Catheter Malfunction Research Articles

What do patients say about their experience with urinary catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters?

BackgroundLittle is known about the patient experience with urinary catheters or peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). We sought to better understand patient perspectives on having a urinary catheter or a PICC by reviewing open-ended comments made by patients about having either of these 2 devices. MethodsAs part of a larger study, we asked patients about certain catheter-related complications at the time of catheter placement and on days 14, 30, and 70 (PICCs only). In this larger project, we performed a structured assessment that included an open-ended question about other comments (initial interview) or problems (follow-up interview) associated with the device. For the current study, we conducted a descriptive analysis of these open-ended comments, classifying them as positive, negative, or neutral. ResultsPositive comments about urinary catheters accounted for 9 of 147 comments (6%), whereas positive comments about PICCs accounted for 10 of 100 comments (10%). Positive comments for both catheter types were mostly related to convenience. More than 80% of comments about both types of devices were negative and fell into the following areas: catheter malfunction; pain, irritation, or discomfort; interference with activities of daily living; provider error; and other. ConclusionsOur findings underscore the need to optimize the patient experience with placement, ongoing use, and removal of urinary catheters and PICCs.

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study

BackgroundUrgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) can help patients with end-stage renal diseases (ESRD) that are referred late to dialysis. However, catheter patency and related complications of urgent-start PD have not been thoroughly clarified. We investigated the clinical outcomes of urgent-start PD in a Chinese cohort.MethodsWe enrolled ESRD patients who received urgent-start PD (starting PD within 14 days after catheter insertion) in our center from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2014, and followed them up for 10 years. The primary outcome was catheter failure. Secondary outcomes included short-term and long-term complications related to urgent-start PD.ResultsTotally 2059 patients (58.9% male, mean age 47.6 ± 15.9 years) were enrolled. Few perioperative complications were observed, including significant hemorrhage (n = 3, 0.1%) and bowel perforation (n = 0). Early peritonitis occurred in 24 (1.2%) patients (0.28 episodes per patient-year). Within the first month after catheter insertion, functional catheter malfunction occurred in 85 (4.1%) patients, and abdominal wall complications (including hernia, hydrothorax, hydrocele, and leakage) in 36 (1.7%) patients. During a median 36.5 (17.7–61.4) months of follow-up, 75 (3.6%) patients experienced catheter failure, and 291 (14.1%) had death-censoring technique failure. At the end of 1-month, 1 -year, 3-year, and 5-year, catheter patency rate was 97.6, 96.4, 96.2, 96.2%; and technique survival rate was 99.5, 97.0, 90.3, 82.7%, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, every 5-year increase in age was associated with 19% decrease of risk for catheter failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73–0.89). Male sex (HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00–2.04), diabetic nephropathy (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.08–2.25) and low hemoglobin levels (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81–0.98) were independent risk factors for abdominal wall complications.ConclusionsUrgent-start PD is a safe and efficacious option for unplanned ESRD patients. A well-trained PD team, a standardized catheter insertion procedure by experienced nephrologists, and a carefully designed initial PD prescription as well as comprehensive follow-up care, might be essential for the successful urgent-start PD program.

SUN-068 RE-EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF BACK-UP ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAS IN A CONTEMPORARY COHORT OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS

The technique survival of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is limited, and transitions to haemodialysis (HD) are often unpredictable, due to events such as peritonitis or catheter malfunction. As such, there is a high risk of central venous catheter (CVC) use amongst patients who transition from PD to HD. Formation of a ‘back-up’ arteriovenous fistula (AVF) at the commencement of PD may reduce the risk of later CVC use, but risks exposing patients to complications of an AVF that may never be needed. Studies in the 1990s concluded that few AVFs created as back-ups were ever used, and recommended against routine formation of back-up AVFs.

The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.

