewire Insertion in Patients With Malignant Colorectal Obstruction and Sphincterotome-Assisted Guidewire Insertion for Improving the Success Rate of Self-Expandable Metal Stent Insertion.

Aims: This study aimed to identify risk factors related to guidewire insertion (GWI) failure and construct a novel predictive nomogram. In addition, sphincterotome-assisted guidewire insertion (SAGWI) in difficult cases was evaluated for efficacy and safety.Methods: We reviewed the data of 509 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction who underwent endoscopic self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) insertion from 2007 to 2018 in our center, retrospectively. We identify risk factors associated with GWI failure by multivariate logistic regression analysis and construct a novel predictive nomogram. Improvements in the GWI and technical and clinical success rates were assessed for the SAGWI technique.Results: A total of 509 patients with malignant colorectal obstruction were included. Increases of 6.9% and 7.0% were found in the GWI success rate by intention-to-treat (ITT; p < 0.001) and per-protocol (PP; p < 0.001) analyses after SAGWI, respectively. Increases of 6.5% and 6.6% in the technical success rate were found by ITT (p < 0.001) and PP (p < 0.001) analyses after SAGWI, respectively. Increases of 5.8% and 6.0% in the clinical success rate were found by ITT (p < 0.001) and PP (p < 0.001) analyses after SAGWI, respectively. Regarding the GWI failure-related factors, a sharply angulated stricture was an independent risk factor, and an experienced colonoscopist was an independent protective factor. A novel effective predictive nomogram was constructed.Conclusion: The novel predictive nomogram can be conveniently used to identify difficult cases. A sharply angulated stricture and an experienced colonoscopist are independent factors related to GWI failure. The SAGWI technique is an effective and safe method for addressing technically difficult cases.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE USE OF COATED AND UNCOATED SELF-EXPANDABLE METALLIC STENTS IN MALIGNANT COLORECTAL OBSTRUCTION

THE OBJECTIVE was to compare the efficacy and rate of complications in patients of groups with uncovered and covered colorectal stents.METHODS AND MATERIALS. The study included 102 patients who were admitted for emergency with symptoms of malignant colon obstruction, who were randomly installed covered and uncovered SEMS from December 2012 to September 2017.RESULTS. Clinical success was achieved with uncovered stents in 98 % of cases and 96 % with covered stents (relative risk (RR) 1.02). 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.954–1.092). The incidence of complications in the group of uncovered stents was 9.8 %, in the group of covered stents – 3.9 % (RR 0.938, CI 0.841–1.046); the frequency of recurrences of obstruction did not significantly different between groups. The median duration of cumulative stent patency was 181 days in the group of uncovered stents and 218 days in the group of covered stents (p=0.427), the difference was statistically insignificant.CONCLUSION. The use of double covered and double uncovered stents is equally effectively and safely for patients with malignant colorectal obstruction. The frequency of reobstructions did not exceed 4 % and did not differ in the groups of covered and uncovered stents. The choice of the type of stent should be determined individually depending on the clinical situation.

Determining the difference in the efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stents as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colon cancer among patients in the CROSS 0 group and those in the CROSS 1 or 2 group: a pooled analysis of data from two Japanese prospective multicenter trials

PurposeThis study compared the feasibility and safety of endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) between patients with obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) classified as ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System (CROSS) 0 and those with CROSS 1 or 2.MethodsWe conducted a post hoc analysis of two prospective, observational, single-arm multicenter clinical trials and performed a pooled analysis of the data. In total, 336 consecutive patients with malignant colorectal obstruction underwent SEMS placement. The primary endpoint was clinical success, defined as resolution of symptoms and radiological findings within 24 h. Secondary endpoints were technical success and adverse events.ResultsHigh clinical (98.0% vs. 98.4%) and technical (96.7% vs. 97.8%) success rates were observed in both groups (CROSS 0 vs. CROSS 1 or 2). The adverse event rate was low. The mean stricture length was lower (3.8 ± 1.2 cm vs. 4.4 ± 1.8 cm) and laparoscopic surgery more common (56.7% vs 52.2%) in the CROSS 0 group than in the CROSS 1 and 2 group.ConclusionThis study was the first to compare the degree of stricture in different CROSS groups and demonstrated comparable results with respect to the short-term efficacy and safety of SEMS placement as a BTS for obstructive CRC in CROSS 0, 1, and 2 patients.

Long-term oncologic safety of self-expandable metal stent as a bridge to surgery for malignant colorectal obstruction: Our experience.

153 Background: About 10-25% patients of colorectal cancer suffer from acute colonic obstruction. Traditional management of acute malignant bowel obstruction has focused on emergency resection but showed high mortality and morbidity rates. Recently, placement of a self-expanding metal stent(SEMS) was widely used and SEMS seems to be as a safe and effective “bridge to surgery” and to offer good palliation. But there is concern about long-term survival after the use of SEMS. Theoretically, tumor cell seeding can occur due to mechanical force during the stent insertion. To identify this theoretical validity, we surveyed long-term survival of malignant colonic obstruction using SEMS placement. Methods: This retrospective study included 303 patients who presented in Korea University Anam Hospital between 2006 and 2014 with obstructing CRC, and underwent surgical resection. Patients were devided into two group: the “SEMS” group included 148 patients who underwent endoscopic stent as a bridge to surgery, and the surgery group included 155 patients who underwent emergency or elective surgery without stenting. In addition, candidates for curative resection were identified (98 patients in “SEMS” group vs 101 patients in “surgery” group). The clinicopathologic characteristics, overall survival(OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in demographics, tumor stage between the two group. The median follow-up times were 48.5 months (IQR, 19.1-73.1 months) for the SEMS group and 39.4 months (IQR, 15.1-39.4 months) for the surgery group. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS rate between two groups (59.6% vs 56.8%; p = 0.3). The 5-year RFS rate did not significantly differ between two groups (71.0% vs. 61.3%; p = 0.221). The long-term oncologic safety did not significantly differ between two groups in either the 5-year OS rate (79.5% vs 74.5%; P= 0.6). or the 5-year RFS rate (95.8% vs 95.8%; P = 0.3). Conclusions: SEMS as bridge to surgery in obstructive CRC did not worsen the long-term oncologic outcomes compared to those of the primary surgery.