Peritoneal catheter dysfunction is a frequent complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Traditionally, dysfunction has been attributed to catheter malposition, but whether the location of the catheter tip in the small pelvis really determines proper function is unclear. We reviewed 900 abdominal X-ray images of PD patients from a 7-year period in two PD units that use different catheter types (straight and Swan Neck Curled). In 52% of the images, the dialysis catheter tip was located in the ideal position in the small pelvis and in 48% in other sites. Peritoneal catheter function was normal at the time of imaging in 87% of those with ideal catheter tip position, and in 74% of those with other than ideal position. The tip was located in small pelvis in 35% of images performed during catheter dysfunction and in 56% of those performed during normal catheter function. There were no differences between two catheter types. The positive predictive value of abdominal X-ray images to predict catheter function was 26%, and the negative predictive value 87%. We also found a significant positive correlation between polycystic kidney disease and normal catheter function. In contrast, obese patients were more likely to have catheter malfunction. Previous abdominal surgery was not associated with catheter dysfunction. Our data showed a higher probability of normal function of peritoneal catheters whose tips were located in the small pelvis. However, also malpositioned catheters generally functioned well, and malpositioning of the PD catheter did not in itself explain its malfunction.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Lead to a High Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Children

Background: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children has seen a sharp increase in recent years with the majority of cases secondary to central venous catheters (CVCs). Among CVCs, the number of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed in children has risen significantly. Methods: In this multi-center, prospective, observational cohort study, we enrolled patients aged 6 months to 18 years with newly placed PICCs or tunneled lines (TLs) and compared the incidence of VTE between them. We also evaluated the incidence and risk factors of CVC-related VTE, central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter malfunctions in PICCs and TLs. Findings: A total of 1967 CVCs placed in 1742 unique subjects were included in the analysis. The incidence of catheter-related VTE was 5.9±0.63%. The majority of the cases, 80%, were in subjects with PICCs which had a significantly higher risk of catheter-related VTE than subjects with TLs (HR=8.5, 95%CI, 3.1-23, p<0.001). PICCs were also significantly more likely to have a CLABSI (HR=1.6, 95%CI: 1.2-2.2, p=0.002) and CVC malfunction (HR=2.0, 95%CI: 1.6-2.4, p<0.001) compared to TLs. Increased risk of CVC-related VTE was found in patients with a prior history of VTE (HR=23, 95%CI: 4-127, p<0.001), multi-lumen CVC (HR=3.9, 95%CI: 1.8-8.9, p=0.003) and leukemia (HR=3.5, 95%CI: 1.3-9.0, p=0.031). Interpretation: Children with PICCs had a significantly higher incidence of catheter-related VTE, CLABSI and CVC malfunction over TLs. The results suggest that pause be taken prior to placing a CVC, especially PICCs, due to the serious complications they have been shown to cause. Funding Statement: The authors state: there was no funding source for this study. Declaration of Interests: The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the ethics committee at each participating institution.

Management of Port Occlusions in Adults: Different-Site Replacement versus Same-Site Salvage

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of different-site port placement versus same-site port salvage in adult patients with occluded ports. Materials and MethodsNinety-five occluded subcutaneous infusion ports (ports) in 95 patients presenting between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2017, were retrospectively reviewed: 48 (51%) different-site placements (replacements; same-day indwelling port removal and different-site new port placement) and 47 (49%) same-site salvages (salvages; 35 fibrin sheath strippings, 12 over-the-wire exchanges). Demographic information, indication for initial placement and replacement or salvage, procedural details, post-intervention primary catheter patency, and post-intervention port sequelae were recorded. Post-intervention primary catheter patency, and malfunction and infection rates were compared with Kaplan-Meier estimation and the log-rank test, and Fisher exact test, respectively. The association of patient risk factors and port patency was assessed with Cox regression. ResultsMedian primary catheter patency after replacement was 254 days (interquartile range [IQR], 297) and after salvage was 391 days (IQR, 906) (P = .25). Within the salvage group, median primary catheter patency after stripping was 391 days (IQR, 658) and after exchange was 666 days (IQR, 1412) (P = .08). There was no statistical difference in malfunction (P = .12) and infection (P = .74) rates between the replaced and salvaged groups or in malfunction (P = .09) and infection (P = .1) rates between the exchanged and stripped subgroups. None of the patient or catheter characteristics assessed were significantly associated with primary catheter patency. ConclusionsThere was no statistical difference between patency, malfunctions, or infections after replacement and salvage, or after stripping and exchange, so technique selection should be based on the patient’s estimated lifetime venous access requirements, cost, and physician preference.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using a very-low-site approach: a 5-year experience.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter tip migration accounts for the majority of cases of PD catheter malfunction. In this case series, we described our experiences of using a modified PD catheter implantation approach through a site that is lower than the site that is conventionally used, to reduce catheter malfunction. We retrospectively identified 76 patients who received PD catheter implantation at the Affiliated Wujin Hospital of Jiangsu University, among whom 39 received the traditional approach of low-site insertion and 37 received a modified approach of very-low-site insertion. All participants were followed up for at least 2years after PD catheter implantation, and the development of catheter dysfunction or death during this period was monitored. We found that the survival rate of the initially inserted catheter was 75.68% among the very-low-site group. This survival rate was significantly better than that observed among the low-site group (48.72%; p = 0.029). Kaplan-Meier curves of the initial catheter survival also showed that the catheter survival was significantly higher in the patients in the very-low-site group than those in the low-site group (log rank p = 0.012). Complications, such as catheter tip migration, were not observed in the very-low-site group, while tip migration occurred in 15.38% of the patients in the low-site group (very-low-site group vs low-site group: p = 0.039). A safe and simple PD catheter implantation can be performed either through the low-site approach or the very-low-site approach.

Outcomes following peritoneal dialysis catheter removal with reinsertion or permanent transfer to haemodialysis.

Long-term use of peritoneal dialysis catheter is associated with complications such as infection and malfunction, necessitating removal of catheter with subsequent reinsertion or permanent transfer to haemodialysis. This study aims to investigate the outcome in patients who underwent reinsertion. A single-centre retrospective study was performed in Singapore General Hospital for all adult incident peritoneal dialysis patients between January 2011 and January 2016. Study data were retrieved from patient electronic medical records up till 1 January 2017. A total of 470 patients had peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with median follow-up period of 29.2 (interquartile range = 16.7-49.7) months. A total of 92 patients required catheter removal. Thirty-six (39%) patients underwent catheter reinsertion. The overall technique survival at 3 and 12 months were 83% and 67%. Median time to technique failure of the second catheter was 6.74 (interquartile range = 0-50.2) months. The mean survival for patients who converted to haemodialysis and re-attempted peritoneal dialysis was comparable (54.9 ± 5.5 vs 57.3 ± 3.6 months; p = 0.75). Twelve (13%) patients had contraindication for peritoneal dialysis and were excluded from analysis. Of 11 patients who required catheter removal due to malfunction, 7 (64%) underwent catheter reinsertion and 6 (86%) patients ultimately converted to haemodialysis during study period. Of the 69 patients who had catheter removal due to infection, 29 (42%) underwent catheter reinsertion and 8 (28%) patients eventually converted to haemodialysis during the study period. Patient survival was comparable between patients who re-attempted peritoneal dialysis and patients who transferred to haemodialysis. Patients who had previous catheter removal due to infections had favourable technique survival than those due to catheter malfunction.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Central venous catheters are still used extensively as temporary or permanent blood access for hemodialysis patients. Catheter-related bloodstream infections are the main complication of central venous catheters and increase morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, the most appropriate lock solution for central venous catheters to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections is still uncertain. Methods: Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched up to August 2018. The reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews were also checked. The primary outcomes were catheter-related bloodstream infections and bleeding events. The secondary outcomes were catheter malfunction, exit-site infection, and all-cause mortality. Findings: 50 trials (7142 patients) were included for this study. Compared with heparin 5000U/ml, antibiotic locks (antibiotics with TSC, EDTA, heparin 5000U/ml, low-dose heparin, or urokinase) and ethanol locks were more effective in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Antimicrobial agents plus low-dose heparin (500-2500 U/ml), TSC and low-dose heparin locks had lower risk of bleeding events than heparin 5000 U/ml. No lock solution reduced rates of catheter malfunction and all-cause mortality compared with heparin 5000 U/ml. In summary, antibiotics plus low-dose heparin was ranked as the best lock solution. The overall results were not materially changed in sensitivity analyses. Interpretation: Taking into account both efficacy and safety, antibiotics plus low-dose heparin (500-2500 U/ml) may be the preferred lock solution. Funding: Chinese Special Funds for Scientific Research on Public Causes (201502010). Declaration of Interest: We declare no competing interests.

Vascular Access in Patients Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Report from a Single Center in China.

Our aim was to analyze the practice pattern of vascular access use and complication rates in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy from a large Chinese urban medical center. Patients who had received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) from April to October 2014 in our center were included in this study. Demographic data, primary disease, department for hospitalization, blood pressure, heart rate, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, presence of mechanical ventilation, CRRT modalities, choice of functioning vascular access, site and duration of catheter insertion, presence of recatheterization, cumulative catheter indwelling time, catheter malfunction and catheter-related infections, as well as laboratory test results, were collected. A total of 292 patients were enrolled in our study, including 175 males (59.9%) and 117 females (40.1%), aged 50.8 ± 18.6 years (range, 12 to 94 years). Acute kidney injury, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome were the main indications for treatment with CRRT. Initial vascular access was non-cuffed temporary catheters in 280 patients and was preferentially obtained in the right internal jugular vein (54.3%). There were 32 (11.4%) patients requiring re-catheterization. Catheter malfunction occurred in 7.14% of all patients, and the median time of catheter malfunction was found at the 5th day. By multivariate analysis, it was found that the main risk factors of catheter malfunction were cumulative treatment time of CRRT and the level of hemoglobin. The average time of catheter-related infections was 10.7 days after insertion and the catheter-related infections occurred at a rate of 7.19 per 1000 catheter days. The main risk factors for catheter-related infections were cumulative time of catheterization and the level of serum albumin. In this cohort of critically ill patients, the main risk factors for catheter malfunction were cumulative CRRT time and the level of hemoglobin. In addition, the main risk factors for catheter-related infections were cumulative time of catheterization and the level of serum albumin.

Image Guidance for Ventricular Shunt Surgery: An Analysis of Ventricular Size and Proximal Revision Rates.

Image guidance is a promising technology that could lead to lower rates of premature shunt failure by decreasing the rate of inaccurate proximal catheter placement. To perform a detailed radiographic analysis of ventricular size using 3 well-described methods and compare proximal revision rates. Our shunt surgery research database was queried to identify procedures (new placement or revision) where frameless stereotactic electromagnetic neuronavigation was used (January 2010-June 2016). A randomly selected cohort of surgeries done without image guidance during the same time period served as the comparison group. A radiographic analysis utilizing the following indices was used to classify ventricular size: bifrontal, bicaudate, and frontal-occipital horn ratio. The primary outcome was shunt failure due specifically to proximal catheter malfunction at 90 and 180 days. A total of 108 stereotactic and 95 free-hand cases were identified. Overall, there was no difference in ventricular size between the 2 groups. Neuronavigation yielded improved accuracy rates (73% grade 1; P<.001). Although there was no statistically significant difference in proximal revision rates when all patients were analyzed, there was a clinically beneficial reduction in the 90- and 180-day failure rates across all radiographic indices in children with small-to-moderate ventricular sizes when using image guidance. Electromagnetic neuronavigation results in more accurate placement of catheters, but did not result in an overall reduction in proximal shunt failure at 90 and 180days after the index surgery. However, subgroup analysis suggests a clinically important benefit in those patients with harder to cannulate ventricles.

Factors associated with early peritoneal dialysis catheter malfunction

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter obstruction often leads to surgical revision and may require transition to hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors (including omentectomy) associated with early PD catheter obstruction (<6 months from insertion). MethodsA retrospective review of all PD catheters inserted at a single high-volume referral center (2005–2018) was performed. 185 PD catheters were placed in 123 patients (45 female). Potential risk factors for early catheter obstruction were analyzed using Chi-square analysis (p < 0.05 considered statistically significant). ResultsMedian age at catheter insertion was 3.42 years (3 days–39 years). Early catheter obstruction occurred in 42 cases (22.7%). Median time to early obstruction was 24 days (3–118 days). Previous PD catheter placement (p = 0.9) or prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.89) was not associated with obstruction. Weight ≥ 10 kg (p = 0.011) and age ≥ 1 year (p = 0.048) were associated with a significantly higher incidence of obstruction. Overall, omentectomy was associated with a trend in reduction of early obstruction in patients with weight ≥ 10 kg (p = 0.08) and significantly in patients ≥1 year (p = 0.028). ConclusionEarly PD catheter obstruction appears to occur more often in older patients with a higher weight. Concomitant omentectomy seems beneficial at reducing early catheter obstruction events in those patients. Type of studyRetrospective comparative study. Level of evidenceIII.

In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding “Adjunctive Gamma Knife Surgery or Wait and Scan Policy After Optimal Resection of Large Vestibular Schwannomas: Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes”

The use of image guidance (IG) in neurosurgery is ubiquitous, even though evidence from patient outcome data has remained limited to smaller, mostly observational, studies. Ommaya reservoir insertion (ORI) has been available as a treatment option for targeted intraventricular pharmacotherapy since the 1960s, far preceding the modern neuronavigation era. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of IG on surgical outcome from ORI.A systematic database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify studies on operative outcomes from ORI. Only studies reporting patient demographics and perioperative outcomes (hemorrhage, infection, malposition, malfunction, and mortality) were included. Study quality was assessed via MINORS criteria.Of the 3560 records screened, 43 studies met study inclusion criteria, for a total of 1995 ORI procedures. Pooled rates of outcome for IG compared with non-IG were 6.4% versus 14.1% for overall complications; 2.0% compared with 2.8% for catheter malfunction; 2.3% compared with 3.3% for catheter malposition; 0.7% compared with 4.5% for early infection; and 0.6% compared with 1.4% for mortality. Postoperative hemorrhage was increased at 3.4% compared with 2.4%. Subgroup analysis revealed a difference in early infection rate between frameless and frame-based IG at 0.0% versus 1.9%. Meta-regression revealed a relationship between publication date and all operative outcomes except for catheter malposition and hemorrhage.This study offers a historical context on the evolution of the practice of ORI and comprises the largest observational analysis of operative outcomes providing objective support for the use of IG in neurosurgery.

Prospective Evaluation of Urodynamic Utility in a Subspecialty Tertiary Practice

To prospectively evaluated the utility of urodynamic evaluations (UDS) ordered in a tertiary referral center as part of a quality improvement project. Patients with UDS ordered by 3 subspecialty physicians were included. Physicians were surveyed when ordering UDS and at the post-UDS clinic visit to assess indications for UDS, pre- and post-UDS diagnosis, treatment plan, confidence level, and perceived helpfulness of UDS. UDS trained nurses conducting studies were surveyed on patient reported reproducibility of their symptoms and perceived difficulty of UDS. From April 2017 to October 2017, 127 UDS were included of which 102 met study criteria. UDS were done for neurogenic (23%) and non-neurogenic lower urinary tract symptoms (76%). The majority were conducted for incontinence evaluation (79%), or after prior lower urinary tract surgery (33%). UDS nurses reported 90% of UDS fully or partially reproduced patient symptoms. Nurses found 18% of UDS difficult due to catheter malfunctions, physical limitations, and communication abilities. Post-UDS, providers found 97% of UDS interpretable. UDS resulted in a change in treatment plan in 78% of patients. On a Likert scale, mean pre-UDS confidence level was 2.9 ± 0.8 (range 0-5). This increased to 4.1 ± 0.6 post-UDS with 76% of evaluations having a change of at least 1 point. UDS in a tertiary referral center result in change in patient treatment plans over three-fourths of the time with high rates of interpretability.

An active learning framework for enhancing identification of non-artifactual intracranial pressure waveforms

Objective: Intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important and established clinical measurement that is used in the management of severe acute brain injury. ICP waveforms are usually triphasic and are susceptible to artifact because of transient catheter malfunction or routine patient care. Existing methods for artifact detection include threshold-based, stability-based, or template matching, and result in higher false positives (when there is variability in the ICP waveforms) or higher false negatives (when the ICP waveforms lack complete triphasic components but are valid). Approach: We hypothesized that artifact labeling of ICP waveforms can be optimized by an active learning approach which includes interactive querying of domain experts to identify a manageable number of informative training examples. Main results: The resulting active learning based framework identified non-artifactual ICP pulses with a superior AUC of 0.96 + 0.012, compared to existing methods: template matching (AUC: 0.71 + 0.04), ICP stability (AUC: 0.51 + 0.036) and threshold-based (AUC: 0.5 + 0.02). Significance: The proposed active learning framework will support real-time ICP-derived analytics by improving precision of artifact-labelling.

Etiology and Management of Upper-Extremity Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Cancer Patients.

Central venous access devices are a critical instrument in the treatment and supportive care delivery for oncology patients. Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a common complication of central venous access devices in oncology patients. Risk factors for CRT include patient-, device-, and treatment-related risk factors. Treatment of CRT is indicated to reduce symptoms, prevent catheter malfunction, prevent recurrent DVT or thromboembolic pulmonary embolism, and minimize the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. Minimal prospective data exist on the prevention and treatment of catheter-related thromboses in cancer patients. As such recommendations largely are derived from data in the lower-extremity DVT and PE studies in cancer and non-cancer patients. Based on the available literature, primary pharmacologic prophylaxis against CRT is not recommended in cancer patients. Treatment options for CRT include catheter removal, anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis, or surgical thrombectomy. Current evidence-based guidelines recommend LMWH as the anticoagulant of choice. However, recent data showing efficacy and safety of DOACs in cancer-related VTE may be extrapolated to treatment of CRT in cancer patients. In patients with CRT, catheter removal should be pursued if continued vascular access is no longer needed, the catheter is dysfunctional, a catheter-associated infection is present, or if CRT symptoms do not resolve with anticoagulation alone. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is reserved for rare severe cases of CRT. Herein we discuss the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and general management of CRT in cancer patients.

A Frontline Approach With Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters for Remission Induction Chemotherapy Phase of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Comparison

BackgroundThe incidence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related adverse events has been uncertain in the setting of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) compared with the incidence of centrally inserted central catheter (CICC) adverse events. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a monocentric, randomized trial of patients with previously untreated AML. Of the 93 patients, 46 had received a PICC and 47 had received a CICC as frontline intravascular device. Thereafter, all patients underwent intensive chemotherapy for hematologic remission induction. The primary endpoint was catheter-related (CR)-bloodstream infection (BSI) and venous thrombosis (VT) rate. The secondary endpoints catheter malfunction, catheter removal, and patient overall survival. ResultsThe CR-BSI and CR-VT rate in the PICC and CICC groups was 13% and 49%, respectively, with a difference of 36 percentage points (relative risk for CR-BSI or CR-VT, 0.266; P = .0003). The CR-BSI incidence was 1.4 and 7.8 per 1000 catheters daily in the PICC and CICC groups, respectively. Among the CR thromboses, the symptomatic VT rate was 2.1% in the PICC group and 10.6% in the CICC group. In the CICC group, 16 of the 47 patients (34%) had the catheter removed for BSI (n = 5), septic thrombophlebitis (n = 4), VT (n = 2), or malfunction (n = 5) a median of 7 days after insertion. In the PICC group, only 6 of the 46 patients (13%) required catheter removal for VT (n = 2) or malfunction (n = 4). At a median follow-up of 30 days, 6 patients in the CICC group died of CR complications versus none of the patients in the PICC group (P = .012). Using PICCs, the reduction in BSI and symptomatic VT decreased mortality from CR infection and venous thromboembolism. In contrast, the CICC approach led to early catheter removal mostly for difficult-to-treat infectious pathogens. ConclusionOur data have confirmed that BSI and symptomatic VT are the major complications affecting frontline central intravascular device-related morbidity in the leukemia setting. The use of a PICC is safer than that of a CICC and maintains the effectiveness for patients with AML undergoing chemotherapy, with an approximate fourfold lower combined risk of infection or thrombosis at 30 days.

Factors Predicting Ventriculostomy Revision at a Large Academic Medical Center

Freehand bedside ventriculostomy placement can result in catheter malfunction requiring a revision procedure and cause significant patient morbidity. We performed a single-center retrospective review to assess factors related to this complication. Using an administrative database and chart review, we identified 101 first-time external ventricular drain placements performed at the bedside. We collected data regarding demographics, medical comorbidities, complications, and catheter tip location. We performed univariate and multivariate statistical analyses using MATLAB. We corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that revision procedures were more likely to occur after drain blockage (odds ratio [OR] 17.9) and hemorrhage (OR 10.3, FDR-corrected P values < 0.01, 0.05, respectively). Drain blockage was less frequent after placement in an "optimal location" (ipsilateral ventricle or near foramen of Monroe; OR 0.09, P= 0.009, FDR-corrected P < 0.03) but was more likely to occur after placement in third ventricle (post-hoc P values < 0.015). Primary diagnoses included subarachnoid hemorrhage (n= 30, 29.7%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage with intraventricular extravasation (n= 24, 23.7%), tumor (n= 20, 19.8%), and trauma (n= 17, 16.8%). Most common complications included drain blockage (n= 12, 11.8%) and hemorrhage (n= 8, 7.9%). In total, 16 patients underwent at least 1 revision procedure (15.8%). Bedside external ventricular drain placement is associated with a 15% rate of revision, that typically occurred after drain blockage and postprocedure hemorrhage. Optimal placement within the ipsilateral frontal horn or foramen of Monroe was associated with a reduced rate of drain blockage.

A Rare Case of Unilateral Pleural Effusion in a Pediatric Patient on Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis: Is it a Pleuroperitoneal Leakage?

Non-infectious complications of peritoneal dialysis (PD) are relatively less common than infectious complications but are a potentially serious problem in patients on chronic PD. Here, we present a case of a non-infectious complication of PD in a 13-year- old boy on chronic PD who presented with symptoms such as hypertension, edema, dyspnea, and decreased ultrafiltration. Chest and abdominal radiography showed pleural effusion and migration of the PD catheter tip. Laparoscopic PD catheter reposition was performed because PD catheter malfunction was suspected. However, pleural effusion relapsed whenever the dialysate volume increased. To identify peritoneal leakage, computed tomography (CT) peritoneography was performed, and a defect of the peritoneum in the left lower abdomen with contrast leakage to the left rectus and abdominis muscles was observed. He was treated conservatively by transiently decreasing the volume of night intermittent PD and gradually increasing the volume. At the 2-year follow-up visit, the patient had not experienced similar symptoms. Patients on PD who present with refractory or recurrent pleural effusion that does not respond to therapy should be assessed for the presence of infection, catheter malfunction, and pleuroperitoneal communication. Thoracentesis and CT peritoneography are useful for evaluating pleural effusion, and timely examination is important for identifying the defect or fistula. Key words: Peritoneal dialysis; Pleuroperitoneal communication; Peritoneography; Pleural effusion; PD catheter

Agitated saline bubble-enhanced ultrasound for the positioning of cuffed, tunneled dialysis catheters in patients with end-stage renal disease.

In patients with end-stage renal disease, the use of cuffed, tunneled dialysis catheters for hemodialysis has become integral to treatment plans. Fluoroscopy is a widely accepted method for the insertion and positioning of cuffed dialysis catheters, because it is easy to use, accurate and reliable, and has a relatively low incidence of complications. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement without the use of fluoroscopy but with a dynamic ultrasound-imaging-based guided technique. From January 2015 to December 2017, we performed an observational prospective cohort study of 56 patients with end-stage renal disease who required tunneled dialysis catheter placement. The overall success rate for ultrasound-guided central access was 100%, with a mean number of 1.16 (±0.4) attempts per patient. There were no incidences of guide wire coiling/kinking, carotid puncture, pneumothorax, or catheter malfunction. Catheter flow during dialysis was 286 (±38) mL/min. The total number of catheter days was 7451, with a mean of 133 days and a range of 46-322 days. Life table analysis revealed primary patency rates of 100%, 96%, and 53% at 30, 60, and 120 days, respectively. Dynamic ultrasound-based visualization of microbubbles in the right atrium is a highly accurate method to detect percutaneous implantation of large-lumen, tunneled, central venous catheters without the need for fluoroscopic guidance technology. Future research should further develop and confirm these initial findings.